Suffolk County may have to pay back $91M in shady red-light camera fees — leading to massive budget deficit
The Long Island county is already facing a potential battle over its spending plan, with its Budget Review Office forecasting a massive $552 million deficit by 2028.
Suffolk ended its red-light program on Dec. 1 but two courts ruled that a $30 administrative fee it tacked onto violations since the program launched in 2010 was illegal because it exceeded a $50 maximum fine.
The county is appealing the decision.
'While the county cannot comment on the specifics of pending litigation, it is not possible to predict how the county would address this situation,' County Executive Ed Romaine said in a statement.
County Executive Ed Romaine said that it is 'not possible to predict how the county would address this situation.'
Newsday via Getty Images
If Suffolk loses the appeal, the county may have to pay even more than just reimbursing drivers who paid the extra fees because state law requires 9% interest for each year the money goes unpaid, according to David Raimondo, an attorney representing Suffolk drivers in a class-action lawsuit.
Earlier this month, Romaine warned constituents that the coming financial situation will require 'some extraordinary budgeting' and 'not everyone's going to be happy' — but the looming payout is just one piece of a much bigger puzzle.
County officials also have to fund a newly approved police union contract with boosted pay, hammer out several other pending labor deals, and contend with the uncertainty of future federal aid and an economy experts warn is on the decline.
Suffolk County Comptroller John Kennedy Jr. did not respond to a request for comment.
Meanwhile, Nassau County may have to cough up even more than Suffolk, as it hit red-light runners with not only the standard $50 fine, but added a $45 'driver responsibility fee,' and a $55 'public safety fee' — bringing the total extra cost of a single ticket to $150.
Seth Koslow, a Democrat, introduced a bill that would permanently eliminate administrative fees and establish a fund to reimburse ticketed drivers charged with these fees.
Newsday via Getty Images
The extra fees raked in $64 million in gross revenue for Nassau in 2022 alone, according to records obtained by Newsday.
It is unclear the total amount the county may owe, but Democratic lawmakers in the Nassau Board of Legislators recently introduced a bill that would permanently eliminate administrative fees and establish a fund to reimburse ticketed drivers charged with these fees.
'For years, Nassau's red light cameras were more about revenue than safety — and drivers paid the price,' Seth Koslow, a Democrat who introduced the bill in December 2024, told The Post. 'It's time to stop the fleecing and start the refunding,' he said.
Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman did not respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
2 minutes ago
- New York Post
Adams backer hosts GOP mayoral nominee in Hamptons for impromptu fundraiser
Big-time Eric Adams backer John Catsimatidis hosted Republican mayoral nominee Curtis Sliwa for an impromptu Hamptons fundraiser — as the billionaire businessman pushes an 'Anyone But Zohran' movement targeting the socialist frontrunner. Sliwa was the guest of honor Saturday at Catsimatidis' 'Hamptons Business Power Breakfast' — a regular Southampton meeting of influential New Yorkers — that has also recently hosted the incumbent mayor and ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo. 'I appreciate everyone who invited me out to share our plan to fix New York City and bring common sense back to City Hall,' Sliwa said to The Post. John Catsimatidis hosted GOP nominee Curtis Sliwa at a Hamptons breakfast. Dennis A. Clark Cats is pushing the charge against Zohran Mamdani, and told the crowd on Saturday, 'ABZ, anyone but Zohran.' Matthew McDermott His campaign confirmed a haul of more than $21,000 from the jaunt out east on Long Island. 'When the movers and shakers join together with regular, working-class New Yorkers behind this campaign, it's a clear sign we're on the path to defeating Zohran Mamdani and turning this city around,' Sliwa said, referring to the Democratic mayoral nominee. Catsimatidis praised Sliwa's performance on Monday, telling The Post the event turned into an impromptu fundraiser for the GOP nominee for mayor. 'Curtis did exceptionally well,' he said. 'People at the end… volunteered and made a contribution. That was not the original intent.' The Guardian Angels founder turned heads when he entered the room, and some attendees didn't initially recognize him as he ditched his signature red beret — which he's been doing more frequently on the campaign trail. The event was co-hosted by Alex Karloutsos, a Greek Orthodox priest who received the Presidential Medal of Honor in 2022. More than 100 other movers and shakers in Big Apple politics attended, including former New York Lieutenant Governor Betsy McCaughey, former NYPD Police Commissioner Ray Kelly. Catsimatidis told the room that business leaders and others need to unite to stave off a mayoralty of Zohran Mamdani, who stunned the politicos in June when he delivered an embarrassing defeat to Cuomo in the Democratic primary. 'ABZ….Anybody but Zohran Mamdani,' the radio host and supermarket magnet told the crowd. The Gristedes owner said he wants to continue to urge people that 'socialism doesn't work in our city.' Sliwa will square off with Queens Assemblyman Mamdani in November when Cuomo, Adams and another independent Jim Walden will also be on the ballot. Recent polls still have Mamdani as the frontrunner in the general election, with Cuomo sitting in second and Sliwa in third.
Los Angeles Times
2 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
U.S. will get a 15% cut of Nvidia and AMD chip sales to China under a new, unusual agreement
NEW YORK — Nvidia and AMD have agreed to share 15% of their revenues from chip sales to China with the U.S. government, as part of a deal to secure export licenses for the semiconductors. The Trump administration halted the sale of advanced computer chips to China in April over national security concerns, but Nvidia and AMD revealed in July that Washington would allow them to resume sales of the H20 and MI308 chips, which are used in artificial intelligence development. President Trump confirmed the terms of the unusual arrangement in a Monday press conference while noting that he originally wanted 20% of the sales revenue when Nvidia asked to sell the 'obsolete' H20 chip to China. The president credited Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang for negotiating him down to 15%. 'So we negotiated a little deal. So he's selling a essentially old chip,' Trump said. Nvidia did not comment about the specific details of the agreement or its quid pro quo nature, but said they would adhere to the export rules laid out by the administration. 'We follow rules the U.S. government sets for our participation in worldwide markets. While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide,' Nvidia wrote in a statement to the AP. 'America cannot repeat 5G and lose telecommunication leadership. America's AI tech stack can be the world's standard if we race.' AMD did not immediately reply to a request for comment. The top Democrat on a House panel focusing on competition with China raised concerns over the reported agreement, calling it 'a dangerous misuse of export controls that undermines our national security.' Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, the ranking member of the House Select Committee on China, said he would seek answers about the legal basis for this arrangement and demand full transparency from the administration. 'Our export control regime must be based on genuine security considerations, not creative taxation schemes disguised as national security policy,' he said. 'Chip export controls aren't bargaining chips, and they're not casino chips either. We shouldn't be gambling with our national security to raise revenue.' Derek Scissors, senior fellow and China expert at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, questioned the constitutionality of the deal and also warned against risking national security for revenue. 'There's no precedent for this, probably because export taxes are unconstitutional, ' said Derek Scissors, senior fellow and China expert at the conservative American Enterprise Institute. 'They call it a fee, but 15% of sales revenue is about a standard a tax as it comes. For this reason, I don't think the 'arrangement' is at all durable. '' 'If it were to last, it has two possible implications. First, there's a possible export tax that high-profile companies and goods must consider. Or the tax only applies in exceptional situations, such as changing export controls. Then we'd risk national security for the sake of tax revenue, which is effectively the same as cutting the defense budget,' Scissors said. Back in July, Nvidia argued that tight export controls around their chip sales would cost the company an extra $5.5 billion. They've argued that such limits hinder U.S. competition in a sector in one of the world's largest markets for technology, and have also warned that U.S. export controls could end up pushing other countries toward China's AI technology. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC in July that the renewed sale of Nvidia's chips in China was linked to a trade agreement made between the two countries on rare earth magnets. Restrictions on sales of advanced chips to China have been central to the AI race between the world's two largest economic powers, but such controls are also controversial. Proponents argue that these restrictions are necessary to slow China down enough to allow U.S. companies to keep their lead. Meanwhile, opponents say the export controls have loopholes — and could still spur innovation. The emergence of China's DeepSeek AI chatbot in January particularly renewed concerns over how China might use advanced chips to help develop its own AI capabilities. Associated Press writers Josh Boak, Shawn Chen, Didi Tang and Paul Wiseman contributed to the reporting.
Miami Herald
32 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
What is the Home Rule Act? Trump just invoked it to ‘rescue' Washington, DC
President Donald Trump just invoked a decades-old law in a bid to crack down on crime in the nation's capital. In an Aug. 11 press conference, he said he was employing Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, permitting him to federalize the city's police department. 'I'm announcing a historic action to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse,' Trump said. 'This is Liberation Day in D.C., and we're going to take our capital back.' He also vowed to deploy the National Guard to 'restablish law, order and public safety,' mirroring tactics used during recent protests in Los Angeles. Multiple Democratic lawmakers condemned the president's move, denouncing it as an example of executive overreach and a political distraction. Passed by Congress in 1973, the District of Columbia Home Rule Act granted the city limited self-governing powers while leaving other authorities in federal hands. For the first time, it permitted D.C. residents to elect their own city council and mayor. However, it established significant oversight powers for Congress, including allowing lawmakers to review all legislation passed by the city council. 'The Home Rule Act is the result of the ongoing push by District residents for control of their own local affairs,' according to the city council's website. 'The existing local government is the most expanded form of self-government since the establishment of the District as the seat of the federal government.' Section 740 of the act — invoked by Trump — is concerned with the control of the police in emergency situations. 'Whenever the President of the United States determines that special conditions of an emergency nature exist which require the use of the Metropolitan Police force for Federal purposes, he may direct the Mayor to provide him, and the Mayor shall provide, such services of the Metropolitan Police force as the President may deem necessary and appropriate,' the section states. However, there are limits on the president's authority to federalize the city police. The president is only permitted to take control of the police department for a maximum of 48 hours without alerting Congress, the act states. But, if the president provides a written letter to the ranking members 'of the Committees on the District of Columbia of the Senate and the House of Representatives,' he may continue to exercise control of the police department for 30 days. After one month, this authority can only be extended by a joint resolution from the Senate and the House. Before invoking the legislation, Trump previously expressed interest in repealing the Home Rule Act, telling reporters on Aug. 5, 'We have to run D.C.' In his Aug. 11 press conference, Trump portrayed Washington, D.C. as a city plagued by lawlessness. 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged out maniacs and homeless people,' the president said. But, official data paints a more complicated picture. While D.C.'s crime rates remain higher than other cities by certain measures, they are steadily improving. So far in 2025, violent crime has decreased 26% year-over-year, with homicides down 12% and robberies down 28%, according to police department statistics. Total crime is also down by 7%. And in 2024, violent crime in the District of Columbia fell by 35% from 2023, reaching its lowest level in over three decades, according to the Department of Justice. Still, Washington's homicide rate in 2024 was among the highest of the nation's largest cities, behind St. Louis, New Orleans and Detroit, according to the Center for Public Safety Initiatives at Rochester Institute of Technology. The falling crime rate in the capital mirrors a broader national trend of reduced violent crime in recent years, following a pandemic-era surge, according to CBS News. FBI Director Kash Patel noted this positive progression during Trump's press conference, stating, 'The murder rates are plummeting. We are now able to report that the murder rate is on track to be the lowest in U.S. history, in modern reported U.S. history.'
