Disney employee's computer hacked, company data stolen DOJ
The Brief
Ryan Mitchell Kramer, a 25-year-old from Santa Clarita, has agreed to plead guilty to hacking a Disney employee's computer to download confidential data.
Kramer used a malicious file disguised as an AI art program to access the victim's computer and Disney's non-public Slack channels.
In July 2024, Kramer threatened to leak the victim's personal and Disney data, later releasing it publicly when the victim did not respond.
LOS ANGELES - A Santa Clarita man has agreed to plead guilty to hacking into a Disney employee's computer to illegally download confidential data, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.
What we know
Ryan Mitchell Kramer, 25, will plead guilty to federal charges of accessing a computer and obtaining information, and threatening to damage a protected computer, the DOJ said.
The charges stem from his actions last year when he hacked into a Disney employee's computer using a malicious file disguised as an AI art program.
Kramer gained access to non-public Disney Slack channels and downloaded approximately 1.1 terabytes of confidential data.
Timeline
The hacking incident occurred between April and May 2024, when a victim downloaded Kramer's malicious file.
In July 2024, Kramer threatened the victim via email and Discord, posing as a member of a fake hacktivist group.
After the victim did not respond, Kramer released the stolen data publicly on July 12, 2024.
What's next
Kramer will enter his plea in U.S. District Court in downtown Los Angeles.
He is expected to make his initial court appearance in the coming weeks.
The charges carry a potential sentence of up to five years in federal prison.
Authorities continue to investigate the extent of Kramer's hacking activities, as he admitted to gaining unauthorized access to at least two other victims' computers and accounts.
The Source
Information for this story is from the U.S. Department of Justice.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Regains Control Of Troops In L.A. From Newsom Thanks To Appeals Court; Governor Was To Take Command Of National Guard On Friday
UPDATE, 9:16 PM: Gavin Newsom's renewed control of the California National Guard didn't last more than a few hours thanks to a federal appeals court. 'The request for an administrative stay is GRANTED,' the court wrote in a short order tonight after the White House and DOJ came up short this afternoon in their bid to maintain a hold on the unrequested and widely seen as unnecessary troop deployment. 'The district court's June 12 temporary restraining order is temporarily stayed pending further order,' a three-judge panel of two Trump appointees and one Joe Biden appointee said. More from Deadline L.A. Curfew Extended For Third Night Running Ahead Of Saturday Demonstrations – Updated 'Manhandling' Of California Sen. Alex Padilla By Federal Agents In L.A. Puts Trump Team In Spin Mode – Update Jon Stewart Calls ABC News "A F-ing Joke" Over Terry Moran Dismissal: "So Stupid" All of which has put the brakes on returning control of the Guard that Trump federalized on June 7 to Gov. Newsom at noon on June 13. It gives Trump at least one more hot weekend to inflame the situation on the ground in L.A. with more immigration enforcement raids. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals trio has now set a June 17 Zoom hearing on the matter. In response to anti-ICE raids protests that started late last week there are currently 4,000 National Guard troops in the City of Angels with 700 Marines in the mix too. A portion of DTLA around federal buildings, City Hall, some courthouses, art galleries and entertainment venues has been under curfew for the past few days and is to remain so from dusk-to-dawn indefinitely at this point. Each night since the curfew was put in place in the sanctuary city by Mayor Karen Bass, the LAPD have been arresting protesters and others who remain in the area. Before the Appeals Court ruling flipped the script on Newsom, the Governor was having media victory dance at longtime foil Trump's expense. 'Today was really about a test of democracy, and today we passed the test,' he said in a short press conference Thursday evening when it looked like he was back in charge of the Guard. Not for the first time, Newsom took aim at Trump's claims that L.A. was going to erupt in rioting and chaos if he hadn't taken over the Guard and called them up as ICE protection. 'This is what Donald Trump does,' the two-term Democrat and potential 2028 White House contender added. 'He creates a problem — and then he tries to be a hero in his own Marvel movie. I would call it pathetic if it wasn't so dangerous.' PREVIOUSLY, 6:14 PM: Donald Trump has just been ordered by a federal judge to 'return control of the California National Guard to the Governor of the State of California forthwith.' Forthwith meaning in practical terms means noon PT Friday with even more orders from the bench to possible follow. In an order handed down Thursday just a couple of hours after a pitched hearing in San Francisco between Department of Justice lawyers and Golden State attorneys, Judge Charles Breyer awarded Gavin Newsom the temporary restraining order he sought over Trump's federalization of the California National Guard on June 7 after protests over ICE raids of undocumented immigrants in and around L.A. 'At this early stage of the proceedings, the Court must determine whether the President followed the congressionally mandated procedure for his actions,' the judge wrote in a 36-page order this evening. 'He did not.' The Bill Clinton appointed judge added: 'His actions were illegal — both exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.' Noting the standard required for such a big reach by the Executive Branch and the reality of the mainly passionate but peaceful protests over ICE in LA, the judge said the gatherings around federal buildings and immigration enforcement 'in Los Angeles fall far short of rebellion.'Newsom and the state Attorney General first filed suit against Trump, Defense Sec. Pete Hegseth and others in the administration on June 9. The gist of their argument was that the president overstepped his authority when he dispatched National Guard troops to the region to respond to protests of ICE immigration raids late last week by heavily armed masked agents. The governor said the president violated the law by not consulting with him first before the deployment. On June 11, Newsom upped the ante and demanded a TRO to halt 'ongoing and unnecessary militarization of Los Angeles' and Trump's brazen authoritarian tactics ASAP. Trump's DOJ lawyers pushed to have the 1 p.m. PT deadline set by the governor delayed, and Judge Breyer (brother of Clinton appointed Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, who retired in 2022) agreed. He required more briefings from both sides and set a hearing on the matter for today at 1:30 p.m. PT. A hearing in which federal lawyers often seemed not to know their own argument or the facts to back it up. Having already warned on 'a monarchy' in the hearing earlier today, Breyer worried in his order this evening that 'Defendants' actions also threaten to chill legitimate First Amendment expression.' To that, and with the overriding Constitutional and jurisdictional issues at play, he laid out exactly what's next for Newsom and Trump with this halting of military deployment to America's second-largest city: For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order:Defendants are temporarily ENJOINED from deploying members of the California National Guard in Los are DIRECTED to return control of the California National Guard to Governor Newsom. The Court further STAYS this order until noon on June 13, are ORDERED to post a nominal bond of $100 within 24 hours. The bond shall be filed in the Clerk's Office and be deposited into the registry of the Court. If said bond is not posted by the aforementioned date and time, this Order shall be are further ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why a preliminary injunction should not issue. A hearing on this order to show cause will be held on June 20, 2025 at 10 a.m. Plaintiffs' moving papers shall be filed no later than June 16, 2025; Defendants' opposition shall be due no later than June 18, 2025, and Plaintiffs' reply shall be due on June 19, 2025. Whether or not this White House complies with Breyer's order is another matter. For one thing, almost immediately after Judge Breyer's order hit the docket, Trump's DOJ filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit court. Earlier today, after the hearing before Judge Breyer ended and before his order was made public, Trump took to his Truth Social platform to take more factually inaccurate potshots at Newsom or Newscum as he says: Less than two hours before today's hearing, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem appeared to be backing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's avoidance of a congressional hearing in Washington, DC earlier in the day of whether or not the administration would respect court orders over its use of troops in Los Angeles. 'We are not going away,' Noem said at the same L.A. press conference where federal agents shockingly assaulted Sen. Alex Padilla, handcuffed and dragged him away for trying to ask the DHS chief a question. 'We are staying here to liberate this city from the socialist and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into this city,' Noem added with a reference to California and L.A.'s 'sanctuary' policies that prevent state and civic participation in federal immigration raids and detentions. Also, Thursday LA Mayor Karen Bass gave much more heated remarks than is usual for the circumspect politician in talking about the continued ICE rounding up of residents and the 4,000 Guard troops and 700 Marines on the streets in and around federal buildings and more. 'No matter what happens out of the White House,' the much Trump attacked Bass said today, as DTLA went under another night of dusk-to-dawn curfew. 'We will always uphold and reflect what Los Angeles and the United States are truly about: freedom, tolerance and, for God's sake, our Constitution.' Almost as fast on the social media draw as Trump, Newsom went online soon after the order landed on the federal court docket. 'The court just confirmed what we all know — the military belongs on the battlefield, not on our city streets,' the Governor posted with a copy of the order. 'This win is not just for California, but the nation,' he said in his post. 'It's a check on a man whose authoritarian tendencies are increasing by the day. End the illegal militarization of Los Angeles now, @realDonaldTrump History is watching.' Newsom later went before the cameras and said of Trump, among other things, 'Today's order makes clear that he is not above or beyond constitutional restraints.' Best of Deadline 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Tonys, Emmys, Oscars & More
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Kilmar Abrego Garcia pleads not guilty to human smuggling charges in Nashville court
Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Maryland man who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador in March, pleaded not guilty in a Nashville federal court on June 13. He is charged with conspiracy to transport aliens and unlawful transportation of undocumented aliens. Abrego Garcia, 29, entered his plea alongside his attorneys in the Fred D. Thompson Federal Building and Courthouse in downtown Nashville at 10:13 a.m. June 13. Attorneys also argued a motion to keep Abrego Garcia in detention while the case is pending. U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes had not ruled on the detention motion as of the afternoon of June 13. Abrego Garcia's wife read a statement from him at a news conference before the hearing, asking people to "keep praying and keep fighting that the light will always come soon." Both prosecutors and defense are heavily staffed for the case. Acting U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee Rob McGuire, who leads all federal prosecutors in Nashville, and lawyers from the U.S. Department of Justice are representing the federal government. Abrego Garcia's attorneys include the local Federal Public Defender Dumaka Shabazz and three assistant public defenders. "This has the feel of a case that's going to be very heavily litigated," said Jack Chin, a professor at the University of California Davis School of Law. The charges against Abrego Garcia were revealed when a federal indictment against him was unsealed June 6, the same day the U.S. flew him back from El Salvador. Abrego Garcia appeared in the Nashville courthouse that day, where he was read the charges against him. Since then, he has been in the custody of the U.S. Marshals. More: How a routine traffic stop in TN exploded into human smuggling charges for Kilmar Abrego Garcia During the hearing, prosecutors and defense attorneys debated whether Abrego Garcia should stay behind bars while the case proceeds. Prosecutors have argued he is a danger to the community, and children in particular, and said there's a risk he could leave the country. Homeland Security Investigations special agent Peter Joseph testified that agents have spoken with five witnesses, including two alleged co-conspirators in what prosecutors say was a smuggling operation. Prosecutors played the bodycam footage from the November 2022 traffic stop in Cookeville now central to the case. Joseph said there was a minor in the car when Abrego Garcia was stopped. In the footage, Abrego Garcia is heard telling Tennessee Highway Patrol troopers that he and the nine others in the car were coming back from St. Louis. License plate readers, however, showed they were not in St. Louis in all of 2022, Joseph said. A license plate reader in Spring, Texas, registered a hit on the vehicle Abrego Garcia was driving days before he was stopped, Joseph said. Joseph also said agents found six of the nine people were in the country illegally. Two had been removed from the U.S. to Mexico in early November. Joseph testified that the Chevrolet Suburban Abrego Garcia was driving was owned by a man named Jose Hernandez-Reyes, whom Joseph said was convicted of alien smuggling. Prosecutors entered into evidence two orders of protection Abrego Garcia's wife has taken out against him. Just before the court recessed for lunch, one of Abrego Garcia's defense attorneys, federal public defender Richard Tennent, pressed the prosecution while cross examining Joseph. Tennent tried to poke holes in the timeline of the allegations of human smuggling levied by the prosecution. In particular, Tennent pointed to the length of the drives prosecutors say Abrego Garcia was taking, and questioned how Abrego Garcia would manage these distances while transporting his family and other passengers. Defense attorneys have argued for his release. "[T]he government isn't even entitled to a detention hearing in this case — much less detention," the defense wrote in a June 11 filing. "Mr. Abrego Garcia should be released." They argued Abrego Garcia does not have an incentive to flee and in fact may have a basis for a new asylum claim after he was illegally deported to a Salvadoran mega-prison. Abrego Garcia denies allegations he is a member of the MS-13 gang; defense attorneys argue that even if he were a member, that not reason enough to keep him detained. Defense attorneys also said the crimes did not involve minor victims, because no children were alleged to have been harmed in transit. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has a detainer against Abrego Garcia. If Holmes were to rule that prosecutors cannot detain Abrego Garcia before trial, he would leave Marshals custody but be transferred to ICE custody due to the detainer, Chin said. If that happened, his attorneys may be able to secure his release. An immigration judge may decide to grant Abrego Garcia bail from ICE custody, Chin said. A crowd of at least 100 people had gathered outside the Fred D. Thompson Federal Courthouse by 9:45 a.m. At a nearby news conference, Abrego Garcia's wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, read a message from her husband to the reporters and community members who'd gathered. "To all the families still fighting to be reunited after a family separation, or if you too are in detention, Kilmar wants you to have faith," Vasquez Sura said. "He said these dark times are where we're facing all of the tribulations God has put in our path. But keep praying and keep fighting that the light will always come soon for all of us, and you too will be able to see your family again." The crowd at the news conference chanted, "We are all Kilmar, we are all Kilmar." This case is separate from the civil case over Abrego Garcia's deportation. Prosecutors say between 2016 and 2025, Abrego Garcia was part of a conspiracy to transport undocumented migrants from various countries in Central and South America into and within the U.S. They say Abrego Garcia's role was generally to pick up immigrants in the Houston area and drive them to other locations in the U.S. The charges were filed in the Middle District of Tennessee because he was stopped in Cookeville in 2022 driving a Chevrolet Suburban with nine men the indictment suggests were undocumented immigrants. The Tennessee Highway Patrol troopers who pulled him over allowed him to leave, giving him only a warning for driving on an expired license. Have questions about the justice system? Evan Mealins is the justice reporter for The Tennessean. Contact him with questions, tips or story ideas at emealins@ This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Kilmar Abrego Garcia pleads not guilty to charges in Nashville court
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Biden robocall producer found inot guilty of criminal charges
A political consultant was found not guilty of 11 felony charges Friday over AI-generated robocalls that mimicked President Joe Biden's voice discouraging Democrats from voting in the 2024 New Hampshire primary. The charges against Steve Kramer included voter suppression and impersonating a presidential candidate. AG vows to keep working on voter integrity after target found not guilty Attorney General John Formella said his office will keep working on efforts to protect voter integrity after a judge found Steven Kramer not guilty of state felonies for making a robocall that mimicked the voice of former President Joe Biden that urged Democrats not to vote in New Hampshire's 2024 primary. On Feb. 6, he identified two Texas companies and one business owner as having placed those robocalls. After the verdict in Belknap Superior Court, Attorney General John Formella noted that the Federal Communications Commission had already fined Kramer $6 million and two telecommunication companies another $1 million for violations of federal anti-robocall regulations. Kramer had been paid $150 by a political consultant working for Democratic presidential candidate Dean Phillips to produce the audio used to call roughly 25,000 likely voters two days before the Jan. 23, 2024 primary. Judge Elizabeth Leonard allowed Kramer's defense team to claim he didn't commit a crime because New Hampshire's primary was a 'straw poll' as it wasn't sanctioned by the Democratic National Committee. 'That, ladies and gentlemen, was a brazen attack on your primary,' Kramer's lawyer Tom Reid told the jury, referring to the DNC's actions. 'And it wasn't done by Steve Kramer. 'He didn't see it as a real election, because it wasn't,' Reid said. Kramer's lawyers also argued the use of deepfake technology was protected speech rather than voter suppression. If convicted, Kramer would have faced decades in prison, with each felony carrying a prison term of up to seven years. He also faced 11 misdemeanor charges that each carried up to a year in jail. Kramer's lawyers argued he didn't impersonate a candidate because the message didn't include Biden's name and the former president wasn't on the primary ballot. Former Democratic Party chair testified at recent robocall trial Former Democratic Party Chairman Kathy Sullivan testified in the criminal trial of Steven Kramer who was found innocent of multiple charges regarding his manufacture of a robocall that mimicked the voice of former President Joe Biden to urge New Hampshire Democrats not to vote in the 2024 primary. All of those calls urged anyone with questions to call Sullivan's home telephone number. Biden honored the DNC calendar and refused to file to run or campaign in New Hampshire; he won the primary easily with a record write-in vote. All the calls left the telephone number of former Democratic Party Chair Kathy Sullivan. During the trial, Sullivan testified that her belief was that Kramer's goal was to suppress the vote. Kramer was paid $259,946 by Phillips's campaign to help the long-shot presidential candidate get on the ballot in New York and Pennsylvania. The campaign told media outlets that that work included production and distribution of a robocall that used Phillips's voice. But the Phillips campaign denied any knowledge of the Biden robocall. Kramer testified during the trial that he had no regrets even though his actions led to AI regulations in multiple states including New Hampshire. He said he came up with the stunt as a warning for how AI can be misused. He chose to use it in New Hampshire believing it would have the most impact. In a statement Friday, Formella said the state 'will continue to work diligently to address the challenges posed by emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, to protect the integrity of our elections.' klandrigan@
