On last day, campus council president calls for renaming Panjab University to also include Haryana
At the same time, PUCSC vice-president Archit Garg, who hails from Punjab, opposed the move.
Congress' Rohtak MP Deepender Singh Hooda, who backed Anurag's proposal, said he would place the issue in Parliament in its next session.
As per the memorandum, Dalal has pointed out both Punjab and Haryana share historical and cultural, and that it aligns with the already existing nomenclature for the high court.
Deepender Hooda said the council president had approached him, and the demand is genuine. 'It will mean a lot for the students of Haryana to see their representation in PU, considering Chandigarh is also the capital of Haryana, not just Punjab,' he said.
'When 48% of the PU students are Haryanvis, it is their right that the name of Haryana be included.'
He added that with the support of other Congress MPs, he will bring this issue in Parliament.
Meanwhile, PUCSC vice-president Archit Garg said, 'Panjab University's name is iconic. It was the name we chose after the university was relocated from Pakistan. It has its own unique identity. Its name shouldn't be changed.'
In 2023, during the varsity's fourth global alumni meet, Vice-President of India Jagdeep Dhankhar had also raked up the issue of PU affiliation to Haryana colleges in nearby districts, like Ambala and Yamunanagar.
Three meetings chaired by former Punjab governor Banwarilal Purohit with the chief ministers of Punjab and Haryana earlier in 2023 remained inconclusive.
At the time of the Punjab's reorganisation in 1966, PU was declared an 'inter-state body corporate' under Section 72 (1) of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966.
The affiliation issue has remained a bone of contention, with Haryana offering to bear up to 40% of the total annual expenses of the cash-strapped university in exchange for affiliation to some of the colleges in Ambala, Panchkula and Yamunanagar districts, and Punjab refusing to budge from its stance that the varsity belongs to it alone.
Then Haryana CM Manohar Lal Khattar had said in the meetings that under the Punjab Reorganisation Act, the colleges and regional centres of Haryana were affiliated to PU. However, the arrangement was withdrawn by Haryana in 1973.
Citing National Education Policy and how colleges are even getting affiliated with international universities, Khattar had said Haryana's colleges again be affiliated with PU.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
Kerala mulling credits, semester system for higher secondary classes
Introduction of credits and a semester system for higher secondary classes is one of the proposals being mulled as the State enters the last phase of its comprehensive curriculum revision for school education. A conclave held in the State capital on Friday to hold discussions with stakeholders and garner public opinion on the higher secondary curriculum revision that is set to begin soon underlined the need to consider the recent changes in the higher education sector, particularly the implementation of the four-year undergraduate programme (FYUGP) in the State, when deciding on the direction of the higher secondary curriculum reforms. Even though the credit system has not been fully realised nationally, the State is pondering if students can earn credits not only through project and assignments but also National Cadet Corps and National Service Scheme activities. Language subjects optional Reducing the academic burden on students is also under consideration. Making language subjects optional is one way being explored. Higher secondary students can study Indian or foreign languages online and earn credits. This will also allow students to focus more on core subjects. For instance, Humanities students currently unable to pursue Economics and Mathematics together can do so if they choose to study one language through SCOLE-Kerala. Decisions though will have to be taken on aspects such as the number of credits that students can earn and if schools have the wherewithal to implement such proposals – such as faculty and infrastructure. National, State levels Presenting the concept note for the higher secondary curriculum revision, State Council of Educational Research and Training (SCERT) director Jayaprakash R.K. pointed out that curriculum revision at the national level was guided by the National Education Policy under which the National Credit Framework provided for 1,200 hours of learning and 160 credits for classes XI and XII. The FYUGP provided more choice to students in pursuing courses and gave importance to skill education. 'When thinking about higher secondary curriculum reforms, the transformations in higher education in the State have to be taken into account.' 21st century skills He also pointed out that importance of skill courses and competency development. The reforms also raised the question of how the 21st century skills could be passed on to students in the classroom, especially at a time when technology was making huge leaps and artificial intelligence had found its way into classrooms, he said. Dr. Jayaprakash explained the schedule for the revision process. Public discussions would be held at the district-levels from August 1 to 15. Workshops on conceptualising ideas, textbook writing, and editing will follow. Expert committee meetings will be held in December. Scrutiny and curriculum subcommittee meetings will follow. The curriculum steering committee will meet in February and the textbooks will be ready for printing by March 10. Minister for Finance K.N. Balagopal who inaugurated the conclave said the achievements in the public education sector could be carried forward only through constant improvements. Minister for General Education V. Sivankutty presided.
NDTV
9 hours ago
- NDTV
6 Big Changes In NEP 2020 That Every Parent, Student, Educator Should Know
Major Changes In NEP 2020: The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 introduced several changes in the education sector to boost learning outcomes and skill development, aiming to improve the overall quality of education across the country. From starting school at age 3 to flexible college degrees, mandatory teacher qualifications, and new-age courses rooted in Indian knowledge, NEP 2020 promises a future-ready education framework. Here are the 6 big changes every student, parent, and educator should know: 1. 4-Year Undergraduate Program With Multiple Entry and Exit Options NEP 2020 introduced new 3 and 4-year Undergraduate (UG) programs with multiple entry and exit options. Students opting to quit after a year in the program will be awarded a certificate, a diploma after 2 years, or a bachelor's degree after a 3 or 4-year program. 2. Classes Start at Age 3 The earlier 10+2 structure included 10 years of primary and secondary education and two years of higher secondary education. The new structure introduced under NEP 2020 classifies the class structure into four categories - Foundational, Preparatory, Middle, and Secondary. Foundational Stage (ages 3-8): Includes 3 years of pre-school (ages 3-5) and Classes 1-2 (ages 6-7) Preparatory Stage (ages 8-11): Classes 3-5 Middle Stage (ages 11-14): Classes 6-8 Secondary Stage (ages 14-18): Classes 9-12 This new structure is designed to align learning with a child's developmental needs. 3. PARAKH Surveys The NEP 2020 introduced PARAKH Surveys, which aim to improve the overall quality of education through student assessment. For example, the survey assesses what percentage of Class 3 students can read and write, and how many can make a simple transaction using 100 rupees. This survey was conducted in December 2024 and results were released in July 2025, which showed a significant learning deficit in Classes 3, 6, and 9. PARAKH, which is a National Assessment Centre, works directly with boards of school education to develop reforms pertaining to examination and help schools make necessary changes to support the overall growth of students and education. 4. Vocational Education Vocational education involves teaching practical skills and knowledge required for a particular job. The 12th Five-Year Plan had estimated that only 5 per cent of Indian students aged between 19-24 had access to vocational education, while in countries like the USA, Germany, and South Korea, the numbers stood at 52, 75, and 96 per cent respectively. The NEP 2020 aims to integrate vocational education programs with mainstream education for at least 50 per cent of students by 2025 in middle and secondary schools. 5. New Courses on Indian Knowledge Systems The NEP 2020 introduced an elective course on Indian Knowledge Systems for secondary school students. This course includes knowledge from ancient India and its contributions to modern India. This new course will be integrated with various subjects like Mathematics, Astronomy, Philosophy, Yoga, Architecture, Medicine, Agriculture, Engineering, Linguistics, Literature, Sports, Games, as well as Governance, Polity, and Conservation. 6. Minimum 4-Year Degree for Teaching Required Candidates will have to mandatorily complete a four-year integrated program to become qualified for the role of a teacher. This four-year program will be a dual-major, which will include a bachelor's in education and a specialized subject such as language, history, music, mathematics, computer science, chemistry, economics, art, physical education, etc. This program will become the minimum qualification required for the role of a teacher by 2030.
Indian Express
13 hours ago
- Indian Express
NEP 2020, Five Years On: Curricular flexibility improves, but multiple entry-exit remains rigid
Five years after its approval by the Union Cabinet in July 2020, the National Education Policy (NEP) — envisioned to transform India into a 'global knowledge superpower' — has led to notable systemic reforms. These include greater curriculum flexibility, the integration of Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS) into classrooms, and the establishment of new institutions. However, despite this progress, several structural challenges remain. According to the first 'QS I-GAUGE Implementation Report' by Quacquarelli Symonds, only 36% of higher education institutions (HEIs) have implemented multiple entry and exit points. The report, based on data from 165 higher education institutions (HEIs) across 24 states and union territories, assesses the policy's progress across key areas. The most visible impact of the NEP has been the shift away from rigid disciplinary boundaries. Nearly 90% of surveyed institutions now report offering flexible, multidisciplinary curricula, often integrated with vocational components. Environmental education is nearly universal, and ethics-based courses such as Mulya Pravah 2.0 are now offered by 62% of institutions. The multiple entry and exit points — touted as a revolutionary student-centric reform — has failed to take root meaningfully. Just 36% of HEIs surveyed have implemented this provision, and only 64% maintain records in the Academic Bank of Credits (ABC), the mechanism required for credit portability. The NEP placed significant emphasis on improving student well-being. Nearly 86% of institutions report having a dedicated student services centre to address emotional and psychological needs. However, more specialised mental health support, especially in collaboration with national institutes such as NIMHANS or AIIMS, is rare. Only 14% of the surveyed HEIs have formal partnerships with such institutions, the report found. This shortfall is further reflected in faculty preparedness: while the NEP encourages teacher training in counselling and mentoring, only 64% of HEIs reported that their faculty undergo refresher courses on mental health support. A lack of formal training could limit the efficacy of mental wellness services already in place. A major NEP goal was to bring industry closer to academia by appointing 'Professors of Practice' (PoPs) to teach applied, experience-based courses. However, this vision remains far from realised. While many HEIs support the idea in principle, only 14% of institutions have actually appointed such professors. Likewise, only 19% of HEIs involve industry experts in curriculum design, even though this is key to keeping academic content aligned with market demands. Internships have become more widespread, 98% of institutions offer them with academic credit but deeper, sustained industry engagement through curriculum and faculty collaboration remains largely limited. According to the QS report, just 22% of institutions currently enjoy autonomous status. What are the barriers? Nothing out of the blue: 153 institutions cite financial dependence as a key issue, 143 mention bureaucratic delays, and 131 point to limited institutional capacity. But does institutional autonomy really matter? Short answer, yes. It restricts the ability of HEIs to redesign curricula, establish interdisciplinary departments, or forge international partnerships, all crucial to the NEP's vision of 'globally competitive' Indian universities. Global collaboration has not kept pace with NEP's ambitions. Fewer than half the institutions surveyed (41%) have signed MoUs with foreign universities. Just 33% reserve seats for international students, and only 39% report having dedicated infrastructure to host them. Cross-border research collaboration is also underwhelming, with only 45% of faculty reportedly engaging with international peers on joint research or teaching. In effect, while the aspiration for global engagement is widespread, the ecosystem to support it, infrastructure, regulatory ease, and funding, remains weak. The NEP's emphasis on Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS) has led to the introduction of electives in areas like Ayurveda, Yoga, Sanskrit, and ancient sciences. But progress here is slow and inconsistent, the report has revealed. Only 38% of institutions offer IKS electives for credit, and just 36% run short-term non-degree courses in these domains. Notably, a mere 8% of HEIs have empanelled 'Kala Gurus', traditional scholars meant to teach and research indigenous knowledge. The report notes that while IKS enjoys rhetorical support, its practical implementation is often limited by a lack of teaching staff, infrastructure, or institutional clarity on integrating traditional and modern epistemologies. NEP envisioned universities pooling resources and forming large knowledge clusters to promote research and innovation. Yet, 61% of institutions surveyed said they are not part of any such cluster. The barriers cited include infrastructural limitations (138 institutions), financial constraints (140), and cultural or administrative differences (123). Moreover, only 64% of institutions reported collaboration with regional R&D partners, pointing to the early stages of a research ecosystem that NEP aims to build. One of NEP's strongest adoption areas has been digital learning. According to the report, 96% of institutions use platforms like SWAYAM, DIKSHA, or SWAYAM PRABHA. Additionally, 94% report investment in digital infrastructure, and 85% offer faculty training in creating high-quality online content. Yet, equitable access remains a challenge. Only 28% of institutions offer two-year postgraduate diplomas via open and distance learning, an option that could democratise access in underserved regions. And while MOOCs are accepted for credit in 72% of institutions, standardised assessment and integration into degree programs are still evolving. The NEP has succeeded in reshaping perceptions around higher education in India. Over the last five years, several new public institutions including the Indian Institute of Heritage and multiple Central Tribal Universities have been launched. Funding models are being reconsidered, and digital learning is seeing greater traction than before. Yet, as the QS I-GAUGE report shows, India's higher education reform remains a work in progress. The policy vision is in place, but its realisation depends on operational support, targeted funding, and regulatory simplification. Without addressing foundational issues like faculty shortages and financial dependency, even the best policy ideas risk being stuck in an implementation limbo.
