
Norwich alderman announces campaign to become first Sikh mayor in city, state
This is more than a campaign for elected office, to me. This is about helping people, and helping Norwich residents, and I am ready to go to work," he said, before the crowd erupted into chants of "move Norwich forward."
Due to term limits, current Mayor Peter Nystrom cannot run for re-election, but can run for City Council. No Republican has yet announced they will run for mayor.
In his speech, 39-year-old Singh Khalsa said he plans to revitalize the city's economy, including by turning the marina into a destination and "more welcoming place," by making downtown Norwich safer and by leveraging education to build a future for children in the city.
Singh Khalsa, in an earlier interview with The Day, had said the city must do a better job of capitalizing on the influx of traffic it gets from two nearby casinos.
"It goes through us," he said of the traffic. "But how we can stop them here? That's one thing we need to kind of focus on. Having a nice operational marina and waterfront. Nice mixed-use development in downtown. More restaurants. These things will give them a reason to stop in.'
He added the city has plenty of attractive history, too, but must do a better job with signage that will make people aware of it, so they have a reason to "take a turn and explore."
Singh Khalsa said the city has had a habit of saying "no" to things, explaining it has been restrictive toward business with its zoning regulations, which has prevented the city attracting new industries and increasing tax revenue.
"We need to keep making sure that we keep our vision open-minded on a lot of different things which are coming," he said. "AI is another big one. Which, you know, is getting bigger and bigger every day.'
Singh Khalsa has and will continue to support the cannabis industry in the city, which has started bringing in tax revenue.
"It's not at the point we were all hoping," Singh Khalsa added. "But sometimes things take time to grow. Because I was looking at the bigger picture, that it will bring more revenues to our city. "
He said he wants to work to help the city be more open to those kind of opportunities.
"Because, I want to see money coming from everywhere," Singh Khalsa said. "I want the city to have a piece of it — maybe a small piece of it — but something trickling down. I want people to come here, make money, and city get their fair portion. But if we don't invest in regulations, we lose that opportunity of that money coming to us, and we also lose opportunity to regulate those entities which might want to come here."
In his speech, he pointed out that the 2024 grand list shrunk by more than $11 million, which will place an additional burden on city taxpayers.
He said he wants the city to encourage mixed-use development, not just housing. He said those developments will provide the kind of amenities that the younger generation is looking for in a thriving city.
"If I go to New York City — people are willing to live in one-bedroom units, because they're always out," Singh Khalsa said. "They just go there for sleep, you know? They are sitting in cafes, they are sitting in restaurants, they are sitting in beautiful parks. They feel like the whole city is their home. And that's just a place to sleep."
He said while the younger generation seems to be looking for apartments with nice views, shopping areas and access to parks, he recognized that people's needs change throughout their lives, and the city has the ability to accommodate different lifestyles.
"We do have a rural setup. We do have a city setup," Singh Khalsa said. "These are already things that already exist in Norwich. We just have to make them more vibrant. We need to explore all these things, so we can keep them here. College students. The young people who will be doing the jobs."
Singh Khalsa, who is raising his family in Norwich and has one child currently in Norwich Public Schools, said he supports the schools, and also wants to provide more recreational opportunities and better promote ethnic food. He described himself as an open-minded person — balanced and bipartisan in his decision making — and one who tries to see things in the long-term.
"I already have a good relationship with the Republicans in town, as well. Of course, I cannot support MAGA. But, you know, a lot of those ideologies — I just don't believe in them. But I'm not going to shy away in talking to people. I'm out there. I'm already doing that."
State and city officials back Singh
State officials Attorney General William Tong, Lt. Gov. Susan Bysiewicz and state Sen. Cathy Osten, all Democrats, were at Saturday's announcement. In speeches, they voiced their support for Singh Khalsa. Originally from Punjab, a state of India, Singh Khalsa moved to the country in 2007, then after graduating college in New Jersey, moved in 2010 to Norwich, where he purchased Norwichtown Shell gas station. He owned it for 12 years.
"I think the reason why Singh is going to be such a great mayor, and such an effective mayor," Tong said, "is because he knows what the people in this city go through every single day. He knows how hard it is to work and start a small business. He knows how great and wonderful it is to have a dream, and to come to a place like Norwich, that gives you the opportunity and how hard you have to work."
Singh Khalsa practices the monotheistic religion Sikhism, and recalled how after he purchased the station, people driving by would see the turbin he was wearing and continue along, to go to a competitor.
City voters had made history with Singh Khalsa in 2021, when they elected him as the first Sikh city councilor in the state. He was the second-highest vote-getter that year. Before that, he served two terms on the city's school board, and terms on the Commission on the City Plan and Inland Wetlands, Water Courses & Conservation Commission.
Bysiewicz pointed out that in November, voters will have the opportunity to make history again, by electing Singh Khalsa as the state's first Sikh mayor.
"I do see sometimes, just by running, it's a win-win situation," Singh Khalsa said. "Because people feel proud when they see somebody who has established to this point, for himself, for his family — come back to the community for public service."
Bysiewicz said at this time in the country "where there are those who seek to vilify immigrants," she was excited to have someone who showcases the "talent, strength and ingenuity that immigrants have brought to the Norwich community.
d.drainville@theday.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
24 minutes ago
- Axios
What to know about the Home Rule Act and Trump's D.C. takeover
President Trump's takeover of the D.C. police began this week, and it's unclear what that control will mean for district residents or how long it will last. The big picture: Trump's decision to upend the status quo in D.C. isn't without legal merit, as the Home Rule Act gives him the power to do so for roughly a month. Driving the news: White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said at a press briefing Tuesday that about 850 officers and agents were sent across Washington, D.C., last night and 23 arrests were made during the first night of the federal takeover. Photos showed U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration agents patrolling the city and U.S. Border Patrol units are stationed there, too. There were also snapshots of the Metropolitan Police Department officers investigating a shooting and federal law enforcement officers gathering at the U.S. Park Police office. Flashback: Trump first announced plans to federalize the D.C. police force on Monday, saying the city is "totally out of control" (despite a drop in violent crime) and "one of the most dangerous cities anywhere in the world." The move prompted protests across the city Monday night and perplexed experts on homelessness and crime. Democratic lawmakers from the Washington, D.C., area criticized Trump for the move. Mayor Muriel Bowser called the move "unsettling and unprecedented," but said she wasn't "totally surprised," either. How the Home Rule Act gives Trump power The D.C. Home Rule Act allows the district's residents to elect a mayor and some other public officials. The act "is the result of the ongoing push by District residents for control of their own local affairs," according to D.C. Council. Section 740 of the act specifically gives the president power to control the D.C. Police in response to "special conditions of an emergency nature" for up to 30 days. However, Congress can vote to end the emergency status. It's unlikely this will happen now, since Republicans control both chambers. Congress can also vote to extend the emergency powers in a joint resolution. Worth nothing: This is the first time a president has invoked the provision. When does Trump's takeover end? The act points to a 30-day limit. The Executive Order Trump signed said the federal government would maintain control of police "for the maximum period permitted under section 740 of the Home Rule Act." What they're saying: A White House official told Axios that timeframe is subject to change "consistent with the Task Force 's operations." Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on Fox News Monday that troops could remain in D.C. for weeks or months, but it would ultimately be "the president's call." U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro didn't rule out an extension, either. "I think at the end of 30 days, he will make the right decision as to what he is going to do at that point going forward," Pirro told ABC News Live. What to expect under Trump's federal takeover of D.C. Zoom in: Trump's takeover is only two days in, but some of what to expect has already been seen. About 800 members of the National Guard will appear on D.C. streets this week. They will work in shifts of 200 for 24/7 coverage, according to The Washington Post, and have "broad latitude," Hegseth told Fox News Monday evening. Attorney General Pam Bondi will be in charge of the D.C. police, which has 3,000 sworn members.


The Hill
24 minutes ago
- The Hill
Just 12 percent found Sydney Sweeney ad campaign offensive: Polling
A little over a tenth of Americans found Sydney Sweeney's recent American Eagle ad campaign offensive, according to a new poll. When asked in The Economist/YouGov poll about the ad campaign, 12 percent considered it offensive, while 39 percent called it clever. Forty percent said it was neither, and 8 percent were unsure. The ad campaign featuring Sweeney sparked some backlash over what some have deemed racist undertones. A majority of the criticism has surrounded the campaign's title: 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans,' riffing on 'good genes.' 'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality, and even eye color,' Sweeney said in one video from the campaign. 'My jeans are blue.' But the campaign captured the attention of several high profile Republicans, including the president, who weighed in on the campaign, stating 'woke is for losers.' 'Sydney Sweeney, a registered Republican, has the 'HOTTEST' ad out there. It's for American Eagle, and the jeans are 'flying off the shelves.' Go get 'em Sydney!' Trump added in a Truth Social post. The Pentagon also waded into the discourse around the ad campaign, posting a photo of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in jeans and saying he 'has great jeans.' Trump himself garnered 44 percent favorability in this week's Economist/YouGov poll, with 52 percent of respondents saying they felt unfavorably about the president. The Economist/YouGov poll took place from Aug. 9 to Aug. 11, with 1,635 respondents and a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.


Boston Globe
24 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Labor unions mobilize to challenge advance of algorithms in workplaces
Union leaders say they must intervene to protect workers from the potential for AI to cause massive job displacement or infringe on employment rights. The technology has already become a sticking point in some labor disputes, such as the Hollywood writers strikes in 2023. Advertisement In February, Gallup found that one-third of workers in the United States feared AI would lead to fewer job opportunities. AI proponents and some economists argue that in the past, technologies that have disrupted some careers also created many new jobs. Advertisement Lorena Gonzalez, cochair of the new AFL-CIO task force on AI, said this week that AI was set to become a defining issue for the labor movement, similar to the impact in the 1990s of the North American Free Trade Agreement, which created a free-trade zone in North America and drove major changes in US employment including the outsourcing of manufacturing jobs to Mexico. 'We cannot allow AI and technology to be our next NAFTA,' she said on an episode of the podcast 'Power At Work' released Tuesday by the Burnes Center for Social Change at Northeastern University. 'It is up to us to determine what kind of society we want to live in and what kind of regulations we live around that protect us.' President Trump has rolled back AI rules introduced by former president Joe Biden and made clear he wants to give the tech industry and its clients free rein with the technology. The AFL-CIO task force plans to help unions take on problematic use of AI in collective bargaining and contracts and in coming months and develop a slate of model legislation available to state leaders, modeled on recently passed and newly proposed legislation in places including California and Massachusetts. 'As soon as the [federal] moratorium got taken out, there was an urgency of 'How do we prepare other states to move forward,'' Gonzalez told The Washington Post. She is also president of the California Federation of Labor Unions, which supports a proposed state law that would prevent employers from primarily relying on AI software to automate decisions like terminations or disciplinary actions. Instead, humans would have to review decisions. The law would also prohibit use of tools that predict workers' behaviors, emotional states, and personality. Advertisement 'If we don't start thinking about how to protect workers we're going to have a lot of problems,' said Democratic State Senator Jerry McNerney, who introduced the California bill. 'People will be dismissed and demoted from jobs without sufficient cause.' Proposals like McNerney's have met pushback from some tech companies and employers. Rob Atkinson, president of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, a tech industry trade group, said societal progress often comes from 'worker-replacing technologies' that sometimes lead to the decline of certain jobs such as elevator operator or gas station attendant. 'The AFL-CIO's efforts to limit AI-driven productivity will only lead to slower wage and economic growth,' he said in an emailed statement to The Washington Post. 'Rather than engaging in a Luddite-inspired campaign against a critical new technology, organized labor should push Congress to improve programs for displaced workers.' Seth Harris, who served as Labor secretary under former president Barack Obama and labor adviser to Biden, said despite the considerable unknowns about the effects of AI on jobs, it is reasonable to try to blunt risks to workers. 'This is the critical moment, not only for AI guardrails, but for collective bargaining over AI in workplaces and industries,' said Harris, who is now a senior fellow at the Burnes Center. In Massachusetts, the Teamsters have argued that autonomous vehicles threaten public safety as well as jobs and fought the expansion of Alphabet's robotaxi service, Waymo, into the state. The union declined to comment but cited a July statement by Tom Mari, president of Teamsters Local 25. 'Waymo is steamrolling into cities throughout our country without concern for workers or residents,' his statement said. 'They're doing this because they want to make trillions of dollars by eliminating jobs.' Waymo did not respond to a request for comment. Advertisement Mari's local supports a bill currently in the Massachusetts Joint Committee on Transportation that requires autonomous vehicles to have a human safety operator who can intervene during the ride. 'We can't just be the Wild West where tech companies can experiment on our roads unregulated,' said Massachusetts State Senator Paul Feeney, a Democrat, who introduced the bill to the state Legislature. 'Let's make sure we're introducing commonsense regulations that keep people safe and employed.'