logo
Dr. Gustavo Dudamel leads the New York Philharmonic, with L.A. style

Dr. Gustavo Dudamel leads the New York Philharmonic, with L.A. style

New York — After triumphantly bringing the Los Angeles Philharmonic to Coachella, Gustavo Dudamel is taking his biggest bite so far out of the Big Apple. He is in town for a three-week New York Philharmonic residency. He has devised two ambitious programs to close the orchestra's season in David Geffen Hall and will then be the big attraction for thousands of New York picnickers at free New York Philharmonic parks concerts throughout the boroughs. In the meantime, Dr. Dudamel picked up an honorary doctorate Saturday from the Juilliard School.
A welcome mat doesn't get more welcoming than that for a conductor, and this is someone who has yet no official title with the orchestra. The three main 'People of the New York Philharmonic' featured on the orchestra's website are pianist Yuja Wang (artist in residence), Matías Tarnopolsky (newly appointed president and chief executive) and Alec Baldwin (radio series host).
In September, Dudamel becomes music and artistic director designate. A year later, having completed 17 seasons as music director of the Los Angeles Philharmonic, he takes charge of the country's oldest and most celebrated orchestra.
But who's counting days, months or years? From the moment Dudamel walked on stage at Geffen Hall to begin the dress rehearsal of his first concert of the series last week, there could be no question that it's his show.
The orchestra has become fully Dudamel-branded, his image plastered everywhere you look. The talk of the town is that a music-director-designate-to-be has already transformed one of the world's great orchestras, which is said to be playing at a new level and with a new sound.
New Yorkers still take pride in not being easily hoodwinked. The press glorifies Dudamel as the next Leonard Bernstein one minute and looks for flaws anywhere it can find them the next. But there is something in the air that even an outsider could feel at the rehearsal, which was open to donors and press interlopers. Dudamel simply seemed, without ostensibly trying, to belong. He knew exactly what to do and how to do it. When he asked the players for something, an orchestra famed for being difficult responded instantly.
But Dudamel was doubtlessly trying to belong. The program, composed of nothing he has performed elsewhere, was meant to be a tribute to the New York Philharmonic. He began by pairing the first work the 183-year-old orchestra had ever commissioned with a premiere of a startling new commission. After intermission, he introduced the largest and most robust of the recent symphonies by the city's best-known composer, a veritable icon — Philip Glass — to an orchestra that had done its best to ignore for half a century.
With orchestra and audience in his hands, Dudamel had yet another triumph. The New York Times called this program a love letter to New York.
If so, the love letter had a postmark from L.A.
Stravinsky composed his Symphony in Three Movements, written during and reflecting World War II, while he lived in West Hollywood. Like Schoenberg before him, the Russian émigré composer tried but failed to get a lucrative contract scoring a Hollywood film. Instead, Stravinsky reused bits he had meant for the 1943 epic 'The Song of Bernadette' in his war symphony.
The newly commissioned work that followed was Kate Soper's 'Orpheus Orchestra Opus Onus,' a sensationally witty and profound monodrama about the meaning of music for amplified soprano and large orchestra. Soper herself was the talented soloist, as she had been a few weeks earlier when she appeared at the L.A. Phil's Green Umbrella concert in a far riskier early work, 'Only the Words Themselves Mean What They Say.' A favorite of operatic progressives, Soper has had three operas staged by Long Beach Opera, including the premiere of her astonishingly fanciful 'Romance of the Rose,' perhaps the most original American opera of the decade.
When it came to breaking the New York Philharmonic's Glass ceiling, Dudamel brought an L.A. Phil hammer. The first concert work by Glass that the New York Philharmonic ever performed was Concerto for Two Pianos in 2017, conducted by Dudamel's predecessor, Jaap van Zweden. It was Dudamel, however, who had given the premiere of the concerto and the L.A. Phil that commissioned it.
Dudamel's performance of Symphony No. 11 thus became the first New York Philharmonic attempt at a Glass symphony. (He's written 15, and the L.A. Phil commissioned the 12th.) The 11th has everything audiences and orchestra players are said to dread. It is long (40 minutes), orchestrally big-boned in the manner of Bruckner and echt-Glass in its repetitions and romantic effusions.
But in an act of remarkable conductorial persuasion, Dudamel emphasized Glass' talent for orchestral go-with-the-flow magnificence to blow the audience away. The crowd stood en mass and cheered the frail 88-year-old composer seated on the first tier.
For all that, the performances were nonetheless on the stiff side, the famously virtuosic orchestra effortfully coming to terms with the unfamiliar. But the needle has moved. What felt unfamiliar was a general feeling of acceptance in Geffen Hall. The audience-friendly renovation during the pandemic helps with a powerful acoustic that encourages openness. This is no longer the uptight atmosphere where John Adams was angrily booed and where people noisily walked out as Zubin Mehta premiered major new works by Olivier Messiaen and Iannis Xenakis.
The New York Philharmonic, moreover, has many younger players. And Geffen Hall has found novel means of reaching new audiences, particularly with its large video screens in the lobby, where every concert is streamed for free for passersby or those who want to take in the whole event. The video work is the most creative I've encountered.
The sound system is not high-end and there are plenty of distractions. But I watched a matinee and found the experience compelling and the sound good enough to tell that by the second performance of the program, the orchestra had already gotten tighter.
All this bodes well for Dudamel, who now has the West Coast support team he wanted. Deborah Borda, who hired Dudamel at the L.A. Phil and poached him at the New York Philharmonic, remains as an adviser to the orchestra. When Tarnopolsky ran Cal Performances at UC Berkeley, he became close to Dudamel. Adam Crane, the orchestra's vice president of external affairs, worked under Borda in L.A. when Dudamel made his U.S. debut at the Hollywood Bowl and was hired by the L.A. Phil.
It is too soon to tell where this may lead. By now New Yorkers should know that Dudamel will not be the next Bernstein. He may well change New York, but he is not likely to be a New Yorker. Bernstein lived in New York, walking distance from Carnegie Hall and, when it was built, Lincoln Center. Bernstein raised his family at the Dakota and was, day and night, at the center of New York cultural, intellectual and political life.
Dudamel says he still thinks of L.A. as home and the L.A. Phil as family. The New York Philharmonic is a new family. But Dudamel, in fact, now lives in Madrid and has Spanish citizenship.
Yet for whatever reason, an L.A. mindset does seem to have reached the New York Philharmonic and Lincoln Center. The orchestra follows Dudamel's appearances with 'Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back' in concert and then heads off on an Asian tour with conductor Esa-Pekka Salonen.
L.A. opera directors Yuval Sharon and Peter Sellars, nowhere to be found in L.A. at the moment, are prominent at the Lincoln Center. Sharon's production of 'The Comet/Poppea' he created for the Industry in L.A. last year will have its New York premiere here in June. Sellars' collaboration with composer Matthew Aucoin, 'Music for New Bodies,' is in July.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Jurassic World Rebirth' is the perfect metaphor for Mamdani's socialism
‘Jurassic World Rebirth' is the perfect metaphor for Mamdani's socialism

The Hill

time29 minutes ago

  • The Hill

‘Jurassic World Rebirth' is the perfect metaphor for Mamdani's socialism

' Jurassic World Rebirth ' is the perfect metaphor for Zohran Mamdani's mayoral campaign. The New York City Democratic mayoral nominee and Democratic socialist Mamdani is enthralled with the dinosaur that is socialism. He wants to take New Yorkers to a place where the dinosaur will roam free. Despite all previous visitors having been devoured, Mamdani promises he can do it right. What could go wrong? Socialism is undisputedly a dinosaur. Dressed up as new and avant garde, it goes back centuries in Europe. In the 1820s America had socialist Owenite communes; even its now standard Marxist variant is a product of the late 19th century. It's not timeless; it's Jurassic-age technology. 'Jurassic World Rebirth,' where the dinosaurs live, is a place people should not go. The movie explicitly tells us this. We moviegoers know all too well why: Dinosaurs devour people. Whatever their rationale, dinosaur projects always fail. Always. Yet, filled with humanity's hubris (and that is what the 'Jurassic' movies are about), each new group imagines it holds the key: Dinosaurs can be lived with. We will all be better for it. And each new group is wrong. The movie's cast is young and attractive; after all, hunting dinosaurs is a young person's game — at least when the dinosaurs are breathing and not merely bones. There's a young woman, a young male professor, a father, children scattered from teen to 'tween,' some locals for color and a corporate executive, for greed. Like the movie, Mamdani's attempt at socialism features stock characters. Through all runs the thread of passion — and anger, always anger: clenched fists thrust upward, clenched jaws thrust forward. All represent far more than they actually are. Of course, Mamdani is the lead: young, earnest, with a beard that adds just the touch of gravitas, while maintaining the millennial vibe. An accomplished actor, Mamdani began his career auditioning as a Black student for a role at Columbia University. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) is the femme fatale, just a beret short of Che. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) brings the tousle-haired head of experience, an avuncular mentor and guide. Although he has never been to where he professes to take his followers, the others don't doubt he knows the way. And there are ensemble characters. The Squad, not intended to be closely scrutinized, communicate by their presence. They look so right for right now, how could they be wrong? The movie's location is exotically tropical — an island just offshore of Suriname and next door to Guyana, which by coincidence is where another American, Jim Jones, failed to establish a socialist utopia half a century ago. Mamdani socialism's intended location is New York City. Here, in the words of Frank Sinatra, it is looking to 'make a brand-new start of it.' If socialism can 'make it there,' it can 'make it anywhere.' As for the movie's plot, no spoiler alert is needed. If you've seen one of the earlier versions you know what happens here. It's a good romp, but suffice it to say, people get eaten. The same applies to Mamdani's socialism's plot: If you've seen one attempt, you've seen them all. People will get 'eaten' here too — lots and lots and lots of them. Everything will come crashing down at the end, or it will die with a whimper. Socialism has many routes to its coda, but always the same one: failure. 'Jurassic World Rebirth,' offers a new cast, higher production costs, better special effects and an updated plot. Mamdani's socialist project offers the same. He brings with him a cast of mostly young, new faces dressing up the old premise that you can somehow get something for nothing — housing, free bus rides, government-run grocery stores and childcare. His New York special effects are new to the U.S., and if he gets his hands on the city's budget, his production costs will be massively larger than any other American socialism project before it. 'Jurassic World Rebirth' is a summer blockbuster. People are lining up to see it. People are also crowding to see Mamdani's socialism project. And if he wins the mayoral race, they will be lining up too, only then, to get out. J.T. Young is the author of 'Unprecedented Assault: How Big Government Unleashed America's Socialist Left.' He has over three decades' experience working in Congress, the Department of Treasury, the Office of Management, and Budget, and representing a Fortune 20 company.

Yellowstone's ‘1944' Spinoff: Latest updates on release date, cast and plot details
Yellowstone's ‘1944' Spinoff: Latest updates on release date, cast and plot details

Business Upturn

time2 hours ago

  • Business Upturn

Yellowstone's ‘1944' Spinoff: Latest updates on release date, cast and plot details

By Aman Shukla Published on August 13, 2025, 19:30 IST Last updated August 13, 2025, 12:44 IST The Yellowstone saga keeps growing, and folks are buzzing about the new prequel, 1944 . This spinoff dives into the Dutton family's story during World War II, promising the same raw drama and historical flavor fans love from Taylor Sheridan's world. Here's the latest on when it might drop, who could star, and what the story holds—written to grab readers and keep search engines happy. When's Yellowstone: 1944 Hitting Screens? No exact release date is out yet for 1944 , but signs point to a 2026 premiere, maybe stretching to 2027. Why the delay? The Yellowstone universe is juggling projects like 1923 Season 2, which wrapped on April 6, 2025, plus other spinoffs like The Madison and 6666 . Since 1944 follows 1923 , it's likely next up after those wrap. The 2023 writers' and actors' strikes slowed things down too, so 2026 feels like a safe bet, though some whispers hint at early 2025 if production speeds up. Fans should stay tuned for solid news. Who's Starring in 1944 ? The cast list for 1944 is still hush-hush, but the timeline sparks some guesses. Set 21 years after 1923 , the show could bring back characters like Spencer Dutton (Brandon Sklenar), Alexandra (Julia Schlaepfer), Jack Dutton (Darren Mann), or Elizabeth (Michelle Randolph). Both Alexandra and Elizabeth were pregnant in 1923 , so their kids—maybe John Dutton II—could take center stage. Brandon Sklenar's dropped hints about wanting to play an older Spencer, which has fans hyped. John Dutton II, father of Yellowstone 's John Dutton III (Kevin Costner), will likely be key. With Dabney Coleman, who played an older John II, gone since 2024, a new actor will step in for a younger version. Could Jacob (Harrison Ford) or Cara Dutton (Helen Mirren) show up? Maybe, but their age in 1944 might mean smaller roles. Talk of Matthew McConaughey joining the Yellowstone world swirls, but he's more likely tied to The Madison . No official casting news yet, so speculation's all we've got. What's the Plot of 1944 About? No official plot details are out, but the title 1944 sets the stage: Montana during the tail end of World War II. The Dutton ranch will likely stay at the heart of things, with the war's impact—like the D-Day invasion or labor shortages—shaping the drama. Expect the next generation of Duttons, maybe John Dutton II or his parents (Spencer and Alexandra or Jack and Elizabeth), to drive the story, based on 1923 's baby reveals. The wartime backdrop opens doors for big moments. With men possibly off fighting, women like Alexandra or Elizabeth could step up to run the ranch, echoing Cara's strength in 1923 . Fans are also hoping 1944 clears up mysteries, like who Chance and Ned Dutton are—names dropped in Yellowstone but not yet pinned down. Taylor Sheridan's gift for blending romance, betrayal, and rugged Western vibes with history means 1944 will pack a punch. Ahmedabad Plane Crash Aman Shukla is a post-graduate in mass communication . A media enthusiast who has a strong hold on communication ,content writing and copy writing. Aman is currently working as journalist at

To know them is to loath them: Oak Park's Alec Nevala-Lee finds a niche, writing about science's biggest jerks
To know them is to loath them: Oak Park's Alec Nevala-Lee finds a niche, writing about science's biggest jerks

Chicago Tribune

time6 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

To know them is to loath them: Oak Park's Alec Nevala-Lee finds a niche, writing about science's biggest jerks

Luis W. Alvarez, physicist, genius, conspiracy debunker, military hawk, Zelig, University of Chicago dyspeptic, to cut to the chase, was not a very pleasant man. He was not especially liked by colleagues. It's hard to tell if he was even liked by his kids. And so, for Alec Nevala-Lee of Oak Park, who has become an underrated biographer of Great Jerks in Science, Alvarez was perfect. Nevala-Lee's previous biography was on Buckminster Fuller, architect, futurist, longtime professor at Southern Illinois University, but also an infamously obtuse, inscrutable mansplainer's mansplainer — his lectures seemed to go on for days. Before that, Nevala-Lee wrote 'Astounding,' a harrowing account of the men behind mid-century science fiction, particularly editor John W. Campbell, who could be described charitably as fascist. His next book, already in the works, is about those lovable scamps behind the RAND Corporation, the most despised think tank in history. Am I nuts or do I see a pattern here? 'No question!' Nevala-Lee said the other day, getting a little loud in his neighborhood library. 'I like intelligent people who succeed in one field only to try and apply those skills elsewhere and decide that they should convince the world that only they have the answer to certain problems.' At the risk of playing pop psychologist, I asked a natural follow-up: Is that you, too? 'I mean, uh… I it.' He smiled. 'Am I a reasonably intelligent person who thought a lot about where to apply their skills? Sure.' I asked this because he attended Harvard University and left with a degree in classics and an over-confident idea that knowing the classics was really the only way to become a writer. So when his fiction-writing career stalled before it could get started, he decided to reinvent himself. He developed a talent for writing quite accessible histories of the boorish. The boorish, but brilliant. As Nevala-Lee explains in 'Collisions: A Physicist's Journey From Hiroshima to the Death of the Dinosaurs,' his surprisingly breezy new history of Luis Alvarez, the Nobel laureate and occasional Chicagoan was pragmatic, for better and for worse. He preferred to work where his skills would get noticed by the widest number of important people — smartly leading to funding and fame. Alvarez had, Nevala-Lee writes, taste when it came to science. Meaning, eventually, after years of frustration in Hyde Park, he knew how to pick projects that 'were both achievable and important.' Which is an understatement. Alvarez learned how to position himself at the heart of the 20th century. He helped develop radar during World War II. He worked on the creation of the atomic bomb with Enrico Fermi and J. Robert Oppenheimer. He flew behind the Enola Gay as a scientific observer while it dropped the first nuclear weapon on Japan. In fact, Alvarez's bubble chamber, the project that would earn him a Nobel, may have been his least publicized work: a pressurized chamber to help scientists study particle behavior. It was groundbreaking, though not as thrilling as proving — using a bunch of watermelons and a high-powered rifle — why the Warren Commission was probably correct about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. In Alvarez's last decades, as if knocking out a little extra credit, he even gave us the answer to a mystery we all know the answer to now: He explained how a planet ruled by dinosaurs could go extinct nearly overnight. But … he was also something of a bootlicker. 'Alvarez knew how to cleave to power,' Nevala-Lee said. 'In a way I find interesting. The contrast to Oppenheimer is real, because Oppenheimer, equally brilliant, spoke his truth as he saw it.' He came to regret his role in creating nuclear weapons, so at the peak of McCarthy-era paranoia, his loyalty to the government was doubted and the head of the Manhattan Project's Los Alamos Laboratory had his security clearance revoked. Alvarez, meanwhile, 'was very careful about alienating people he needed to get stuff done,' Nevala-Lee said. 'In fact, and this is important, he doubled down and felt the solution to the Soviet problem was definitely a thermonuclear bomb. Alvarez would even become one of those people who was all for mutual assured destruction. Oppenheimer was not. Alvarez had such a high opinion of his own intelligence that when he sees someone equally bright, like Oppenheimer, opposing him on a fundamental point, he assumed it couldn't be he's wrong — no, Oppenheimer must be compromised. I don't know if he really believed that for sure, but I think so: Alvarez saw it to his advantage if Oppenheimer could be neutralized. He was causing problems, and Alvarez's work would go smoother if he was out of the way.' In the end, ever an opportunist, Alvarez testified Oppenheimer was loyal to his country, yet wrong on nukes. Not the profile in courage that makes for Oscar biopics. (Indeed, in Christopher Nolan's 'Oppenheimer,' Alvarez is mostly on hand to say Germans just split the atom. Then he's gone from the picture. Alvarez, whose career was just getting started in 1939, wouldn't have been pleased.) To make matters worse, egads — Alvarez didn't seem to be a big fan of Chicago. Scientist Luis Walter Alvarez with a radio transmitter used in a radar ground-controlled approach system built to help guide airplanes to land. (AP) His ex-wife lived here with his ex-mother-in-law. During the development of the bomb, while traveling constantly between MIT and Los Alamos, he would call Chicago his 'decompression chamber,' but after working for a while at Argonne National Laboratory in Lemont, he felt rudderless and assumed all of the interesting science was being done elsewhere. He became something of a legend around Hyde Park — 'high on my list of mythological figures,' is how one scientist at University of Chicago described him — but Alvarez himself complained bitterly of his undergraduate education at the school, a place where, he said: 'Most of the graduate students didn't understand any quantum mechanics, largely for the reason that the professors had just learned it themselves.' He sounds, in many ways, I told Nevala-Lee, like the archetypal UC student. How so, he asked. Arrogant, awkward, questioning yet has all the answers; inquisitive yet careerist. 'I mean, that describes Alvarez,' Nevala-Lee said. 'I think of him now as someone who understood how to get things done. But he was abrasive, didn't treat subordinates well — it was a problem. He would have gotten more accomplished if people didn't feel personally attacked by him so much. He assumed if you were in physics at his level, you get this treatment. Can't take it, find another field.' Tack on a whimsical side — a study of UFOs, a study of pyramids, a genuine love for the science of the Superball by Wham-O — and Alvarez even sounds like a descendant of, well, Elon Musk. Nevala-Lee can see it. He was once enthralled himself by 'the American idea of visionary genius.' Nevala-Lee is 45 now, though younger, 'I had an exaggerated sense of my own abilities. I thought of myself as someone who could enter the world and solve its problems myself. Elon Musk was that guy about 10 years ago. I've since become pretty skeptical of this idea of a visionary genius. I don't know now if they ever did exist. Deep down, our figures like this, they all have the same problems.' By the way, since you're probably wondering, for the record, Nevala-Lee is a nice guy. cborrelli@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store