logo
8 Non-Obvious Reasons Startups Struggle To Fundraise

8 Non-Obvious Reasons Startups Struggle To Fundraise

Forbes5 hours ago

This article outlines eight less obvious but highly influential reasons startups fail to raise ... More capital — reasons investors notice even when founders don't.
Most founders are familiar with the typical reasons why fundraising is challenging: a poor pitch, a small market, a weak team, or a lack of traction. But many funding struggles come from less visible issues - structural, strategic, or psychological problems that don't always show up in a pitch deck.
In this article, we outline eight less obvious but highly influential reasons startups fail to raise capital.
1. The Vision Is Too Small
Startups often describe what they're building today, not what it could become. A narrow, tactical story may be logical, but investors look for ambition. They want to know: if this works, how big could it be?
The reason is simple - startup investors take a large number of high-risk bets. For their investment strategy to work, the successful investments need to be able to pay for multiple unsuccessful ones. In other words, for traditional startup investors, 1.5 ROI simply doesn't make economic sense.
A product that solves a clear problem but doesn't hint at a broader market, ecosystem, or category-defining potential is easy to pass on. Founders need to cast a vision that stretches beyond their MVP without sounding delusional.
For example, Zoom wasn't just 'video calls with better UI'. It pitched itself as the next platform for enterprise communication, and currently it's pitching itself as 'The AI-first work platform for human connection'.
As noted in our startup fundraising checklist, articulating a compelling long-term vision is one of the most important elements of a successful early-stage fundraising strategy. Founders need to help investors imagine what happens if everything goes right — and what the business could become at scale.
2. No Clear 'Why Now'
Timing matters. Investors often ask: Why hasn't this worked before, and why will it work now? If your pitch doesn't answer that, it feels like a stale idea.
Sometimes, a startup idea is too early - or worse, not early enough. Founders who explain the shift (tech, regulation, behavior, distribution) that now makes their idea viable tend to stand out.
For example, Uber only became viable when smartphones and GPS were widely adopted. That was their 'why now.'
3. Lack Of A Founder-Problem Fit
Even if the idea is good, investors want to see why you are the person to build it. Founders often fail to show authentic founder-problem fit - a personal connection to the problem, or an unfair advantage in solving it.
Generic motivations or vague enthusiasm can undermine otherwise strong pitches. Investors fund people more than ideas.
For example, Brex's founders had previously built a fintech company in Brazil (pagar.me). That experience gave them credibility and insight into building financial products.
4. No Clear Wedge Into the Market
A huge market is good. But a startup that tries to tackle the entire market at once often fails to show how it gets its first 1,000 users.
A 'wedge' is a focused, practical entry point into a larger opportunity. Without it, founders sound like they're boiling the ocean.
For example, Slack started as an internal chat tool for the team that built it, which at the same time was working on a video game. After focusing on Slack, they provided the service to teams with similar profiles to theirs. That was their wedge.
5. Too Many Assumptions Without Evidence
Many early-stage startups pitch ideas based on logic, but without proof. If you haven't talked to enough customers, tested demand, or shown willingness to kill assumptions, it shows.
Investors don't need traction to write early checks, but they do need evidence of rigor: signals that you're testing, learning, and adapting.
6. The Team Doesn't Look Fundable
Investors will rarely say this out loud, but team dynamics matter, especially in early rounds. Red flags include unclear roles between co-founders, a lack of technical depth for a technical product, or no one with go-to-market experience.
Teams that look too homogeneous (e.g., all engineers or all generalists) raise concerns. The best early teams balance strong execution with learning speed and a sense of complementary skills.
Consider adding a technical advisor, domain expert, or experienced operator if your team has a visible gap.
7. The Deck Doesn't Show А Business
Many decks describe a product, but not a company. There's a big difference. Investors want to see how the product becomes a business: acquisition channels, pricing strategy, retention drivers, and competitive advantage.
Especially in founder-led seed rounds, it's easy to underplay these topics. But smart investors will dig, and if your unit economics or GTM strategy is vague, you'll lose momentum.
A basic revenue model, even if it's mostly assumptions, shows you're thinking like a builder and an operator.
8. Fundraising Looks Like a Backup Plan
If it feels like you're fundraising only because other options failed - e.g., you couldn't bootstrap or get acquired - it signals a lack of confidence.
Investors want to back people who are raising because they believe funding accelerates their vision, not because they ran out of cash.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bush and Obama fault Trump's gutting of USAID on agency's last day
Bush and Obama fault Trump's gutting of USAID on agency's last day

CNN

time10 minutes ago

  • CNN

Bush and Obama fault Trump's gutting of USAID on agency's last day

Former Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush delivered rare open criticism of the Trump administration – and singer Bono held back tears as he recited a poem – in an emotional video farewell on Monday with staffers of the US Agency for International Development. Obama called the Trump administration's dismantling of USAID 'a colossal mistake.' Monday was the last day as an independent agency for the six-decade-old humanitarian and development organization, created by former President John F. Kennedy as a peaceful way of promoting US national security by boosting goodwill and prosperity abroad. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has ordered USAID absorbed into the State Department on Tuesday. The former presidents and Bono spoke with thousands in the USAID community in a video conference, which was billed as a closed-press event to allow political leaders and others privacy for sometimes angry and often teary remarks. Parts of the video were shared with The Associated Press. They expressed their appreciation for the thousands of USAID staffers who have lost their jobs and life's work. Their agency was one of the first and most fiercely targeted for government-cutting by President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, with staffers abruptly locked out of systems and offices and terminated by mass emailing. Trump claimed the agency was run by 'radical left lunatics' and rife with 'tremendous fraud.' Musk called it 'a criminal organization.' Obama, speaking in a recorded statement, offered assurances to the aid and development workers, some listening from overseas. 'Your work has mattered and will matter for generations to come,' he told them. Obama has largely kept a low public profile during Trump's second term and refrained from criticizing the monumental changes that Trump has made to US programs and priorities at home and abroad. 'Gutting USAID is a travesty, and it's a tragedy. Because it's some of the most important work happening anywhere in the world,' Obama said. He credited USAID with not only saving lives, but being a main factor in global economic growth that has turned some aid-receiving countries into US markets and trade partners. The former Democratic president predicted that 'sooner or later, leaders on both sides of the aisle will realize how much you are needed.' Asked for comment, the State Department said it would be introducing the department's foreign assistance successor to USAID, to be called America First, this week. 'The new process will ensure there is proper oversight and that every tax dollar spent will help advance our national interests,' the department said. USAID oversaw programs around the world: providing water and life-saving food to millions uprooted by conflict in Sudan, Syria, Gaza and elsewhere; sponsoring the 'Green Revolution' that revolutionized modern agriculture and curbed starvation and famine; preventing disease outbreaks; promoting democracy; and providing financing and development that allowed countries and people to climb out of poverty. Bush, who also spoke in a recorded message, went straight to the cuts in a landmark AIDS and HIV program started by his Republican administration and credited with saving 25 million lives around the world. Bipartisan blowback from Congress to cutting the popular President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, known as PEPFAR, helped save significant funding for the program. But cuts and rule changes have reduced the number getting the life-saving care. 'You've showed the great strength of America through your work – and that is your good heart,'' Bush told USAID staffers. 'Is it in our national interests that 25 million people who would have died now live? I think it is, and so do you,' he said. Former Liberian President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, former Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos and former US Ambassador to the U.N. Linda Thomas-Greenfield also spoke to the staffers. So did humanitarian workers, including one who spoke of the welcome appearance of USAID staffers with food when she was a frightened 8-year-old child in a Liberian refugee camp. A World Food Program official vowed through sobs that the US aid mission would be back someday. Bono, a longtime humanitarian advocate in Africa and elsewhere, was announced as the 'surprise guest,' in shades and a cap. He jokingly hailed the USAID staffers as 'secret agents of international development' in acknowledgment of the down-low nature of Monday's unofficial gathering of the USAID community. Bono held back tears at times as he recited a poem he had written to the agency and its gutting. He spoke of children dying of malnutrition, a reference to millions of people who Boston University researchers and other analysts say will die because of the US cuts to funding for health and other programs abroad. 'They called you crooks. When you were the best of us,' Bono said.

Stocks are back in 'meltup' mode after a wild first half — and the S&P 500 could soar 60% by 2030, market vet says
Stocks are back in 'meltup' mode after a wild first half — and the S&P 500 could soar 60% by 2030, market vet says

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Stocks are back in 'meltup' mode after a wild first half — and the S&P 500 could soar 60% by 2030, market vet says

After a volatile first half, the stock market looks to be back in "melt-up mode," market vet Ed Yardeni says. The longtime forecaster said he sees the S&P 500 rising as much as 60% by the end of the decade. That's partly due to the continued strength of the US economy and waning risks from tariffs. Chaos in markets sparked a lot of bearish prognostications in the first half, but investors have pushed through, and stocks look like they're back in "meltup mode." That's the view of Ed Yardeni, a longtime forecaster and the president of Yardeni Research. His "melt-up" thesis says the stock market embarked on a 1990s-style bull run starting in 2024, a stellar but ultimately unsustainable stock rally similar to what markets saw at the height of the dot-com bubble. To Yardeni, the S&P 500 reaching a new record last week confirms that the formation of a speculative bubble is one of the biggest risks to investors at the moment. Yardeni says he anticipates the S&P 500 reaching 6,500 by the end of the year, a gain of about 5% from levels on Monday. However, by the end of the decade, Yardeni's meltup thesis sees the benchmark index rising to 10,000, representing a 60% gain. "So far, the current bull market looks like a normal one, with the potential to match the returns of some of the best bull markets since the mid-1960s," Yardeni said. The upward climb in stocks is partly due to the continued strength of the US economy, the market vet told CNBC on Friday. While some economic data—like retail sales—has come in weaker-than-expected in recent months, that has largely reflected temporary uncertainties like tariffs. Stocks rallied to records last week on a handful of catalysts. Investors cheered Trump's announcement that the US and China had agreed to a framework trade agreement, and the market continued to rise to fresh records on Monday as investors digested further progress. Canada on Monday said it would cancel a digital services tax that had caused Trump to threaten to end trade talks. "Clearly, trade isn't a done issue yet, but I think will be by the end of the summer," Yardeni said. "You put it all together and I think it's a pretty solid economy, pretty solid stock market," he later added. Forecasters on Wall Street have turned more bullish on stocks since Trump paused his sweeping tariff agenda in April and struck a handful of framework agreements with some of America's top trading partners. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

NBA sets salary cap for 2025-26 at $154.647M, the maximum 10% increase over this past season
NBA sets salary cap for 2025-26 at $154.647M, the maximum 10% increase over this past season

Washington Post

time10 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

NBA sets salary cap for 2025-26 at $154.647M, the maximum 10% increase over this past season

NEW YORK — The NBA has set the salary cap for the coming season at $154.647 million, the maximum allowed 10% increase over the level for this past season. The tax level for the 2025-26 season is $187.895 million, the league said Monday. The cap and tax go into effect on Tuesday, and the league's moratorium period for most signings will be lifted at noon on Sunday. Other numbers set by the league for the coming season: — The minimum team salary is $139.182 million. — The first apron level is $195.945 million. — The second apron level is $207.824 million. The midlevel exception levels were set at $14.104 million for non-taxpayer levels, $5.685 million for taxpayer levels and $8.781 million for teams with room under the salary cap. The cap for next season, if it were to rise 7% as planned, would be around $165.5 million. That figure will not be set until June 2026. ___ AP NBA:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store