Dollar holds losses on US economy concerns, Fed appointments
TOKYO : The dollar remained lower against major peers on Thursday, as expectations of Federal Reserve rate cuts grew and concerns swirled about partisanship creeping into key US institutions.
Initial jobless claims in the US are under scrutiny after last week's disappointing nonfarm payrolls, which triggered a slide in the greenback. Meanwhile, the euro found support ahead of anticipated talks next week to end the war between Russia and Ukraine.
Last week, President Donald Trump fired the official responsible for the labour data he did not like, and focus is centring on his nomination to fill a coming vacancy on the Fed's Board of Governors and candidates for the next chair of the central bank.
'All those things suggest that we're seeing those political risks around the US dollar increase, and on top of that you've got the weak data coming through,' said Tony Sycamore, a market analyst at IG.
Any progress in ending the war in Ukraine 'is going to be a positive driver of the euro,' he added.
The dollar index, which measures the greenback against a basket of major peers, edged up 0.1% to 98.259 in early trade in Asia, after a 0.6% slide in the previous session.
The US currency was little changed at 147.36 yen. The euro stood at US$1.1654, down almost 0.1% after a 0.7% jump previously.
The US Labor Department is expected to report that initial claims for unemployment benefits likely rose by 3,000 to 221,000 for the week ended Aug 2. Continued jobless claims for the week that ended July 26 are expected to increase slightly.
Data last Friday showed US employment growth was weaker than expected in July while the nonfarm payrolls count for the prior two months was revised down considerably, suggesting a sharp deterioration in labour market conditions.
Fed funds futures traders are now pricing in a 94% probability of a 25 basis point cut at the Fed's September meeting, up from 48% a week ago, according to the CME Group's FedWatch Tool. In total, traders see 60.5 basis points in cuts this year.
Trump could meet Russian leader Vladimir Putin as soon as next week, a White House official said on Wednesday, as the US kept up pressure on Moscow to end the war in Ukraine.
The president said on Tuesday he would decide on a nominee to replace outgoing Fed Governor Adriana Kugler by the end of the week and had separately narrowed the possible replacements for Fed Chair Jerome Powell to a short list of four.
Sterling was steady at US$1.33505. The Australian dollar was little changed at US$0.65.
Bitcoin edged 0.1% lower to US$115,038.79.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
The risk of nuclear war waned after the Cold War. It's back with a vengeance
WHEN the first nuclear bomb test took place 80 years ago, the scientists who gathered to observe the explosion in the New Mexico desert recognised they were playing with fire. Physicist Enrico Fermi tried to break the tension by taking bets on whether the bomb would ignite the atmosphere and destroy the world. J. Robert Oppenheimer wagered US$10 the bomb wouldn't work at all, and Edward Teller conspicuously applied sunscreen in the predawn darkness, offering to pass it around. The bomb exploded in a fireball hotter than the surface of the sun, producing far more destructive power than the scientists anticipated. Within weeks, the United States nuked the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, hastening the end of World War II while killing more than 200,000 civilians. The bomb hasn't been used since, apart from test blasts, and after the Cold War ended in 1991, the risk of nuclear war mercifully declined. Now the risk is back on the rise, as an alarming new nuclear age dawns. Today, we are in a 'uniquely dangerous moment'. The nuclear landscape is changing for the worse. For starters, the main players are no longer two global superpowers. During the Cold War, the US and the Soviet Union largely controlled the potential for conflict, which made the risks relatively straightforward to analyse. These days, the politics of nuclear arms have become more complicated and unpredictable. Nine nations are said to possess the weapons today, including the rogue state of North Korea, and others could build them quickly. Most people have forgotten that South Africa once developed a bomb but gave up its programme voluntarily. Iraq and Libya also had active nuclear-weapon programmes that were stopped under intense international pressure. At the moment, the focus is on Iran's nuclear programme, which the US bombed on June 22, alongside Israel. The US launched its attack even though Iran continued to pursue diplomacy about its nuclear ambitions. Iran may conclude that it needs a nuclear capability for self-defence, to deter future attacks. The same could be said for other states threatened by nuclear- armed rivals. Consider Ukraine, which voluntarily gave up the nuclear arms based on its soil after the fall of the Soviet Union. Would Russia's 2022 invasion still have occurred against a Ukraine bristling with doomsday weapons? Doubtful. Besides the chilling political calculations, the weapons used to deliver nuclear warheads have become more dangerous. Hyper-sonic glide missiles could elude defence systems before striking their targets with practically no warning, while smaller, low-yield nukes threaten to blur the lines between conventional and nuclear warfare, making all-out war more likely. Defence spending is soaring across the globe, and with it, faster and deadlier weapons are likely to be deployed. At the same time, treaties restricting nuclear arms are in decline. The most impactful of them – the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons – was undermined in 2003 when North Korea withdrew from it and built an atomic arsenal. It's time for the targets of these terrible weapons – us, that is – to rise up and say, 'No!' The 1980s witnessed mass demonstrations demanding a nuclear freeze. Today, the threat of nuclear war is beginning to enter the public consciousness again. The movie Oppenheimer about the Trinity bomb test 80 years ago was a boxoffice hit. The 2024 book by journalist Annie Jacobsen, Nuclear War: A Scenario, became a bestseller. Star movie director James Cameron has committed to making Ghosts of Hiroshima , a Japan-set movie said to be a nightmarish look at the A-bomb blasts. During the Cold War, pop culture helped convince everyday people to stand against the march towards Armageddon, and here's hoping it can do so again. For 80 years, the world has lived with the threat of nuclear destruction. Let's act now to curb it, before it's too late. — Chicago Tribune/Tribune News Service
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Trump-backed peace push leaves Azerbaijan and Armenia one step from final accord, top diplomat says
U.S. President Donald Trump, Azerbaijan's President Ilham Aliyev, and Armenia's Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan pose with their documents during a trilateral signing event at the White House, in Washington, D.C., August 8, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo (Reuters) -A peace push backed by U.S. President Donald Trump leaves Azerbaijan and Armenia just one step from a final peace deal and is a paradigm shift in the strategically important South Caucasus region, a top Azerbaijani diplomat said on Saturday. Trump welcomed Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan in the White House on Friday and witnessed their signing of a joint declaration aimed at drawing a line under their decades-long on-off conflict. Russia, a traditional broker and ally of Armenia in the strategically important South Caucasus region which is crisscrossed with oil and gas pipelines, was not included despite its border guards being stationed on the border between Armenia and Iran. While Moscow said it supported the summit, it proposed "implementing solutions developed by the countries of the region themselves with the support of their immediate neighbours – Russia, Iran and Turkey" to avoid what it called the "sad experience" of Western efforts to mediate in the Middle East. Azerbaijan's close ally, NATO member Turkey, welcomed the accord. Russia-ally Iran also welcomed the agreement but warned against any foreign intervention near its borders. Baku and Yerevan have been at odds since the late 1980s when Nagorno-Karabakh, a mountainous Azerbaijani region mostly populated by ethnic Armenians, broke away from Azerbaijan with support from Armenia. Azerbaijan took back full control of the region in 2023, prompting almost all of the territory's 100,000 ethnic Armenians to flee to Armenia. "The chapter of enmity is closed and now we're moving towards lasting peace," said Elin Suleymanov, Azerbaijan's ambassador to Britain, predicting that the wider region's prosperity and transport links would be transformed for the better. "This is a paradigm shift," said Suleymanov, who as a former envoy to Washington who used to work in President Aliyev's office, is one of his country's most senior diplomats. Suleymanov declined to speculate on when a final peace deal would be signed however, noting that Aliyev had said he wanted it to happen soon. There remained only one obstacle, said Suleymanov, which was for Armenia to amend its constitution to remove a reference to Nagorno-Karabakh. "Azerbaijan is ready to sign any time once Armenia fulfils the very basic commitment of removing its territorial claim against Azerbaijan in its consitution," he said. MANY QUESTIONS UNANSWERED Pashinyan this year called for a referendum to change the constitution, but no date for it has been set yet. Armenia is to hold parliamentary elections in June 2026, and the new constitution is expected to be drafted before the vote. The Armenian leader said on X that the Washington summit would pave the way to end the decades of conflict and to open up transport connections in the region that he said would unlock strategic economic opportunities. Friday's agreement saw Armenia hand exclusive U.S. development rights to a strategic transit corridor through the South Caucasus that the White House said would facilitate greater exports of energy and other resources. The proposed Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP) which would run across southern Armenia, would give Azerbaijan a direct route to its exclave of Nackchivan and in turn to Turkey. Asked when the transit rail route would start running, Suleymanov said that would depend on cooperation between the U.S. and Armenia whom he said were already in talks. Joshua Kucera, Senior South Caucasus analyst at International Crisis Group, said the Washington summit was not the easy win that Trump may have hoped for as the agreements left many questions unanswered. The issue of Armenia's constitution continued to threaten to derail the process, and key questions about how the new transport corridor would work in practice had not been addressed. "Key details are missing, including about how customs checks and security will work and the nature of Armenia's reciprocal access to Azerbaijani territory. These could be serious stumbling blocks," said Kucera. Control of the corridor, which will be operated under Armenian law, is a sensitive issue, with Azerbaijan wary of Armenian law. Suleymanov played down suggestions that Russia, which still has extensive security and economic interests in Armenia, was being disadvantaged. "Anybody and everybody can benefit from this if they choose to," he said. (Reporting by Andrew OsbornEditing by Philippa Fletcher)
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Over half of Hong Kong residents plan to work past 65, survey shows
More than half of Hong Kong residents do not plan to retire at the typical retirement age of 65, with many feeling that they cannot reach the average HK$5 million (US$637,000) savings target necessary for a comfortable post-work life, according to the T. Rowe Price Hong Kong Retirement Survey released on Thursday. About 52 per cent of respondents indicated they would not retire at age 65. Among them, about 80 per cent preferred not to retire at all or opted instead for a 'micro-retirement', which involves taking a break for several months to a few years before returning to work. The survey, the first of its kind by the US financial firm, polled 600 Hong Kong residents over the age of 30 in May. 'Financial pressure is certainly one factor, especially in a high-cost city like Hong Kong,' said Shen Wenting, global investment solutions strategist and portfolio manager at T. Rowe Price, which manages US$1.56 trillion in assets. About 60 per cent of respondents had a retirement savings target between HK$2 million and HK$10 million, with the average being HK$5 million, considered enough for them to feel secure in completely stopping work. For those considering a micro-retirement, the average savings target was HK$2 million. However, one-third of respondents felt they could not achieve their goals, and 40 per cent reported not having any retirement savings target at all. This may explain why 62 per cent cited the need to maintain an income as their reason for not retiring at age 65. The survey showed that non-financial motivations were equally influential, Shen said, noting that 69 per cent of respondents wanted to continue working to keep their minds active, while 40 per cent sought the sense of accomplishment that work provided. About 72 per cent said they would be satisfied with earning less from their jobs after retirement age. For those opting for micro-retirement, 34 per cent sought a break to improve their well-being, 24 per cent aimed to relieve work pressure, and 16 per cent wanted to pursue personal interests. 'These findings suggest a growing desire to reprioritise life beyond just income,' Shen said. Financial firms like Manulife, HSBC and BOC Life have been targeting retirees with new investment products that offer regular income streams, amid a broader government-led initiative to capture opportunities in the so-called silver economy. People aged 65 and above comprised 22 per cent of Hong Kong's 7.5 million residents last year, according to official data. Projections indicated that senior citizens would account for 31 per cent of the population by 2036. Shen said only 20 per cent of respondents were aware of retirement investment products, while many opted for conservative investment strategies. About 54 per cent kept their retirement savings in time deposits, which currently offer interest rates of only 1 per cent to 2 per cent, while 52 per cent chose savings accounts with almost zero interest. Only 30 per cent opted for higher-return investments such as mutual funds, and 24 per cent invested in annuities. Shen attributed the conservative investment choices to the entrenched belief that 'cash is king', as well as economic uncertainty. She urged retirees to consider a different investment approach to meet their retirement goals. For those wishing to retire at 65, investing more in stocks at a younger age could yield higher returns, while shifting to lower-risk fixed income as they aged was advisable, Shen suggested. Individuals who plan to continue working might consider adjusting their asset allocation towards a slightly more aggressive stance, with a higher percentage in equities to capitalise on growth opportunities, she added. For micro-retirees, taking a career break of a couple of years 'will not substantially change their retirement horizon', Shen said. 'We suggest following a glide path based on a general estimate of time left until retirement.' - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
