Arson attack on Pennsylvania governor's home evokes trauma for the state's Jews
Now, as she looks at photos of the destruction, Zawatsky can envision where she had been seated and how deadly the attack could have been.
Like many others, Zawatsky is cautiously awaiting word from investigators about the motivations of the attacker, which are clouded by hints of erratic behavior as well as statements from his past.
Still, the attack hit the Jewish community hard in a state where such pain is achingly familiar. It targeted Pennsylvania's religiously observant Jewish governor in the very place where just hours before he had hosted one of the central rituals of the Jewish calendar.
Zawatsky heads a Pittsburgh organization formed to counter antisemitism and memorialize the victims of another Pennsylvania assault – the murders of 11 worshippers from three congregations at the Tree of Life synagogue more than six years ago, the deadliest antisemitic attack in U.S. history.
'Seeing those images is deeply traumatic,' said Zawatsky, CEO of The Tree of Life, the group established in the wake of the Oct. 27, 2018 killings. 'It's not too much to ask that we all live in a country where we celebrate our faith without fear.'
A murkier picture emerges on motive
The synagogue shooting trial revealed that the gunman, who was convicted and sentenced to death, had long been steeped in antisemitism and methodically carried out the attack.
In the Harrisburg case, things are less clear. Investigators have released only fragments of what the suspect, Cody Balmer, of Harrisburg, told them. His relatives say he has struggled with mental illness, and his lawyers suggested Wednesday that will be central to their defense.
'We have no definitive information about this person's motive," Zawatsky said. "We do know that there was certainly hate involved.'
Pennsylvania State Police said the 38-year-old Balmer confessed to the attack, harbored hatred for the governor and said he planned to beat Shapiro with a hammer.
'BALMER identified himself by name and related that Governor Josh SHAPIRO needs to know that he '...will not take part in his plans for what he wants to do to the Palestinian people,'' police wrote as part of applications for search warrants. Exactly who and what that meant were unclear in the documents.
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York on Thursday called on the Justice Department to determine whether the attack qualifies as a federal hate crime.
Audrey Glickman, a survivor of the 2018 attack and a member of Tree of Life Congregation, said she admired Shapiro's composure, just hours after the attack, and his emphatic denunciation of hatred regardless of motivation.
'It takes a while to realize you've been attacked and what to make of it,' Glickman said. She admired 'how he stood up right away and spoke strongly about it.'
Shapiro responded to the scene of the 2018 Pittsburgh attack as Pennsylvania's then-attorney general. As governor, he took part in the 2024 groundbreaking for a new building to replace the synagogue, including a memorial, programming and other exhibits aimed to counter antisemitism.
Reminders of an overheated political climate
About 200 people participated in a somber march Wednesday night in Harrisburg. They walked from the parking lot of a synagogue to the governor's residence, where they held a multifaith prayer vigil across the street.
Several marchers connected the attack to the overheated political climate.
'To deny it is like putting your head in the sand,' said retired Presbyterian minister Don Potter, 75, of Dillsburg, who said the images of the building's interior with fire damage 'made me sick.'
Enid Wassner, a retired child care worker from Hershey, said the fact that the firebombing occurring during Passover and targeted Shapiro and his family was 'extremely worrying.' She noted that Jewish institutions and buildings in Harrisburg have had to increase security.
'Gradually things have been getting more worrisome, for me personally and the entire Jewish community."
Questions emerge about attacker's mental state
Police said in court affidavits that in an interview with detectives Balmer 'admitted to harboring hatred towards' Shapiro and referred to the Palestinian people in a 911 call attributed to him that was placed shortly after the break-in.
Balmer's mother and brother have said he suffered from bipolar disorder and would not consistently take medication. His brother, Dan Balmer, said Cody Balmer twice in recent years spent time in a psychiatric hospital in Harrisburg. During a court hearing on Monday, Balmer denied any history of mental illness.
Dan Balmer told the AP on Tuesday that Cody Balmer 'had these theories that were going on in his head' and became angry when family members would tell him his views didn't reflect reality.
'The allegations, if true, demonstrate the devastating consequences of severe mental illness,' Mary Klatt, the chief public defender in Dauphin County, whose office is representing Balmer, said Wednesday. She said his preliminary hearing would be delayed to determine whether Balmer is mentally competent to stand trial.
Identity moves to forefront for Shapiro
Shapiro declined to talk about the attacker's motive on Wednesday, saying prosecutors will ultimately determine what drove him.
'It's not for me to answer that,' he said.
The governor has publicly criticized Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government and the nature of Israel's military action in Gaza, but also has backed Israel's right to defend itself from Hamas.
Hank Butler, executive director of the Pennsylvania Jewish Coalition, said Shapiro's focus has been Pennsylvania and not the Palestinian people.
'To say that our governor wishes the worst on the Palestinian people is not welcomed here,' Butler said. 'It is not justified, absolutely not justified -- no attack is justified.'
Shapiro has won statewide races three times in a crucial battleground state. He was a finalist to be Vice President Kamala Harris's running mate in last year's presidential campaign and is considered a potential 2028 Democratic candidate for president.
The attack once again puts his identity front and center. When Harris picked Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz over Shapiro, Republicans tried to cast the pick as a snub to Jewish voters.
Rabbi Rick Jacobs, president of the Union for Reform Judaism, an umbrella group for more than 800 Reform congregations in North America, connected the attack to Shapiro's identity.
'He's also someone who is a strong supporter of Israel,' Jacobs said of Shapiro. "Are those things that put your life at risk in the 21st century?'
Zawatsky, the Tree of Life CEO, noted that in the Passover ritual, Jews are instructed not just to recite the story of their ancient forebears' liberation from slavery but to envision themselves as having experienced it – something that feels especially poignant now. Whether law enforcement officials ultimately settle on a definitive conclusion about what motivated last weekend's attack, she and others already know what living in fear feels like.
'It's very sad to think we pass along the inherited trauma of the fear of antisemitism, but never did I think we would be a generation that would have the lived experience of this kind of violent antisemitism,' she said.
___
Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.
___
Smith reported from Pittsburgh and Cooper from Phoenix.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
a minute ago
- The Guardian
South Korea's military shrinks by 20% as low birthrate hits recruitment
South Korea's military has shrunk by 20% in the past six years, largely due to a sharp drop in the population of men of enlistment age for mandatory service in the country with the world's lowest birthrate, according to a report. The sharp decline in the pool of men available for military service is also causing a shortfall in the number of officers and could result in operational difficulties, the defence ministry said in the report. The report was made to the ruling Democratic party member of parliament Choo Mi-ae, whose office released it. South Korea's military has declined steadily since the early 2000s, when it had about 690,000 soldiers. The pace accelerated during the late 2010s and there are now about 450,000 troops. North Korea is believed to have an active-duty military of about 1.2 million, according to the latest estimate by the defence ministry in 2022. The population of 20-year-old men in South Korea declined between 2019 and 2025 by 30% to 230,000, according to government data. Twenty is the age when most men who pass a physical exam enlist for military service. South Korea is one of the world's fastest ageing societies and has the lowest fertility rate in the world at 0.75 in 2024, which signifies the average number of babies a woman is expected to have during her reproductive life. Its population, which hit a peak of 51.8 million in 2020, is expected to shrink to 36.2 million by 2072, according to a government projection. The military has cited improved capabilities as a key reason for shortening service periods, made possible by a military alliance with the US and the development of a defence industry that has become a major exporter of arms. Able-bodied men served 36 months in 1953 when the Korean war ended in an armistice. South Korea's defence budget, at more than 61tn won (£32.7bn) in 2025, is larger than the estimated size of North Korea's economy. Still, the country's military is 50,000 troops short of the number of troops adequate for maintaining defence readiness, the ministry said. About 21,000 of the shortfall is in the non-commissioned officer ranks, it said.
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
How the Texas Democrats are living on the run: 'We are all on alert'
"It makes me scared. It makes me sad," Bucy said in an interview about his self-imposed exodus from his family. "I want to be a part of their lives every chance that I can. But what scares me more is if I'm not here, if they grow up and things are worse off in this country because we didn't stop this gerrymandering." More: Why Trump's political war in Texas is much bigger than the Lone Star State Bucy is staying at an undisclosed hotel in Illinois while he and his fellow Democrats continue to block their Republican colleagues from conducting official business back in Austin, such as the rare mid-decade redrawing of their state's maps that define congressional district boundaries. He said he's still in touch with his legislative staff, who are keeping up with constituents and connecting them to state agencies. Texas is a part-time legislature with a $7,200 annual salary, so like many members, Bucy also has a regular job running a statewide organization that provides athletic, academic and arts competitions for charter school students. Other Texas colleagues who aren't able to work remotely say they are juggling their personal lives, too, amid a partisan firestorm that is spilling over into other Republican and Democratic-controlled states ahead of the November 2026 midterm election campaign. Texas state Rep. Donna Howard said she had to take her grandson along when she left town. Baker, 4, has one parent in recovery and another who isn't in the picture. He's since become a "mascot" for the Democratic legislators at the hotel who have volunteered to help watch him when she speaks with constituents, conducts media interviews or when she needs time alone. "It is a village and my village is stepping up to support me with my grandchild," said Howard, 73, whose district includes parts of southern Austin. "I can't tell you how many people I don't even normally work with on things who have come up and said, 'Can I take him for a little bit and go throw the ball?' So he's kind of like 'King of the Hill' in a lot of ways." Texas Dems resist 'headache factor' but for how long? More: Trump says FBI 'may have to' force Democratic lawmakers back to Texas USA TODAY spoke with more than a dozen Texas Democrats at the center of the national tug-of-war who are facing $500-per-day fines, plus sharp rebukes from Trump and his allies. They have made arrangements to secure extended childcare. They have requested longer-than-expected work absences and found new locations for aging loved ones who require 24-hour caretakers. But they also said living in close quarters has an upside: their relationships and team-building have improved with activities such as daily exercise groups. "Pack a toothbrush. Pack hair spray, because hey, this could go on for a while and you got to be ready for it," said Democratic state Rep. Ann Johnson, an attorney who represents parts of Houston. Johnson, 50, participated in the last Texas quorum break orchestrated by Democrats in 2021, when they fled to Washington, D.C., to resist the GOP tightening the state's election rules. She said she was more prepared this time, but added that this fight is a more stressful and significant situation given the Trump administration's pressure campaign. More: Texas Democrats flee state amid heated redistricting battle. Has this happened before? "They'll continue to try to break us, but I actually feel, unlike 2021, there's a really strong coalition here," Johnson said. "There's a drastic difference... now the threats are so much harsher, they're so much more significant, and the risk of what we lose if we are not successful is really large." Republicans are also doing their part to stymie the Democrats' political efforts, not to mention making their personal lives uncomfortable. Three-term Texas GOP Gov. Greg Abbott has threatened to arrest and expel the missing Democrats from the legislature. The state's Republican attorney general, Ken Paxton, filied an Aug. 8 lawsuit seeking to get 13 of them removed from office. The FBI is also helping with the search for the lawmakers, according to U.S. Sen. Jon Cornyn, a Texas Republican facing his own 2026 primary challenge from Paxton and who made the request for help. "A lot of people are demanding they come back," Trump told reporters on Aug. 5. "You can't just sit it out. You have to go back." In suburban Chicago, an Aug. 6 bomb threat at the hotel where some of the Texas Democratic legislators have been staying woke them from sleep with a blaring siren echoing through the halls every 30 seconds. It forced an evacuation of the building and took about two hours before guests were allowed back inside, several lawmakers told USA TODAY. Many of the Democrats said the bomb threat marks a turning point, and made them think of officials being targeted in other states, such as in Minnesota, where an alleged gunman shot two state lawmakers and their spouses at their homes in June, killing one of the couples. "We have people who are threatening our lives, threatening our families' lives by exposing us," said state Rep. Christian Manuel, 38, whose district covers an eastern portion of the state that includes Beaumont, Texas. Manuel, who is Black, helps take care of his 95-year-old grandmother and remains in constant contact with family members. Living an hour outside of Jasper, Texas, where a Black man named James Byrd was dragged to death by confirmed white supremacists in 1998, he said the bomb threat at the Illinois hotel reminded him of the potential danger. "My family is aware," Manuel said. "We are all on alert." For many of the absconding Democrats, these incidents have hardened their resolve to resist what progressive critics say are Trump and Abbott's attempts to change the math in their favor for the upcoming 2026 midterm elections. Texas state Rep. Jolanda Jones, who represents parts of Houston, went viral this week after she slammed Abbott's attempt to have the legislators return. She was also embroiled in controversy for comparing the redistricting plan to the Holocaust in an Aug. 5 interview on "The Don Lemon Show," for which she later apologized. Yeah, that viral video is me. Union kid. Union member. Single mom. Public school product. Survivor. Fighter. Lost loved ones to gun violence. Fighting to protect voting rights. I'm not afraid of Trump or his cult. I'm running for Congress. Please support!#CD18 #QuorumBreaker — Jolanda Jones (@JonesJolanda) August 7, 2025 Jones said she serves as her mother's primary caregiver and that other relatives and neighbors back home have stepped up to help, but that she remains worried about her mother's well-being, given Jones' high visibility. "My mother can't live by herself - that's the bottom line. So me deciding to quorum break was a big deal," Jones, 59, who is running for a Houston-based seat in Congress, told USA TODAY. "I don't know what would happen to my mom if she opened the door and, would they barge in, what would they do? I'm absolutely concerned." Dems hope to frame Texas battle as flood victims v. Trump's whims Experts warn the endgame of the quorum break looks bleak for Democrats even as the national party and liberal activists say they believe the fight could be an inflection point against the Trump administration. "They walked out to stop Republicans from hijacking our democracy," said Christina Harvey, executive director of Stand Up America, a left-leaning voting rights group that has been running ads on social media and TV to mobilize its members against the redistricting efforts. The current Texas special session is scheduled to end Aug. 19, and Democratic legislators say they're committed to staying away from Austin for the long haul. But Abbott can also keep convening legislators, over and over, legal and political experts say, while applying legal and law enforcement pressure until the Republican-controlled legislature gets what it wants. The governor is adding a "headache factor" for lawmakers, Mark Jones, a professor of political science at Rice University, told USA TODAY. Even if none of Abbott's efforts bear fruit, they could lead to the need for the runaway legislators to at least respond to a lawsuit and incur costs, lost time and extra effort, he said. Quorum breaks have been a tool used by the minority party in Texas since 1870. Often, the move is more of a messaging effort with little success in blocking the specific proposal, experts point out. Texas rules say the House must have two-thirds of its members, or 100 people, present to move forward. Of the 62 House Democrats, a few have remained behind in Austin, meaning only a handful need to be arm-twisted into returning to the state for a quorum to be restored and votes to proceed. Jones, the Rice University professor, said the roughly 50 legislators would have to stay out of the state through the end-of-year holidays and into the spring of 2026 for their long-term strategy to prevail. Asked how long they can stay out of Texas, many of the Democratic legislators pivot in their responses to hammer the argument that Abbott is putting the two-term Republican president's desires over a needed aid package for the destructive and deadly flooding that submerged central parts of the state in July. For now, it's unclear how the public is coming down on the Democrats' framing of the fight. A poll conducted by Texas-based Z to A Research, a Democratic-aligned firm, found that 63% of likely voters - including 41% of Republican voters - believe it's unnecessary to be redrawing the congressional district lines several years before it typically happens. An overwhelming majority of 94% said they support funding flood warning systems and relief efforts, according to a Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee memo. Wherever the Texas battle lands, the Democratic legislators who have fled to Illinois - a few others have been part of press conferences and public events in California, New York, Massachusetts - said they have become a stronger caucus as a result. They described bonding in ways they couldn't during regular sessions, and they believe that sense of unity will spread to Democrats in other states as the Trump administration looks to expand its redistricting strategy.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Gerrymandering war puts US democracy under renewed strain
What is happening in Texas? TEXAS Republican lawmakers are moving ahead with their plan to change congressional map boundaries that, if allowed to happen, would shift the power in Washington to their favour for years to come. These newly drawn districts, created this month by a Texas legislative committee, aim to erode and target several Democratic districts and their sitting incumbents, while also creating five new Republican-leaning districts. This move in the context of the looming 2026 midterm election can be seen as a pre-emptive attempt to consolidate the GOP's narrow majority in the US House of Representatives. These redistricting measures have been defended and framed by Republican legislators as a legal and needed step to better reflect the political realities of Texas. Greg Abbott, the Texas governor, said in an interview with Fox News: 'All of these districts that are being added are districts that were won by Trump. READ MORE: Anas Sarwar blasted as 'hypocrite' after branding Benjamin Netanyahu 'war criminal' 'Gerrymandering can be done, or drawing lines, can be done on the basis of political makeup, as in Republicans versus Democrats, and there's nothing illegal about that.' This redistricting plan will be considered and voted on by the Texas House of Representatives during a 30-day-long legislative session that was called by Abbott on July 25. In order to combat this, a group of Texas Democratic lawmakers fled the state and sought refuge in Illinois in order to break the quorum and delay the vote past the 30-day deadline. This act has triggered major criticism from Republican officials, such as Ken Paxton, the Texas Attorney General who accused the absent Democrats of cowardice. He also later wrote in a post on Twitter/X saying that the Democrats who fled should be: 'Found, arrested, and brought back to the Capitol immediately.' As a punishment for breaking the quorum and leaving the state, Governor Abbott has stated that each of the lawmakers will be fined $500 a day, and has issued warrants for their arrests. The Democratic lawmakers who fled have sought refuge in Democratic-controlled Illinois, whose billionaire governor JB Pritzker has vowed to protect them and not enforce the arrest warrant. Pritzker, in a press conference, defended the actions of his fellow Democrats saying: 'They're here in Illinois. We're going to do everything we can to protect every single one of them.' Gerrymandering and representation AT the heart of this issue is the matter of gerrymandering, which is the act of drawing district boundaries, skewing election data to favour one political party over another. Gerrymandering has long been a staple of US politics, dating all the way back to 1812 with Governor Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, who signed a bill that created Boston-area State Senate districts so contorted that one was said to look like a salamander. However, critics argue that modern partisan gerrymandering has become both incredibly sophisticated and dangerous to the foundations of democracy. 'In states that have been politically gerrymandered, voters lose much of their ability to hold elected officials accountable,' according to US politics professor David Niven. 'Members of Congress are likely to pay less attention to towns where they represent just a fraction of voters.' Modern gerrymandering is able to take groups such as Black or Hispanic minority voters who typically vote for Democrats and concentrate them all into a few districts – which is called packing – giving them less voting representation. They can also dilute their influence by 'cracking', which involves spreading a community across multiple districts, making sure the democratic voting group can't have enough votes to win over any district. The new proposed Texan maps have been met with opposition from experts, such as Justin Levitt, a redistricting expert at Loyola Law School, who said that states generally cannot redraw districts based on race without a compelling argument that it's necessary to protect voters' ability to elect their candidates of choice. This has raised questions of the possibility of voter suppression affecting black and hispanic voters disproportionately. Although redrawing the district lines in states occurs once a decade (following the US census), some states such as Texas have allowed their lawmakers to alter the maps more frequently if one party controls both the governor's office and the legislature. This has paved the way for many states to conduct their own mid-decade redistricting as a way to gain more political capital. Federal courts have no ability to adjudicate claims of partisan gerrymandering, as found in the result of a 2019 Supreme Court ruling over a North Carolina case. They ruled that the Constitution states no clear guidelines for when gerrymandering goes too far, and as such, the federal judiciary has no power in the matter. John Roberts, the Chief Justice for the Supreme Court, said in the decision that while the practice of gerrymandering may be unseemly, it does not fall under their purview. This decision has meant that the matter of fairness in redrawing district lines is up to the individual state courts. However, many states do not have either the legal framework or the judicial willingness to combat gerrymandering that goes too far, which leaves a major gap in accountability. A national domino effect THIS issue over redistricting has already prompted a tit-for-tat counter-move from Democrats in California, who are now preparing for their own mid-decade redistricting plan to combat Texas. The Governor of California, Gavin Newsom, announced on August 4 that his state legislature is working on a gerrymandering measure to be presented to voters on November 4. This would only go ahead if Texas successfully follows through with its plan of redistricting. READ MORE: 'Absolutely crazy': Scottish jazz artist scores new film by Hollywood director 'It's cause and effect, triggered on the basis of what occurs or doesn't occur in Texas,' Newsom said in an interview with the LA Times. 'I hope they do the right thing, and if they do, then there'll be no cause for us to have to move forward.' California holds 52 congressional seats, with the Democrats holding 43 of those. The new proposed redistricting would help bolster vulnerable seats, while increasing pressure on the state's current nine Republican representatives. However, nothing formally can occur until lawmakers return from recess in Sacramento on August 18. Undermining democratic norms MOVING past the immediate political implications these gerrymandering moves have, the redistricting in Texas raised deeper questions about the future state of American democracy. When a political party uses its control over a state government to re-draw congressional maps to shift power in elections to favour them, it leads to an erosion of public trust in the legitimacy of electoral outcomes. Competitive gerrymandering between political parties ends with reduced competition by creating safe districts for incumbents who face little risk of losing. This leads to a weaker level of electoral accountability, fueling political polarisation as lawmakers in safe seats will feel far more emboldened to cater to their base rather than the broader electorate. In Texas, the changing of district lines has widely appeared as a drive to preemptively consolidate Republican seats from any potential losses in the 2026 midterms. With the Trump administration hitting setbacks, and currently sitting at only a 41% approval rating according to an Economist Poll, the Republicans seem to be entrenching their partisan advantages now. If they manage to pull it off, it will lead to Texas Republicans keeping hold of their power and seats, even if their support among voters declines. This dynamic adds to the cycle in which political survival becomes less dependent on voter persuasion and more reliant on structural advantage. Such practices, if left to continue, have the possibility of leading to an alienated citizenry who do not engage in civic matters. Broader impact THE stakes for these gerrymandering cases extend far beyond the shores of California or the districts of Texas – they are crucial to who controls the House in Trump's final two years in office. With the Republicans' push to maintain complete control over the future of federal policymaking, it's not surprising to see Trump push to solidify his party's control over Congress for the remainder of his second term. Succeeding in securing new seats in the House while removing Democratic seats at the same time could help maintain a conservative legislative agenda despite shifting national sentiment. On the other hand, Democrats are seeing the 2026 midterms as a chance to finally gain the power to check the Trump administration's agenda. This is the reason behind California's push to explore redistricting – not only as a response to Texas, but as part of a national strategy to defend vulnerable Democratic-held seats and challenge Republican incumbents. The never-ending arms race of redistricting between parties to seize further power for themselves marks a departure from stable, consensus-based democratic norms and ushers in an era of increasingly fractured representation.
