Trump tariffs hit India's shrimp farmers, profits slashed
On India's southern coast, V Srinivas thrived for two decades by farming shrimp, as the country became the top supplier of the delicacy to the United States. Now, Donald Trump's 50 percent tariff threat is forcing many to consider other ways of making money.
Andhra Pradesh state sends the most shrimp from India to the US and farmers there have spent millions of rupees (hundreds of thousands of US dollars) over the years to cultivate high-quality shrimp in saline ponds.
Now they are being hit hard as Indian exporters have slashed rates they offer farmers by almost 20 percent after the tariff shock, wiping out most of their profits.
'I am contemplating if I should do fish farming,' said the 46-year-old from Veeravasaram village who has already mortgaged his family property and has $45,800 in outstanding loans.
'These prices will not help me get any profits and I will not be able to pay off my loan.' The United States is the biggest market for India's shrimp farmers and exporters, with clients including US supermarket chains such as Walmart and Kroger. Last year, total seafood exports from India globally stood at $7.4 billion, with shrimp accounting for 40 percent.
But the industry is now in troubled waters with President Trump's 25 percent tariff on imports from India already in place - the highest among major economies, and another 25 percent levy to kick in from August 27 to penalize New Delhi for buying Russian oil.
By comparison, Ecuador, India's main rival for shrimp exports to the US, faces a much lower 15 percent tariff, heightening its competitive edge.
In Andhra, there are around 300,000 farmers engaged in shrimp farming, selling products to dozens of exporters who ship to America. Pawan Kumar, head of the Seafood Exporters Association of India, said orders from US clients have been paused in recent weeks as buyers aren't willing to absorb the tariff, and neither can exporters, forcing the latter to cut prices they pay to farmers.
Although India also sells shrimp to other countries such as China, Japan and the UK, and likely will look to expand sales there and diversify into new markets, 'that's not going to happen overnight,' Kumar said.
The impact is yet another example of how Trump's tariff threats are causing business disruptions across the world, especially in India, given it faces one of the steepest levies that have soured its relations with Washington.
In Andhra, six of 12 farmers Reuters interviewed said they were considering putting shrimp farming on hold and looking at fish farming, vegetable retailing or other local businesses to tide over the crisis. The other six are choosing to wait it out a bit. Each round of shrimp cultivation takes about 2 months or more.
While prices being offered for their shrimp are being slashed, the farmers said they still face loan payments and high operating costs for electricity, raw material and feed, as well as high land rentals.
'There's hardly a 20-25 percent profit for us on good days, and if that's getting eaten up, what else is left?,' said Gopinath Duggineni, the chief of a local union in Ongole city, adding the farmers plan to seek financial support from the state government.
Ecuador, meanwhile, is closely tracking tariffs on India to seize on business opportunities, but producers there will go slow on new investments amid uncertainty over whether India and the Trump administration could strike a tariff deal, said Jose Antonio Camposano, president of National Chamber of Aquaculture of Ecuador.
'India's exports are highly concentrated in the United States ... just as China is for us. So that is where we could gain ground if India withdraws,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
Is European lobbying of Trump a sign of strength – or weakness?
European leaders in intense efforts to influence Trump on Ukraine. European leaders are engaging in an unprecedented effort to sway United States President Donald Trump on Ukraine. They are hoping to influence any deal with Russian President Vladimir Putin. list of 3 items list 1 of 3 list 2 of 3 list 3 of 3 end of list But what's the status of the transatlantic alliance now? Is it a relationship of equals, or is Trump fully in charge? Presenter: James Bays Guests: Mark Storella – Professor of the practice of diplomacy at Boston University, former US ambassador and served as deputy chief of mission at the US Embassy in Brussels. Jessica Berlin – Non-resident senior fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis and founder of strategy consultancy CoStruct in Berlin. Eldar Mamedov – Non-resident fellow at the Quincy Institute and a former Latvian diplomat who served in embassies in Washington, DC and Madrid.
Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Russia says talks on Ukraine security guarantees must include Moscow
Russia has warned that attempting to resolve security issues relating to Ukraine without the participation of Moscow is a 'road to nowhere', days after European leaders met US President Donald Trump to discuss security guarantees for Kyiv. 'We cannot agree with the fact that now it is proposed to resolve questions of security, collective security, without the Russian Federation. This will not work,' Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said on Wednesday. 'I am sure that in the West and above all in the United States they understand perfectly well that seriously discussing security issues without the Russian Federation is a utopia; it's a road to nowhere.' The minister's comments come two days after US President Donald Trump hosted Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy alongside prominent European leaders at the White House, and days after Trump met with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump is trying to steer Putin and Zelenskyy towards a settlement more than three years after Russia invaded its neighbour, but major obstacles remain. The Russian official said any summit between Putin and Zelenskyy 'must be prepared in the most meticulous way' so the meeting does not lead to a 'deterioration' of the situation around the conflict. Lavrov also accused European leaders of making 'clumsy attempts' to change the US president's position on Ukraine. 'We have only seen aggressive escalation of the situation and rather clumsy attempts to change the position of the US president,' he said, referring to Monday's meeting. 'We did not hear any constructive ideas from the Europeans there,' Lavrov added. NATO talks NATO military chiefs are due to meet on Wednesday to discuss the details of potential security guarantees for Ukraine amid efforts to broker a ceasefire to Russia's offensive. NATO's Military Committee said that 32 defence chiefs from across the alliance would hold a video conference. US General Alexus Grynkewich, who oversees NATO's operations in Europe, will also take part in the talks. Kyiv's European allies are looking to set up a force that could backstop any peace agreement, and a coalition of 30 countries, including European nations, Japan and Australia, have signed up to support the initiative. Military chiefs are considering how that security force might work. The role that the US might play is unclear. Trump on Tuesday ruled out sending US troops to help defend Ukraine against Russia. Russia has repeatedly said that it would not accept NATO troops in Ukraine.
Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Did Trump's tariff war force India and China to mend ties?
India and China have agreed to step up trade flows and resume direct flights in a major diplomatic breakthrough, as the two most populous nations try to rebuild ties damaged by a 2020 deadly border clash and amid US President Donald Trump's unpredictable foreign policy. The two rivals also agreed to advance talks on their disputed border during Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi's two-day visit to India. The rebuilding of India-China ties coincides with friction between New Delhi and Washington, following the recent imposition of steep tariffs on India by the Trump administration. So why did India and China decide to mend their ties, and what steps were taken to address their border dispute? What specific points were agreed? Discussions covered a range of issues related to withdrawing tens of thousands of troops that both countries have amassed along their Himalayan border, boosting investment and trade flows, hosting more bilateral events, and enhancing travel access. The Asian neighbours agreed to reopen several trading routes – namely the Lipulekh Pass, Shipki La Pass and Nathu La Pass. An expert group will also be established to explore 'early harvest' steps (i.e. mini-agreements that can be implemented quickly before the conclusion of a more complex deal) to improve border management, a move India had previously opposed. In the past, India was keen to avoid a situation where China secured partial gains up front, but where its territorial integrity concerns remained unresolved. India's opposition has accused the government of ceding territory to China. Elsewhere, China has reportedly agreed to address India's concerns over its export curbs on fertilisers, rare earth minerals and tunnel-boring machines, according to Indian media reports. But Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mao Ning, when asked about Indian media reports on the lifting of export controls, said she was not familiar with the media reports. 'As a matter of principle, China is willing to strengthen dialogue and cooperation with relevant countries and regions to jointly maintain the stability of the global production and supply chain,' she said in a media briefing on Wednesday. New Delhi and Beijing also agreed to resume direct flights between the two countries, enhance river-sharing data and drop certain visa restrictions for tourists, businesses and journalists. Who said what? During his two-day trip, Wang Yi held meetings with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and India's National Security Adviser Ajit Doval, encounters that will pave the way for Modi's first visit to China in seven years at the end of August. 'Stable, predictable, constructive ties between India and China will contribute significantly to regional as well as global peace and prosperity,' Modi posted on X after his meeting with Wang. Meanwhile, Doval said that China and India had achieved a 'new environment' of 'peace and tranquillity'. He added that 'the setbacks that we faced in the last few years were not in our interest', and 'delimitation and boundary affairs' had been discussed. A readout from China's Foreign Ministry said Wang told Doval that 'the stable and healthy development of China-India relations is in the fundamental interests of the two countries' people'. The two sides 'should enhance mutual trust through dialogues and expand cooperation', Wang said, and should aim for consensus in areas such as border control and demarcation negotiations. Looking ahead, Modi is scheduled to travel to China at the end of this month to take part in the summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation – his first visit to the country since June 2018. Why did relations sour in the first place? Relations between the two countries plummeted in 2020 after security forces clashed along their Himalayan border. Four Chinese soldiers and 20 Indian soldiers were killed in the worst violence in decades, freezing high-level diplomatic relations. The chill in relations after the deadly Ladakh clash – the first fatal confrontation between India and China since 1975 – also affected trade and air travel, as both sides deployed tens of thousands of security forces in border areas. Following the border tensions, India imposed curbs on Chinese investments in the country. Months later, New Delhi banned dozens of Chinese apps, including TikTok, owned by China's ByteDance, citing security concerns. But despite the soaring tensions, the bilateral trade between the two countries did not see a drastic drop, and in fact, New Delhi's imports from Beijing have grown to more than $100bn from $65nb in the financial year 2020-2021 as the country's electronics and pharma industries heavily rely on raw materials from China. On Monday, Wang said, 'The setbacks we experienced in the past few years were not in the interest of the people of our two countries. We are heartened to see the stability that is now restored on the borders.' For his part, Modi emphasised the importance of maintaining peace and tranquillity on the border and reiterated India's commitment to a 'fair, reasonable and mutually acceptable resolution of the boundary question', his office said in a statement on Tuesday. Why did the two sides decide to mend ties? The geopolitical disruption caused by Donald Trump's trade wars has helped create an opening for Asia's leading and third-largest economies to try to mend their diplomatic and economic relations. Indeed, the improvement in ties has accelerated since Trump increased tariffs on both countries earlier this year – particularly India, which had been pursuing a closer relationship with the United States in a joint front against China. Moreover, India and the US have been haggling over free trade agreements for months, with Trump accusing India of denying access to American goods due to higher tariffs. China has also been locked in months-long trade negotiations with the US. China and India increased official visits and discussed relaxing some trade restrictions and easing the movement of citizens since Modi met Chinese President Xi Jinping in Kazan, Russia last October. In June, Beijing even allowed pilgrims from India to visit holy sites in Tibet while India issued tourist visas to Chinese nationals in a sign of improving ties. But Trump's decision to declare a 25 percent 'reciprocal' tariff on India in June over the country's imports of Russian oil – and his move a week later to raise it again to 50 percent – have hastened dramatic diplomatic realignment. Even the US's close allies – South Korea and Japan – have not been spared by Trump's tariffs. Top Trump officials have accused India of funding Russia's war in Ukraine, with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Tuesday accusing India of 'profiteering'. But China's imports of Russian oil are even larger than India's. And on August 12, the US extended a tariff truce on Beijing for another 90 days – staving off triple-digit tariffs. In turn, New Delhi has accused Washington of double standards over its tariff policy. Suhasini Haidar, an Indian journalist writing in the newspaper The Hindu, said that the rationale behind the US sanctions on India is 'dubious'. 'The US has itself increased its trade with Russia since Trump came to power,' she wrote. US Treasury Secretary Bessent, however, has defended Washington's decision not to impose secondary sanctions against China, saying Beijing 'has a diversified input of their oil'. Beijing's import of Russian oil, he said, went from 13 percent to 16 percent while India's went from less than one percent to over 40 percent. Trump's claim that he secured a ceasefire between India and Pakistan has further caused anger in India, which has refused to give credit to the US president for the May 10 ceasefire that stopped the five-day war between the nuclear-armed neighbours. Trump's hosting of the Pakistan Army's General Asim Munir has not helped the cause, either. US-India relations have frayed despite Modi cultivating personal ties with Trump, particularly during his first term. The Indian prime minister was Trump's first guest in his second term in February, when he coined the slogan 'Make India Great Again' (MIGA), borrowing from Trump's 'Make America Great Again' (MAGA) base. 'MAGA plus MIGA becomes a mega partnership for prosperity,' Modi said. But Trump's repeated attacks on India have poured cold water on 'the partnership', with Indian foreign policy experts fearing the ties are headed towards uncharted territory. 'At risk is three decades of India's economic ascent, and its careful positioning as an emerging power, shaped in the shadow of US strategic backing,' wrote Sushant Singh, a lecturer in South Asian studies at Yale University, in the Financial Times. 'Trump has shredded India's road map; it could be replaced by strategic drift, realignment or eventual rapprochement.' The turbulence in India-US ties has forced New Delhi to repair ties with its adversary China, which supplies military equipment to Pakistan and took the side of Islamabad during the recent war. Amid Trump's trade war, New Delhi and Beijing have joined forces to improve trade and people-to-people contact. The new developments may also boost relations between members of the BRICS bloc – with India and China being the group's founding members, along with Brazil, Russia and South Africa. India and China will host the 2026 and 2027 BRICS summits, respectively. Trump has also railed against BRICS nations, warning the member nations against challenging the US dollar.
