Turkish president hails the start of disarmament by militant Kurdish separatists
Erdogan told a meeting of his ruling AKP party in Ankara that the more than 40-year-old 'scourge of terrorism' for which the Kurdistan Workers' Party - or PKK - was responsible is on its way to ending.
Erdogan's remarks came a day after male and female members of the PKK in northern Iraq cast rifles and machine guns into a large cauldron where they were set on fire. The symbolic move was seen as the first step toward a promised disarmament as part of a peace process aimed at ending four decades of hostilities.
The move came after PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan, who has been imprisoned on an island near Istanbul since 1999, urged his group in February to convene a congress and formally disband and disarm. In May the PKK announced that it would do so.
The PKK had waged an armed insurgency against Turkey since 1984, initially with the aim of establishing a Kurdish state in the southeast of the country. Over time, the objective evolved into a campaign for autonomy and rights for Kurds within Turkey.
The conflict, which spread beyond Turkey's borders into Iraq and Syria, killed tens of thousands of people. The PKK is considered to be a terrorist organization by Turkey, the United States and the European Union.
Previous peace efforts between Turkey and the PKK have ended in failure — most recently in 2015.
'Today the doors of a great Turkey, a strong Turkey, a Turkish century have been opened wide,' Erdogan said.
In a statement issued on Friday, the PKK said the fighters who were laying down their weapons, saying that they had disarmed 'as a gesture of goodwill and a commitment to the practical success' of the peace process.
'We will henceforth continue our struggle for freedom, democracy, and socialism through democratic politics and legal means,' the statement said.
But Erdogan insisted that there had been no bargaining with the PKK. 'The terror-free Turkey project is not the result of negotiations, bargaining or transactions.' Turkish officials have not disclosed if any concessions have been given to the PKK in exchange for laying down their arms.
The Turkish president also said that a parliamentary commission would be established to oversee the peace process.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
IAF pilot almost emergency landed in Tehran during strikes over fuel malfunction
A contingency plan was prepared in parallel, which included the option of landing in a neighboring country should the malfunction persist. An Israeli Air Force F-15 'Baz' fighter jet experienced a critical fuel malfunction while en route to carry out a strike near Tehran during Operation Rising Lion, N12 revealed in a report on Saturday. The aircraft, which was operating deep inside Iranian territory, encountered a failure in one of its fuel tanks, preventing it from accessing necessary fuel during the mission. The malfunction resulted in a serious fuel shortage midflight, threatening to compromise the operation. Unlike some previous IAF missions, no aerial refueling tanker had been deployed in advance. Once the pilot identified the issue, he reported it in real time, prompting an urgent response. A tanker aircraft was scrambled and reached the fighter jet in time to conduct an emergency refueling. Despite the complications, the air crews managed to resolve the problem without deviating from the flight path. A contingency plan was prepared in parallel, which included the option of landing in a neighboring country should the malfunction persist. This was considered in order to avoid the possibility of an Israeli warplane being forced down in central Tehran. In a related report, N12 revealed that IAF Commander Maj.-Gen. Tomer Bar had outlined a worst-case scenario prior to the operation. According to the internal military assessment, up to 10 Israeli aircraft could be hit or crash within the first 72 hours of fighting. The scenario was presented in closed briefings as part of the IDF's operational risk planning. That grim forecast, however, did not come to pass.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
More than 70 arrests at protests over Palestine Action ban
More than 70 people have been arrested at protests against Palestine Action being designated a proscribed terrorist group. Protesters gathered for the second week in a row in central , where the Metropolitan Police made 42 arrests. Other demonstrations took place around the UK, including in , where police said 16 arrests were made, and in Cardiff, where South Wales Police arrested 12 people. In London, two groups of protesters gathered underneath statues of Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela in Parliament Square, shortly before 1pm. They wrote the message "I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action" on pieces of cardboard and silently held the signs in the air as they were surrounded by police officers and members of the media. Some demonstrators could be seen lying on top of each other on the floor as police searched their bags, and took their ID cards and signs. Officers then carried away a number of protesters, lifting them off the ground and into waiting police vans. The last protester was lifted from the Nelson Mandela statue shortly after 2.30pm. Forty-one of the 42 arrests at the London protest were for showing support for a proscribed organisation, while one person was arrested for common assault, the Met Police said. Read more: Palestine Action's terror group designation means membership of, or support for, the group is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Greater Manchester Police said it had arrested 16 people under the Terrorism Act 2000 after responding to a protest in St Peter's Square at around 2.30pm. South Wales Police confirmed 13 people were arrested on suspicion of offences under the same act in the vicinity of Central Square in Cardiff. The Met Police at a similar protest last weekend. Read more from Sky News: Scotland Yard has said its stance remains that officers will act where criminal offences, including support of proscribed groups or organisations, are committed. It added that this includes "chanting, wearing clothing or displaying articles such as flags, signs or logos". The move to ban Palestine Action came after at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire last month. Police said the incident caused around £7m worth of damage.
Associated Press
5 hours ago
- Associated Press
A court called off a key 9/11 suspect's plea deal. Here's where the case stands
NEW YORK (AP) — The United States' long legal case against accused Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed remains in limbo after an appeals court this week scrapped a plea deal that the government had negotiated but had later withdrawn. Essentially, the ruling leaves the case on track for trial before a military commission. It is unclear when that might happen. Here's what to know about the case and how it got here: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is accused mastermind of 9/11 Mohammed is accused of developing and directing al-Qaida's plot to crash hijacked airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001. Another of the hijacked planes flew into a field in Pennsylvania. In all, nearly 3,000 people were killed in one of the deadliest attacks ever on the United States. Mohammed was arrested in 2003 in Pakistan and eventually taken to the U.S. military base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. At the time, it was where the U.S. held hundreds of men captured in President George W. Bush's 'war on terror.' Military prosecutors filed charges in 2008 against Mohammed and some co-defendants. After an Obama-era plan to try them in a civilian court in New York collapsed, the case remained with the military commission. The case dragged on through years of legal and logistical challenges. A major point of contention has been how much the evidence and case have been tainted by the men's torture while in CIA custody during the first years after their capture. Mohammed was waterboarded 183 times. The plea deal called for life in prison Military prosecutors and defense lawyers began plea talks several years ago. Last year, Mohammed and two others agreed to plead guilty, under an agreement that would have led to life in prison instead of a potential death penalty. The deal also would have required the men to answer questions posed by Sept. 11 victims' relatives. Military prosecutors called the arrangement 'the best path to finality and justice.' Some 9/11 families also saw the deal as the best hope for bringing the painful case to a conclusion and getting some answers from the defendants. But other victims' relatives said a trial was the right way to get justice and information, and some saw the plea deal as capitulation. Republican lawmakers also criticized the agreement, negotiated during Democratic President Joe Biden's administration. Defense secretary withdrew the plea deal Then-Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin soon rescinded the deal, saying that victims' relatives, U.S. troops and the American public ' deserve the opportunity ' to see military commission trials play out. Defense attorneys and the government wrangled in various courts over whether Austin was legally able to scrap the deal. It was on-again, off-again for months. A panel of appeals judges put it on hold in January and then, on Friday, issued 2-1 ruling saying that Austin had the authority to rescind the agreement. The order bars the military judge from taking any guilty pleas under the now-undone deal. The case could be headed to pretrial stage It is not clear whether defense lawyers plan to appeal. A message seeking comment was sent Saturday to Mohammed's attorneys. Without a plea deal, the case would once again be back in the pretrial stage within the military commission system, with the legal and logistical complications that it has faced. Questions about whether the men's torture would prevent the use of evidence, including statements they made, are yet to be resolved.
