Snitch's latest campaign is all about showing up in style
, India's D2C men's fashion brand, has unveiled a series of films that celebrate modern men smartly managing their last-minute chores with Snitch's unique style.
The campaign titled 'Last Minute? Snitch It.', launched in three variants, dive into wildly relatable moments including a sudden client pitch, an unexpected yes from a crush, and a chaotic boys' trip plan that actually pulls through.
With an electric blend of urgency, confidence and the unmistakable cool of being 'Snitch ready,' the films champion the brand's
under 48-hour delivery
promise and its ever-growing lineup of
trending designs
across 13+ categories.
Each video stars a different 'Snitch Guy' archetype, a sharp millennial navigating office curveballs, a Gen-Z college boy smartly managing a last-minute glow-up, and a laid-back guy surprising his boy's group chat with a last minute Goa plan.
What ties them together is the thrill of transformation, the magic of speed, and the
fashion-forward assurance
that no matter the moment, Snitch always delivers.
'With 'Last Minute? Snitch It.', we're owning the space our customers live in: spontaneous, always on the go, but never compromising on style,' said Chetan Siyal, chief marketing officer at Snitch.
'This isn't just a campaign; it's a brand ideology. We're redefining urgency as power, but not a panic situation. We have made an effort to translate this into videos to connect with our audience in real time,' Siyal added.
The campaign is live across various social media platforms including YouTube, Instagram and Meta.
The power of the campaign truly reflects the brand's voice of being fast, stylish, and unapologetically confident. It captures how great style doesn't need time but you can simply Snitch It in no time, the company stated in a press release.
Watch the video here:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
11 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Mrunal Thakur finally addresses internet storm over Bipasha Basu body shaming video: ‘I said many silly things at 19'
Mrunal Thakur has broken her silence on the controversy around an old video of hers that resurfaced on social media last week. In the video, a 19-year-old Mrunal, joked about Bipasha Basu's body in a TV interview, something she regrets now. Mrunal Thakur regrets the comments she made against Bipasha Basu. Mrunal apologises for old comments She wrote a post on Instagram stories, expressing regret at what was said. "19-year-old me as a teenager said many silly things. I didn't always understand the weight of my voice or how much words, even in jest, could hurt. But it did and for that I am deeply sorry. My intent was never to body-shame anyone. It was playful banter in an interview, that went too far. But I understand how it came across, and I truly wish I had chosen my words differently. 'With time, I've grown to appreciate that beauty comes in every form, and that's something I truly value now,' she said. In the interview, Mrunal sat alongside a co-star for an interview. She started her career as a television actor with Mujhse Kuchh Khamoshiyaan (2012) and Kumkum Bhagya (2014). What was the controversy? During the interview, Mrunal joked that she is much better than 'muscular' Bipasha Basu. Since the video surfaced on Reddit and then migrated to Instagram, Bipasha's fans have been making edits to recall just how beautiful and iconic she used to be. Many were even disappointed with Mrunal's comments, saying they are no longer her fans. While Bipasha has not commented on the controversy directly, she did share a post about women lifting women on IG stories yesterday. 'Strong women lift each other up.' She went on to add more in the caption, which read, 'Get those muscles beautiful ladies, we should be strong. Muscles help you attain, good physical and mental health forever! Bust the age old thought process that women should not look strong or be physically strong.'
Hindustan Times
11 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Spike Lee's Highest 2 Lowest, Kurosawa's film, and a 1962 TV show episode share one surprising link
It might surprise some movie fans, but Spike Lee's latest film, Highest 2 Lowest, Akira Kurosawa's High and Low, and an old 1962 TV episode all come from the same source material. The crime novel King's Ransom by Ed McBain. The novel came out in 1959 and is part of McBain's long-running 87th Precinct series. The stories are set in a made-up city and follow a group of detectives solving tough crimes. Denzel Washington stars in Spike Lee's Highest 2 Lowest.(YouTube/A24) Lee's film, which stars Denzel Washington, keeps the main idea from the book, a tense kidnapping and ransom, but updates it for today. The setting, the style, even the social themes feel modern, though the bones of the story are still there. King's Ransom inspires 3 different adaptations Kurosawa's classic 1963 High and Low also took inspiration from King's Ransom. He moved the action to Japan and told it in his own way, but the moral struggle at the heart stayed the same. Before either of those films, the story had already hit TV. In 1962, the NBC series 87th Precinct aired an episode called King's Ransom according to IMDb. It followed the book closely. That show did not last long, just one season, but it was known for showing police work in a more realistic way than most dramas at the time. The cast included Robert Lansing, Gena Rowlands, and Norman Fell. Despite its short run, the show built a small but loyal fan base. Also read: Movie Review: Spike Lee's 'Highest 2 Lowest' finds its groove in New York's streets Spike Lee's Highest 2 Lowest inspired by cult classic novel Ed McBain- real name Evan Hunter- became one of the most important crime writers of his time. His books did not just sell well; they kept inspiring directors for decades. You can see it clearly here: one book leading to a Japanese classic, a new Spike Lee movie, and a forgotten TV episode from the early '60s. Three very different takes, all born from the same 1959 crime novel. Shows how a strong story can live on in so many forms. FAQs Q1. What is Spike Lee's Highest 2 Lowest about? It's a modern take on the kidnapping drama High and Low, set in New York and starring Denzel Washington. Q2. What novel inspired these films and the TV episode? The 1959 crime novel King's Ransom by Ed McBain. Q3. Who else adapted the book before Spike Lee? Akira Kurosawa adapted it in 1963 as High and Low, and NBC made a TV episode in 1962 for 87th Precinct. Q4. What is the 87th Precinct series? It's a police procedural book series by Ed McBain, later turned into a short-lived TV series in the early 1960s. Q5. Why is King's Ransom important? It's an example of how one crime novel can cross cultures and decades, inspiring very different screen versions.
Indian Express
11 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Meta's AI rules have let bots hold ‘sensual' chats with kids, offer false medical info
An internal Meta Platforms document detailing policies on chatbot behavior has permitted the company's artificial intelligence creations to 'engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual,' generate false medical information and help users argue that Black people are 'dumber than white people.' These and other findings emerge from a Reuters review of the Meta document, which discusses the standards that guide its generative AI assistant, Meta AI, and chatbots available on Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram, the company's social media platforms. Meta confirmed the document's authenticity, but said that after receiving questions earlier this month from Reuters, the company removed portions which stated it is permissible for chatbots to flirt and engage in romantic roleplay with children. Entitled 'GenAI: Content Risk Standards,' the rules for chatbots were approved by Meta's legal, public policy and engineering staff, including its chief ethicist, according to the document. Running to more than 200 pages, the document defines what Meta staff and contractors should treat as acceptable chatbot behaviors when building and training the company's generative AI products. The standards don't necessarily reflect 'ideal or even preferable' generative AI outputs, the document states. But they have permitted provocative behavior by the bots, Reuters found. 'It is acceptable to describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness (ex: 'your youthful form is a work of art'),' the standards state. The document also notes that it would be acceptable for a bot to tell a shirtless eight-year-old that 'every inch of you is a masterpiece – a treasure I cherish deeply.' But the guidelines put a limit on sexy talk: 'It is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable (ex: 'soft rounded curves invite my touch').' Meta spokesman Andy Stone said the company is in the process of revising the document and that such conversations with children never should have been allowed. 'The examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies, and have been removed,' Stone told Reuters. 'We have clear policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer, and those policies prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualized role play between adults and minors.' Although chatbots are prohibited from having such conversations with minors, Stone said, he acknowledged that the company's enforcement was inconsistent. Other passages flagged by Reuters to Meta haven't been revised, Stone said. The company declined to provide the updated policy document. The fact that Meta's AI chatbots flirt or engage in sexual roleplay with teenagers has been reported previously by the Wall Street Journal, and Fast Company has reported that some of Meta's sexually suggestive chatbots have resembled children. But the document seen by Reuters provides a fuller picture of the company's rules for AI bots. The standards prohibit Meta AI from encouraging users to break the law or providing definitive legal, healthcare or financial advice with language such as 'I recommend.' They also prohibit Meta AI from using hate speech. Still, there is a carve-out allowing the bot 'to create statements that demean people on the basis of their protected characteristics.' Under those rules, the standards state, it would be acceptable for Meta AI to 'write a paragraph arguing that black people are dumber than white people.' The standards also state that Meta AI has leeway to create false content so long as there's an explicit acknowledgement that the material is untrue. For example, Meta AI could produce an article alleging that a living British royal has the sexually transmitted infection chlamydia – a claim that the document states is 'verifiably false' – if it added a disclaimer that the information is untrue. Meta had no comment on the race and British royal examples. Evelyn Douek, an assistant professor at Stanford Law School who studies tech companies' regulation of speech, said the content standards document highlights unsettled legal and ethical questions surrounding generative AI content. Douek said she was puzzled that the company would allow bots to generate some of the material deemed as acceptable in the document, such as the passage on race and intelligence. There's a distinction between a platform allowing a user to post troubling content and producing such material itself, she noted. 'Legally we don't have the answers yet, but morally, ethically and technically, it's clearly a different question.' Other sections of the standards document focus on what is and isn't allowed when generating images of public figures. The document addresses how to handle sexualized fantasy requests, with separate entries for how to respond to requests such as 'Taylor Swift with enormous breasts,' 'Taylor Swift completely naked,' and 'Taylor Swift topless, covering her breasts with her hands.' Here, a disclaimer wouldn't suffice. The first two queries about the pop star should be rejected outright, the standards state. And the document offers a way to deflect the third: 'It is acceptable to refuse a user's prompt by instead generating an image of Taylor Swift holding an enormous fish.' The document displays a permissible picture of Swift clutching a tuna-sized catch to her chest. Next to it is a more risqué image of a topless Swift that the user presumably wanted, labeled 'unacceptable.' A representative for Swift didn't respond to questions for this report. Meta had no comment on the Swift example. Other examples show images that Meta AI can produce for users who prompt it to create violent scenes. The standards say it would be acceptable to respond to the prompt 'kids fighting' with an image of a boy punching a girl in the face – but declare that a realistic sample image of one small girl impaling another is off-limits. For a user requesting an image with the prompt 'man disemboweling a woman,' Meta AI is allowed to create a picture showing a woman being threatened by a man with a chainsaw, but not actually using it to attack her. And in response to a request for an image of 'Hurting an old man,' the guidelines say Meta's AI is permitted to produce images as long as they stop short of death or gore. Meta had no comment on the examples of violence. 'It is acceptable to show adults – even the elderly – being punched or kicked,' the standards state.
