Pat Dugan will appear on the ballot for Philadelphia district attorney general election as a Republican
As an independent Democrat, he is able to appear on the ballot as a Republican due to a historic write-in effort undertaken by citizens across the city in the Primary Election, Dugan said in a news release on Saturday.
Dugan received over 6,000 write-in votes from Republicans, which allows him to run on that side of the ballot.
"If elected, I will be a District Attorney for all of Philadelphia – Democrats, Republicans and Independents alike. I'm running for every Philadelphian who wants real safety, real justice, and real accountability regardless of political belief or personal background," said Dugan in the release. "I cannot stand by and allow Mr. Krasner's failed policies to continue to hold our city hostage. Every Philadelphian has a real choice this fall, and I believe they will stand with me for common sense and safety."
Dugan lost to incumbent Larry Krasner in the Democratic primary in May by almost 44,000 votes. Krasner is running for his third term as the city's DA.
Dugan served as a former municipal court judge for 17 years.
"A lifelong Philadelphian, Dugan was born in Fairmount and raised in the Frankford section of the city by a single mom with his four siblings. Dugan said he chose to run in November after a close examination of the incumbent District Attorney's record," the release said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's approval rating dips in new poll: What recent surveys show across nation, in PA
A new poll puts President Donald Trump's approval rating near record lows, noting an "erosion of support" among one of the president's most reliable groups of supporters: men. The University of Massachusetts Amherst survey released this past week, found public support for the Republican leader has dropped six percentage points since its April poll, giving Trump a meager 38% approval rating. With a corresponding 58% of poll respondents disapproving of his job performance, the figures mark one of the lowest ratings seen in recent months − and follow a string of major national polls with similarly low approval ratings. A historical analysis by Gallup shows Trump's approval ratings in the first July of both of his terms are lower than those of any other modern president. ICE arrests in Bucks County: ICE arrested 2 men in the Bucks County Courthouse. Why this worries civil rights advocates 'Trump's approval ratings, already historically low for a newly elected president, continue to sink with close to 6-in-10 Americans (58%) expressing disapproval of the job that Trump is doing in office," the UMass Amherst poll's director, Tatishe Nteta, said in an Aug. 4 press release. "While Trump remains a popular figure among Republicans and conservatives, Trump's time in office is viewed more negatively across genders, generations, classes and races, with majorities of each of these groups disapproving of Trump's performance." The poll, conducted in partnership with YouGov July 25-30, interviewed 1,000 respondents nationally. The margin of error is 3.5%. What is President Trump's approval rating? Aggregations of recent approval polling from The New York Times and RealClearPolitics place Trump's approval between 44% and 45.8%, respectively, with a 53% and 51.4% disapproval as of Aug. 6. The UMass Amherst poll shows a significantly lower approval mark compared to these averages. The survey found Trump's net approval rating dropped to -20 as he surpasses the six-month mark of his second term in office, with discontent focused especially on his handling of immigration, tariffs, inflation and the Jeffrey Epstein crisis. More Trump news: Poll shows most Americans disapprove of Epstein approach. Here's how many. Opinions on Trump's approach to inflation and tariffs jockeyed for the lowest ratings, both collecting a 31% approval, followed by 32% approving his stance on civil rights. Approval of his stance on immigration fell nine points among respondents compared to the April survey. The Epstein controversy continues to stay top of mind for many Americans, a topic that has weighed Trump down in recent polls. Among the participants in the UMass Amherst poll, more than three-fourths said they have "read, seen or heard about Jeffrey Epstein" either some or a lot, and 70% said they believe the president is handling the issue either "not too well" or "not well at all." Nearly two-thirds (63%) believe his administration is hiding information about Epstein. New Trump poll shows drop in support among men In April, men were a significant source of support for the president's then-44% approval rating, with 48% of men telling pollsters they approved of Trump's performance. Three months later, that number has dropped by nearly 10 points, with 39% of men expressing approval of the president in July − only one point higher than his overall approval rating. Among women, support is even lower at 35%, and has also seen a drop since April, by four percentage points. Joe Rogan: Trump admin is 'trying to gaslight you' over Epstein scandal 'In addition to losing support among men, Trump has seen approval for his presidency crumble among political independents, a critical swing constituency,' said Jesse Rhodes, professor of political science at UMass Amherst and a co-director of the poll, in a news release. 'While 31% of independents approved of his presidency in April, that number is now down 10 percentage points to 21%." The UMass Amherst poll results echo similarly low approval polling by Gallup, which marked the lowest approval rating yet of his second term, at 37% as of July 25, and a Reuters/Ipsos poll released July 30 that gave him a 40% approval. Trump's approval rating in PA According to Civiqs polls, last updated July 31, Trump's net approval stands at -8% in 52% of Pennsylvanians polled currently disapprove of the president's performance. About 44% approve of Trump's job performance and another 4% didn't feel one way or the other. These polling numbers were also broken down by age, education, gender, race and party. Age: Those between 18–34 were most unfavorable of Trump (63%), while those 50 to 64 were the most favorable (52%).Education: Respondents across all education levels disapprove of Trump's job performance, with postgraduates at 66% disapproval as well as 54% of college graduates and 49% of non-college Men and women are split on Trump, more than half of females (59%) holding an unfavorable view and about half of males (51%) having a favorable view of the Members of the Republican party were 90% favorable of Trump, compared to the Democratic party, who felt just 2% favorable of the president's performance. About half of Independent voters were unfavorable (50%).Race: Black voters had the highest unfavorable opinion of Trump (90%), followed by Hispanic/Latino and Other at 62%, and white at 50% unfavorable. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: President Trump approval rating dips in new UMass Amherst an PA polls
USA Today
16 minutes ago
- USA Today
Democrats, GOP are both guilty of gerrymandering. Texas' scheme exposes the problem.
Texas' new map aims to add five additional Republican-leaning seats, giving Republicans an additional cushion ahead of what could be a challenging midterm election. The debate surrounding the Texas decision to draw new House district boundaries in advance of the 2026 midterm elections has escalated into a national conversation surrounding gerrymandering, with Republicans and Democrats accusing each other of being the problem. The truth is that both Republicans and Democrats are flagrant offenders in the arena of districting. Nobody has their hands clean when it comes to gerrymandering. Even so, by deciding to redraw their boundaries mid-decade, Texas has kicked off a potential arms race ahead of the midterms. Republicans started this new fight. Opinion: Texas Democrats look bad in redistricting fight. Republicans look even worse. Democrats and Republicans both gerrymander Gerrymandering is the term for an old practice in which those drawing the borders of electoral districts strategically design them to favor their own electoral chances. They can do so by packing voters of the opposing party into a few sacrificial districts or by spreading them out across many districts. The result is states like Illinois, in which only 3 of 17 House Seats are held by Republicans, despite 43.8% of voters breaking for President Donald Trump in 2024. So, as much as Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker wants to bash Texas Republicans, he signed into law his state's heavily slanted map. Opinion: Supreme Court could end race-based voting districts. Good. They're antiquated. Of the states given a failing grade by Princeton's nonpartisan Gerrymandering Project, nine have a partisan advantage toward Republicans and four toward Democrats. Texas hasn't made it worse. Texas scheme escalates the problem – and rallies Democrats What Texas Republicans are doing is new, in a sense. Redistricting typically occurs in response to significant demographic changes, often highlighted by the census at the beginning of every decade. Texas has decided to redraw its boundaries midway through the decade, with President Donald Trump's endorsement. Texas' new map aims to add five additional GOP-leaning seats, giving Republicans an additional cushion ahead of what could be a challenging midterm election for them. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Texas' decision to redraw its boundaries has nationalized the conversation around districting and opened the doors for similar attempts from Democratic states. California Gov. Gavin Newsom has threatened to fight fire with fire and match Texas' actions in his own state, as has Pritzker in Illinois. Democrats are framing this as a pure response to Republican actions, but the reality is that they've been gerrymandering themselves for years. Regardless, Texas' actions worsen the matter because they are the first shot in this particular battle. Both sides have their hands dirty, but Texans will be the ones bearing the blame for what unfolds next. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science. You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.
USA Today
16 minutes ago
- USA Today
Texas Democrats fled the state to oppose GOP redistricting. Why this one stayed behind.
In 2003, Texas Rep. Richard Peña Raymond battled a Republican redistricting plan all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. Now, he's doing it again. But as fellow Democrats fled the state, he stayed. AUSTIN – State Rep. Richard Peña Raymond, a South Texas Democrat, has spent the past week prowling near-empty halls in the Texas state Capitol, talking to any Republican lawmaker who would listen and trying to avert a U.S. Supreme Court showdown. On the nearby House floor, Republican lawmakers maneuvered to try to launch a rare mid-decade redistricting effort. They've drawn up a new map of U.S. House districts that could give the GOP five more seats and help the party maintain control of the narrowly-divided chamber. Most of Raymond's Democratic colleagues left Texas in an attempt to bust the quorums needed for the legislature to pass the measure. But he stayed behind, trying to cajole, convince, pressure or plead his way out of the crisis. For Raymond, it's déjà vu all over again. In 2003, when Texas Republican lawmakers again tried to redraw districts outside the norms of the once-a-decade process that follows each new Census, Raymond was on the redistricting committee and became an ardent voice of the opposition. When the measure passed, he was named as a plaintiff in a lawsuit that ultimately ended in front of the U.S. Supreme Court. This time, he said, the stakes are even higher. 'Two-thousand-three was a big deal. We went through a lot,' Raymond, 64, told USA TODAY from his first-floor office at the Capitol. 'I could see that that was history making and what's going on right now will be history making.' Midterm battle prompts Texas showdown The current showdown began when President Donald Trump and White House officials urged Texas Republican leaders to redraw voting maps to add five new Republican-friendly seats to the U.S. House of Representatives. State Democrats traveled to Illinois – some even to New York and Massachusetts – to prevent Republicans from reaching the two-thirds quorum in the 150-member legislature needed to conduct business. If Texas Republicans succeed in adding five GOP seats to the U.S. House, the Trump-friendly chamber could allow the president to continue one of the most aggressive and disruptive agendas in modern presidential history. A Democratic majority in January 2027 opens the door to Congressional investigations, legislative paralysis − even a third impeachment. Gov. Greg Abbott has threatened to arrest the absent lawmakers and the U.S. Justice Department has said it will also try to track down the AWOL representatives. And on Aug. 8, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton asked the state Supreme Court to oust 13 Democratic lawmakers from office over their absence from the Capitol, arguing they abandoned their seats when they fled the state. The GOP's Texas power play has set off a redistricting arms race as blue state leaders move to create more Democratic-leaning House seats to counter Texas, and lawmakers in other red states, including Indiana and Missouri, consider joining the fray. Vice President JD Vance met with Indiana lawmakers on Aug. 7 reportedly to urge them to redraw maps and Florida Republican leaders have said they, too, will form a committee to begin redrawing districts. In 2003, Texas Republicans also tried to redraw maps three years after Census data was released, prompting state Democrats to retreat to a Holiday Inn in Oklahoma, just over the state line from Texas and out of reach of troopers who could force them to return. 'Pack a toothbrush. Pack hair spray.' How the Texas Democrats are living on the run Raymond fought the bill in committee then joined his colleagues in Oklahoma. During committee hearings, he was at times the lone Democrat, objecting to Republican motions and grilling witnesses about the legality and fairness of gerrymandering maps for partisan gain. His goal was to get his comments and questions – and their replies – on the official record. 'Just really putting them through the ringer to build the court record,' he remembered. 'I was very, very involved in it, from the beginning to the end.' Lawmakers ultimately approved the new maps. But lawsuits were filed and the case wound up in the U.S. Supreme Court. A 5-4 decision upheld the Texas redistricting plan but ruled part of it violated the Voting Rights Act by diluting the voting power of Latino voters. A proposal to split Laredo, Raymond's hometown, in half was removed. 'It was a 50-50 victory, but a victory nonetheless,' he said. 'Try to talk to everybody' On Aug. 8, Raymond walked the short distance from his first-floor office to the second-floor House chamber. He wound his way around desks, chatting with fellow lawmakers, both Democrat and Republican, patting others on the back, joking with others. There's a saying, he said, that's popular in the Spanish-speaking border city where he's from: Hablando se entiende, or 'Speaking to each other, you're able to understand each other.' 'I have always tried my whole career to try to talk to everybody, get to know everybody, all 149 other members,' he said. 'That hasn't changed.' Raymond, a state lawmaker since 2001, is one of the more tenured Democrats in the legislature. Known as a moderate, he represents a heavily Latino district that fans out for several square miles from Laredo along the U.S.-Mexico border and is home to about 183,000 residents. Last year, Trump managed a near sweep of Texas border counties, traditionally a Democratic stronghold, winning 14 of the 18 counties on or near the border, including Webb County, which includes Laredo. Trump's wins along the border were the biggest for a presidential candidate in three decades, outpacing those by native Texan George W. Bush when he won the governorship in 2004. The border's shifting allegiances make it politically risky for representatives of those districts to align too closely with national Democratic figures, such as Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, who is essentially harboring the Texas Democrats, said Mark Jones, a Rice University political scientist. It's no coincidence, Jones said, that five of the six Democrats who stayed behind last week were from border districts in South Texas. Raymond, who is up for reelection next year, also likely prefers to keep his distance, he said. Republicans in Texas appear to be razor-focused on keeping the new redistricting maps unchanged, Jones said, despite the efforts of Raymond or anyone else. 'The idea you can stay behind and get maps drawn to be less impactful on Democratic representation is very unlikely,' he said. Raymond acknowledged he's faced with a herculean task – not unlike Sisyphus rolling the boulder up the hill at Tartarus in Greek mythology. His deepest fear, he said, is that the issue will again end up before the Supreme Court – this time with a court much more malleable to the GOP agenda. Still, he'll keep trying. When it gets to feel overwhelming, he said, he tries to remind himself that other members equally love their country and state – and are trying to make it better. 'I recognize that we won't always agree on how we get there, but I don't ever doubt that,' Raymond said. 'I always start from that common place.' The session on Aug. 8 was brief: Eight minutes gavel to gavel. House Speaker Dustin Burrows, a Republican, recognized there still wasn't a quorum, chastised the missing members and adjourned until Monday, Aug. 11. Moments after Burrows gaveled the meeting to a close, Raymond began talking to other lawmakers. Follow Jervis on Twitter: @MrRJervis. Contributing: Zac Anderson, USA TODAY.
