Heydon: Trade agreement a 'positive' for Irish butter exports
Yesterday evening (Sunday, July 27), the EU reached a trade agreement with the US, after US President Donald Trump met with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen during Trump's visit to Scotland.
The announcement of a trade agreement comes after months of negotiations between the two sides and Trump's threat of higher tariff rates to apply to EU goods from August 1 if a deal was not struck.
Minister Heydon believes that trade is essential for Ireland's export-focused agri-food sector.
He said: "The United States is the second most important market for Irish agri-food, with exports valued at €2 billion last year.
"Ireland's strong trading relationship with the US has mutual benefits for businesses on both sides of the Atlantic," the minister added.
The agreement announced yesterday will avoid tariffs of 30% being imposed by the US on EU goods from August 1.
Instead, a baseline tariff of 15% on EU goods to the US is included in the agreement.
Minister Heydon said: "Since April, our food and drink businesses have faced major uncertainty around future US trade policy. President von der Leyen has confirmed that the 15% tariff rate agreed will be a maximum tariff rate, with no stacking.
"This is positive for Irish butter exports in particular, which since April have faced an additional tariff rate of 10% stacked on a pre-existing tariff of 16%."
"President von der Leyen also referenced certain products being included in a 'zero-for-zero' tariff rate. I look forward to seeing more detail on this in the coming days," he added.
Minister Heydon noted that he will be engaging with stakeholders on the details of the agreement.
Minister of State at the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Noel Grealish also welcomed the announcement of a trade agreement.
He said: 'I welcome this outcome which will give certainty to Irish food and drink businesses exporting to the US market.
"Together with Minister Heydon, my department and Bord Bia, I will continue to support new market development and market access efforts for our quality, sustainable food and drink products,' Minister of State Grealish added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
29 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Trading principles for predictability — what the EU gave up to avoid a tariff war
In the hours following the announcement that the US and EU had struck a deal last weekend on tariffs, European reaction was mixed. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the deal, which imposes 15% tariffs on most items going both ways, "creates certainty in uncertain times" and "delivers stability and predictability, for citizens and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic" as she tried to sell the deal to the 27 EU member states. But if Ms von der Leyen expected a lap of honour to ease her troubled start to her second term, one was not coming. "It is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, brought together to affirm their common values and to defend their common interests, resigns itself to submission," French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou wrote on X of what he called the "von der Leyen-Trump deal". German Chancellor Friedrich Merz himself initially appeared satisfied, saying that the agreement "succeeded in averting a trade conflict that would have hit the export-oriented German economy hard". But by Monday, amid cross-party criticism, Mr Merz said the deal would "substantially damage" his nation's finances, but acknowledged that the negotiating team "couldn't expect to achieve any more" as Mr Trump's willingness to enter into a 30% trade war was apparent. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, an ally of Mr Trump, said the US president "ate von der Leyen for breakfast" while Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said he would support it "without any enthusiasm". Across the bloc, there has been criticism of Europe's perceived capitulation, with many echoing Mr Bayrou's sentiments that it poses fundamental questions about the cohesiveness of the project. German Green MP Sandra Detzer told her parliament that the EU "has agreed to a deal that abandons fundamental principles of rules-based global trade, instead of long-term stability". Ms Detzer's alarm is representative of a particular sharp end of the deal. According to one think tank, the deal will cost the German economy around €6.5bn in terms of its GDP in the first year, while experts have slashed the country's growth forecasts in recent months. Fabio de Masi, a German MEP, told EuroNews this week that not only was the deal bad, it was "a betrayal" for which Ms von der Leyen should resign. The bloc is set to face 15% tariffs on most of its goods including cars, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals entering the US, and 'zero for zero' tariffs on a number of products including aircraft, some agricultural goods and certain chemicals – as well as EU purchases of US energy worth €643bn over three years. But as the tariffs were set to kick in on Friday, the two sides had not agreed on all of the details, which Ms von der Leyen's commission has stressed will be a "set of principles" and not a trade deal. On Thursday, commission spokesperson Olof Gill said that "from there will flow the additional negotiated exemptions that we're looking to bake into our agreement with the US". Drinks tariffs What shape those carveouts take is still to be decided, with a 15% tariff applying until they are. That is of particular concern to the drinks industry across the continent. From Irish whiskey to French and Spanish wines, exporters across Europe have been arguing for a carveout on their products. The US tariff on European spirits is currently 10%. Brussels is keen to reduce that to zero or, for wine at least, to the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) rates that are set on a fixed cost per litre basis, rather than in percentage terms. Until recently, spirits had benefited from zero tariffs between the US and EU following an agreement in 1997 that also included other countries such as Canada and Japan. That lasted until 2018, when the EU response to US steel and aluminium tariffs included increased duties on US bourbon and other spirits. These were suspended in 2021. From Irish whiskey to French and Spanish wines, exporters across Europe have been arguing for a carveout on their products. File photo US most-favoured-nation rates for wine are 19.8c per litre for sparkling and 6.3c per litre for most other wine, which equates to very low rates in most cases. But as Mr Trump signed an executive order overnight into Friday, there was no movement on the exemption and the drinks industry will, for now at least, pay the 15% rate. With EU officials privately briefing Reuters that negotiations could run into late autumn, that will mean financial pain for those businesses in the short-term, at least. Speaking to journalists at a press conference on Thursday, commission spokesperson Olof Gill said: 'The commission remains determined to achieve and secure the maximum number of carve-outs, including for traditional EU products such as wine and spirits. 'It is not our expectation that wine and spirits would be included as an exemption in the first group announced by the US tomorrow, and therefore that sector, as with all other economic sectors, will be captured by the 15% ceiling.' Motor tariffs In Germany, a number of car manufacturers revised down profit guidance on the back of the tariffs, which will face a 15% tariff as well, but for BMW, the impact of the agreement was "exaggerated". 'I think this tariff discussion is way exaggerated and also its effects on the industry,' chief executive Oliver Zipse told the Financial Times. 'What's more important is the question, are the products attractive?' Carveouts At Tuesday's Cabinet meeting, enterprise minister Peter Burke updated ministers on the detail of the weekend's agreement, telling journalists that there will be exemptions to the tariff regime, with aviation one for which Ireland had successfully argued alongside others. 'The key thing is that there will be a number of carveouts. Obviously, aviation has been cited as zero-for-zero, but also in relation to agri-foods and potentially spirits.' Ireland, like many other countries, is banking on the carveouts agreed protecting key sectors like agri-foods and that the rate for pharmaceuticals would not exceed 15%. Like many countries across Europe, ministers here are privately saying that the deal is far from ideal, but also query what else is to be done. By Friday, they could point to Mr Trump's executive order, which imposed tariffs on many countries with whom he had not negotiated. But there is also acceptance that the tariff regime brings with it a new reality, one with which the EU needs to grapple. If countries are arguing for exceptions, how does the European negotiating team balance those interests? And what will the reaction be when the final deal is reached?
RTÉ News
31 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
Stress test shows AIB and BOI could withstand an economic shock
An EU wide bank stress test has found that the country's two largest banks currently hold enough capital to withstand an economic shock. The European Banking Authority exercise was conducted on a sample of 64 banks from 17 EU and EEA countries, covering 75% of EU banking sector assets. The results indicate that the largest EU banks would be resilient to a severe hypothetical stress scenario over a three-year period from 2025 to 2027. It assumes a simultaneous and prolonged recession across the EU and other advanced economies, driven by severe global disruptions. Under the scenario, the disruptions are caused by escalating geopolitical tension, particularly in the Middle East, and a rise in protectionist trade policies worldwide, including tariffs. It concluded AIB's transitional Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio - an important measure of a bank's financial strength - would stand at 13.4%. While the CET1 capital ratio for Bank of Ireland would stand at 13.9% under the adverse stress test scenario. Both are above the average 12% CET1 capital ratio, which is up from the avearge 10.4% in the 2023 exercise. AIB's Chief Financial Officer, Donal Galvin, said the bank's result of 13.4% fully loaded CET1 in the EBA's hypothetical adverse scenario "demonstrates our high capital base and capital resilience in the EBA adverse scenario". "AIB continues to be very well-capitalised with a CET1 ratio of 16.4% (1) at H1 2025 which remains substantially in excess of regulatory requirements," he added. The EBA said the strong performance of the EU banks in the 2025 stress test "is reassuring, nonetheless, this should not lead to complacency among banks or supervisors". The Director of Banking & Payments Supervision at the Central Bank, Domhnall Cullinan said: "On balance, the scenario in use for the EU area is broadly aligned with the 2023 exercise but the impact of the stress test is milder than the results from that exercise. "This is mainly due to banks entering the exercise with stronger profitability, and stable asset quality," he added. Mr Cullinan said despite prevailing uncertainty, "the benefits of resilience built up in recent years are evident, with banks having sufficient capital to absorb the impact of the severe scenario." "Given the uncertainty, there remains a need to maintain and continue to build resilience, both financial and non-financial."
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Trump orders US nuclear subs repositioned over ex-Russian leader's statements
US President Donald Trump said he is ordering the repositioning of two US nuclear submarines in a warning to Russia. The move is 'based on highly provocative statements' from the country's former president Dmitry Medvedev. Mr Trump posted on his social media site that based on the 'highly provocative statements' from Mr Medvedev he had 'ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that'. Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances The president added: 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances.' It was not immediately clear what impact Mr Trump's order would have on US nuclear subs, which are routinely on patrol in the world's hotspots, but it comes at a delicate moment in the Trump administration's relations with Moscow. Mr Trump has said that special envoy Steve Witkoff is heading to Russia to push Moscow to agree to a ceasefire in its war with Ukraine and has threatened new economic sanctions if progress is not made. He cut his 50-day deadline for action to 10 days, with that window set to expire next week. The post about the sub repositioning came after Mr Trump, in the wee hours of Thursday morning, had posted that Mr Medvedev was a 'failed former president of Russia' and warned him to 'watch his words'. Mr Medvedev responded hours later by writing: 'Russia is right on everything and will continue to go its own way.' Mr Medvedev was president from 2008 to 2012 while Russian President Vladimir Putin was barred from seeking a second consecutive term but stepped aside to let him run again. Now deputy chairman of Russia's National Security Council, which Mr Putin chairs, Mr Medvedev has been known for his provocative and inflammatory statements since the start of the war in 2022, a U-turn from his presidency, when he was seen as liberal and progressive. He has frequently wielded nuclear threats and lobbed insults at Western leaders on social media. Some observers have argued that with his extravagant rhetoric, Mr Medvedev is seeking to score political points with Mr Putin and Russian military hawks. Mr Trump and Mr Medvedev have gotten into online spats before. On July 15, after Mr Trump announced plans to supply Ukraine with more weapons via its Nato allies and threatened additional tariffs against Moscow, Mr Medvedev posted, 'Trump issued a theatrical ultimatum to the Kremlin. The world shuddered, expecting the consequences. Belligerent Europe was disappointed. Russia didn't care'. Earlier this week, he wrote: 'Trump's playing the ultimatum game with Russia: 50 days or 10″ and added, 'He should remember 2 things: 1. Russia isn't Israel or even Iran. 2. Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country.'
