Bihar monsoon session: Oppn protests in black, Deputy CM hits back on voter list row
The opposition, led by the Leader of Opposition in the Council, Rabri Devi, alleged, 'The government is using SIR to tamper with the voter list. It is a conspiracy to suppress votes of backward and marginalised communities under the guise of verification,' Rabri Devi said.
During the protest, slogans were raised like, 'Stop trying to usurp elections and SIR is an excuse; the purpose is to ban voting.'
MLCs of the Grand Alliance arrived at the Council wearing black clothes, holding posters and placards while raising slogans in the portico before the session began.
Meanwhile, Deputy Chief Minister Samrat Chaudhary countered the opposition's allegations, stating, 'The Election Commission has made it clear that no citizen—poor, backward, Dalit, or general—is being removed unfairly from the voter list. So far, 98 per cent participation has been recorded in the re-verification process of 19 lakh deceased voters, 20 lakh migrated citizens and 8 lakh duplicate voters have been identified.'
He further said, 'The SIR process will conclude on July 26, after which the draft voter list will be published, allowing all parties to file objections transparently.'
Samrat Chaudhary targeted the opposition's black-clothes protest, remarking, 'Shani has overshadowed them; that's why they are roaming around in black.'
He accused the opposition of misleading the people and referenced past political statements on illegal voters to justify the verification drive, citing that 'over 120 per cent Aadhaar registration in districts like Kishanganj makes investigation necessary.'
When questioned about speculations of CM Nitish Kumar being considered for Vice President, Samrat Chaudhary remarked, 'It is up to the BJP and NDA leadership, and they will decide.'
The monsoon session is politically crucial, with the government aiming to pass key bills before the upcoming elections.
The opposition is aggressively targeting the government on law and order, voter list revision, and unemployment during this five-day session.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Bihar Voter List Revision 2025: Final Day to Submit Forms, Check Your Name Now
Bihar is undergoing its first major voter list revision in over two decades, and today—July 25—is the final day for voters to submit their forms as part of the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR). This large-scale clean-up aims to verify who remains eligible to vote and remove outdated or duplicate entries. With over 7.89 crore registered voters in the state, the scale of this effort is unprecedented. As of July 24, nearly 15 lakh forms were still pending, 20 lakh voters were found deceased, 28 lakh had permanently moved away, and 7 lakh were registered in more than one location. About 1 lakh couldn't be traced at all. Booth Level Officers (BLOs) have visited homes with pre-filled forms for verification. Those unavailable could also submit via WhatsApp or online. However, missing today's deadline means your name might not be on the draft list published August 1—and if you're not on the list, you can't vote. The revision has sparked controversy, with opposition parties warning that legitimate voters—especially migrants, the poor, or those without formal documents—may be excluded. Aadhaar, though widely used, is not accepted as sole proof of eligibility. From August 1 to September 1, voters can file claims or objections before the final list is released ahead of Bihar's Assembly elections. This process is not just about cleaning up the list—it's about ensuring a transparent and fair electoral system. But as the deadline hits, the question remains: will it include everyone it should? Presentation: Aniket Singh Chauhan Script: Shikha Kumari A. Video: Tayyab Hussain Editing: Zeeshan Akhtar
NDTV
32 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Rohingya Muslims Using Bengali Language For Aadhaar Cards": BJP Leader
New Delhi: Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Jagannath Sarkar on Friday reacted to West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee's recent remarks, emphasising Prime Minister Narendra Modi's commitment to promoting the Bengali language. Mr Sarkar alleged that Rohingya Muslims from Bangladesh have been learning Bengali and changing their names to obtain Aadhaar and voter cards in India. "Prime Minister Modi gives priority to the Bengali language... Rohingya Muslims from Bangladesh have learned Bengali and changed their names to obtain Aadhaar and voter cards here... The Supreme Court has also clearly stated regarding the steps taken by the Election Commission to conduct fair elections," he said. Referring to Mamata Banerjee's earlier statement, Mr Sarkar said the West Bengal Chief Minister highlighted the universal use of mother tongues, beginning with children saying "Maa," and condemned the targeting of Bengali speakers. She called for a new Bhasha Andolan to raise awareness and organise programmes against the alleged persecution of Bengali-speaking people. "We all speak our mother tongue. Children first speak "Maa" in their mother tongue. However, a language war has been declared over the Bengali language. Another Bhasha Andolan should raise awareness among everyone. People are tortured for speaking Bengali in many places. People cannot be detained just for speaking Bengali. We cannot tolerate this. Programmes should be organised on this issue," he said. Earlier, on the issue of the State of Individual Registration (SIR), West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee had criticised the Election Commission of India (ECI), claiming that the electoral body had removed 40 lakh voters from the list in Bihar and intended to do the same in West Bengal. "ECI removed over 40 lakh names from the voters' list in Bihar, and now you want to do the same in Bengal? Try it, and we will launch a Gherao movement. We brought our people back from detention once, and we fought in court and won. We will not let this new law stand. We will fight, we will change it, we will not accept it", she said.
NDTV
32 minutes ago
- NDTV
Rahul's 'Masterly Inaction' Can Cost Congress More Than Just Karnataka
Away from the din in parliament, the Congress in faraway Karnataka is struggling to get its act together. As the November 2025 'deadline' of an in-house power-sharing formula is inching closer, the grand old party insiders fear a repeat of Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Punjab in Karnataka. Between 2018 and 2023, the Congress lost power in these states due to the infighting. Madhya Pradesh was the first to go after Jyotiraditya Scindia revolted and defected to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in 2020. By the time assembly polls were held in Punjab in 2022 and subsequently in Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh in 2023, the rivalries of Captain Amarinder Singh-Navjot Singh Sidhu, Ashok Gehlot-Sachin Pilot and Bhupesh Baghel-TS Singhdeo had become so intense that no amount of welfare-ism and good governance could salvage the situation. What was worse was that Sonia-Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge remained hapless spectators. Why Removing Siddaramaiah Is Not Easy At Bengaluru's Vidhana Soudha, the big question doing the rounds is, will Rahul Gandhi, representing the political leadership of the Congress, enforce a change of guard? Would he be able to bench Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and bring in DK Shivakumar? When Karnataka gave the Congress a handsome verdict in May 2023, Rahul had hammered out a compromise between an eager and restless state party chief, Shivakumar, with Siddaramaiah promising to protect his interest at a future date. Rahul was perhaps hoping for the party's better performance in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls and a central role for Siddaramaiah. Nothing of this sort happened. The challenges confronting Rahul Gandhi in Karnataka till November 2025 are manifold. While he, Sonia and Priyanka Gandhi bat for Shivakumar, removing Siddaramaiah is not easy. Rahul, having taken up the cause of the backwards classes in reservations and census, cannot afford to remove a backward-class Chief Minister and have three upper-caste Chief Ministers - Sukhwinder Singh Sukku in Himachal Pradesh, Revanth Reddy in Telangana, and Shivakumar in Karnataka. The Kharge Awkwardness The Gandhis have an additional burden in Mallikarjun Kharge. The 88th president of the All India Congress Committee (AICC) is keen to throw his hat in the ring, offering himself as a replacement for Siddaramaiah. In Kharge's scheme of things, a backward-class Chief Minister getting replaced by a Dalit would not create any hiccups. Privately, Kharge has often narrated his story of how, thrice, he came close to becoming the Chief Minister of Karnataka but lost the race to the likes of Siddaramaiah, SM Krishna and Dharam Singh. Conventional wisdom says Rahul, Sonia and Priyanka would be least interested in sending Kharge to Bengaluru. But the Kharge camp is still optimistic. It may be worth noting that when it comes to Karnataka's political affairs, Kharge consciously sticks to the 'high-command-to-decide' refrain - as if to stress that he is not part of the 'high command'. In any case, party leaders familiar with Karnataka affairs don't feel Kharge would make the cut. All in all, the problem of retaining or replacing Siddaramaiah remains. Shivakumar is not in the mood to wait till 2028 and perhaps sit for another five years in the opposition to become a chief ministerial face in 2033. In fact, he has been getting constant feelers from those claiming to represent the ruling Delhi durbar. Nonetheless, as of now, to Shivakumar's credit and Congress's relief, the prospects of pulling a Scindia are not on his mind, for now. Betting On Bihar All eyes are on the Bihar assembly outcome. If the mahagathbandan edges out NDA-Nitish Kumar, Rahul, having somewhat proved himself, will have greater chances of manoeuvring and perhaps breathing easily on the plank of social justice. A poor Opposition showing, on the other hand, will set uncertainty in motion not only in Karnataka but in Himachal Pradesh and perhaps in Jharkhand, too, where the Congress is part of the ruling coalition led by the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha's (JMM) Hemant Soren. A section of the Congress blames Rahul Gandhi for creating much of the confusion in the selection of chief ministers way back in December 2018, when he was the AICC chief and the party had won Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh assembly polls. The Chhattisgarh Fiasco In 2018 Rahul had then tried to act as a 'democrat', but, in the process, ended up annoying many. In Madhya Pradesh, his childhood friend Jyotiraditya felt let down when Rahul went by a headcount (that was a strategic coming together of MLAs loyal to Digvijaya Singh and Kamal Nath) instead of projecting a young face. Jyotiraditya defected after 15 months, bringing down the Kamal Nath government. The selection of a chief ministerial candidate for Chhattisgarh had proved to be the trickiest. Rahul had four contenders for the post. Singhdeo was a suave and experienced hand, but his feudal background stood against the former Sarguja ruler. Tamaradhwaj Sahu, the then lone Lok Sabha Congress MP from Durg, was AICC pointsman PL Punia's favourite, and was at the last minute fielded in the state assembly polls to win the influential Sahu samaj votes. Then there were the resourceful and worldly-wise Charan Das Mahant, a former Union Minister, and Chhattisgarh Congress unit chief Bhupesh Baghel. Ghosts Of A Rebellion On December 13, 2020, Singhdeo, Sahu, Baghel and Mahant were summoned to Delhi and given an audience with Rahul Gandhi. The latter hugged them and tried to hammer out a consensus. Over the next three hours, Sahu was almost declared the next Chief Minister of the tribal-dominated state, till a rebellion blew up right into Rahul's face. Almost speaking in unison, the three regional satraps refused to work under Sahu, declining to be ministers. Rahul panicked, and consequently, another round of consultation followed. This time, Singhdeo emerged as a favourite - till Sahu threatened to revolt. Motilal Vora was brought into the negotiations. When the deadlock failed, Sonia's trusted aide and AICC treasurer, Ahmed Patel, intervened. Patel backed Baghel, and to Rahul's astonishment, everyone almost came around. It is said that when Baghel's name was cleared, Rahul or someone on his behalf whispered that Singhdeo would be considered to complete the second half of the chief ministership. Today, both Vora and Patel are no more, and Rahul is no longer the AICC chief. But in Raipur, TS Singhdeo kept pressing his aspirations till the party got voted out. If Rahul opts for masterly inaction, the prospects of a repeat of Madhya Pradesh cannot be ruled out. In the long run, a replication of Punjab, Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh is almost a certainty. Clearly, Rahul is running out of time and options.
