
Suffolk County may have to pay back $91M in shady red-light camera fees — leading to massive budget deficit
Suffolk County may have to pay back as much as $91 million in shady fees collected from its controversial red-light camera program — a cost that could cause budget mayhem.
The Long Island county is already facing a potential battle over its spending plan, with its Budget Review Office forecasting a massive $552 million deficit by 2028.
Suffolk ended its red-light program on Dec. 1 but two courts ruled that a $30 administrative fee it tacked onto violations since the program launched in 2010 was illegal because it exceeded a $50 maximum fine.
The county is appealing the decision.
'While the county cannot comment on the specifics of pending litigation, it is not possible to predict how the county would address this situation,' County Executive Ed Romaine said in a statement.
County Executive Ed Romaine said that it is 'not possible to predict how the county would address this situation.'
Newsday via Getty Images
If Suffolk loses the appeal, the county may have to pay even more than just reimbursing drivers who paid the extra fees because state law requires 9% interest for each year the money goes unpaid, according to David Raimondo, an attorney representing Suffolk drivers in a class-action lawsuit.
Earlier this month, Romaine warned constituents that the coming financial situation will require 'some extraordinary budgeting' and 'not everyone's going to be happy' — but the looming payout is just one piece of a much bigger puzzle.
County officials also have to fund a newly approved police union contract with boosted pay, hammer out several other pending labor deals, and contend with the uncertainty of future federal aid and an economy experts warn is on the decline.
Suffolk County Comptroller John Kennedy Jr. did not respond to a request for comment.
Meanwhile, Nassau County may have to cough up even more than Suffolk, as it hit red-light runners with not only the standard $50 fine, but added a $45 'driver responsibility fee,' and a $55 'public safety fee' — bringing the total extra cost of a single ticket to $150.
Seth Koslow, a Democrat, introduced a bill that would permanently eliminate administrative fees and establish a fund to reimburse ticketed drivers charged with these fees.
Newsday via Getty Images
The extra fees raked in $64 million in gross revenue for Nassau in 2022 alone, according to records obtained by Newsday.
It is unclear the total amount the county may owe, but Democratic lawmakers in the Nassau Board of Legislators recently introduced a bill that would permanently eliminate administrative fees and establish a fund to reimburse ticketed drivers charged with these fees.
'For years, Nassau's red light cameras were more about revenue than safety — and drivers paid the price,' Seth Koslow, a Democrat who introduced the bill in December 2024, told The Post. 'It's time to stop the fleecing and start the refunding,' he said.
Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman did not respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bad actors in LA protests a 'good thing' for Trump's immigration agenda: Chuck Rocha
Protests in Los Angeles and other cities continue as citizens protest ICE raids taking place in their communities. Democratic strategist Chuck Rocha encourages Americans to protest if they have disagreements with the government but cautions against bad actors who cause destruction and violence, saying, "Those are the imagery Donald Trump wants to see … because it's a good thing for him." Rocha talks about how President Trump campaigned on immigration, which he says is a key reason Trump was reelected. Rocha believes Democrats have a hard time sticking to core values and need to return to those if they want to win elections. #DonaldTrump #LosAngeles #ICEprotests


Axios
17 minutes ago
- Axios
Pam Bondi: LA protesters "very different" to Jan. 6 rioters Trump pardoned
The Trump administration is "not scared to go further" in its response to Los Angeles ' ongoing fiery protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids, Attorney General Pam Bondi said Wednesday. Why it matters: President Trump has referred to protesters as "insurrectionists" and has already taken the rare steps of federalizing California's National Guard and deploying the Marines to LA, prompting reporters to ask Bondi whether he'll next use emergency powers under the Insurrection Act. California's Democratic leaders have expressed strong opposition to the federal response, and Trump and Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) have traded insults as they blamed each other for the unrest. What they're saying: "Right now, in California, what we're doing is working," Bondi said, after being asked about whether Trump would invoke the 1807 law that allows presidents to deploy U.S. troops to quell domestic unrest. "By bringing in the National Guard, by bringing in the Marines, right now, to back them up, to protect our federal buildings, to protect highways, to protect the citizens," she said during her briefing with reporters. "So, right now, in California, we're at a good point. We're not scared to go further. We're not frightened to do something else if we need to." Bondi expressed hope that the federal action and the downtown night-time curfew that LA Mayor Karen Bass imposed on Tuesday to address looting and vandalism would bring the situation under control. Of note: Newsom in a Tuesday night address said that Trump is "not opposed to lawlessness and violence, as long as it serves HIM," adding: "What more evidence do we need than Jan. 6th?" A reporter asked Bondi whether there was a double standard in the administration defending law enforcement during the current protests when Trump pardoned most of the roughly 1,500 Jan. 6 rioters during his first day back in office. "Well, this is very different," Bondi said. "These are people out there hurting people in California right now. This is ongoing." State of play: There have now been six days of ICE protests in LA, and they've triggered similar demonstrations nationwide.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrat Congresswoman draws boos over 'shameful' sexism remark in committee hearing with Treasury Secretary
A House Ways and Means Committee hearing took an unexpected turn Wednesday when Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-CA) accused Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent of interrupting her because of her gender—prompting audible groans from the room. The exchange occurred during a tense five-minute questioning session, where Sanchez challenged Bessent on the impact of tariffs enacted under President Trump's administration. "Prices are rising on many everyday goods," Sanchez said, citing increases in clothing, shoes, canned food, toys, and household tools. She added, "On average, Trump's tariffs are estimated to cost households $3,000 more for the same goods than they would have last year," though she did not cite the source of the figure when pressed. Trump Says 'Total Reset Negotiated' With China During Tariff Talks In Geneva When Bessent attempted to interject, Sanchez quickly cut him off: "Please don't interrupt me… I know I'm a woman, but please try to limit yourself to answering my questions." That remark prompted groans from the hearing room, with one attendee audibly reacting, "Oh, come on." Sanchez responded: "No, I'm sorry, but we get talked over all the time, and I don't want that to happen at this hearing." Read On The Fox News App Bessent, who is openly gay, did not address the accusation and instead focused on defending the administration's trade policies. When Sanchez challenged him on pricing impacts and China's trade behavior, Bessent responded, "That's incorrect," and said, "They met their agreements under President Trump in 2020, and President Biden did not enforce them." Wh Slams Dems' 'Partisan Games' After Trump-foe Schiff Calls For Insider Trading Investigation Over Tariffs Sanchez repeatedly claimed that American consumers are paying more due to tariffs and described recent negotiations with China as rushed and lacking transparency. "A poorly negotiated trade deal with China is probably not worth the paper that it is written on," she said. "I was alarmed to hear this morning that Trump said the U.S.–China deal was done after just two days of talks in London." Bessent defended the agreement as an initial step. "The deal struck was for a specific goal, and it will be a much longer process," he said, adding, "China has proven an unreliable partner." The clash between Sanchez and Bessent was repeatedly moderated by Chairman Adrian Smith (R-NE), who reminded members of time limits and decorum throughout the article source: Democrat Congresswoman draws boos over 'shameful' sexism remark in committee hearing with Treasury Secretary