
Wisconsin's Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, Republicans reach budget deal to cut taxes, fund university
The deal in the battleground state, where Evers and Republicans have a long history of not working together, emerged the day after the deadline for enacting a new budget. However, there is no government shutdown in Wisconsin when the budget is late. The Legislature is scheduled to pass it this week.
Evers called the deal "a pro-kid budget that's a win for Wisconsin's kids, families, and our future."
Here is what to know about Wisconsin's budget deal:
Evers and Republicans agreed to $1.3 billion in income tax cuts largely targeting the middle class. More than 1.6 million people will have their taxes cut an average of $180 annually.
The deal would expand the state's second lowest income tax bracket and make the first $24,000 of income for people age 67 and over tax-free. It also eliminates the sales tax on electricity, saving taxpayers about $178 million over two years.
Republican legislative leaders praised the deal as providing meaningful tax relief to the middle class and retirees.
"This budget delivers on our two biggest priorities: tax relief for Wisconsin and reforms to make government more accountable," Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos said in a statement.
And Senate Republican Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu praised it as a compromise that cuts taxes but also stabilizes the state's child care system and strengthens schools by increasing special education funding.
The Universities of Wisconsin would see a $256 million increase over two years, the largest funding increase for the UW system in about two decades. UW Regents had asked for an $855 million overall increase and Republicans in June floated the possibility of an $87 million cut.
The deal also imposes a faculty minimum workload requirement and calls for an independent study on the system's future sustainability.
Republicans will be voting on a plan Tuesday that would close the 127-year-old Green Bay Correctional Center by 2029 as Evers proposed. However, it's not clear what other elements of Evers' prison overhaul plan Republicans will endorse.
That part of the budget was not under the negotiated deal with Evers, which means he could make changes to it with his powerful partial veto.
There will be $200 million in additional tax revenue to pay for transportation projects, but Evers and Republican leaders did not detail where that money would come from.
The agreement increases funding for child care programs by $330 million over two years, a third of which will be direct payments to providers. The money will replace the Child Care Counts program started during the COVID-19 pandemic. That program, which provides funding to child care providers, expired on Monday. Evers, Democrats and child care advocates have been pushing for additional funding to address child care shortages throughout the state.
Funding for K-12 special education programs will increase by $500 million.
State employees, including at the university, would get a 3% raise this year and a 2% raise next year.
The budget deal was reached after Republicans killed more than 600 Evers proposals in the budget, including legalizing marijuana, expanding Medicaid and raising taxes on millionaires.
Democrats said Republicans were forced to compromise because they didn't have enough votes in the Senate to pass the budget without Democratic support.
Democrats gained seats in November under the new maps drawn by Evers and narrowed the Republican majority in the Senate to 18-15. Two Republican senators said they planned to vote against the budget, resulting in Senate Democrats being brought into the budget negotiations with Evers and Republicans.
"What we are seeing playing out in this budget is the consequence of Wisconsin's new fairer maps — legislators working together to find compromise and make meaningful progress for the people of Wisconsin," Democratic Sen. Jodi Habush Sinykin said in a statement.
Republican budget committee co-chair Sen. Howard Marklein said, "This budget has involved an awful lot of compromise."
The deadline for finishing the budget was Monday, but unlike in other states and the federal government there is no shutdown in Wisconsin. Instead, the previous budget remains in place until a new one is signed into law.
The Legislature's budget-writing committee was voting on the plan Tuesday. The full Legislature is set to meet starting Wednesday to give it final passage.
Once the budget clears the Legislature, Evers will be able to make changes using his expansive partial veto powers. But his office said Evers would not veto any budget provisions that were part of the deal he reached with Republicans.
Evers, who is midway through his second term, has said he will announce his decision on whether he will seek a third term after he has signed the budget. He has 10 business days to take action on the spending plan once the Legislature passes it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
25 minutes ago
- New York Post
Prez rips Lara Trump guest, Charlamagne tha God, after he made brash claim about Epstein and the GOP
President Trump unleashed on Charlamagne tha God — calling him a 'sleazebag' and 'Low IQ individual' — after the talk radio star went on Lara Trump's Fox News show to saying he believed the Epstein scandal could end MAGA's hold on the Republican party. Appearing on 'My View' with the president's daughter-in-law on Saturday, Charlamagne — real name Lenard Larry McKelvey — claimed that 'traditional conservatives' were about to take over the GOP again. Trump wasn't having it. Advertisement 'The very wonderful and talented Lara Trump, whose show is a big ratings success, put racist sleazebag Charlamagne 'The God,'' Trump fumed on Truth Social in the wee Sunday morning hours. 'Why is he allowed to use the word 'GOD' when describing himself?' 3 Charlamagne tha God posited that the GOP is going through significant upheaval over the Jeffrey Epstein drama. Getty Images 'He's a Low IQ individual, has no idea what words are coming out of his mouth, and knows nothing about me or what I have done – like just ending 5 Wars, including a 31 year bloodbath between Republic of the Congo and Rwanda.' Advertisement While Trump didn't reveal a specific grievance with what Charlamagne said on Lara's show, it came after 'The Breakfast Club' co-host weighed in on the scandal over the Trump administration's delay in releasing files related to pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein. 3 Lara Trump had a spirited exchange with Charlamagne tha God. Getty Images Charlamagne claimed that the Epstein row is a 'political coup going on right now in the Republican Party that people are not paying attention to.' Last month, the MAGA base erupted over a July 6 Justice Department and FBI memo that concluded the evidence suggests Epstein killed himself and did not have an 'incriminating client list.' Advertisement Trump had ripped into elements of the MAGA base for harping on the issue and blamed Democrats for kicking up the 'Epstein Hoax.' 'I think that traditional conservatives are going to take the Republican Party back,' Charlamagne said. 'I think this Epstein thing is going to be a way for traditional conservatives to take their party back, I really do.' He added: 'I think they know this is the issue that has gotten the base riled up. The MAGA base isn't letting this issue go, and for the first time, they know they can probably take the party back and not piss off the MAGA base.' The 'Breakfast Club' host described Trump as a 'once-in-a-lifetime, one-on-one, political juggernaut.' Still, he panned Trump's performance across the board and contended that Americans are still struggling economically under his watch. Advertisement 'Right now people are hurting,' Charlamagne argued. 'He campaigned on immediate change. Day one change.' He also pointed to former US ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley as a Republican he could see himself backing. 3 President Trump did not seem pleased with Charlamagne tha God's appearance on Lara Trump's 'My View' show. Getty Images Trump further dinged Charlamagne and accused him of not knowing about his accomplishments in office. 'He didn't know that, or India and Pakistan or, wiping out Iran's nuclear capabilities, or closing the horrendous open Border, or creating the greatest economy, where prices and Inflation have come way down,' Trump vented, referring to his efforts to end wars overseas. 'But this dope, Charlamagne, would vote for Sleepy Joe or Kamala? Remember, one year ago our Country was DEAD, now it's the 'HOTTEST' Country anywhere in the World. MAGA!!!'


Newsweek
25 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Full List of Democrats Who Voted for New Trump-Pick Confirmations
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Several Democrats voted over the weekend to confirm nominees appointed by President Donald Trump, including for the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice. Newsweek contacted the Democratic National Committee via online form for comment on Sunday. Why It Matters Democrats appear to be divided over how to approach Trump and his administration. While many have been hesitant or slow to confirm his nominees, several Senate Democrats broke with party expectations by voting in favor of his nominees, which ultimately helped advance some of his picks. As reported by Newsweek, the Democrats' bind over how to handle Trump spilled out on the House floor this week when New Jersey Senator Cory Booker delivered an impassioned speech on the Senate floor Tuesday, criticizing his fellow Democrats for what he perceives as "complicity" with Trump's administration. Booker's remarks were instigated by an exchange with other Democratic senators over a package of law-enforcement funding bills. The seal of the U.S. Senate on December 27, 2012, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. The seal of the U.S. Senate on December 27, 2012, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. PAUL J. RICHARDS/AFP viaWhat To Know The official Trump-pick confirmations and the Democrats who voted for them are as follows: Adam Telle: Department of Defense Angela Alsobrooks (Maryland) Tammy Baldwin (Wisconsin) Chris Coons (Delaware) Catherine Cortez Masto (Nevada) Dick Durbin (Illinois) John Fetterman (Pennsylvania) Kirsten Gillibrand (New York) Maggie Hassan (New Hampshire) Martin Heinrich (New Mexico) John Hickenlooper (Colorado) Tim Kaine (Virginia) Mark Kelly (Arizona) Amy Klobuchar (Minnesota) Gary Peters (Michigan) Jack Reed (Rhode Island) Jacky Rosen (Nevada) Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire) Elissa Slotkin (Michigan) Mark Warner (Virginia) Raphael Warnock (Georgia) Sheldon Whitehouse (Rhode Island) Jason Reding Quinones: Department of Justice Dick Durbin (Illinois) Andrew Puzder: Department of State Maggie Hassan (New Hampshire) Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire) John Arrigo: Department of State Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire) Mark Warner (Virginia) Sean Cairncross: Executive Office of the President Angela Alsobrooks (Maryland) Tammy Baldwin (Wisconsin) Chris Coons (Delaware) Catherine Cortez Masto (Nevada) Dick Durbin (Illinois) John Fetterman (Pennsylvania) Kirsten Gillibrand (New York) Maggie Hassan (New Hampshire) Martin Heinrich (New Mexico) John Hickenlooper (Colorado) Tim Kaine (Virginia) Mark Kelly (Arizona) Amy Klobuchar (Minnesota) Gary Peters (Michigan) Jack Reed (Rhode Island) Jacky Rosen (Nevada) Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire) Elissa Slotkin (Michigan) Mark Warner (Virginia) Raphael Warnock (Georgia) Sheldon Whitehouse (Rhode Island) Richard Blumenthal (Connecticut) Lisa Blunt Rochester (Delaware) Cory Booker (New Jersey) Maria Cantwell (Washington) Tammy Duckworth (Illinois) Mazie Hirono (Hawaii) Andy Kim (New Jersey) Ben Ray Luján (New Mexico) Ed Markey (Massachusetts) Jeff Merkley (Oregon) Chris Murphy (Connecticut) Patty Murray (Washington) Jon Ossoff (Georgia) Alex Padilla (California) Brian Schatz (Hawaii) Adam Schiff (California) Chuck Schumer (New York) Tina Smith (Minnesota) Chris Van Hollen (Maryland) Elizabeth Warren (Massachusetts) Ron Wyden (Oregon) Marcus Molinaro: Department of Transportation Angela Alsobrooks (Maryland) Tammy Baldwin (Wisconsin) Miriam Cantwell (Washington) Chris Coons (Delaware) Catherine Cortez Masto (Nevada) Dick Durbin (Illinois) John Fetterman (Pennsylvania) Maggie Hassan (New Hampshire) Mazie Hirono (Hawaii) Mark Kelly (Arizona) Andy Kim (New Jersey) Amy Klobuchar (Minnesota) Gary Peters (Michigan) Jack Reed (Rhode Island) Jacky Rosen (Nevada) Brian Schatz (Hawaii) Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire) Elissa Slotkin (Michigan) Mark Warner (Virginia) Raphael Warnock (Georgia) Luke Lindberg: Department of Agriculture Angela Alsobrooks (Maryland) Tammy Baldwin (Wisconsin) Chris Coons (Delaware) Catherine Cortez Masto (Nevada) Dick Durbin (Illinois) John Fetterman (Pennsylvania) Kirsten Gillibrand (New York) Maggie Hassan (New Hampshire) Martin Heinrich (New Mexico) John Hickenlooper (Colorado) Tim Kaine (Virginia) Mark Kelly (Arizona) Amy Klobuchar (Minnesota) Gary Peters (Michigan) Jack Reed (Rhode Island) Jacky Rosen (Nevada) Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire) Elissa Slotkin (Michigan) Mark Warner (Virginia) Raphael Warnock (Georgia) Sheldon Whitehouse (Rhode Island) What People Are Saying New Jersey Senator Cory Booker, in a speech on the Senate floor Tuesday regarding specific bills: "This, to me, is a problem with Democrats in America right now, is we're willing to be complicit to Donald Trump…to let this pass through when we have all the leverage right now." "We are standing at a moment where our president is eviscerating the Constitution of the United States of America, and we're willing to go along with it today. No. No. Not on my watch." What Happens Next With more key positions still awaiting confirmation, the spotlight now turns to upcoming Senate hearings, where further bipartisan cooperation—or division—could shape the direction of Trump's agenda.


Time Magazine
27 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Trump Tells Schumer to 'Go to Hell' as Talks Break Down
After hours of deliberation over President Donald Trump's stalled nominees, tensions between Senate Democrats and the White House reached a boiling point on Saturday evening. In a row that spilled over to social media, the President said that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer can 'go to hell.' In a post on Truth Social, Trump instructed Republicans not to make a deal with the Democrats, who he claimed were making 'egregious and unprecedented' demands in order to 'approve a small number of our highly qualified nominees.' 'Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the radical left lunatics, to go to hell,' Trump said. 'Do not accept the offer, go home and explain to your constituents what bad people the Democrats are, and what a great job the Republicans are doing, and have done, for our country.' The stalemate is particularly poignant as the Senate has now embarked on its monthlong August recess. Democrats have largely denied fast unanimous consent votes regarding Trump's nominees, instead opting for roll calls. Addressing the Republican Party's complaints over this, Schumer said on Saturday: 'Historically bad nominees deserve historic levels of scrutiny. We have never seen nominees as flawed, as compromised, as unqualified as Trump's.' Schumer also addressed Trump's social media commentary, during which the President instructed Republicans to 'go home' and called for Schumer to 'go to hell.' 'Donald Trump attempted to steamroll the Senate to put in place his historically unqualified nominees, but Senate Democrats wouldn't let him,' Schumer said in a filmed address. 'In a fit of rage, Trump threw in the towel, sent Republicans home, and was unable to do the basic work of negotiating. Is this the 'art of the deal?'' 'Trump tried to bully us, go around us, threaten us, call us names, but he got nothing. He walked away with his tail between his legs.' Read More: In Averting a Shutdown, Schumer Ignites a Rebellion The lack of progress ahead of the August recess comes after Senate Majority Leader John Thune on Thursday accused Democrats of deciding 'to slow-walk every single civilian nomination from the President.' Thune said that in recent history, Presidents have had the majority of their nominees approved by unanimous consent or voice vote, but that 'zero' of Trump's civilian nominees had been confirmed by those means by Democrats this Congress. Thune vowed that Republicans would 'figure out a way to change it' if there's no progress moving forward. Shortly before Trump called time on the negotiations on Saturday, some GOP Senators aired ideas for alternative ways to advance Trump's nominees. Sen. Roger Marshall of Kansas said: "The Senate should immediately adjourn and let President Trump use recess appointments to enact the agenda 77M Americans voted for.' Recess appointments refer to when a President can 'make temporary appointments when the Senate is not in session,' according to the Constitution. It enables a President to appoint their chosen nominees without Senate confirmation. Shortly after his election in November, Trump spoke out in favor of recess appointments. 'Any Republican Senator seeking the coveted leadership position in the United States Senate must agree to recess appointments (in the Senate), without which we will not be able to get people confirmed in a timely manner,' he said via a post on Truth Social. Later that same month, Thune said that 'all the options' would remain on the table to help the advancement of Trump's picks. Read More: Why Trump's Talk of Recess Appointments Is Dangerous There have also been reports that GOP Senators could, at some point, seek to change the Senate rules in order to confirm more Trump nominees. Amid discussion surrounding this earlier in the week, Sen. Alex Padilla of California, a Democrat and ranking member of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration, urged caution. 'We can and should have thoughtful, bipartisan conversations in the Rules Committee on updating the confirmation process for the future, but Republicans should keep in mind that if they choose to go nuclear—yet again—it will have consequences long beyond Donald Trump's presidency,' Padilla warned in an online statement.