logo
Social media giants can ‘get on' and tackle fraud cases, says City watchdog

Social media giants can ‘get on' and tackle fraud cases, says City watchdog

Nikhil Rathi, chief executive of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), said fraud is set to be one of the most 'profound issues' facing regulators over the next few years.
The boss was asked by MPs on the Treasury Committee whether he would like to see stronger guidance to technology platforms about how to take down fraud and their responsibilities in relation to the Online Safety Act.
'I think they know what to do,' Mr Rathi told the committee.
'I don't think they need guidance. There's plenty of cases where they can get on and do it.'
The Online Safety Act will require platforms to put in place and enforce safety measures to ensure that users, particularly children, do not encounter illegal or harmful content, and if they do that it is quickly removed.
The FCA has stepped up its crackdown on financial influencers, or 'finfluencers', with numerous take down requests on social media platforms and a handful of arrests.
The watchdog's boss was asked whether tech firms were too slow to tackle fraud on their platforms.
'We have to operate within our powers, we can't force the tech firms to take down promotions that we see as problematic and we rely on co-operation from them,' he said.
'I would not say that all tech firms don't co-operate.
'There are some that have invested very significantly, they are proactive, they are responsive and once they've decided to move we've seen significant improvements on their platform.'
Referring to Facebook and Instagram owner Meta, he said the issue was both the speed at which harmful content was taken down and that new accounts were being created with 'almost identical content'.
Mr Rathi said Ofcom – which oversees online platforms' safety systems – was 'understandably' prioritising child protection and sexual exploitation offences and would 'get to fraud next year'.
Pressed further on tech giants being held to account on fraud, Mr Rathi said: 'I think this is going to be one of the most profound issues facing financial regulation for the next several years.
'We talk about big tech firms entering financial services, well many have already entered and provide systemic services adjacent to financial services.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Top 10 cities where Brits are checking if they're owed in car finance scandal
Top 10 cities where Brits are checking if they're owed in car finance scandal

Daily Mirror

time19 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Top 10 cities where Brits are checking if they're owed in car finance scandal

Brits who bought a car on finance could be owed a payout** after it has emerged that lenders were paying undisclosed "secret" commissions to car dealerships. This meant that car dealers could determine the interest rates on finance deals, with an incentive to offer higher interest because it earned them a higher commission. It means that Brits could have been signing up for finance agreements with interest rates that were higher than necessary. According to claims management firm My Claim Group, that could mean some Brits who bought a vehicle before 28 January 2021 could be due payouts of up to £4,000** on average. Now, the firm has revealed the top 10 cities where they're seeing the most Brits checking to see if they're due a payout - and you can see if yours has made the cut. The top 10 cities are: The car finance scandal kicked off in January 2021, when the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) stepped in and prohibited discretionary commission models to protect consumers. However, further investigations found that the problem has been going on as early as 2007, so there's been a further examination of past lending activities. By October 2024, the Court of Appeal declared that the non-disclosure of commissions on car loans was illegal. The financial fallout for lenders has been colossal, prompting the government to step in, with UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves voicing concerns about the wider economic implications. However, claims management firms like My Claim Group are urging consumers to lodge complaints. If you think the scandal may have impacted you, visit the My Claim Group website to find out more information and begin the easy process to discover whether you are owed a payout**. My Claim Group is a trading name of the Claims Protection Agency Ltd, authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA No. 836470). *My Claim Group will undertake a free check at no cost to you on your behalf to assess if you may have a vehicle finance claim. *** If you proceed, our panel solicitors work on a no win, no fee basis (subject to exclusions, for full details click on: Solicitor fees are up to 36% inc VAT. We receive a fee after a successful payout or a referral fee from your solicitor and this does not affect the compensation you will receive. You do not need to use a claims management company to make a claim; you can do this yourself for free by contacting the car dealership or finance provider and if that is not successful you can complain to the Financial Ombudsman Service. **See link for the FCA reference, solicitor fee tables & average valuations:

HMRC boss ‘regrets' frustrations over £49m phishing scam disclosure
HMRC boss ‘regrets' frustrations over £49m phishing scam disclosure

Glasgow Times

time19 hours ago

  • Glasgow Times

HMRC boss ‘regrets' frustrations over £49m phishing scam disclosure

The revenue body has faced criticism and questions over why MPs were not informed earlier about the incident. On June 4, it was disclosed that HMRC had lost £47 million after a phishing scam breached tens of thousands of tax accounts. Following updated information published by HMRC on Tuesday, that figure was revised upwards, to £49 million. Senior civil servants at HMRC told the Treasury Committee that 100,000 people had been contacted, or were in the process of being contacted, after their accounts were locked down in what they said was an 'organised crime' incident which started last year. The Treasury Committee, which held a live session on June 4, wrote to Mr Marks earlier this week, telling him that: 'To discover this information during a session from press reports and without adequate time for the committee to review the information in detail is unacceptable.' During a Public Accounts Committee hearing on Thursday, Mr Marks told MPs: 'We welcome your scrutiny.' Mr Marks described the incident as a 'serious, and (an) unacceptable loss of £49 million to the Exchequer, affecting 100,000 of our customers, which is about 0.2% of the PAYE caseload'. He added: 'Given we collect over £840 billion a year, the judgment on materiality is different for HMRC perhaps than other government departments. 'But nonetheless, I agree with the point with regards (to) disclosure, and I will do that in my annual report, which I will publish next month for the first time, so that is, again, properly done according to the rules under public money. 'The final thing really to say, I do regret if there's been any frustration in terms of our handling of this, that was not our intent at all.' He said he would respond to correspondence he had received this week with more detail. Mr Marks continued: 'I welcome your point, with regards (to) the opportunity to have in-private briefings, the level of security threats is significant and constant. 'The team detected and disrupted this one well. There was a criminal investigation. And in (a) private hearing, I'm happy to bring the head of the fraud investigation service, my chief security officer, to explain more about some of that detail but also the threat environment and the way in which we are ensuring HMRC is secure now and secure for the future as well.' Earlier this week, an HMRC spokesperson said: 'We faced a series of evolving and complex criminal attempts to access online tax accounts and our priority has been to protect customers and their accounts. 'Our customers suffered no financial loss as a result. 'Thorough investigation has been necessary to understand the extent of this activity and pursue the criminals responsible. 'We've worked closely with the Information Commissioner's Office throughout to ensure we met our obligations.'

HMRC boss ‘regrets' frustrations over £49m phishing scam disclosure
HMRC boss ‘regrets' frustrations over £49m phishing scam disclosure

Western Telegraph

time20 hours ago

  • Western Telegraph

HMRC boss ‘regrets' frustrations over £49m phishing scam disclosure

The revenue body has faced criticism and questions over why MPs were not informed earlier about the incident. On June 4, it was disclosed that HMRC had lost £47 million after a phishing scam breached tens of thousands of tax accounts. Following updated information published by HMRC on Tuesday, that figure was revised upwards, to £49 million. Senior civil servants at HMRC told the Treasury Committee that 100,000 people had been contacted, or were in the process of being contacted, after their accounts were locked down in what they said was an 'organised crime' incident which started last year. The Treasury Committee, which held a live session on June 4, wrote to Mr Marks earlier this week, telling him that: 'To discover this information during a session from press reports and without adequate time for the committee to review the information in detail is unacceptable.' During a Public Accounts Committee hearing on Thursday, Mr Marks told MPs: 'We welcome your scrutiny.' Mr Marks described the incident as a 'serious, and (an) unacceptable loss of £49 million to the Exchequer, affecting 100,000 of our customers, which is about 0.2% of the PAYE caseload'. He added: 'Given we collect over £840 billion a year, the judgment on materiality is different for HMRC perhaps than other government departments. 'But nonetheless, I agree with the point with regards (to) disclosure, and I will do that in my annual report, which I will publish next month for the first time, so that is, again, properly done according to the rules under public money. 'The final thing really to say, I do regret if there's been any frustration in terms of our handling of this, that was not our intent at all.' He said he would respond to correspondence he had received this week with more detail. Mr Marks continued: 'I welcome your point, with regards (to) the opportunity to have in-private briefings, the level of security threats is significant and constant. 'The team detected and disrupted this one well. There was a criminal investigation. And in (a) private hearing, I'm happy to bring the head of the fraud investigation service, my chief security officer, to explain more about some of that detail but also the threat environment and the way in which we are ensuring HMRC is secure now and secure for the future as well.' Earlier this week, an HMRC spokesperson said: 'We faced a series of evolving and complex criminal attempts to access online tax accounts and our priority has been to protect customers and their accounts. 'Our customers suffered no financial loss as a result. 'Thorough investigation has been necessary to understand the extent of this activity and pursue the criminals responsible. 'We've worked closely with the Information Commissioner's Office throughout to ensure we met our obligations.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store