Prohibitory orders imposed in Jharkhand village following clash during Muharram procession
At least three persons were injured in the clash that took place in Palhe village in the
Patan police station
area on Sunday evening.
"Prohibitory orders under Section 163 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, earlier section 144 of CrPC, have been imposed for 48 hours from 6 am on Monday in the village as a precautionary measure," Deputy Commissioner (DC) Sameera S told PTI.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Experience Luxury at Its Finest – ATS Dolce Gr. Noida
ATS Infrastructure Ltd
Learn More
Undo
She said that the persons involved in the incident are being identified and statements of the injured are being recorded.
The peace committee is working in the area to calm the situation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
13 minutes ago
- NDTV
'Divine Intervention': Missing Kanwariya, 9, Reunited With Father In UP
Muzaffarnagar: Nine-year-old Sheersh, who was on his maiden Kanwar Yatra, thinks he encountered nothing short of a pure divine intervention. The boy, who had embarked on the pilgrimage from Barkali village in Uttar Pradesh's Muzaffarnagar district, got separated from his father Babloo Kumar on the Delhi-Haridwar national highway on Sunday. Police eventually found the boy inside a pilgrims' camp and reunited him with his father near Falauda village in the evening. According to a statement issued by the office of Senior Superintendent of Police on Monday, acting on a child missing complaint, the police started searching for the boy and found him in a camp. Sadar Circle Officer Devwrat Bajpai told PTI, "After they were reunited, both the child and the father were moved to tears with joy." Babloo Kumar said he had taken Sheersh with him on Kanwar Yatra for the first time ever this year. Two days ago, they went to Haridwar to collect holy water from river Ganga. While they were returning on foot on the highway along with other kanwariyas, his son went missing. He filed a complaint with the Uttar Pradesh Police, who eventually found Sheersh at a pilgrim's camp and returned his son to him. The duo then continued their yatra to reach Barkali village.
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Jannik Sinner clostebol controversy: What is this drug and why are some tennis fans angry
Jannik Sinner has just lived out the kind of script Hollywood might reject for being too on the nose: young prodigy, doping cloud, short ban, glorious return, and finally, the crown jewel — a Wimbledon title on the hallowed grass of Centre Court. He didn't just beat Carlos Alcaraz in the final; he beat Novak Djokovic in the semis — the man who's made a second career out of destroying generational dreams. And yet, for many watching, the taste is bittersweet. Because running parallel to the fairytale is the quiet but persistent question: what about the drugs? No, not syringes-in-the-locker-room kind of drugs. Just a whisper of Clostebol — a name that sounds more like a cough syrup than a career-altering compound. But in sport, as in politics, it's not the crime; it's the chemical. So, what on earth is Clostebol? Clostebol is a synthetic anabolic steroid, essentially a Frankenstein cousin of testosterone with just enough bite to help muscle recovery, but not enough to turn you into Ivan Drago. Think of it as the steroid equivalent of a smart casual dress code: won't win you a bodybuilding contest, but may give you an edge in a five-set war of attrition. It's often used in topical creams in parts of Europe to treat wounds, ulcers, and skin abrasions. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Đây có thể là thời điểm tốt nhất để giao dịch vàng trong 5 năm qua IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo In Italy, Trofodermin — a clostebol-based ointment — is as common as Volini is in Indian households. So yes, it's medically legitimate. But in sports? Completely banned. No exceptions. Not even for a scraped shin or your physio's poor hygiene. The Sinner saga: Contamination, conviction, and comeback Sinner tested positive for Clostebol in March 2024 — twice, in fact. But not in your usual doping scandal fashion. According to his team, the steroid didn't come from pills or injections, but from his physiotherapist's cut finger. Yes, really. Apparently, the physio had been using a clostebol-laced cream on himself and then massaged Sinner's legs without gloves. Nine days of leg massages later, the world's top-ranked player had enough trace amounts in his system to show up on a drug test. Microscopic levels — picograms. A trillionth of a gram. You'd find more chemical residue in a municipal swimming pool. Anti-doping authorities believed the explanation. Sort of. They ruled he bore no significant fault, stripped him of his Indian Wells prize money, and then quietly negotiated a three-month suspension — a sort of sporting house arrest. Sinner took the ban, did the time, and returned just in time to storm through the clay and grass seasons. Now he's Wimbledon champion. The ghosts of tennis past: Enter Agassi, with meth If all this sounds surreal, remember: tennis has been here before. In the late 1990s, Andre Agassi tested positive for methamphetamine — yes, the same stuff that fuels Breaking Bad plotlines. He blamed it on a spiked soda from his assistant 'Slim' (yes, really), and the ATP, in a fit of convenient bureaucracy, accepted the excuse and buried the result. It didn't come out until Agassi admitted it in his 2009 memoir, Open, turning a potentially career-ending scandal into a literary redemption arc. Sinner's case isn't nearly as dramatic — no crystal meth, no faux-cocaine denial — but the echoes are unmistakable. Tennis has always had a peculiar relationship with drug use. It forgives quietly, forgets efficiently, and moves on gracefully — preferably in white. Why fans are divided To Sinner's supporters, this is a non-story. A nothingburger served cold. He didn't cheat, didn't inject, didn't knowingly dope. He explained, he cooperated, he accepted a suspension. Move on. But to critics, the issue isn't what Sinner did — it's what the system allows. A three-month slap on the wrist for a banned substance, a return timed perfectly for the Grand Slams, and now a standing ovation at Wimbledon. If the same had happened to a lower-ranked player, would the outcome have been so lenient? If the banned substance had been found in, say, an Eastern European wild card, would the public discourse be so forgiving? And most damning of all: if Novak Djokovic had tested positive for clostebol, would anyone believe the 'accidental cream contamination' narrative? The larger dilemma: Intent vs presence Anti-doping rules are built on strict liability — you're responsible for what's in your body, regardless of intent. But elite sport often muddies the water. Intent becomes a legal grey zone, contamination becomes plausible deniability, and reputation often sways judgment more than science. Clostebol, by itself, won't make you a Grand Slam champion. But it might help you recover a little faster, push a little harder, get through that fifth set with a bit more gas in the tank. And in a sport where margins are everything — a foot fault here, a net cord there — that matters. So, is Sinner's Wimbledon win tainted? Officially? No. He served his time. He's clean. He's earned it. Culturally? That's trickier. This is tennis, after all — a sport that prizes elegance, tradition, and the illusion of perfection. A grass court is sacred. A champion is supposed to be not just victorious, but virtuous. Sinner's win may be legitimate, but for some fans, it's no longer immaculate. And in the end, perhaps that's the true cost of Clostebol — not the suspension, not the missed points, but the asterisk some will always see, even if it's written in invisible ink. Wimbledon 2025 may have a new king. But the crown, as always, weighs heavy — especially when there's steroid cream on the throne.
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
BRS functionary K Kavitha gets court nod for US travel
New Delhi: A Delhi court on Monday allowed the plea of Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) functionary K Kavitha seeking permission to travel to Los Angeles between Aug 16 and Sept 2 to secure admission for her younger son in a university. The court of special judge Dig Vinay Singh was hearing two applications filed by the BRS leader seeking the release of her passport and permission to travel abroad. "The right to travel abroad has been considered to be an important facet of the right to life and liberty guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution, and there is no reason as to why the applicant (Kavitha) should be deprived of that right, having considered all the facts and circumstances, including the fact of the applicant being on bail in both the matters," the court said. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi Kavitha is an accused in the corruption and money laundering cases linked to the alleged Delhi excise policy scam. The court rejected the argument of the directorate of enforcement and CBI that Kavitha may flee from justice, noting that she has deep roots in society. "Regarding the apprehension of the prosecuting agencies as to the availability of the accused and the progress of the trial, adequate directions can be passed while allowing the applications," the court said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Esse novo alarme com câmera é quase gratuito em Criciúma (consulte o preço) Alarmes Undo The court said that Kavitha was also permitted to travel abroad by the present court on May 3, and during the travel period, she did not misuse the liberty or engage in conduct which could prejudice the trial. The judge also imposed the terms and conditions as mentioned in its earlier order. Kavitha was released on bail by the Supreme Court on Aug 27, 2024, and one of the conditions imposed in the bail order was that she would deposit her passport in the court.
