Ex-British Army chief says conflict with Russia a ‘realistic possibility'
Sir Patrick stated that a conflict with Russia by 2030 is a "realistic possibility" and urged the government to swiftly improve national resilience.
He criticised the UK 's lack of preparedness, citing stalled conversations about underground bunkers and insufficient funding for air defences, contrasting it with countries like Finland.
Sir Patrick also highlighted that troop cuts have left the British Army"too small" for sustained engagement, with personnel numbers at their lowest since the Napoleonic wars.
He concluded that recent defence budget increases are "pretty marginal" and that the UK needs to recognise the world is as dangerous as, if not more dangerous than, during the Cold War.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
32 minutes ago
- BBC News
Gisele Pelicot awarded France's Legion of Honour
Gisèle Pelicot, the French woman who earned international recognition after publicly testifying at her mass-rape trial last year, has been given France's top 72-year-old was named knight of the Legion of Honour on a list announced ahead of France's Bastille waived her right to anonymity during the high-profile trial against her husband who had drugged and raped her, in addition to inviting dozens of strangers to also abuse her over nearly a was among 589 other people given France's highest award on Sunday. She attended almost every day of the trial, which ended last December with Dominique Pelicot, 72, being given a maximum 20 years in jail for aggravated rape, after confessing to drugging her and recruiting around 50 men to rape her while she lay comatose in bed."I want all women who have been raped to say: Madame Pelicot did it, I can too," Pelicot previously told reporters, adding that she wanted to make "shame swap sides" from the victim to the President Emmanuel Macron has publicly paid tribute to Pelicot as a trailblazer, adding that her "dignity and courage moved and inspired France and the world".According to her lawyer, a memoir detailing Gisèle Pelicot's story in her own words will be published early next year.
The Sun
43 minutes ago
- The Sun
Transport Secretary admits she doesn't have ‘expensive' EV – despite trying to convince drivers to make switch
TRANSPORT Secretary Heidi Alexander admits she doesn't have an "expensive" electric car - despite trying to convince drivers to make the switch. The Cabinet Minister highlighted the difficulties of living in a terraced home and not having a driveway to plug in the motor for charging. 1 Her comments come as £700 million could be on the table offering subsidies to lower the upfront costs of purchasing electric vehicles. She told the BBC "I don't have an electric car. But I'm like millions of people in this country, I bought a new car about six years ago. "I'm thinking about the next car I will purchase, and it will definitely be an electric vehicle. I'm not in the habit of changing my car on a yearly basis, expensive as it is." Electric car sales amounted to 47,000 in June but this is still below the mandated level which states 28 per cent of new car sales and 16 per cent of van sales should be zero emission. She also committed to giving £25 million to councils so they could adapt paths between a house and the road for cables to be laid. Ms Alexander said: "We do need to make it easier and cheaper for people to buy an electric vehicle. "So today we're announcing a really big investment, £63 million in charging infrastructure across the country, £25 million for councils so that people like me, who don't have a driveway. "I live in a terrace house, if I had an EV, I'd be asking myself questions about how I would get the electric cable across to the car." Electric car sales amounted to 47,000 in June but this is still below the mandated level which states 28 per cent of new car sales and 16 per cent of van sales should be zero emission. The transition to electric vehicles comes as new petrol or diesel motors should come to an end by 2030. Just five years later, all new motors will have to be electric as part of the drive to meet Net Zero targets by 2050.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
All the times Labour has changed the definition of ‘working people'
Ever since the Labour general election manifesto promised there would be no tax rises for 'working people', party figures have struggled to define what that means. The manifesto claimed 'Labour will not increase taxes on working people, which is why we will not increase National Insurance, the basic, higher, or additional rates of Income Tax, or VAT'. Sir Keir Starmer said on Wednesday that the Government would keep this promise, but a growing hole in the public finances has raised questions over whether this will remain the case, and how the party will define a 'working person'. Heidi Alexander, the Transport Secretary, on Sunday appeared to suggest that only those on 'modest incomes' would be classed as working people. It was not clear how she defined a 'modest' income. This is not the first time that the language surrounding 'working people' and how the Labour Party defines them has come under scrutiny. The Telegraph breaks down how the term 'working people' has changed since Sir Keir first made that promise last year. Working people do not have savings Before voters went to the polls, the Labour leader suggested that he did not believe that 'working people' had savings. Asked what he meant by a working person, Sir Keir told LBC in June: 'People who earn their living, rely on our [public] services and don't really have the ability to write a cheque when they get into trouble.' The following day, Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, appeared to contradict him by saying that some working people did have savings. She claimed on Sky News that her definition was: 'Working people are people who go out to work and work for their incomes. 'Sort of by definition, really, working people are those people who go out and work and earn their money through hard work.' Ms Reeves added: 'Many other people who go out to work have had to run down their savings. 'But there are people who do have savings, who have been able to save up and those are working people as well.' People on six figures can be working people The new Government came under intense scrutiny over its definition of 'working people' ahead of the Chancellor's first Budget in October last year. Lisa Nandy first suggested that someone on a six-figure salary who goes to work counts as a 'working person'. In an interview with Sky News, the Culture Secretary said: 'When I think about working people, particularly the challenges they face, I think about the factory workers, I think about people driving the buses in my constituency, working in the public services, working in the private sector, delivery drivers, call centres.' When asked whether someone on a six-figure salary counted, the minister replied: 'I mean, if they go to work obviously they will be working.' Landlords and shareholders aren't working people The following day, the Prime Minister said that he did not believe that landlords or shareholders fell under his definition of a working person. Asked by Sky News if those who earn income from assets such as shares or property would count as working people in the Budget, Sir Keir said that they 'wouldn't come within my definition'. The Chancellor went on to announce an increase in capital gains tax at the Budget, but kept property rates the same. Small business owners might not be working people Bridget Phillipson, just days before the Government's first fiscal event, refused to say whether a small business owner who earned £13,000 a year was a 'working person' or not. The Education Secretary told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg that Labour's definition of a working person was someone 'whose main income arises from the fact that they go out to work every day'. Those paying employers' NI contributions are not working people When Ms Reeves's first Budget was unveiled on October 30, she announced an increase to employer's NI contributions. Standing at the despatch box, the Chancellor said that 'people will not see higher taxes in their playslips as a result of the choices that I am making today. That is a promise made and a promise fulfilled'. Ministers insisted that this did not breach the manifesto promises not to raise taxes on 'working people' because it was employers, rather than employees, paying the increased levy. But critics, including the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), disagreed. Paul Johnson, the then director of the IFS, said ahead of the Budget that the manifesto did not 'specify employee National Insurance' and therefore raising employers' NI would be a breach. He also warned that the levy ultimately came from employee pay, and therefore an increase could result in 'less pay rises' and 'possibly fewer jobs'. Working people earn 'modest incomes' On Sunday, Ms Alexander said that the Government had promised not to put up taxes for 'people on modest incomes'. She told Sky News: 'We made a commitment in our manifesto not to be putting up taxes on people on modest incomes, working people. We have stuck to that.'
