Eersterust residents stand firm against government relocation amid housing crisis
Image: Rapula Moatshe
Eersterust residents, who illegally occupied empty land during the Covid-19 pandemic, have vowed to defy the government's imminent plans to relocate them from the area, which is considered unsuitable for housing.
This was revealed by residents on Tuesday during a visit to the area by Gauteng MEC for Human Settlements Tasneem Motara and City of Tshwane's MMC for Human Settlements Aaron Maluleka.
The pair visited the informal settlement to assess the living conditions of the residents.
They told residents about the plans in the pipeline to relocate them from the area, citing its unsuitability for housing.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Motara said: 'The surveys that the municipality has conducted indicate that the land is not developable; it is probably because of the soil type.'
However, some residents have shown reluctance to relocate from the land.
One of them, Linah Mlanjeni, said she illegally erected her shack on the land because renting had become too expensive for her.
'Renting is very expensive for us, and mostly the job that we are doing does not pay at least R10 000 salary a month. I have the responsibility to feed myself and my children,' she said.
She expressed frustration over broken government promises of housing, questioning the claim that the land is unsuitable for building.
'They wanted to build a garage here. How can it not be suitable for building? We disagree on that. There are people who are already staying here in brick houses,' she said.
Lizzy Bosman echoed similar concerns, citing unaffordable rent, which can be at least R6 000 for a small room.
'We don't want to leave this place, it is home, we have grown up here, and now we have kids of our own,' she said.
Other residents demanded development in the area, highlighting the absence of basic amenities like toilets, clean water, and electricity.
The residents firmly reiterated their opposition to relocation, insisting they will not leave Eersterust under any circumstances.
Motara said the municipality has identified suitable land for relocation and will provide further details about it soon.
'If I tell you where the land is, then tomorrow they will invade it. We know where the land is,' she said.
She said the relocation will happen as soon as her department and Tshwane have finalised the necessary processes, which include budgeting for it.
When asked about handling those who refuse relocation, she said that relocation is necessary and there are various ways to address resistance.
For example, she said, for residents occupying Sanral land, the entity would need to obtain a court-ordered eviction.
'We have to evict those people and relocate them. That land is unsuitable for people to reside on. To avert a disaster, they have to relocate. Where? It is based on where we have land and where the project is available,' Motara said.
She urged everybody to respect the rule of law and refrain from invading land and constructing permanent structures.
Maluleka said 79 people occupying Sanral's road reserves need urgent relocation due to road construction, while the total number of residents in the informal settlement is 1 149.
'We have to acknowledge the injustices of the past that people were deprived of land,' he said.
He explained that the settlement emerged because the community felt neglected and left behind for a long time.
'We don't want to overpromise but whatever we are going to do, let's work together to be able to speed up development,' he said.
rapula.moatshe@inl.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
11 hours ago
- IOL News
Amazulu King Misuzulu's advisors suggest Zulus contribute R10 per month to support his financial independence
A proposal has been made that the Zulus contribute R10 monthly for king Misuzulu's financial independence. Image: archive In an effort to make the Zulu king and the royal family truly independent , King Misuzulu kaZwelithini's advisors have proposed a monthly R10 contribution by every Zulu person in South Africa and the rest of the world. The proposal was a direct response to the KwaZulu-Natal Treasury's decision to block additional funding for the annual Reed Dance festival after the king moved it from its original venue of Enyokeni royal palace to the new Mashobeni palace. Enyokeni palace, which has hosted the ceremony for more than 40 years, is in Nongoma in the north of the province while Mashobeni palace is in Pongola in the north-east of the province. In a statement issued by the king's advisors, African historian, Professor Jabulani Maphalala and Abantu Botho Congress founder Philani Mavundla, they said they were concerned about the negative press coverage of the king's decision to relocate the Reed Dance from eNyokeni to Mashobeni. 'The suggestion that this decision could 'set him against the financially strained KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Government' is not only far-fetched but utterly ridiculous. As Isizwe saMazulu (the Zulu nation) we wholeheartedly support the King's decision. "Our position is unequivocal: once 'Umlomo Ongathethimanga' (the one that does not speak lies) has spoken, no other voice should presume to challenge his authority. Let every Zulu person contribute R10 (ten Rand) per month to ensure the Zulu Nation can independently manage its affairs,' read the statement. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The advisors said that the financial difficulties faced by the KwaZulu-Natal government are a problem of its own making, adding that the Zulu people continue to pay taxes in the country, and have never been asked to cease doing so. "The question must be asked: what has been done with our contributions? If it is true that there are insufficient funds to support what the Zulu nation rightfully deserves. 'We are exasperated by the repeated claim that there is 'no money' whenever the King makes a decision, despite the taxes diligently paid by the Zulu people. It is time for us, as the Zulu people, to examine this government's actions and priorities more closely. We deserve respect for our cultural and traditional obligations,' the statement reads. Attempts to get reaction from both the KZN provincial government and the royal family's spokespersons were unsuccessful. Speaking on Sunday, Maphalala said the proposal was important because politicians tend to undermine the king as he is on their payroll and they fund his cultural ceremonies. He said the idea was not entirely new as it was first introduced in 1933 after the death of King Solomon kaDinuzulu. He said it was prompted by the fact that the king died at the age of 40, leaving behind 50 wives and many children without any financial support. The proposal was made by the regent Prince Mshiyeni who held the position for the young heir Prince Bhekuzulu, the late king Zwelithini's father, who eventually ascended to the throne in 1948. The collection at the time was 25c per person.
The Citizen
3 days ago
- The Citizen
National Dialogue: ANC talking to an empty room, but it must listen
What is the use of a National Dialogue when the nation isn't taken seriously by its leaders? You don't have to be an expert to know that a wounded animal, when cornered, will fight tooth and nail for its survival. Such a scene is playing out before our eyes with the ANC and its hijacking of the National Dialogue. The dialogue, packaged as a forum for citizens, activists, civil society, business, and political parties to discuss issues facing the country, kicks off today in Pretoria. A true family meeting is needed. Not the one-sided announcements fed to us by the president under the Covid-19 lockdown, but a proper, clear-the-air discussion to unite us behind a strategy to take the country forward. SA really is sitting on a watershed moment. A coalition government demands more political consensus and unified policy than has been needed since 1994. Black economic empowerment (BEE), the Expropriation Act, and SA's foreign policy are just three of many sticking points in the ruling government of national unity (GNU) that need to be discussed and a national stance adopted. We can no longer drink from a tin that says national unity but tastes and smells just like ANC policy. Social collapse Socially, we sit on a tsunami of crises that threaten to overwhelm communities and citizens. Whether it is powering streetlights or fixing potholes, businesses and citizen groups have had to step in where the government has failed. They deserve a place and a voice at the discussion table. Services that should be offered by the government to its citizens are now being privatised, leaving those who want them to pay for everything from water and electricity to schooling, security, waste collection, and medical care. This further divides the chasm between the haves and have-nots in the most unequal country in the world. Those who live on both ends of the chasm deserve to have a voice at the National Dialogue. They should speak about how the government's failure to provide sufficient basic services and jobs has led to a scarcity and frustration that has become a fertile ground for Operation Dudula to thrive. Whenever the vigilante group questions the nationality of those working at stores or in line at clinics, hospitals, and schools, they are adding to the hysteria that 'foreigners are stealing our jobs, rights, and privileges'. All citizens will talk about how we blindly deal with water shortages, power outages, corruption, racism, gender-based violence, and crime on a daily basis. SA is among the most crime-ridden countries in the world. Private security companies and police are on the front line each day, dealing with everything from potential terrorism threats and illegal mining to extortion, kidnapping and muggings in the CBD that 'nobody saw'. They should be heard at a national discussion. ALSO READ: A VIEW OF THE WEEK: When will the ground fall beneath us? National dialogue: another ANC rally? But none of these crucial players, whether meaningful political opposition to the ANC or John from down the road, will be there on Friday. Several political parties have pulled out, as have key foundations and civil society organisations. Their fears that this will be a costly talkshop for ANC cadres and their supporters to hijack may become a reality, with echo chambers of party policy passed as national consensus. The party should have learnt from losing power in a bruising 2024 election and realised it needs to be a fair player. Like an apologetic but insincere ex, ANC secretary-general Fikile Mbalula loves to go on about how the party has learnt its lessons from its past failures and has listened to the people of SA. It is a lie parroted by his boss, President Cyril Ramaphosa, when addressing the national government's failures. But what lessons have they learnt, and who exactly have they been listening to? Government community imbizos are a powerful and progressive step, but complaints fall on deaf ears, and no changes are implemented when the blue-light brigades leave town. Both the ANC and the government that it controlled for 30 years need to understand the reality of the people they claim to serve, but refuse to hear it and would rather talk to an empty room. Perhaps if they stopped talking, stopped fighting, the silence of those who chose not to be part of their charade will tell them how they got there in the first place. NOW READ: A VIEW OF THE WEEK: Ramaphosa risks losing control of Cabinet
Daily Maverick
3 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Outa in court bid to declare Joburg property power broker Helen Botes delinquent director over Usindiso fire
The anti-corruption organisation is demanding that Helen Botes – who has been implicated in various other crises in the city – face immediate and decisive accountability. Anti-corruption organisation Outa served delinquent director court papers on Johannesburg Metro strongwoman Helen Botes on Wednesday, 13 August. The papers relate to Botes's negligence in the Usindiso fire in August 2023, in which 76 people were killed. A second case involves Botes's implication by the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) in Covid-19 procurement criminality, where R18.6-million was spent on dodgy companies. These providers failed to do the work on City property, and the spending took place even when most City staffers were working from home. (See Mark Heywood's report here.) Botes, like a cat with nine lives, has been implicated in various other crises in the city, including the abandonment of the Metro Centre and the leasing of expensive buildings from an ANC cadre. This property cadre has on several occasions been in arrears in paying the City's bills, as reported here. But, as a powerful member of the ANC region, she has escaped censure. Botes has been the CEO of the Johannesburg Property Company (JPC) and a director of the City entity since 2008, and in that role has consolidated her position as an official and political power broker. She was appointed acting COO of Johannesburg in January in unprocedural circumstances, but with Tshepo Makola now back in his position, it's unclear what Botes is doing. JPC spokesperson Lucky Sindane confirmed that Botes has not returned to the entity as CEO. 'The JPC board is studying the court action and will consider its options,' he said. The board is chaired by Simon Motha, who is the deputy chairperson of the ANC Johannesburg region. Mayor Dada Morero is the chairperson. Legal action Outa demands that Botes face immediate and decisive accountability. 'Public officials trusted with life-and-death responsibilities cannot be allowed to walk away from catastrophes without consequences. We owe it to the victims, their families and all residents of South Africa to ensure those responsible are held accountable, and that such a disaster (the fire) never happens again,' said Outa executive director, advocate Stefanie Fick. Fick is using the Companies Act, which allows for an application to the court to declare a director delinquent. 'A court must make an order of delinquency if a director grossly abused this position, inflicted harm on the company or acted with gross negligence, wilful misconduct or breach of trust,' she said. The organisation successfully used a delinquency application against the late Dudu Myeni, who was a wrecking ball at SAA, in 2020. That case took three or four years to finalise, said Outa's Wayne Duvenage, but he added that this case should not take that long since the organisation's standing to bring the application has been decided and is now case law. Outa has used the findings of the Khampepe Commission of Inquiry (chaired by Judge Sisi Khampepe) as the cornerstone of its application to court. Daily Maverick sent questions to the City about the Outa case, and its answers will be added once received. The JPC manages a portfolio of 29,001 properties with a book value of R10.2-billion, many of which are in poor condition due to inadequate management, as evidenced by the Usindiso shelter, the Metro Centre, the Randburg Civic Centre and numerous other properties. (See this report from Carte Blanche, for example.) The City's attempts to squeeze more money out of leaseholders on public properties and green spaces in Johannesburg have caused an uproar, as reported here by Ed Stoddard and Julia Evans. The Khampepe commission found that: The board of directors of the JPC must consider taking appropriate action against Botes, the chief executive of the JPC, for the total disregard of managing the Usindiso building despite knowledge of the disastrous state since at least 2019; Botes gave evidence and answered questions by the evidence leader (of the commission) and, in cross-examination, made concessions indicating awareness of the following relevant facts spanning from at least 2015 until the fire occurred. Since at least 2015, Usindiso Ministries had vacated the building; the building was not zoned for residential purposes; the building had been hijacked, remained occupied illegally and was overcrowded; crime was rife in the building, and the building was not habitable; the building had illegal electricity connections and water consumption; the building lacked firefighting equipment and installations; and the JPC had failed to maintain the property since 2003; and The evidence of the former residents detailed herein indicates without any shadow of a doubt that the Usindiso building was dangerous or showed signs of becoming hazardous to life or property. In contrast, the evidence presented by Botes elsewhere demonstrates that the JPC and, by extension, the COJ were aware that the Usindiso building posed a danger to life or property, yet no steps appear to have been taken to uphold applicable laws to ensure public safety. DM
