How will the federal government's under-16s social media ban work? Here's what we know
But questions still remain around how the restrictions will work, and exactly which platforms will be affected.
Just this week, the federal government reversed plans to provide an exemption to video-sharing site YouTube, following a recommendation from eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant.
Here's what to know about the teen social media ban.
All children under the age of 16 in Australia.
The federal government says the ban is needed to protect the mental health and wellbeing of children and teens.
It says the risks of harm presented by social media, such as cyberbullying and exposure to harmful content, outweigh any positives of having accounts.
Australian children below the age of 16 will be unable to have social media accounts under the ban.
Social media companies will be required to take "reasonable steps" to ensure there are no workarounds.
If they don't enforce the ban, they could face fines of up to $50 million.
There won't be fines or penalties for young people or their families if they gain access to the platforms.
Communications Minister Anika Wells said platforms would be required to deactivate existing accounts owned by children.
We still don't know.
The law specifies that while social media companies can request users provide their government ID to verify their ages, it must not be a requirement to access the platform.
Instead, they need to offer "reasonable alternatives" for users to prove they are 16 or older.
There have been trials of age-checking technology, but the results aren't expected to be released until later this year.
Last month, a preliminary report from the organisation commissioned to lead the testing found options existed to verify the age of users privately, robustly and effectively.
But separately, questions have been raised over the viability of some of the technology tested, sowing doubt over whether the ban can be executed.
For example, face-scanning technology tested on school students this year could only guess their age within an 18-month range in 85 per cent of cases.
Ms Wells said the government was awaiting final recommendations out of those trials to provide more clarity on what the government considered "reasonable steps" companies should be taking to enforce the ban.
"There is technology and each platform works differently," she said, adding that companies should be working directly with Ms Inman Grant to establish verification methods.
"Reasonable steps is reasonable," she concluded.
Platforms will not be allowed to use any information provided to verify age for other purposes unless the user consents.
Platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, X and Reddit will be age-restricted.
Some messaging apps, such as Messenger Kids, WhatsApp and Google Classroom, won't be included in the ban.
A fact sheet published by the federal government in December last year said platforms would fall under the age restriction requirements if the platform:
The federal government did have plans to carve out an exemption for YouTube, but it has since changed its stance.
Ms Inman Grant wrote to Ms Wells formally recommending the platform be included in the ban.
She cited a survey of 2,600 children, which found nearly four in 10 had been exposed to harmful content on YouTube.
While YouTube will be included in the ban, it won't be inaccessible in the same way other social media platforms will be.
That's because an account is not needed to access most of the site's content, meaning children will still be able to view videos without logging in.
They won't be able to view age-restricted content, leave comments or upload their own videos, though.
Meanwhile, YouTube Kids will be exempt from the ban, because accounts on the platform cannot upload content or comment on videos.
It's due to take effect on December 10.
The government has said online video games won't be included in the ban.
Ms Wells said they "pose fewer social media harms to under-16s" compared to social media platforms.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
3 hours ago
- The Advertiser
PM says Indigenous partnership to unlock true potential
A "real economy" is needed in Arnhem Land, say Indigenous leaders addressing a major Australian cultural gathering. Yothu Yindi Foundation chair Djawa Yunupingu has told crowds at Garma Festival at Gulkula in northeast Arnhem Land his people plan on being part of the future. "Yolngu people are not suddenly going to stop and rest and think everything is OK," he said on Saturday. "We intend to use our lands and waters for our own future and the future of our children, and the future of our nation." His comments came as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese used his Garma address to unveil an economic partnership with the Coalition of Peaks. "Our government also wants to work with communities as economic decision-makers, to unlock the true potential of their land and their endeavour beyond passing transactions to lasting partnerships that create and share wealth," he said. The approach would allow traditional owners to advocate for infrastructure, housing and energy projects on their land and to build equity beyond the land itself. Mr Albanese also announced $70 million for Indigenous clean energy projects, $75 million for native title reforms and $31 million for a mobile TAFE program under the partnership. The prime minister said, "we have made a start but there is more to do". "We must end the stalemate that arises when native title organisations with little in the way of back-of-house, or legal and commercial expertise are expected to negotiate with multinational firms." Mr Albanese said the partnership builds on agreements made under Closing the Gap, saying it is a "new way of doing business". Closing the Gap has been a major topic of discussion at Garma, which has become a ground for political conversations and policy announcements while also focusing on culture and empowerment of the local Yolngu people. Data released on Thursday revealed just four of 19 targets are on track to be met, with another four goals going backwards - adult incarceration, children in out-of-home care, suicide rates and child development. Mr Albanese said Closing the Gap data underlined the fact that a different, dedicated approach was required to address these issues. "Reports and reviews have their place but they are not a substitute for outcomes, results," he said. "Creating a process matters but it is not the same thing as making progress." Mr Yunupingu closed his address by telling the prime minister he was open to doing business together. "My brothers and sisters are telling me now, we have serious business," he said. "They are reminding me that making hard decisions with serious people is what leadership is all about." 13YARN 13 92 76 Lifeline 13 11 14 A "real economy" is needed in Arnhem Land, say Indigenous leaders addressing a major Australian cultural gathering. Yothu Yindi Foundation chair Djawa Yunupingu has told crowds at Garma Festival at Gulkula in northeast Arnhem Land his people plan on being part of the future. "Yolngu people are not suddenly going to stop and rest and think everything is OK," he said on Saturday. "We intend to use our lands and waters for our own future and the future of our children, and the future of our nation." His comments came as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese used his Garma address to unveil an economic partnership with the Coalition of Peaks. "Our government also wants to work with communities as economic decision-makers, to unlock the true potential of their land and their endeavour beyond passing transactions to lasting partnerships that create and share wealth," he said. The approach would allow traditional owners to advocate for infrastructure, housing and energy projects on their land and to build equity beyond the land itself. Mr Albanese also announced $70 million for Indigenous clean energy projects, $75 million for native title reforms and $31 million for a mobile TAFE program under the partnership. The prime minister said, "we have made a start but there is more to do". "We must end the stalemate that arises when native title organisations with little in the way of back-of-house, or legal and commercial expertise are expected to negotiate with multinational firms." Mr Albanese said the partnership builds on agreements made under Closing the Gap, saying it is a "new way of doing business". Closing the Gap has been a major topic of discussion at Garma, which has become a ground for political conversations and policy announcements while also focusing on culture and empowerment of the local Yolngu people. Data released on Thursday revealed just four of 19 targets are on track to be met, with another four goals going backwards - adult incarceration, children in out-of-home care, suicide rates and child development. Mr Albanese said Closing the Gap data underlined the fact that a different, dedicated approach was required to address these issues. "Reports and reviews have their place but they are not a substitute for outcomes, results," he said. "Creating a process matters but it is not the same thing as making progress." Mr Yunupingu closed his address by telling the prime minister he was open to doing business together. "My brothers and sisters are telling me now, we have serious business," he said. "They are reminding me that making hard decisions with serious people is what leadership is all about." 13YARN 13 92 76 Lifeline 13 11 14 A "real economy" is needed in Arnhem Land, say Indigenous leaders addressing a major Australian cultural gathering. Yothu Yindi Foundation chair Djawa Yunupingu has told crowds at Garma Festival at Gulkula in northeast Arnhem Land his people plan on being part of the future. "Yolngu people are not suddenly going to stop and rest and think everything is OK," he said on Saturday. "We intend to use our lands and waters for our own future and the future of our children, and the future of our nation." His comments came as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese used his Garma address to unveil an economic partnership with the Coalition of Peaks. "Our government also wants to work with communities as economic decision-makers, to unlock the true potential of their land and their endeavour beyond passing transactions to lasting partnerships that create and share wealth," he said. The approach would allow traditional owners to advocate for infrastructure, housing and energy projects on their land and to build equity beyond the land itself. Mr Albanese also announced $70 million for Indigenous clean energy projects, $75 million for native title reforms and $31 million for a mobile TAFE program under the partnership. The prime minister said, "we have made a start but there is more to do". "We must end the stalemate that arises when native title organisations with little in the way of back-of-house, or legal and commercial expertise are expected to negotiate with multinational firms." Mr Albanese said the partnership builds on agreements made under Closing the Gap, saying it is a "new way of doing business". Closing the Gap has been a major topic of discussion at Garma, which has become a ground for political conversations and policy announcements while also focusing on culture and empowerment of the local Yolngu people. Data released on Thursday revealed just four of 19 targets are on track to be met, with another four goals going backwards - adult incarceration, children in out-of-home care, suicide rates and child development. Mr Albanese said Closing the Gap data underlined the fact that a different, dedicated approach was required to address these issues. "Reports and reviews have their place but they are not a substitute for outcomes, results," he said. "Creating a process matters but it is not the same thing as making progress." Mr Yunupingu closed his address by telling the prime minister he was open to doing business together. "My brothers and sisters are telling me now, we have serious business," he said. "They are reminding me that making hard decisions with serious people is what leadership is all about." 13YARN 13 92 76 Lifeline 13 11 14 A "real economy" is needed in Arnhem Land, say Indigenous leaders addressing a major Australian cultural gathering. Yothu Yindi Foundation chair Djawa Yunupingu has told crowds at Garma Festival at Gulkula in northeast Arnhem Land his people plan on being part of the future. "Yolngu people are not suddenly going to stop and rest and think everything is OK," he said on Saturday. "We intend to use our lands and waters for our own future and the future of our children, and the future of our nation." His comments came as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese used his Garma address to unveil an economic partnership with the Coalition of Peaks. "Our government also wants to work with communities as economic decision-makers, to unlock the true potential of their land and their endeavour beyond passing transactions to lasting partnerships that create and share wealth," he said. The approach would allow traditional owners to advocate for infrastructure, housing and energy projects on their land and to build equity beyond the land itself. Mr Albanese also announced $70 million for Indigenous clean energy projects, $75 million for native title reforms and $31 million for a mobile TAFE program under the partnership. The prime minister said, "we have made a start but there is more to do". "We must end the stalemate that arises when native title organisations with little in the way of back-of-house, or legal and commercial expertise are expected to negotiate with multinational firms." Mr Albanese said the partnership builds on agreements made under Closing the Gap, saying it is a "new way of doing business". Closing the Gap has been a major topic of discussion at Garma, which has become a ground for political conversations and policy announcements while also focusing on culture and empowerment of the local Yolngu people. Data released on Thursday revealed just four of 19 targets are on track to be met, with another four goals going backwards - adult incarceration, children in out-of-home care, suicide rates and child development. Mr Albanese said Closing the Gap data underlined the fact that a different, dedicated approach was required to address these issues. "Reports and reviews have their place but they are not a substitute for outcomes, results," he said. "Creating a process matters but it is not the same thing as making progress." Mr Yunupingu closed his address by telling the prime minister he was open to doing business together. "My brothers and sisters are telling me now, we have serious business," he said. "They are reminding me that making hard decisions with serious people is what leadership is all about." 13YARN 13 92 76 Lifeline 13 11 14
The Advertiser
3 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Business slams plan to enshrine right to work from home
A legal right to work from home would be divisive and likely send jobs elsewhere, business groups say. A state government has revealed plans to enshrine the right to work from home for both public and private-sector employees. The premier behind the Australian-first push hails its as the next frontier in worker rights that would benefit working parents. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation in 2026 for the right to work from home on two days per week, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office. The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home. Details are yet to be worked through and Premier Jacinta Allan signalled the changes could come into effect under Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act, as private workplaces are regulated by federal laws. Ms Allan promoted the plan as beneficial to both the economy and families, likening it to other significant workplace changes in recent decades including more women entering the workforce. "There's been many, many gains over many, many generations that have supported women's opportunity to increase their workforce participation, this is just another important, big step," she told reporters. Issues such as the definition of remote work, who can do it, how it would affect part-time workers and the types of businesses to which the law would apply, will be figured out through a consultation process. Ms Allan said the decision had gone through cabinet and brushed off suggestions it could trigger a court challenge. The plan drew sharp criticism from business groups, with Australian Industry Group Victorian head Tim Piper describing it as serious government overreach that undermines business autonomy. He described it as "pure political theatre" designed to wedge the opposition while also running counter to both global trends and business best practice. "These policies foster an 'us versus them' dynamic, privileging some white-collar workers while leaving blue-collar employees with no choice," he said. "It's divisive, disruptive, and dangerous." Victorian Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief executive Paul Guerra claimed businesses would move interstate and jobs would be lost if Victoria moved away from the legislated national system. "(Work from home) certainly works well in some contexts, but that should be determined by the employer in consultation with the employee," he said. Ms Allan promised to introduce the law in 2026 prior to the state election. Polls indicate Labor is on track to win a fourth term but the November 2026 poll will be the first as premier for Ms Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. Mr Battin said working from home was a valuable option for many workers and families. "We support measures that help Victorians enjoy a better work-life balance, and will review any legislation closely, to ensure it supports flexibility, productivity and personal choice," he said. The federal coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day. NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices. More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not. A legal right to work from home would be divisive and likely send jobs elsewhere, business groups say. A state government has revealed plans to enshrine the right to work from home for both public and private-sector employees. The premier behind the Australian-first push hails its as the next frontier in worker rights that would benefit working parents. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation in 2026 for the right to work from home on two days per week, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office. The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home. Details are yet to be worked through and Premier Jacinta Allan signalled the changes could come into effect under Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act, as private workplaces are regulated by federal laws. Ms Allan promoted the plan as beneficial to both the economy and families, likening it to other significant workplace changes in recent decades including more women entering the workforce. "There's been many, many gains over many, many generations that have supported women's opportunity to increase their workforce participation, this is just another important, big step," she told reporters. Issues such as the definition of remote work, who can do it, how it would affect part-time workers and the types of businesses to which the law would apply, will be figured out through a consultation process. Ms Allan said the decision had gone through cabinet and brushed off suggestions it could trigger a court challenge. The plan drew sharp criticism from business groups, with Australian Industry Group Victorian head Tim Piper describing it as serious government overreach that undermines business autonomy. He described it as "pure political theatre" designed to wedge the opposition while also running counter to both global trends and business best practice. "These policies foster an 'us versus them' dynamic, privileging some white-collar workers while leaving blue-collar employees with no choice," he said. "It's divisive, disruptive, and dangerous." Victorian Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief executive Paul Guerra claimed businesses would move interstate and jobs would be lost if Victoria moved away from the legislated national system. "(Work from home) certainly works well in some contexts, but that should be determined by the employer in consultation with the employee," he said. Ms Allan promised to introduce the law in 2026 prior to the state election. Polls indicate Labor is on track to win a fourth term but the November 2026 poll will be the first as premier for Ms Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. Mr Battin said working from home was a valuable option for many workers and families. "We support measures that help Victorians enjoy a better work-life balance, and will review any legislation closely, to ensure it supports flexibility, productivity and personal choice," he said. The federal coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day. NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices. More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not. A legal right to work from home would be divisive and likely send jobs elsewhere, business groups say. A state government has revealed plans to enshrine the right to work from home for both public and private-sector employees. The premier behind the Australian-first push hails its as the next frontier in worker rights that would benefit working parents. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation in 2026 for the right to work from home on two days per week, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office. The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home. Details are yet to be worked through and Premier Jacinta Allan signalled the changes could come into effect under Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act, as private workplaces are regulated by federal laws. Ms Allan promoted the plan as beneficial to both the economy and families, likening it to other significant workplace changes in recent decades including more women entering the workforce. "There's been many, many gains over many, many generations that have supported women's opportunity to increase their workforce participation, this is just another important, big step," she told reporters. Issues such as the definition of remote work, who can do it, how it would affect part-time workers and the types of businesses to which the law would apply, will be figured out through a consultation process. Ms Allan said the decision had gone through cabinet and brushed off suggestions it could trigger a court challenge. The plan drew sharp criticism from business groups, with Australian Industry Group Victorian head Tim Piper describing it as serious government overreach that undermines business autonomy. He described it as "pure political theatre" designed to wedge the opposition while also running counter to both global trends and business best practice. "These policies foster an 'us versus them' dynamic, privileging some white-collar workers while leaving blue-collar employees with no choice," he said. "It's divisive, disruptive, and dangerous." Victorian Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief executive Paul Guerra claimed businesses would move interstate and jobs would be lost if Victoria moved away from the legislated national system. "(Work from home) certainly works well in some contexts, but that should be determined by the employer in consultation with the employee," he said. Ms Allan promised to introduce the law in 2026 prior to the state election. Polls indicate Labor is on track to win a fourth term but the November 2026 poll will be the first as premier for Ms Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. Mr Battin said working from home was a valuable option for many workers and families. "We support measures that help Victorians enjoy a better work-life balance, and will review any legislation closely, to ensure it supports flexibility, productivity and personal choice," he said. The federal coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day. NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices. More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not. A legal right to work from home would be divisive and likely send jobs elsewhere, business groups say. A state government has revealed plans to enshrine the right to work from home for both public and private-sector employees. The premier behind the Australian-first push hails its as the next frontier in worker rights that would benefit working parents. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation in 2026 for the right to work from home on two days per week, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office. The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home. Details are yet to be worked through and Premier Jacinta Allan signalled the changes could come into effect under Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act, as private workplaces are regulated by federal laws. Ms Allan promoted the plan as beneficial to both the economy and families, likening it to other significant workplace changes in recent decades including more women entering the workforce. "There's been many, many gains over many, many generations that have supported women's opportunity to increase their workforce participation, this is just another important, big step," she told reporters. Issues such as the definition of remote work, who can do it, how it would affect part-time workers and the types of businesses to which the law would apply, will be figured out through a consultation process. Ms Allan said the decision had gone through cabinet and brushed off suggestions it could trigger a court challenge. The plan drew sharp criticism from business groups, with Australian Industry Group Victorian head Tim Piper describing it as serious government overreach that undermines business autonomy. He described it as "pure political theatre" designed to wedge the opposition while also running counter to both global trends and business best practice. "These policies foster an 'us versus them' dynamic, privileging some white-collar workers while leaving blue-collar employees with no choice," he said. "It's divisive, disruptive, and dangerous." Victorian Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief executive Paul Guerra claimed businesses would move interstate and jobs would be lost if Victoria moved away from the legislated national system. "(Work from home) certainly works well in some contexts, but that should be determined by the employer in consultation with the employee," he said. Ms Allan promised to introduce the law in 2026 prior to the state election. Polls indicate Labor is on track to win a fourth term but the November 2026 poll will be the first as premier for Ms Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. Mr Battin said working from home was a valuable option for many workers and families. "We support measures that help Victorians enjoy a better work-life balance, and will review any legislation closely, to ensure it supports flexibility, productivity and personal choice," he said. The federal coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day. NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices. More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not.
Sydney Morning Herald
4 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Capital cities prepare for bridge marches as fears raised over emergency services impact
Premier Chris Minns also refused to grant the group permission to march across the bridge, and said police were not given enough time to safely organise resources for the protest, prompting organisers to launch a last-ditch attempt to save the Sydney protest after NSW Police filed Supreme Court action seeking an order to block the protest. Justice Belinda Rigg on Saturday found any inconvenience caused by the march to commuters across the Sydney Harbour Bridge was not a reason to refuse it on legal grounds. 'The application by the commissioner should be refused,' Rigg said in her judgment on Saturday. 'It is in the very nature of the right of peaceful protest that disruption will be caused to others. If matters such as this were to be determinative, no assembly involving inconvenience to others would be permitted.' The court's decision means protesters will now have the legal right to occupy the bridge and streets surrounding the route of the march from the streets surrounding Wynyard Station in the Sydney CBD to North Sydney. NSW Police Minister Yasmin Catley said the public should prepare for 'massive, massive disruption'. Palestine Action Group organiser Josh Lees said the iconic bridge was essential to the planned march as it would send 'an urgent and massive response' to the crisis in Gaza. The Israeli government has denied claims of genocide and says the war in Gaza is an act of self-defence. Loading It has also denied claims that there is starvation in Gaza after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese accused it of breaching international law by stopping food from being delivered into the 13-kilometre-wide strip, which has 2.1 million people squeezed into an area half the size of Canberra. The World Health Organisation said there had been 63 malnutrition-related deaths in Gaza last month, including 24 children under the age of five – up from 11 deaths total the previous six months of the year. The Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry claims 82 people died last month of malnutrition-related causes, including 24 children and 58 adults, taking Gaza's death toll from the war, which began in 2023 after Hamas militants killed more than 700 civilians in southern Israel, to more than 60,000. Albanese has also called on Hamas to release the Israeli hostages taken as part of the attacks on October 7, as Jewish-Australian leaders raise fears the protests will fuel antisemitism. In Melbourne on Friday, Victoria Police warned the Melbourne demonstration – which plans to shut down the busy King Street Bridge – would require hundreds of its officers to be redeployed from other policing duties across the state. Rally organisers have vowed to let emergency services vehicles through, but police warned it was not enough to mitigate the risk.
