
I Tried Midjourney's AI Video Generator, and It's Hard to Beat the Value for the Price
As CNET's resident AI creative software reviewer, I knew I had to try out its V1 video model. I was most curious to see if the creative, detailed quality I had come to enjoy in its AI images would translate to its new videos. What I found was classic Midjourney: fun results, with some common AI foibles, wrapped in an intuitive, quick-to-use interface.
Midjourney is a competitive option for AI enthusiasts in an increasingly crowded market. But before you pull out your wallet, you should know where the cracks and pitfalls are. Here's how my experience with Midjourney went, including the video fails and successes that I generated.
The good, bad and physics-defying nature of Midjourney videos
Midjourney offers image-to-video generation. You can upload your own images and animate them, with or without additional text prompting. This is great for constraining the model to one image's appearance -- reducing the chance for it to run wild and hallucinate -- but I hope the company eventually adds a text-to-video pathway for those of us who prefer to ideate with text rather than imagery.
To test and stretch Midjourney's artistic capabilities, I generated AI images first. Then, I asked it to animate them with instructions for specific movements or additional elements moving through the frame. The results, like any AI creative service, were hit or miss.
First, the things I liked: Midjourney's videos were easy to create, simple to upscale and came in its usual colorful and whimsical style. It was a speedy process, usually about a minute or two for a batch of four variations per prompt. You can adjust several settings, including dimensions, before running your prompt. My favorite tool was a new-to-me slider that let me increase the weirdness of a video. The videos are capped at five seconds, with no watermarks and no audio.
Now, the bad. Midjourney still struggles with prompt adherence, or creating exactly what you ask for. This is something I've run into with its image generator, too. For example, in one video, I asked it to make some tree roots move and add some fairies floating above them. I only got the new elements, while my tree roots stayed static. Text generation is still messy and illegible. (To be fair to Midjourney, OpenAI's new image generator has set a pretty high bar.) My dreams of having a butterfly reveal the phrase "I'm over it" didn't quite come true.
Object permanence is also a struggle. Sometimes the model understands and obeys the laws of physics, and other times overlapping elements disappear and reappear at random. It took a lot of generating to get an example of Michael Jordan dunking over LeBron James without his hand going through the solid hoop or the ball disintegrating the net. And yes, I was able to generate semi-recognizable versions of celebrities, with and without using their names in my prompts. The AI moderator only kicked in occasionally.
You can try to add objects after your image is created, but it was pretty inexact and frustrating in my experience. I got the best results when I crafted my perfect image (or grabbed a favorite from my camera roll) and simply told Midjourney to animate it -- basically, just make things move with simple stage directions. I know adding too many moving parts to a project is usually a disaster, but I expect better when that project is creating a video.
How Midjourney stacks up against Veo 3 and competitors
The best AI video service for you is going to depend on your project and the quality level you need to complete it. Amateur creators and Midjourney enthusiasts will find familiar ground and a lot to enjoy, but many AI quirks mean Midjourney will run too short to be useful for professional creators.
One obvious place where Midjourney's video falls short of its competitors is with audio. If you need AI-generated and/or synchronized audio to go with your AI video clips, you'll need to use Veo 3 or Adobe Firefly. Midjourney's V1 doesn't have that capability, though it's possible that could change with a future update.
Other things to consider when choosing between Midjourney and other services are whether you already have assets you want to animate or want to brainstorm/start from scratch. Midjourney excels as an AI brainstorming partner, and its creativity helped spark new ideas. The model could easily animate my existing images, but more complex instructions often made it harder to bring my exact ideas to life. In those cases, patience -- and plenty of time refining and editing prompts -- will be your best friends.
Midjourney pricing, availability and privacy
Midjourney is a paid-only service available through its website and Discord. Its subscriptions start at $10 per month -- cheaper than Google's Veo 3 and OpenAI's Sora, which both start at $20 per month. (Adobe Firefly also starts at $10 per month.) Upgrading to pricier plans gets you more concurrent jobs and faster generation time, which means you can run multiple prompts at once, and those jobs will be ready quicker.
Midjourney's privacy policy says it can use the information you provide to train its machine learning algorithms. It also says the company may share your information with service providers, third-party vendors and other business partners. All your images and videos are automatically shared in Midjourney's public gallery unless you pony up for the stealth mode feature in the $60 per month Pro plan or the most expensive Mega plan for $120 per month.
Also noteworthy in privacy considerations, Midjourney recently got slapped with a massive copyright infringement lawsuit. Disney and Universal called the AI service "a bottomless pit of plagiarism" in its complaint alleging that Midjourney allowed its users to create ultra-realistic images of protected characters like Shrek and Yoda. The case is ongoing and doesn't currently impact Midjourney users.
For more, check out how to write the best AI image prompts and how to fix the most common AI hallucinations.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jim Cramer Says Don't Quit Market When It's Frothy: 'Is Widespread Irrationality a Reason To Sell Down in Perfectly Rational Stocks? Absolutely Not'
In the face of a frothy market, financial expert Jim Cramer encourages investors to stay the course, highlighting numerous positive stock narratives that counterbalance the market's irrationality. What Happened: Cramer made a case last week, asserting that the current market conditions are far removed from the dotcom bubble burst of the late 90s. He emphasized that despite the froth, today's market is more rational. Cramer drew attention to the irrationality in recent IPOs like Circle, Figma, and Bullish, which have witnessed significant gains since their launch. On CNBC, he also noted Oklo Inc., a firm with ambitions to construct a compact nuclear reactor powered by nuclear waste, whose stock has surged 247% year-to-date. 'Flying cars, supercharged crypto ETFs, secretive companies that consult in magical ways, all irrational. I could go on and on,' Cramer said. 'Is the widespread irrationality a reason to sell down your positions in perfectly rational stocks? Absolutely not.' Also Read: Jim Cramer Has Blunt Message for Fed Chair Powell After July Job Numbers Tanked On the other hand, Cramer pointed to Amazon Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) and Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE:LLY) as instances of rationality. Amazon's stock climbed by 3% after the introduction of same-day fresh food delivery in over 1,000 U.S. cities and towns. Eli Lilly's stock also experienced a boost when a team from the pharmaceutical company's management and board of directors purchased stock on the open market. 'Sure, there's froth, but there are also perfectly legitimate moves in the stocks of great companies. I am calling this the year of magical thinking, but the truth is you can't get the runs in the good ones without the runs in the bad ones,' Cramer added. Read Next Short Seller Slams Jim Cramer Over Palantir, Accuses Him Of Hyping 'High-Multiple, Hype-Driven Narrative' Image: Shutterstock/katz Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? (AMZN): Free Stock Analysis Report ELI LILLY (LLY): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Jim Cramer Says Don't Quit Market When It's Frothy: 'Is Widespread Irrationality a Reason To Sell Down in Perfectly Rational Stocks? Absolutely Not' originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Sign in to access your portfolio


Geek Tyrant
10 minutes ago
- Geek Tyrant
SUPERMAN Concept Art and Photos Reveal First Look At Kal-El's Suit Without The Divisive Red Trunks — GeekTyrant
We have our first look at what Superman might have looked like without one of his most recognizable wardrobe choices. Newly revealed concept art gives fans a glimpse of an alternate version of the suit designed for Superman, one that skips the red trunks entirely. Graphic and surface designer Maybelle Pineda shared the behind-the-scenes concept on social media, offering a peek at an early take on the Man of Steel's costume. And yes, the red trunks were nowhere to be seen. Without them, the design feels oddly incomplete, almost like something you'd find on a knock-off toy version of the character. There's a strange nakedness to it, even if everything else about the design remains the same. There was a serious debate behind the scenes about whether or not the red trunks should make a return in the DCU. It echoes the earlier decision made by Zack Snyder to ditch the trunks in his interpretation with Henry Cavill, a move that sparked plenty of controversy back in the day. Initially, Superman director James Gunn was leaning in the same direction. "We were trying on all these different versions, and we screened tested with trunks and no trunks," Gunn explained to io9 during an on-set interview last year. "And one of the things David said is that Superman wants kids to not be afraid of him. 'He's an alien. He's got these incredible powers. He shoots beams out of his eyes… He's this incredibly powerful, could be considered scary, individual and he wants people to like him. He wants to be a symbol of hope and positivity. So he dresses like a professional wrestler. He dresses in a way that makes people unafraid of him, that shows that hope that shows that positivity. And that really clicked in for me. 'And I think trying to pretend that Superman's costume doesn't have some frivolity to it at its base, trying to make it look serious, is silly because he is a superhero. He's the first one, brightly colored and that's who he is." It turns out we have David Corenswet to thank for standing up for the red trunks. His argument wasn't just about tradition, it was about what Superman represents to the world. That visual cue, however campy it may seem to some, carries weight. It's about tone and symbolism. Corenswet pushed for the classic look, and thankfully, he got through to Gunn. So while this trunk-less concept may never see the light of day on screen, it's an interesting glimpse into the creative process behind one of the most iconic superheroes of all time. And it shows just how close we came to another red-trunkless Superman in the DC Universe.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Sex and the City' Universe Will End With ‘And Just Like That' Season 3
And Just Like That… It's over. On Friday, director Michael Patrick King announced that the Sex and the City revival show that started airing its third season recently will end with a two-part finale, releasing on Aug. 14. 'The ongoing storytelling of the Sex and the City universe is coming to an end,' King opened his statement. 'When I was writing the last episode of And Just Like That… season 3, it became clear to me that this might be a wonderful place to stop.' More from Rolling Stone Sarah Jessica Parker on Talking Politics Online: 'FDR Was Elected Without Social Media' 'And Just Like That' Season 3: How to Watch the 'Sex and the City' Reboot Online Carrie Bradshaw Not Over Aidan, Possibly Writing Romantasy in 'And Just Like That' Trailer King says he made the decision with Sarah Jessica Parker, Casey Bloys, and Sarah Aubrey to expand the season from 10 to 12 episodes (with a two-part finale) to give a proper send-off to the series that revived the fan-favorite characters on HBO Max. 'SJP and I held off announcing the news until now because we didn't want the word 'final' to overshadow the fun of watching the season,' King wrote. 'It's with great gratitude that we thank all the viewers who have let these characters into their homes and their hearts over these many years.' And Just Like That brought back Sex and the City, which originally aired from 1998 to 2004. The original show ran for six seasons and spawned two films. The new show relaunched the series in 2021, airing with SJP's Carrie Bradshaw reconnecting with Miranda (Cynthia Nixon) and Charlotte (Kristin Davis). Kim Cattrall didn't return as Samantha, but made a cameo in the second season. And Just Like That Season Three premiered on May 29, 2025 on HBO Max with episode lengths running between 42-44 minutes. Along with Parker, Davis, and Nixon, And Just Like That also stars Sarita Choudhury (Seema), Nicole Ari Parker (Lisa), John Corbett (Aidan), Mario Cantone (Anthony), and new faces this season, including Rosie O'Donnell and Logan Marshall-Green. Best of Rolling Stone The 50 Best 'Saturday Night Live' Characters of All Time Denzel Washington's Movies Ranked, From Worst to Best 70 Greatest Comedies of the 21st Century Solve the daily Crossword