
Bank of Ireland ‘actively considering' buying out small legacy shareholders
is 'actively considering' a plan to offer to buy out thousands of legacy shareholders with tiny holdings after their stakes were severely diluted by its crisis-era bailouts, according to its chief executive.
It follows moves by AIB and PTSB last year to launch so-called odd-lot offers last year, which saw them buy back hundreds of thousands of shares from investors whose stakes were catastrophically watered down by taxpayer rescues about a decade-and-a-half ago.
'We are actively looking at a mechanism by which smaller shareholders can sell their shares. That's a commitment we are making today,' said
Myles O'Grady
, the chief executive, responding to questions from shareholders at the bank's annual general meeting (agm) in Dublin on Thursday about the prospects of such a process.
'We are aware of the issue, but, to be frank, we didn't think it was as acute an issue as other banks.'
READ MORE
AIB, where taxpayers took a 99.8 per cent stake in exchange for a €20.8 billion bailout during the crisis, bought back 253,765 shares from individual investors with as many as 20 shares for a total consideration of €1.4 million. PTSB, in which the Government acquired a 99.2 per cent stake in 2011, spent just over €1 million repurchasing 592,943 shares.
The two schemes applied automatically to such shareholders, unless they actively opted out.
[
Bank of Ireland sticks to 2025 outlook after 'good start' to year
Opens in new window
]
The programmes were in response to calls from shareholders for such a mechanism, as they – or, in many cases, the estates of deceased legacy investors – could not realise any remaining value for their shares on the market on account of dealing costs.
They crystallise large capital losses for pre-crash investors, even if they could be used to offset tax on investment gains elsewhere.
Boomtime investors in Bank of Ireland were also severely diluted during the financial crisis as the State and a group of North American investors acquired over 15 per cent and almost 35 per cent stakes, respectively, in emergency cash calls.
Legacy investors that did not participate in rights-issue share sales to preexisting shareholders during the crisis saw their stakes diluted even further.
'We're at a critically low level of housing stock' for buyers and renters
Listen |
33:06
Bank of Ireland has 2,500 shareholders with 25 or fewer shares. It has 80,000 investors in total.
The bank's chairman of less than five months, Akshaya Bhargava, fielded a number of questions and complaints from former employees about bank's defined benefit pension scheme, where retirement benefits are linked to final salaries. Dozens of former staffers also staged a protest outside the agm venue.
The scheme closed to new members over a decade ago, at a time when existing plan members suffered a hit to future benefits.
For the past dozen years pension increases have been essentially capped at 3 per cent – or 4 per cent, minus a 1 per cent clawback – while newly retired individuals get no rise for the first three years. The bank had promised in 2010 and 2013 to review the limits when its profitability stabilised.
Mr Bhargava said that the bank carried out 'a very detailed review' of the matter, but concluded that now was not the right time to make changes.
He said that the bank and the fund's trustees have an obligation to make sure the plan remains stable as it faces making payouts for the next 60 years to retirees. 'But we will keep it under review,' he said.
Bank of Ireland reiterated its forecasts for 2025 in a trading statement earlier this month it had a 'good start to the year', with performance and profitability meeting its expectations.
The bank said that its core loan book grew during the quarter, with its mortgage book expanding by an annualised 3.5 per cent.
The bank said it continues to expect that its full year net interest income will come in greater than €3.25 billion, and that business income – including its New Ireland and Davy units and shares of joint ventures – is expected to rise 5 per cent. It reported €3.56 billion of net interest income last year in a higher interest rate environment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
15 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Kenmare urges decision on Mozambique rights renewal
Titanium miner Kenmare Resources said on Wednesday it could seek arbitration over delays to an extension of its mining rights in Mozambique. The Dublin-headquartered company owns the Moma Titanium Minerals mine on the north-east coast of Mozambique, mainly producing ilmenite. The mineral is a source of titanium dioxide used mainly in industrial paints and coatings as well as in electronic equipment, packaging, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics. Kenmare said it has been in inconclusive talks with the Mozambican authorities since 2022 to renew a 20-year mining and export agreement that lapsed in December 2024. "We are concerned at the continued extension of this process," Kenmare managing director Tom Hickey said in a statement. "While we remain hopeful of a successful conclusion to negotiations, we reserve the right to safeguard Kenmare's contractual entitlements, up to and including arbitration, if an agreement cannot be reached," he added. Hickey told Reuters in an interview that the royalty rate was a major hurdle in agreeing new terms. "We've been told, when this agreement went to the Council of Ministers back in March, the royalty was the principal sticking point," Hickey said. "We have made a proposal that we hope will be seen as satisfactory to address that, but we just want a conclusion," he added. The Mozambican government was not immediately available to comment. Kenmare's proposals include a phased increase in the royalty rate from 2.5% in 2025 to 3.5% over the course of the 20-year agreement, a withholding tax on payments to non-Mozambican suppliers as well as further capital investments and contributions to community development projects. On Wednesday, Kenmare reported $160 million of mineral sales in the six months to June 30, a 3% increase on the same period last year. Weak prices in an oversupplied market slashed its half-year profit by 71% to $6.1 million. Reuters


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Irish house price inflation at 7.8% in June amid ongoing supply shortage
House prices in the Republic grew at an average annual rate of 7.8 per cent in June, keeping the pressure on would-be buyers. The headline rate was unchanged from the previous month and down from over 10 per cent last year. The Central Statistics Office's (CSO) latest barometer indicated prices in Dublin, where supply pressures are strongest, rose at an annual rate of 6.6 per cent in June while prices outside the capital were up by 8.8 per cent year-on-year. The median or middle price paid for a home in the 12 months to June was €370,000. READ MORE


Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Nepalese restaurant worker has €23,000 award overturned over delay in making complaint
A Nepalese restaurant worker awarded more than €23,000 at the Workplace Relations Commission last year has had the award overturned by the Labour Court . The court found his complaint about breaches of employment law by the fast food outlet where he worked had been made after the permitted time period had elapsed. Suman Bhurtel had told the WRC he started working at Chicken Castle Ltd's Chicken Club on Main Street, Castleisland, Co Kerry , in October 2020 having been given a contract that suggested he would receive €30,000 a year for a 39-hour week, equivalent to €576.92 per week or €14.79 an hour. Accommodation was also included in the deal. However, the WRC concluded from the evidence presented Mr Bhurtel had been paid an average hourly wage of just €8.24 while working there, €6.52 less than the hourly wages set out in his contract and more than €3 under the €11.30-an-hour minimum wage in force at the time. READ MORE Among the other complaints made by Mr Bhurtel, who was represented by the Migrant Rights Centre Ireland (MRCI), was that he worked 92 Sundays and various public holidays without receiving any premium payments, his working weeks averaged 70 hours, he did not receive the days off he was due, he had taken no annual leave in 2020 or 2021 and was then not paid for his only period of annual leave in 2022 and he did not get to take adequate breaks when at work. Satwinder Singh, the company secretary, denied Mr Bhurtel worked 70 hours a week and maintained he worked 39 hours as provided for in his contract. He told the tribunal Mr Bhurtel, whose job included preparing food, taking payments, cleaning and handling takings, was never scheduled to work Sundays or public holidays and said he had paid Mr Bhurtel in cash for annual leave. The date on which Mr Bhurtel left the job was disputed by the two sides while there was a question over the commission's jurisdiction to hear the case because of the delay in making the original complaints. Mr Bhurtel sought an extension of the period covered by the complaints on the basis that he was totally dependent on his employer because of his work permit and accommodation status. Adjudicator Úna Glazier-Farmer found the employer 'took advantage' of Mr Bhurtel's situation of 'total dependency' in respect of his accommodation and work permit status and concluded this was reasonable cause to extend her jurisdiction beyond the usual six-month limit to 12 months, giving her the power to compensate Mr Bhurtel for 22 weeks and four days between February 22nd, 2023, and the end of his employment on August 15th that year. The total of €23,130.94 she awarded him included €6,655.50 for breaches of his rights in relation to rest periods, €4,538.80 in relation to annual leave, €3,244.50 for breaches of the National Minimum Wages Act and €5,496.75 under the terms of the Working Time Act in respect of the difference between the national minimum wage and the hourly rate set out in his contract of employment. The company appealed all five awards, however, and in a newly published decision the Labour Court found all to have been statute barred. The court heard Mr Bhurtel's original delay in complaining was also because he had been unaware of his legal rights until consulting with the MRCI and he had been hampered by his first language not being English. In its decision, however, the court said that 'put at their most basic, the facts speak for themselves ... the application was made out of time and, in the court's judgment ... no explanations 'which both explain the delay and afford an excuse for the delay' have been advanced ... that would permit the court to extend time'.