BRC responds to Employment Rights Bill roadmap
The government states the Bill will raise living standards across the country and the roadmap will give employers and workers the time to adapt. It hopes to deliver its new package of workers' rights through the 'Make Work Pay' plan.
Landmark changes in the Employment Rights Bill include sick pay for up to 1.3 million of the lowest earners and day one rights to parental and paternity leave will be introduced for the first time from early next year.
Other key points include the establishment of a Fair Work Agency in April 2026 to enforce labour rights and promote fairness in the workplace, alongside whistleblowing protections to encourage reporting of wrongdoing without fear of retaliation.
From 2027, the Bill will introduce a gender pay gap and menopause action plans to promote gender equality and support women's health in the workplace, alongside enhanced dismissal protections for pregnant women and new mothers to safeguard job security, as well as ending the "exploitative use of zero hours contracts to provide workers with stable hours and predictable income".
Commenting on the roadmap, Helen Dickinson, chief executive at the British Retail Consortium, said in a statement: 'We welcome the publication of the roadmap, particularly the clarity it provides around timescales for consulting on and implementing various policies within the Employment Rights Bill. It is critical this includes quality engagement with the large employing sectors where implementation will have significant consequences.'
'Retailers remain concerned about some of the proposals. The industry has lost 350,000 jobs since 2015. Currently, provisions around Guaranteed Hours, in particular, could threaten the availability of local flexible part-time jobs. 1.5 million of the 3 million people in retail currently work part-time, which allows them to work as much or as little as they need and to balance work with their other life commitments.
'We look forward to engaging with Government and other stakeholders to ensure effective solutions are designed to address these concerns so the Bill tackles the unscrupulous employers, without penalising responsible ones and actually delivers benefits for retail employees.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Urgent warning made over UK pensions
An industry expert has warned that the UK state pension age may need to rise to 80 without significant reforms, as the current system is becoming unaffordable. The state pension age is already scheduled to increase from 66 to 67 by 2028, with a further rise to 68 expected to be brought forward from 2046. The Office for Budget Responsibility projects the annual cost of the state pension could reach £200 billion by 2073, representing 7.7-8.4 per cent of GDP by the 2070s. Pensions expert Jack Carmichael suggests the cost could be even higher than official projections, potentially necessitating a state pension age of 80 to maintain affordability. To manage spiralling costs, the government may be compelled to either raise the state pension age more rapidly or reform the triple lock mechanism.
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
It's time to come clean on what the Government actually owes
Today's fiscal climate is dominated by one overriding and impossible to escape fact: the Government owes so much money it may be impossible to borrow much more at affordable interest rates. The last time we got close to this position was in 1976, when in October of that year, at the worst point of the funding crisis, the Government was forced to issue what was then a 'jumbo' gilt issue (£600m) with a maturity date of 1998 at an interest rate of 15.5pc. Imagine that interest rate today! As you may recall, this was the same year the UK applied to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for the largest loan requested at that time (although only half was actually drawn). In return, the Government agreed to IMF-imposed austerity. Clearly, this is consequential stuff. Gilts are UK government bonds, which pay a fixed annual interest at the rate stated until they mature, at which point they are repaid in full. They are unconditionally guaranteed by the UK government – which has never defaulted on its debt promises – so have lent their name in a colloquial sense to their 'gold-plated' nature as high grade assets. The name itself, however, comes from the original debt certificates issued by the Bank of England being literally 'gilt-edged'. The Government mostly covers its annual fiscal deficit by issuing gilts.
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
What do this year's exam results mean for the future of the Scottish education system?
Around the time that Scottish school pupils were sitting their preliminary exams in February, people in the SNP were whispering in my ear that the Education Secretary, Jenny Gilruth, was vulnerable to being moved from her post in a Scottish Government reshuffle. Today, alongside many young people north of the border, the education secretary will be relieved at this year's exam results. She will see them both as a vindication of how she is doing her job – and the fact that she kept it. Overall attainment is up, with 30.8 per cent of pupils who sat a Higher exam receiving an A grade and 75.9 per cent passing their tests. That is a slight increase on last year and – in the case of top grades – a decent bump on the 2019 results, which were the last set of exams sat before the Covid-19 pandemic. The awards handed out during the various lockdowns were higher than usual as pupils had high-stakes exams removed. In 2020, they were based on heavily moderated teacher estimates before a series of smaller assessments were then used to determine grades the following year. These latest set of results were a key test after a series of controversies last year: from falling pass rates, to blank emails being sent to thousands of pupils instead of exam results, to controversy over how some exams were marked. Chaos, in other words. It had to go smoothly this year and, so far, it has for Gilruth. So, that's the good news. The downside is that the SNP is still being judged on a pledge made a decade ago by former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon. 'My aim - to put it bluntly - is to close the attainment gap completely,' she said in a 2015 speech. 'It will not be done overnight - I accept that. But it must be done.' The following year, the Scottish Government's programme for government said ministers were aiming to 'substantially eliminate the gap over the course of the next decade'. Well, we're 12 months out from that deadline, and while the gap has narrowed a little year on year, it is largely stuck at the same level as it was pre-pandemic. Indeed, it has widened for advanced highers. Gilruth, a former modern studies teacher, who was appointed to her cabinet post in 2023, believes that the key to progress is by focusing on what goes on in classrooms and listening to those leading them. Her family and friends still work in the profession, meaning she is left in no doubt about concerns from those on the frontline. She is determined to work with teachers and that has informed her approach to the new body, Qualifications Scotland, which will run next year's exams. Donna Stewart, Scotland's chief examining officer, is a former deputy headteacher, and others are being moved straight from classrooms into senior positions. Teachers at the sharp end say this is filtering down to them with a 'very positive' Curriculum Improvement Cycle, which was set up in 2021 to help develop how subjects are taught, listening to those in classrooms and being unafraid to criticise the outgoing Scottish Qualifications Authority. The SQA is being scrapped – and replaced by Qualifications Scotland – because of a series of exam controversies. The biggest of these was the decision to use an algorithm to use schools' past performances to change some pupils' grades when exams were first scrapped during the 2020 lockdown. After public protests from pupils and teachers – and a vote of no confidence being tabled in the education secretary of the day – 124,000 exam results were reinstated. So who was that education secretary, who survived that vote on his future only after U-turning on the original policy? It was the current First Minister, John Swinney. If these exam results are signs that a mess is being cleared up, his successor could argue that much of the untidiness is of her boss's making.
