
Rhonda Belford: Democrats can't fight for democracy in Texas while undermining it in Illinois
This week, he welcomed Texas Democratic legislators to Oakwood, Illinois, to denounce Republican redistricting efforts in that state. But while Pritzker lectures red states about fairness, he continues to ignore the glaring problems in his own backyard.
Don't forget that in 2021, Pritzker signed one of the most blatantly and aggressively gerrymandered congressional maps in the country, drawn and passed by his own party. The map created districts with lines that make my grandchildren's scribblings look like Pablo Picasso's.
That map gave Democrats a clear advantage in 14 of Illinois' 17 congressional districts and earned an 'F' for fairness from the nonpartisan Princeton Gerrymandering Project. The maps weren't an accident. They deliberately cut out two Republican-leaning seats and helped lock in Democratic control.
It's a stark contrast from when Pritzker was on the campaign trail. He promised to veto any map that was 'in any way drafted or created by legislators, political party leaders and/or their staffs or allies.' Pritzker campaigned with a message of hope and fairness and moving past Democrats' history of corruption. Then, at his first opportunity, Pritzker broke that promise without hesitation. 'Fairness' wasn't on Illinois Democrats' minds.
Now, as he positions himself to run for president, Pritzker is outraged. While standing on his giant soapbox and projecting his moral authority, he floated the idea of redrawing even more favorable maps in Illinois. That's not democratic leadership; it's partisan gamesmanship.
Let that sink in: The same man who signed, supported and pushed one of the worst partisan gerrymanders in the nation is now upset that other states are following his lead. Instead of looking in the mirror or pushing for national changes, Pritzker responds by threatening additional partisan moves that will continue to divide our state.
Illinois families deserve better. They deserve fair representation, not districts drawn in backrooms to silence opposition and insulate power. When maps are rigged to favor one party, voters lose faith in our elections and our country's founding principles.
The truth is, with Democratic supermajorities in Springfield, there's no one who can force Illinois Democrats to do the right thing and clean up partisan games — they need to do it themselves. If Pritzker truly wants to lead on voting rights and gerrymandering, he should start by honoring the promise he made to Illinois voters: to support an independent redistricting commission and end partisan gerrymandering in our state.
Until then, his speeches about fairness will continue to ring hollow. You can't fight for democracy in Texas while undermining it in Illinois.
Editorial: Illinois Supreme Court, it's time — finally — to act on gerrymanderingThe phrase 'fix your own house before criticizing your neighbor' has never been more apt. And until Pritzker refuses to rein in Illinois' partisan splintering map, his lectures about Texas ring hollow.
Gerrymandering matters, and both Republicans and Democrats should do their part in making sure that there is a system that doesn't play political games. But our country won't learn how to draw better maps from the man who inked Illinois' most gerrymandered script.
Before our governor lectures Texas on fairness, he should take a long, hard look at his own record — and start living up to the promises he made to the people of Illinois.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
36 minutes ago
- Fox News
Billionaire Democratic Gov. Pritzker defends his wealth as party rails against the rich
Gov. JB Pritzker, D-Ill., was pressed by NBC's Kristen Welker on his billionaire status as other members of the Democratic Party, including New York City mayor candidate Zohran Mamdani, continue to rail against billionaires. "Some in your party are openly questioning whether billionaires such as yourself should exist at all, governor," Welker said before she played a clip of Mamdani saying the United States shouldn't have billionaires. Welker asked the Democratic governor if the party should be embracing an anti-billionaire message. "Look, how much money you have doesn't determine what your values are, and I'm a Democrat because I believe that everyone deserves health care. I'm a Democrat because I believe we've got to fund education and have a free public education available to every kid in this country. I'm a Democrat because I believe that we've got to stand up for our democracy and against the MAGA Republicans who are literally trying to take away people's rights around this country. It does not matter what your income level is, what matters is what your values are and that's what makes me a Democrat," Pritzker responded. Other liberals, including Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., have also been vocal in criticizing billionaires. Sanders has been touring the country on a "Fighting Oligarchy" tour since President Donald Trump took office. Sanders started the tour to "take on the Oligarchs and corporate interests who have so much power and influence in this country." Other Democrats, like Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., have spoken out in favor of increasing taxes on billionaires. Warren fiercely defended Mamdani's plan to increase taxes on billionaires should he be elected mayor during an interview on CNBC earlier this week. Welker also pressed Pritzker on the Republican redistricting efforts in Texas and whether Democrats were being hypocritical. "I do want to look at the map of Illinois. Let's take a look at this. Despite President Trump winning 44% of the statewide vote in 2024, Republicans hold only three of Illinois's 17 districts. These districts seem to be to maximize Democratic advantage. What do you say to those who argue it's hypocritical for you to criticize Texas for partisanship when your state also drew maps to boost your party's standing?" Welker asked. "Well, remember that what Texas is trying to do is, again, violate the Voting Rights Act. We didn't. We held public hearings, legislative hearings. People attended them. They spoke out. There was a map that was put out. There were actually changes made to the map and a map was passed, and it was done at the end of the census, the decennial census, so that's how it's done in this country," Pritzker responded. Welker said that groups who grade the fairness of congressional maps have given Illinois an F. She pointed to one government watchdog who said Illinois' map "represents a nearly perfect model for everything that can go wrong with redistricting." "You talk about preserving democracy, how do you preserve democracy, if you're using the same tactics that you've criticized Texas Republicans for?" Welker asked. Pritzker said again that the Texas Republicans were attempting to violate the Voting Rights Act. "Democracy is at stake and these Texas Democrats are standing up to what the GOP is attempting to do which is to, to steal seats because they know what they've done is wrong. They know that they've made an enormous mistake," he said.

USA Today
43 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump says homeless people in DC 'have to move out IMMEDIATELY'
Trump says he plans to make an announcement Aug. 11 about a D.C. crime initiative, even as violent crime is down significantly in the nation's capital. Last year marked the lowest level of violent crime in Washington, D.C., in more than 30 years, but President Donald Trump has raised concerns about public safety in the city, teasing a plan that would also target its homeless population. "I'm going to make our Capital safer and more beautiful than it ever was before," Trump said on Truth Social on Aug. 10. "The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital." In a series of social media posts, Trump said he would unveil his initiative on Aug. 11, adding it would address the city's crime and the "Cleanliness and the General Physical Renovation and Condition of our once beautiful and well maintained Capital." The president threatened to "take Federal control" of Washington, D.C., in an Aug. 5 post complaining about crime. The post came after Edward Coristine, a 19-year-old former employee of the Department of Government Efficiency nicknamed "BigBalls," was assaulted in an attempted carjacking. "Crime in Washington, D.C., is totally out of control," Trump said on Aug. 5, adding: "If this continues, I am going to exert my powers, and FEDERALIZE this City." Days later, Trump ordered an increased federal law enforcement presence on D.C. streets, led by officers from U.S. Park Police and including officers from about a dozen other agencies. Cruel and unusual punishment?: In major decision, Supreme Court allows cities to ban homeless camps Violent crime declined by 35% in D.C. in 2024, according to data compiled by the D.C. Metropolitan Police. The 2024 numbers marked the lowest level of violent crime in "over 30 years," the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia said in a news release. Homicides dropped by 32%, robberies were down 39% and armed carjackings were down 53%. Violent crime has declined so far in 2025, according to police data. Homicides and robberies are down 12% and 28%, respectively, while total violent crime is down 26% through Aug. 8 when compared with the same period in 2024. Homicides spiked in D.C. in 2023 to 274, up from 203 the year before, before dropping down to 187 in 2024, according to police data. That is the lowest level since the city had 166 homicides in 2019. There have been 99 homicides in 2025, compared to 112 during the same period last year. Trump has long denigrated Washington, D.C, which leans heavily Democratic. He also floated taking over governance of the district in February in comments to reporters, complaining about crime and homelessness. Contributing: Joey Garrison, USA TODAY


New York Post
43 minutes ago
- New York Post
NY Gov. Kathy Hochul slights Zohran Mamdani in live TV reality check, hints she may not endorse: ‘Many differences'
Gov. Kathy Hochul slighted mayoral hopeful Zohran Mamdani in a live TV interview Sunday — signaling she may not endorse him in the election even after he praised her 'courage.' 'We still have many differences,' Hochul said, keeping her distance from her fellow Democrat during a Fox News Sunday interview. 'I don't know how you whitewash that away.' Fox host Shannon Bream had read a statement from Mamdani effusively praising Hochul for sparring with President Trump and Republicans over redistricting fights that could dictate who controls Congress. Advertisement 4 Gov. Kathy Hochul hinted that she may not make an endorsement at all in the New York City mayoral election during an interview Sunday. Tomas E. Gaston Mamdani said Hochul showed 'courage' and was 'meeting the moment.' 'Is the feeling mutual? Is Mamdani a good choice' [for New York City mayor], Bream asked, sparking Hochul to bring up their 'many differences.' Advertisement 'He can agree with me and many people agree with me and I think it's not just Democrats who say, 'New Yorkers stand up for our rights.' We do that,' Hochul said. 'We're fighters. I'm a mom from Buffalo. I guess they're not used to taking on a mom from Buffalo.' Hochul, who is seeking re-election next year, has come out against Mamdani's proposals to hike taxes by $9 billion on millionaires and corporations in the city to fund his affordability agenda of subsidized child care, fare-free bus services, housing expansion and government-run grocery stores. 4 Hochul with Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani and Mayor Eric Adams at the Dominican Day Parade on Aug. 10, 2025. LP Media Advertisement Those taxes need sign off from the governor and state lawmakers, who also are up for re-election in 2026. Despite the apparent snub, Hochul did say she agrees with Mamdani's focus on tackling New York's high cost of living and making both the city and state more affordable for residents. 'There's many areas of disagreement,' she noted. 'But also there's areas of alignment including affordability. His election touched a nerve. And people said, 'you know what, we're just not getting ahead.'' 4 Mamdani praised Hochul for having 'courage' and 'meeting the moment' in her battle with Republicans over redistricting. LP Media She claimed that President Trump's policies, including imposing tariffs, have not helped. 'There's a sense that we need some change now,' Hochul said. Hochul then hinted she may sit out the race and not endorse Mamdani, who is running against two other Democrats running on independent party lines — Mayor Eric Adams and ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo, whom she served with as lieutenant governor. She took over as governor when Cuomo resigned as governor amid sexual misconduct accusations that he denies. Advertisement 4 Adams and former Gov. Andrew Cuomo are running against Mamdani as independent candidates. LP Media 'I already worked with two different mayors. I'll continue to work with whomever the voters want me to and I'll make it work out. I'm not going to go to war with the 8 million residents of New York I also represent,' the governor said. 'My job is to calm things down,' Hochul said. 'Let's see what the election results are. But people have to recognize that the candidate for mayor [Mamdani] has also touched a nerve and we need to respond to that. I'm aligned with him that we need to find ways to make life more affordable for New Yorkers.' It wouldn't be the first time Hochul stayed on the sidelines during a high-profile mayoral showdown. In her native Buffalo in 2021, democratic socialist India Walton defeated then-sitting Mayor Byron Brown in the Democratic Party primary but Brown, a moderate, continued as a write-in candidate. Hochul stayed out of the race, and Brown won re-election in a landslide in November as the write-in candidate.