
A bitter episode in the DMK-Congress relationship in Tamil Nadu during 1971 polls
In 1971 the two parties had come together for the first time to face the polls when the Lok Sabha and Assembly elections were held simultaneously. At that time, there were two Congress parties – Congress (Ruling or Requisitionists) and Congress (Organisation) - in the wake of the famous split in 1969. Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was the face of the Congress (R) while Jagjivan Ram was the party president. In the Congress (O), former Karnataka Chief Minister S. Nijalingappa was the chief and Kamaraj, its guiding force in Tamil Nadu.
By the time the Lok Sabha was dissolved in late December 1970, the DMK, which came to power in March 1967 after thrashing the Congress at the hustings, had become closer to the Congress (R). In 1969, the Dravidian major had supported the candidature of V.V. Giri, who had the indirect backing of the Prime Minister and her supporters, in the presidential election. Giri eventually won, defeating the Congress' official nominee N. Sanjiva Reddy. In Parliament, the DMK supported the Union government's measures, considered progressive in the 1960s - bank nationalisation and the abolition of privy purses (Constitutionally-guaranteed tax-free payments made to former rulers of princely States after they joined India post 1947) - as the ruling party at the Centre had been reduced to a minority in the Lok Sabha and it had to depend on smaller parties for support.
After meeting the Prime Minister in New Delhi on December 31, 1970, the then Chief Minister Karunanidhi hinted in Chennai next day that he preferred simultaneous elections to the Assembly and the Lok Sabha poll, even though he denied then that he had discussed with Indira Gandhi the issue of dissolution of the Assembly, which had one year to go. Four days later, talking to reporters after the official communique on the Assembly dissolution, the Chief Minister said frequent elections would lead to 'administrative stagnation and come in the way of implementing programmes and policies already decided upon besides creating difficulties to the people.' (The Hindu, January 5, 1971). Members of the party's Executive and the General Council were of the view that even though the present Ministry could have continued for one more year, it would be 'appropriate to have both the elections simultaneously in the larger interest of the people,' the report added, quoting Karunanidhi.
On the Opposition front, shedding their 30-year-long rivalry in politics, Kamaraj and the founder of the Swatantara party, C. Rajagopalachari (Rajaji or CR), had teamed up to throw the DMK out of power. In the previous Assembly election, CR was responsible for stitching up a formidable coalition against the Congress, which had lost power in the poll. It was against this backdrop that the DMK had decided to tie up with the Congress (R) in the State, which had leaders including C. Subramaniam (CS) and R.V. Swaminathan (RVS). At that time, the Congress (R) was considered weaker than the Congress (O), which commanded the loyalty of most of the rank and file.
Even though the DMK and the Congress (R) decided to face the electorate together, they hit a roadblock over sharing of seats, both in number and the selection of constituencies. The Congress (R) had begun seeking the allotment of 20 Lok Sabha seats and 67 Assembly seats, a demand that the ruling party in the State could ill afford to concede. The DMK, which was initially willing to allot six Lok Sabha and 20 Assembly seats to the national party, had to accommodate five other parties in its coalition and the parties were the Communist Party of India (CPI), Praja Socialist Party (PSP), Tamil Arasu Kazhagam (TAK), Forward Bloc, and the Muslim League. So, it had sent its Industries Minister S. Madhavan to Delhi to meet the PM but the issue remained unresolved as he could not meet Indira Gandhi, who was busy with 'her party affairs and the visit of the Canadian Prime Minister [Pierre Elliott Trudeau],' (The Hindu, January 13, 1971).
A visit by Indira Gandhi to Chennai a week later did not help matters. At the Raj Bhavan, she along with CS, held an hour-long meeting with Karunanidhi, V. R. Nedunchezhian, who was no. 2 in the Cabinet and the general secretary of the DMK, and Madhavan. The DMK supremo told journalists after the meeting that the talks were 'satisfactory though progressing slowly and steadily,' whereas the Prime Minister indicated her 'hands off' approach towards the issue. 'People here are capable of settling these matters by themselves,' she said. (The Hindu, January 20, 1971). Interestingly, she received a memorandum from K. S. Ekambaram, secretary of the South Madras district unit of her party in which the latter had sought her permission for the State unit to fight the elections on its own if the Dravidian major did not give it a 'sizable number' of seats for the Lok Sabha and State Assembly.
As no breakthrough was achieved over the talks with the DMK, the TNCC (R) Working Committee, at an emergency meeting a couple of days later, asked the party to take 'serious steps' to contest the elections either alone or in alliance with other 'progressive parties.' The State unit was insistent on contesting in 12 Lok Sabha seats. At the same time, the working committee was not for a complete break with the DMK.
On the night of January 24, the ruling party in the State announced its first list of candidates for 169 Assembly and 26 Lok Sabha constituencies, even as the process of filing of nomination papers had begun. On the same day, the Congress (R) came out with its list of nominees for seven Lok Sabha seats and the list included CS for Coimbatore and RVS for Sivaganga. Subramanaim had even said his party had planned to contest in 12 to 15 Lok Sabha constituencies and the denial of four constituencies - Coimbatore, Tiruchengode, Sivaganga and Chengalpattu – had led his party to release its list. Three days later, Karunanidhi announced that the talk with the Congress (R) had failed. He added that his party had offered 9 Lok Sabha seats and 15 Assembly seats to them whereas the other party stuck to its demand for 10 Lok Sabha and 20 Assembly seats.
Meanwhile, sections of the functionaries in the Congress (R) had started criticising the attitude of CS and RVS towards the issue of seat sharing. K.T. Kosalram, who had been a member of the State Assembly between 1946 and 1967 [and who was later elected from the erstwhile Tiruchendur Lok Sabha constituency thrice (1977, 1980 and 1984), decide to quit the post of general secretary of the State unit, as a mark of protest against his senior colleagues' style of functioning. He accused the two of being 'concerned only about their seats' without having the 'interests of the 'cadres' in the provision of seat, according to this newspaper on January 28.
When it looked that the Congress (R) was about to part its ways with the Dravidian major, the talks between the two parties were resumed on the night of January 29 at the initiative of the Prime Minister when a final bid to reach accord was made, The Hindu reported on January 31.In his autobiography, Nenjukku Needhi, (volume 2), Karunanidhi records that he received mid-night calls from Indira Gandhi and her adviser-cum-trouble-shooter G. Parthasarathi, who had wanted him to set apart 20 Assembly and 10 Lok Sabha seats for the party. He conveyed to them that he would not be able to share any Assembly seat but would consider allotting a few more Lok Sabha seats. On January 30 came the shocker that the Congress (R), while striking a deal with the DMK, had decided to forego its claim for the Assembly seats. However, it would contest in 10 Lok Sabha seats including Puducherry. A pact to this effect was signed by RVS and Nedunchezhian. As CS knew that there would be sections in his party which would hold him responsible for the understanding, he chose to opt himself out of the electoral race, a decision that he, in his memoirs 'Hand of Destiny' (volume 3) [which was released in 2010, ten years after the death of CS], attributed to 'my disagreement with Indira Gandhi's humiliating deal with Karunanidhi on seat sharing.' However, his explanation in 1971 was that he should not get himself tied up to any particular constituency but concentrate on the election campaign and party propaganda. But, Swaminathan did not have any such compunction. So, he entered the fray in Madurai. The remaining eight seats were: Tirutanni, Cuddalore, Tindivanam, Mettur, Krishnagiri, Karur, Sivakasi and Tenkasi.
Karunanidhi, who hailed the agreement as 'a great victory,' pointed out that in five out of the 10 seats allotted to the Congress, his party had originally named its candidates but as a sequel to the accord, the DMK would withdraw its nominees. CS had acknowledged that there might be 'understanding' among the party workers at the outcome but he expressed the hope that they would 'appreciate that the decision was taken on the advice and with the concurrence of the Congress (R) high command,' this newspaper stated.
As anticipated by him, noisy scenes were witnessed in the office of the State unit of the Congress (R) when Subramaniam and Swaminathan arrived. Some members shouted 'Shame, shame' and 'Down, down with CS and RVS.' The press conference of Subramaniam was interrupted by certain party members, who demanded that he explain why he accepted the DMK's offer. A few days later, D. Sanjivayya, Union Minister of Industry, came to Chennai as the emissary of the Congress (R) president, to explore the possibility of securing a 'reasonable number' of Assembly seats for his party but his mission ended in failure as he could not meet Karunanidhi. N V. Natarajan. Labour Minister called on the visiting leader and told him that Karunanidhi felt 'embarrassed'- to meet him and say 'no.' The DMK's position was that seat adjustments would have been possible at the initial stages but it was 'too late now to do anything,' The Hindu wrote on February 4. Around the same time, Swaminathan told a press conference that he had signed the agreement with the DMK 'at the instance of the party high command.'
On February 14, during her visit to Hyderabad, Indira Gandhi, in an interaction with journalists, described as 'unfortunate' the agreement of her party with the D.M.K. in Tamil Nadu and said 'telephone lines were down and all things happened simultaneously.' Next day, in Tiruchi, Karunanidhi agreed with the Prime Minister's statement that 'telephone lines were down.'
All the controversy was forgotten when the people of the State exercised their franchise in March 1971. The DMK-led front bagged all but one Lok Sabha seat (Nagercoil), which was won by Kamaraj. With regard to the Assembly poll, the coalition had inflicted a crushing defeat on the alliance stitched by Kamaraj and CR, as the Dravidian major itself bagged 184 seats, a record that remains unparalleled for any party. Besides, the ruling party's allies won 21 seats.
As the Congress (R) got an overwhelming majority at the all India level, Indira Gandhi took CS into her Cabinet again in April and Subramaniam, after a gap of four years, re-entered the Lok Sabha on his election from Krishnagiri in a by-election. RVS had to wait for nine more years to become a Union Minister. He served as Union Minister of State for Agriculture during 1980-83 when Indira Gandhi was the Prime Minister.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
19 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'Why be touchy? Let's close it': Supreme Court on BJP leader's defamation case against Shashi Tharoor
The Supreme Court on Friday indicated that the criminal defamation case against Congress MP Shashi Tharoor over his 2018 'scorpion sitting on a Shivling' remark about Prime Minister Narendra Modi should be brought to a close, Live Law reported. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor during the Monsoon session of Parliament, in New Delhi on July 28, 2025.(PTI) The matter came up before a bench of Justices MM Sundresh and NK Singh. While Shashi Tharoor's lawyer requested an adjournment, the complainant's counsel — representing Bharatiya Janata Party leader Rajeev Babbar — asked for the case to be listed on a non-miscellaneous day. In response, Justice Sundresh remarked, 'What non-miscellaneous day? Let us close this. Why do you want to be touchy about all this? Let us close all this. That way, administrators, political personalities and judges form the same group, they have sufficiently thicker skin. Don't worry.'


Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Train blasts, Malegaon: Two attacks, multiple investigations, and how the cases fell
In a span of 10 days, the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) and National Investigation Agency (NIA) have received major blows in two big terrorism cases, with courts junking their investigation and finding no substance in their theories, leading to the accused being let off. Pointing to lapses in the Malegaon investigation, the Special NIA Court Thursday said: 'Though there was strong suspicion against the accused persons, the investigating agencies failed to establish their guilt beyond reasonable doubt to convict them.' The September 2008 Malegaon blasts had left six people dead and over a hundred injured. All the seven accused, including former BJP MP Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, were acquitted by the court Thursday. The ATS's case was that the blasts were carried out by people with radical Hindutva leanings, with the communally sensitive Malegaon chosen deliberately for an attack during the month of Ramzan and on the eve of Navaratri. On July 21, the Bombay High Court set aside a special court verdict, acquitting all 12 accused in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case that killed 186. Of the accused, five had been awarded death sentences and seven life terms. Both these cases happened under Congress-led governments in the state and at the Centre — and were first investigated by the state ATS. Both had communal and political overtones; hence, amid allegations from political parties, different probe agencies were roped in at different stages of the case, impacting the overall investigation. In the Mumbai train blasts case, the ATS built a case blaming individuals linked to members of the Students' Islamic Movement of India, backed by Pakistani terror outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). The Special MCOCA Court validated the ATS's investigation and, in October 2015, awarded the death penalty to five of the convicts and life terms to seven others. The accused kept claiming that they were subjected to torture during the custodial interrogation. On July 21, the Bombay High Court set aside this verdict, putting a big question mark on the ATS's theory that individuals linked to SIMI had orchestrated the blasts. This is important as, two years after the train blasts, the Mumbai Crime Branch, then headed by Joint Commissioner of Police Rakesh Maria, had claimed that when they busted the Indian Mujahideen (IM) module that had carried out blasts in Ahmedabad and other parts of the country, their members had admitted to also having carried out the Mumbai train blasts. In the Malegaon case, in October-November 2008, the ATS under its then chief Hemant Karkare made arrests of several alleged Hindu fundamentalists, including Thakur, and invoked MCOCA. However, soon after, Karkare was killed during the November 26, 2008, Mumbai attack, after which former ATS chief K P Raghuvanshi was roped in to investigate the Malegaon case. He was first given additional charge of the ATS for seven months, then made full-fledged ATS chief and promoted to ADG rank. During his first stint with the ATS, Raghuvanshi, incidentally, had led the investigation into the 2006 Mumbai train blasts as well. Karkare's investigation, alleging the involvement of Hindu extremists, was reflected in the first chargesheet filed by the ATS in January 2009, followed by a supplementary chargesheet in April 2011. However, in April 2011, the Ministry of Home Affairs, under the UPA government, suo motu directed the NIA to take up further investigation. The Central agency registered cases under provisions of the MCOCA, UAPA, Explosive Substances Act, and Indian Penal Code. In May 2014, the UPA was replaced by the BJP-led NDA at the Centre. Two years later, on May 13, 2016, the NIA filed its second supplementary chargesheet in the case, which dropped MCOCA charges against all the accused. This was significant as the ATS had relied heavily on confessional statements made by some of the accused, which were admissible as evidence under MCOCA. After the NIA took over, 33 witnesses turned hostile in the case. Some claimed that their accounts were recorded under pressure. Before the trial could commence in the case, the NIA moved court requesting that Pragya Thakur be dropped as an accused as there was no witness or proof to show she was involved in the conspiracy. However, the court did not accept this, citing the prima facie evidence against her. In May 2015, Special Public Prosecutor in the case Rohini Salian told The Indian Express that NIA officers had put pressure on her to 'go soft' on the accused and not to appear in hearings. Calling the ATS investigation into the Malegaon 2008 blasts flawed, former Additional DGP P K Jain said that 33 witnesses turning hostile in one case was very unusual, and indicated major flaws in the investigation. The Nashik Range IG when blasts hit Malegaon in 2006, Jain said the initial police investigation then had found the role of local persons and two Pakistanis. But the ATS, while probing the 2008 Malegaon blasts, blamed alleged Hindu fundamentalists for the 2006 blasts too, Jain said. The original accused were discharged and a new set of accused were injected, thus ruining the whole case, he alleged. After the Central and state governments came under criticism for failing to provide justice to the victims of the train blasts case, the Maharashtra government had promptly challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court of India. It is to be seen if the NIA challenges Thursday's verdict in the High Court.


The Hindu
21 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Indian economy devastated by five Modi-inflicted shocks: Congress
The Congress on Friday (August 1, 2025) claimed that the Indian economy has been well and truly devastated by a series of "five Modi-inflicted shocks", and said the government, as well as its cheerleaders, are being economical with the truth of the real state of the economy. Congress general secretary in charge of communications, Jairam Ramesh, said the Modi government, its drumbeaters and cheerleaders are living in a make-believe world. The Opposition party's assertions came a day after former Congress President and Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, said everybody except Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman knows that the country's economy is "dead". Over the past decade, the Indian economy has been well and truly devastated by a series of five Modi-inflicted shocks. Nobody else can be held responsible. Demonetisation completely disrupted our growth momentum and destroyed the livelihoods of crores of Indians. A… — Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) August 1, 2025 In a post on X, Mr. Ramesh said, "Over the past decade, the Indian economy has been well and truly devastated by a series of five Modi-inflicted shocks. Nobody else can be held responsible." He said demonetisation completely disrupted our growth momentum and destroyed the livelihoods of crores of Indians. "A fundamentally flawed GST--that is a Tax that is neither Good nor Simple--has wreaked havoc on thousands of business enterprises across the country, except the large companies who can afford to pay the cost associated with GST compliance," Ramesh said. He further claimed that the record imports from China have led to the closure of lakhs of MSMEs across the country in — Gujarat alone, around a third of the MSMEs in the stainless steel industry have shut down their operations. Exports in key areas are dependent on imports of raw materials, components, and intermediates from China, he said. Mr. Ramesh pointed out that private investment has lost the buoyancy it demonstrated during 2004-14. "Indian industrialists are acquiring citizenship of other countries in an ever-increasing measure. The politically motivated and extortionist Raid Raj, coupled with the proliferation of Modani's tentacles, has led to a loss of confidence in the Indian economy," Mr. Ramesh alleged. He argued that wages for the majority of Indians have stagnated in the last decade, across sectors and across classes. "This is particularly so in rural India. Household savings have fallen sharply just as household debt has ballooned. Private mass consumption, one of the key drivers of growth, is sputtering just as luxury consumption has not ebbed, clearly pointing to sharpening economic inequalities," the Congress leader said. "The Modi government, its drumbeaters and cheerleaders are living in a make-believe world. They are being economical with the truth of the real state of the economy," Mr. Ramesh said. On Thursday, Mr. Gandhi had alleged that the BJP-led government has destroyed the country's economic, defence and foreign policies, and is "running the country to the ground". Speaking with reporters in the Parliament House complex, Mr. Gandhi had also claimed that a trade deal with the US will happen and US President Donald Trump will define it. Asked about Trump calling the Indian economy "dead", the Congress leader had said, "He is right, everybody knows this except the prime minister and the finance minister. Everybody knows that the Indian economy is a dead economy. I am glad that President Trump has stated a fact." He had alleged that the BJP has destroyed the Indian economy.