US home sales rose in July as mortgage rates eased a bit and home prices grew more slowly
Existing home sales rose 2% last month from June to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.01 million units, the National Association of Realtors said Thursday.
Sales edged up 0.8% compared with July last year. The latest sales figure topped the 3.92 million pace economists were expecting, according to FactSet.
Home prices rose on an annual basis for the 25th consecutive month, although the rate of growth continued to slow. The national median sales price inched up just 0.2% in July from a year earlier to $422,400.
That was the smallest annual increase since June 2023. Even so, the median home sales price last month is the highest for any previous July, based on data going back to 1999.
'The ever-so-slight improvement in housing affordability is inching up home sales,' said Lawrence Yun, NAR's chief economist. 'Wage growth is now comfortably outpacing home price growth, and buyers have more choices.'
The U.S. housing market has been in a sales slump since 2022, when mortgage rates began climbing from historic lows. Sales of previously occupied U.S. homes sank last year to their lowest level in nearly 30 years.
This year's spring homebuying season, which is traditionally the busiest period of the year for the housing market, was a bust as stubbornly high mortgage rates put off many prospective homebuyers. Affordability remains a dauting challenge for most aspiring homeowners following years of skyrocketing home prices.
First-time homebuyers, who don't have home equity gains to put toward a new home purchase, accounted for 28% of homes sales last month, down from 30% in June, NAR said. Historically, they made up 40% of home sales.
The average rate on a 30-year mortgage has remained elevated this year, although last week it dropped to a 10-month low of 6.58%.
Homes purchased last month likely went under contract in May and June, when the average rate ranged from 6.76% to 6.89%. Mortgage rates eased in July, dropping briefly to 6.67%.
As home sales have slowed, the number of unsold homes on the market has been rising.
There were 1.55 million unsold homes at the end of last month, up 0.6% from June and 15.7% from July last year, NAR said. That's the most homes on the market since May 2020, early on in the COVID-19 pandemic.
Still, the inventory remains well below the roughly 2 million homes for sale that was typical before the pandemic.
July's month-end inventory translates to a 4.6-month supply at the current sales pace, down from a 4.7-month supply at the end of June and up from 4 months in July last year. Traditionally, a 5- to 6-month supply is considered a balanced market between buyers and sellers.
Homes are also taking longer to sell. Properties typically remained on the market for 28 days last month before selling, up from 24 days in July last year, NAR said.
Home shoppers who can afford to buy at current mortgage rates or pay in cash are likely to benefit from the slower growth in prices and increased supply of properties on the market.
It's not uncommon now for sellers, especially those in Southern and Western markets, to lower their asking price and offer incentives such as money for closing costs or repairs in order to sweeten the deal, real estate agents say.
'One can say that things are a little better today as a buyer, compared to say just a couple of years ago,' Yun said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
33 minutes ago
- CNBC
Avoid these stocks that saw ‘double misses' this earnings season, Wolfe Research warns
Stocks that have missed analyst expectations on both the top and bottom lines this earnings season could be good candidates to sell, according to Wolfe Research. For the most part, the second-quarter earnings season has blown away Wall Street expectations. Approximately 94% of the S & P 500 has already reported, and 82% of companies have delivered a positive earnings surprise. About 79% of companies have posted revenue exceeding analysts' estimates. But several stocks have lagged their numbers. A recent report from Wolfe Research shared a list of companies that investors might consider selling — stocks that missed both revenue and earnings expectations this quarter, while also having negative year-to-date earnings revisions for 2025. One name on Wolfe's list was Southwest Airlines , down 8% this year. Last month, Southwest reported adjusted earnings of 43 cents per share on revenue of $7.24 billion in its latest quarter, while analysts polled by FactSet had estimated earnings of 51 cents and revenue of $7.30 billion. Afterward, Evercore ISI downgraded the Dallas-based carrier to an in line rating from outperform. Still, analyst Duane Pfennigwerth's $40 price target implies that Southwest shares could soar 28% from the Wednesday close. "Trading at 36x '25E, 11x '26E EPS, we believe shares are now much closer to fair value and are beginning to more fully price in clean execution of these initiatives into next year," Pfennigwerth wrote. "We also wonder if the company's aggressive pace of buyback (likely a big contributor to YTD outperformance) can be sustained at this rate." Another stock that Wolfe says investors might avoid is Align Technology . Shares of the maker of Invisalign orthodontics have tumbled 32% in 2025. In July, Align second-quarter earnings and revenue missed analyst estimates. The company also guided for current-quarter revenue in the range of $965 million to $985 million, below the FactSet consensus among analysts of $1.04 billion. In the wake of the report, Morgan Stanley downgraded Align to equal-weight from overweight, slashing its 12-month price target to $154 per share from $249. The new forecast implies that shares might add another 7% from the Wednesday close. "Our prior [overweight] thesis was based on ALGN's leadership in a high growth category, but growth has been challenged for years, w/ limited clarity on [the] path from here," wrote analyst Erin Wright. "We view a re-rate lower as warranted, closer to the Dental peer average." Defense prime contractor Lockheed Martin is another sell, according to Truist. The investment bank downgraded Lockheed to a hold from buy after second-quarter revenue at the maker of the F-35 fighter-bomber fell short of Wall Street estimates, and it lowered its full year guidance below prior estimates. Truist also slashed its price target to $440 per share from $554, implying the stock won't do much in the coming year. "We are downgrading LMT shares now as we have little confidence that management will be able to execute on its multi-year growth framework, and we can not be certain that more charges will not materialize in the coming quarters," wrote analyst Michael Ciarmoli. "We expect shares will trade flat for the balance of the year given a lack of catalysts and believe LMT shares will continue to trade at a discounted multiple vs its larger peers." Shares of Lockheed Martin, which yields almost 3%, are down 8% on the year.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Gavin Newsom and Zohran Mamdani can bring about the ruin of California and New York
It was in December 1777 that the great Scottish economist Adam Smith learned of General Burgoyne's defeat at Saratoga. Smith's correspondent said that he feared Smith's own nation of Great Britain, was ruined. The economist's reply was: 'There is a great deal of ruin in a nation.' Ever since that quote became famous, it has been both consoling and misleading. Consoling because it is true that while some people always claim the sky is falling down, more often than not, it stays up perfectly nicely. Adam Smith's own nation more than survived the defeat at Saratoga. Advertisement At the same time, the quote is misleading. Nations cannot cope with an infinite amount of ruin. Cities and states can tolerate even less. In our own country, there are many politicians who think that US cities in particular can put up with almost anything. Take Governor Gavin Newsom of California. In recent days, he has been trying to 'win' the internet. That's because, having failed at his job of governing an actual state, he seems to have decided to become chief troll online. Democrat pundits are 'LOLing' all over the place at Newsom's alleged brilliance in aping the internet manners of President Trump. Advertisement It would be a lot more fun if the situation in Gavin's own state were sunnier. As it is, while Newsom plays cute online, California is in a disastrous state. Just this year, it has suffered ruinous wildfires, causing billions of dollars worth of damage. And even if the areas of Los Angeles that burned to the ground are rebuilt, good luck to anyone trying to get home insurance. Then there are the riots — stoked along by Democrat politicians, who seem to think that it is the natural-born right of every illegal alien to riot against ICE and other law-enforcement officers and wave the flags of Mexico and other countries to demonstrate just how many rights they think they should get in America. Advertisement All this comes as the state of California still struggles to recover from the disastrous COVID-19 lockdown policies that Newsom tried to install in his state. For everyone but himself, naturally. Perhaps Newsom and the sycophants in his party think that some winsome online behavior will bring back the 2.1 million registered Democrats who seem to have been lost by the party in the years between 2020 and 2024. But the reality is that Newsom's policies — from taxation to homelessness and law and order — have seen a great exodus of the people the state needs most. In recent years, California has lost even more wealthy millennials than New York has. Some 10,000 millennial households bringing in more than $200,000 a year fled California in a single year. A figure almost twice the size of the exodus from New York of the same demographic in the same year. Of course, in part, that is because of the genius of the federal system in this country that makes moving between states so relatively easy. Advertisement A British person afflicted by high taxes and high crime cannot just up sticks and move to a different jurisdiction in their country. It's all going to be the same. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters But if California or New York decides to tax the successful beyond their endurance and fails to give them a decent quality of life in return, then Florida or Texas will never look so appealing. That is a fact that Democrats in New York, as much as in California, should keep at the top of their minds. Even as New York is considering the possibility of electing a high-taxing, radical socialist mayor, there are people who say that it is an empty threat that people will actually leave this city. These are the same people who seemed to think that the Golden State would be endlessly attractive, even if there were syringes all over the sidewalks and the place was on fire. The same people seem to think that you can test and test New York as much as you like, and it doesn't matter because people will still want to live here. Tell that to the people who had to live through the city's downturn in the 1970s. In fact, tell that to the citizens of the numerous cities in this country that have managed to fall through the floor. Advertisement There was a time when Detroit seemed like the city of the future. There was a time when St. Louis seemed like a good bet. But these places should be reminders that what seems enduring can in fact be stress-tested to death in front of your eyes. I mentioned the country of Adam Smith, and it is still worth looking to it for a lesson in what could happen here. The left-wing Labour government in the UK came into power last year, promising to tax the rich to fill its fiscal deficits. Of course, it hasn't worked. But the threat has certainly chased money out of the country. The UK is expected to lose some 16,500 millionaires this year alone. An uptick of over 50% just in the year before. All driven away by the brilliant tax policies of a government that doesn't even say it is socialist. Advertisement What Zohran Mamdani and Co. would do to this city is orders of magnitude worse than anything Labour has achieved in the UK. But there is another lesson still to learn. Which is that, having chased the wealthy out of the UK, the Labour government is now suddenly hoping to woo them back. They are learning in real time the old conservative lesson that it is much easier to destroy than it is to build. Easier to chase people away than to give them the long-term confidence that would be needed to encourage them back. Which returns me to Adam Smith. There may be a great deal of ruin in a nation. But there isn't an endless amount of ruin in a state. Much less of a city. Come November, New Yorkers should remember that.
Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Tinley Park District 146 teachers union declares impasse over contract negotiations
The union for Tinley Park Elementary District 146 teachers says it is at an impasse with district officials over negotiating an updated contract. While most of the contract's provisions are settled, the Tinley Council Teachers 146 of Local 604 is fighting for higher wage increases and improved retirement benefits than the district is offering. Negotiations began in February, and the most recently approved contract expired July 31. The district's most recent offer includes wage increases of 6% for each of the next two school years and 5% for the 2027-2028 school year. Keegan Kociss, a spokesperson for the district, said District 146 teachers are among the highest paid in the surrounding area, saying the district's proposal is 'generous and it's fair and it keeps our taxpayers in mind.' The teachers union countered with wage increases of 7% each year for the next three school years, which they say is important to counter inflation and struggles teachers faced during the COVID-19 pandemic as well as to attract good teachers amid a nationwide shortage. 'As always, our number one priority is ensuring our students get the high-quality education they deserve. To us, that means a stable district that is fully staffed. It means ensuring that the district can retain great teachers through their career, making them a long term part of the school community,' union President Eileen VonBorstel said in a statement. Kociss said the district is unwilling to match the union's 7% proposal because wage increases beyond 6% expose the district to financial penalties through the Illinois Teachers Retirement System. Under the district's proposed salary increase, teachers' starting salaries would be $52,570. Teachers with master's degrees would start at $67,284. The union said it allowed the district to choose between two financial proposals in April, one that the district pay teachers' TRS contribution, which is 9% of every teacher's salary, while providing lower raises, or that they provide higher raises. The district chose the higher salary increase, the union said. In its public posting of their offer, the teachers union said the school board has impeded progress of negotiations and spread inaccurate information about the union's proposal. The district and the union met twice with a mediator since May but do not have any scheduled negotiation sessions. 'The union has been forced to bargain against itself repeatedly in order to find a path to progress, revising our proposals over and over again, to only be met with the same 'no,'' the union said. District 146 board President Julie Berry said in a district news release that the board values its teachers and their contributions to the district, which includes Fierke Education Center, Kruse Education Center, Fulton School, Memorial School and Central Middle School. 'We have been fortunate enough to maintain small class sizes and student-teacher ratios, exceptional educational programming, and minimal unfilled vacancies,' Berry said. Superintendent Jeff Stawick, district said 'we remain focused on reaching a fair, sustainable agreement that honors educators, meets student needs, and protects the district's financial stability.'
