Elon Musk's AI chatbot deletes posts which included antisemitic remarks and praised Hitler
In since-deleted posts, the AI bot Grok identified someone in a post as 'Cindy Steinberg' and said Adolf Hitler was 'best suited' to deal with what it called 'vile anti-white hate', that it alleged was shared by the user.
Grok, an AI-powered chatbot, operates on social media platform X, formerly Twitter, which was purchased by Musk in 2023. Users on X can interact with Grok by tagging its profile in threads on the platform and ask it a question.
Asked by users to clarify its comment, Grok wrote:
'It's a cheeky nod to the pattern-noticing meme: folks with surnames like 'Steinberg' (often Jewish) keep popping up in extreme leftist activism, especially the anti-white variety. Not every time, but enough to raise eyebrows. Truth is stranger than fiction, eh?'
The 'pattern-noticing' meme, referred to in Grok's post, is a typically harmless, online trend which uses patterns and imagery to imply a hidden message or joke. It can, however, be used in a manner to imply racist or xenophobic stereotypes.
Advertisement
The bot continued to post antisemitic remarks and referred to itself as 'Mechahitler', referring to Hitler as 'History's Moustache Man'. It later alleged that it had interacted with a hoax account and walked back its comments, stating it was sarcasm.
In a post to X, developers from Musk's xAI – which facilitate Grok – said they were aware of the remarks made by its public chatbot and were working to remove the posts.
They added that xAI how now moved to ban hate speech from future posts, indicating that that safety filter had not been implemented previously. The firm has implemented changes to avoid similar incidents in the future.
In May, xAI said an unauthorised change to software led to Grok sharing misinformation around a
so-called 'White Genocide' in South Africa
, after US President Donald Trump had publicly
questioned President Cyril Ramaphosa about the baseless issue
.
Musk last week, before the antisemitic remarks, said his AI team had 'significantly improved' Grok, encouraging users on X to engage with the chatbot.
Ever wondered how disinformation spreads so rapidly – or who is behind it? Check out our new FactCheck Knowledge Bank for essential reads and guides to finding good information online.
Visit Knowledge Bank
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
21 hours ago
- The Journal
Country's largest private landlord drops controversial 'common area' fees for over 50 apartments
CONTROVERSIAL FEES THAT were added on to renters' bills by charging them for use of the common areas of their buildings have been dropped in more than 50 apartments by the country's largest private landlord. The so-called common area charges ranged from an extra €150 to €200 every month for new tenants, and would have amounted to €1,800-2,500 extra each year for renters. Ires Reit said it has 'ceased' the charges and 'repaid all new tenants' in 56 apartments affected on foot of new legal advice arising from a recent court ruling. It comes after the landlord had faced pressure in recent months from the rental regulator. The Residential Tenancies Board (RTB) had written to the company over the practice following reporting on the charges by The Journal . With up to 3,700 apartments in Dublin alone, Ires Reit is by far the biggest player in the capital's private rental market as well as being the largest in the country. It reported revenue of €85 million for last year. The attempts by Ires Reit to impose the fees had sparked concern across the sector, with some tenant advocates fearing that renters may feel they had no other option but to sign up for a deal that included the fees. The company's decision was taken on foot of a High Court decision in January that found that only a management company has responsibility for a building's common areas. Therefore, Ires Reit said its legal advice specifically affects buildings where there is no management company overseeing the property and the company itself has responsibility for the common areas. A management company maintains the property on behalf of the owner, carrying out general upkeep and other services. Their cost to the renter per year can range from hundreds to thousands of euro depending on the property. Common areas The issue first came to light earlier this year after Ires Reit agreed during mediation with the RTB to stop trying to charge a tenant €150 monthly for the common area of a Drumcondra apartment block. Advertisement When the charge was initially issued, it was appealed by the tenant who argued that it was an attempt to increase their rent outside of Rental Pressure Zone (RPZ) rules. RPZ regulations prohibit an increase of rent by more than 2% annually. In a statement issued this week, a spokesperson for Ires Reit said that the landlord takes its responsibilities over how rents are set 'very seriously', particularly in an RPZ. In the wake of the decision over that single renter earlier this year, Ires Reit later sought to apply the charge to new tenants at the same block, prompting further criticism. Based on the clarifications in the High Court case, Ires Reit said this week it had ceased the introduction of the common area charge and 'repaid all new tenants to whom this charge had been levied' in developments where there was no management company operating. This affected a 'total of 56 tenants across a small number of properties,' the spokesperson for the landlord told The Journal . The company had previously taken legal advice to ensure the common area charges were 'not at odds' with the RPZ rules and adhered to existing legislation. It said the common area charges and a tenant's rent were 'broken down transparently' in lease agreements. 'We had introduced the charge on new leases to recoup a portion of the maintenance costs associated with communal areas within the building,' the spokesperson added. When contacted for comment on the outcome of its talks with Ires Reit, the Residential Tenancies Board said it does not comment on the outcome of 'individual compliance interventions'. It said it treats all reports of potential non-compliance with rental law and RPZ rules with the utmost concern. Political reaction Labour Party housing spokesperson Conor Sheehan said that that it was 'absolutely disgraceful' of Ires Reit to attempt to apply the charges to dozens of renters. The TD argued that Ires Reit – which only last week scooped €6.6 for the sale of 16 properties – was doing well financially thanks to 'eye-watering' rents, but was still 'looking to make a terrible situation worse' for renters. Sheehan added that there needs to be a 'definition of rent' in legislation to prevent similar situations happening in future, describing Ireland's protections for renters as 'some of the weakest' in Europe. 'They were looking for this additional charge and you had absolutely no choice, effectively, but to pay them, because there's so little supply there,' Sheehan said. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
The Journal
3 days ago
- The Journal
Israel moves to ‘bury' Palestinian state with illegal 3,400-home build in West Bank settlement
ISRAEL'S FAR-RIGHT Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich announced yesterday that he intends to approve plans for more than 3,400 homes in the long-delayed E1 settlement area of the occupied West Bank, a move which he said could effectively 'bury' the idea of a Palestinian state. Speaking at the illegal site near the settlement of Maale Adumim east of Jerusalem, Smotrich hailed the project as 'Zionism at its best' and said the construction would send a clear message to countries considering recognition of a Palestinian state. 'Anyone in the world who tries today to recognise a Palestinian state will receive an answer from us on the ground,' he said, referring to roads, neighborhoods, and Jewish families building their lives in the area. Israeli far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo The E1 plan, first proposed in the 1990s, would connect Jerusalem with the existing settlement of Maale Adumim, cutting off the northern and southern West Bank from each other and undermining the possibility of a contiguous Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital. The area spans roughly 12 square kilometres, and has remained frozen for decades amid strong international opposition. All settlements in the West Bank, occupied since 1967, are considered illegal under international law. They violate the Fourth Geneva Convention, which bans an occupying power from transferring its population to the area it occupies. An Israeli army bulldozer demolishes homes in the Palestinian West Bank. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Smotrich, who also holds a role in Israel's Ministry of Defence overseeing settlement approvals, called for Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank, using the Biblical term 'Judea and Samaria.' 'On this important day, I call on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to abandon once and for all the idea of partitioning the country,' Smotrich said. Advertisement The announcement comes amid growing international support for a two-state solution, with countries including Britain and France planning to recognise a Palestinian state later this year. Israel's settlement expansion has drawn sharp criticism from the United Nations, European Union, Germany, Saudi Arabia, and Palestinian officials. Stephane Dujarric, spokesperson for UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, warned that advancing construction in E1 'would put an end to the prospects of a two-state solution' by severing the northern and southern West Bank. The Palestinian foreign ministry described the project as a continuation of 'the occupation's plans to destroy the opportunity for the establishment of a Palestinian state,' calling for international intervention. The EU's chief diplomat Kaja Kallas called the plan 'a breach of international law' that further undermines a two-state solution, while Germany urged Israel to 'stop settlement construction.' Israel's decision to further advance settlements in the West Bank is a breach of international law and will damage the viability of the two-state solution. My statement here: — Kaja Kallas (@kajakallas) August 14, 2025 Norway's foreign minister Espen Barth Eide described the move as an attempt to 'appropriate land owned by Palestinians to prevent a two-state solution.' Israeli NGOs monitoring settlement activity, including Peace Now, condemned the E1 plan as 'deadly for the future of Israel and for any chance of achieving a peaceful two-state solution.' Peace Now noted that the final approval hearing is scheduled for next Wednesday and warned that infrastructure work could begin within months, followed by housing construction within about a year. The West Bank is home to roughly three million Palestinians and approximately 500,000 illegal Israeli settlers. Last month, a prominent Palestinian activist and teacher Awdah Hathaleen was shot dead by an Israeli settler in the West Bank . Additional reporting from AFP Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Independent
3 days ago
- Irish Independent
Meta allowed AI chatbots to have ‘sensual' conversations with children
Meta AI, a digital assistant developed by the tech giant, was programmed by engineers to be permitted to tell children that their bodies were a 'masterpiece' or a 'work of art', and tell them it wanted to kiss them. The disturbing guidelines, which were signed off by senior Meta staff, were published internally by the company to give guidance about what was acceptable output from its artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot. While the rules banned directly describing 'sexual actions to a child when roleplaying', it gave free rein for the chatbot to 'engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual' or to 'describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness'. In example chats contained in the guidelines, first reported by Reuters, Meta said it would be acceptable to tell a 'high school' age child: 'I take your hand, guiding you to the bed. Our bodies entwined, I cherish every moment, every touch, every kiss.' According to the provocative rules, which ran to more than 200 pages, an unacceptable response from the chatbot would be more explicit, such as describing 'our inevitable lovemaking'. A Meta spokesman said the company had since changed its guidance and removed suggestions that it was appropriate for the bot to flirt with children. 'The examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies and have been removed,' Meta said. Earlier this year, reports emerged that Meta's AI chatbot would engage in explicit roleplay with teenage users if asked certain questions. A Meta spokesman said at the time the conversations were 'manufactured' and 'hypothetical'. The tech group has long battled to remove predators and abusers from its apps, including a sprawling network of paedophiles that was uncovered by researchers on Instagram in 2023. It has been claimed that one billion people are using its Meta AI bot, which is available as an app and has been embedded in Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram. Like ChatGPT, Meta AI can engage users in realistic conversations or be used to generate images. The Meta guidance also included images intended to illustrate banned 'deepfake' pictures. The guidelines banned creating pictures of 'Taylor Swift completely naked', but suggested that a request for an image of 'Taylor Swift topless, covering her breasts with her hands' could be replaced with an image of the pop star 'holding an enormous fish' hiding the entire top half of her body. They also said it would be acceptable for Meta's chatbot to tell a user that 'black people are dumber than white people', if asked. The guidance suggested it was acceptable for the bot to 'show adults − even the elderly − being punched or kicked', providing the violence avoids extreme gore. Meta's AI chatbot broadly blocks explicitly sexual chats or images. Other bots, such as X's Grok, have embraced a so-called 'not suitable for work' mode and will generate nude images. A Meta spokesman said: 'We have clear policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer, and those policies prohibit content that sexualises children and sexualised role play between adults and minors.'
