Chowta Accuses Congress Govt of Misusing Police to Target Hindu Leaders in Coastal Karnataka
Mangaluru:
Dakshina Kannada MP Capt. Brijesh Chowta has alleged that the Congress-led government in Karnataka is deliberately targeting Hindu leaders and youth in the coastal region, misusing police powers to intimidate and silence organisations aligned with the Hindu community.
Responding to a series of FIRs, including one against senior RSS functionary Kalladka Prabhakar Bhat, Chowta accused the state government of running a "systematic campaign" to vilify Hindu leaders. "This government is trying to mask its failure in maintaining law and order by resorting to appeasement politics," he said in a sharply worded press release issued on Sunday.
Chowta claimed that at least 15 Hindu leaders had been booked in recent days and that BJP leader Arun Puthila was being externed to Kalaburagi as part of this effort. "Young members of the Hindu community are being slapped with false charges and driven out under the externment provisions. This is not acceptable in a democracy," he stated.
According to Chowta, several incidents in Dakshina Kannada, including late-night police visits to Hindu households in areas such as Kadaba, point to what he described as 'selective and extrajudicial' enforcement. He warned that such actions could disrupt the social harmony of a district known for its educational advancement and strong nationalistic values.
Chowta also asserted that the government's perceived bias could force the BJP and Hindu organisations to launch a statewide agitation. 'If this authoritarian and anti-Hindu approach continues, we will have no choice but to take this fight across the state,' he said.
The MP added that he had already spoken to the state's Director General of Police and urged him to intervene. BJP legislators and district officebearers from Dakshina Kannada are set to meet senior police officials in Mangaluru on Tuesday to lodge a formal protest.
'Our region stands as a bastion of nationalism and self-reliance. The Congress government, cloaked in secular rhetoric, cannot digest this reality. It wants to dismantle the region's communal peace to cater to its vote-bank politics,' Chowta alleged, concluding with a stern warning that the party will not remain passive.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
14 minutes ago
- News18
Why A Mega Dalit Outreach Is Part Of BJP's Plan For Poll-Bound Bihar From June 20
Last Updated: Caste arithmetic and an unfavourable result in the elections last year have prompted the party to take steps to win the poll battle The BJP has decided to go all out to woo Dalits of poll-bound Bihar, even before seat-sharing talks have begun among the NDA constituents for the upcoming election. Starting June 20, the party will target the Ravidas community by organising the Sant Shiromani Ravidas Sammelan-cum-honour ceremony in Bihar. Sant Ravidas, a 15th-century Bhakti saint, is a significant figure in the Dalit community and is widely recognised as a Dalit icon. Last year, Prime Minister Narendra Modi commemorated Ravidas' 647th birth anniversary in his Lok Sabha constituency Varanasi. Now, with Bihar election around the corner, BJP has decided to hold such conclaves in different districts and created a schedule for that. News18 has learnt that BJP has fixed conclave dates for Begusarai on June 20, Samastipur on June 22, Madhubani on June 25, Bagaha and Bhagalpur on June 29, Saharsa on June 30, Muzaffarpur and Siwan on July 6, Darbhanga on July 7, Gaya on July 13, Banka on July 16, Arwal on July 18, Khagaria and Sitamarhi on July 20 and Gopalganj on July 31, which will be the season finale. There will also be a special conclave through which Dalit outreach efforts will be made in Bihar's capital Patna though the date for it is not yet finalised. The party wants the Patna conclave to be a show-stopper with big names in attendance, and hence, the date will depend on their availability, say BJP sources. But why the focus on Dalits? Sources in the know suggest there are two reasons behind it. One is pure caste arithmetic. Though the Ravidas community constitutes just 5 per cent of Bihar's voters, if the total Dalit pie in Bihar is taken into consideration, the number jumps to 19 per cent. While BJP is confident about upper castes and OBC support of a few, JDU too brings OBC strengths. Even NDA's smaller allies like Rashtriya Lok Morcha leader Upendra Kushwaha can influence OBC votes. Only former Bihar CM Jitin Ram Majhi's Hindustan Awam Morcha-Secular(HAM-S) and LJP (RV) Chirag Paswan have limited sway over those known as the backwards. The second reason stems from an unfavourable experience in last year's Lok Sabha election when the BJP-led NDA lost nine Lok Sabha seats in Bihar. In 2019 Lok Sabha polls, NDA won 39 seats while in 2024, it managed to win 30. In neighbouring Uttar Pradesh, the situation was even more grim. The BJP-led NDA lost a whopping 28 seats. Later, BJP went on record to accept that Congress managed to twist BJP's '400 paar' campaign slogan as fear mongering among Dalit voters, suggesting their reservation rights are on the line. This worked against the BJP in the two Hindi heartland states. Since June 4 last year, when the results were declared, BJP has taken corrective measures to win the narrative war. However, the party feels that with no big alliance partner that has a solid grip among the Dalit community, the outreach is the best way forward. Sources in the BJP say the plan to carpet-bomb the Ravidas Sammelans was conceived in mid-May when Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi alleged that the Bihar Police stopped him on his way to Ambedkar hostel in Darbhanga, adding that 'they could not stop me because your power (minority community) is watching over me". Back then, Bihar BJP president Dilip Jaiswal had hit out at Gandhi, saying: 'He should use his mind. If he had to use a government building or hostel, he should have sent an official itinerary. He is the Leader of Opposition and a state president of a party has to teach this?" However, it is learnt that this visit may have worked as a catalyst for the state BJP to pre-emptively launch a mega Dalit outreach, having learnt its lessons last year. First Published: June 04, 2025, 10:29 IST
News18
15 minutes ago
- News18
Modi's India: Civilisational Confidence Or Cultural Shift?
For decades, India tiptoed around its Hindu roots in the name of secularism. Modi changed that. In this episode of Straight Talk, we explore how Narendra Modi's unapologetic embrace of India's civilisational identity—through the Ram Mandir, Article 370, and global cultural diplomacy—signals more than a political shift. It's a cultural recalibration. Is this a confident Bharat owning its legacy, or a contested transformation of the national ethos? We dive deep into Modi 3.0's vision at home and abroad.
Hindustan Times
16 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
CJI Gavai cautions judges against accepting govt posts, contesting polls
Chief Justice of India (CJI) Bhushan R Gavai has sounded a strong note of caution against judges accepting government posts or contesting elections immediately after retirement, warning that such practices raise 'significant ethical concerns' and risk eroding public confidence in the judiciary's independence. 'If a judge takes up another appointment with the government immediately after retirement, or resigns from the bench to contest elections, it raises significant ethical concerns and invites public scrutiny,' underlined CJI Gavai, addressing a high-powered roundtable on judicial independence at the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom on Tuesday. 'A judge contesting an election for a political office can lead to doubts regarding the independence and impartiality of the judiciary, as it may be seen as a conflict of interest or as an attempt to gain favour with the government,' he added. According to the CJI: 'The timing and nature of such post-retirement engagements,' he added, 'could undermine the public's trust in the judiciary's integrity, as it could create a perception that judicial decisions were influenced by the prospect of future government appointments or political involvement.' CJI Gavai emphasised that he and many of his colleagues had 'publicly pledged not to accept any post-retirement roles or positions from the government.' This, he said, was 'an effort to preserve the credibility and independence of the judiciary.' His remarks come amid long-standing debate over whether judges should be eligible for post-retirement positions -- a concern deepened in recent years by examples of Supreme Court and high court judges taking up roles offered by the executive soon after demitting office. Justice SA Nazeer, for instance, retired as a Supreme Court judge in January 2023. He was appointed as the governor of Andhra Pradesh, within 40 days of his retirement. Notably, justice Nazeer was part of the five-judge bench that decided the disputed Ram Janmabhoomi case in November 2019 handing over the Ayodhya land to the Hindu party. Justice Nazeer was the lone Muslim face on the Ayodhya bench presided by then chief justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi. Justice Gogoi was also nominated to the Rajya Sabha merely four months after retiring as the CJI in November 2019, sparking widespread criticism. Justice Gogoi was the second CJI to become a member of the Upper House. Former CJI Ranganath Misra was nominated to Rajya Sabha by the Congress and served from 1998 to 2004. Former Supreme Court judge Fathima Beevi was appointed Governor of Tamil Nadu from 1997-2001. Former CJI P Sathasivam was also appointed Governor of Kerala from 2014-2019. While Justice K Subba Rao contested the fourth Presidential elections, Justice Mohammad Hidayatullah became Vice President from 1979 to 1984. Similarly, justice Arun Mishra was appointed chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission within a year of retirement. Similarly, several high court judges have taken gubernatorial or tribunal posts immediately after leaving the bench. Judicial misconduct: The CJI also acknowledged a deeper malaise afflicting the judiciary -- instances of corruption and professional misconduct among judges, which he said severely tarnish the institution's legitimacy. 'Sadly, there have been instances of corruption and misconduct that have surfaced even within the judiciary. Such occurrences inevitably have a negative impact on public confidence, potentially eroding faith in the integrity of the system as a whole,' he lamented. Simultaneously, justice Gavai underscored: 'The path to rebuilding this trust lies in the swift, decisive, and transparent action taken to address and resolve these issues.' He added: 'In India, when such instances have come to light, the Supreme Court has consistently taken immediate and appropriate measures to address the misconduct.' He further said: 'Transparency and accountability are democratic virtues. In today's digital era, where information flows freely and perceptions are rapidly shaped, the judiciary must rise to the challenge of being accessible, intelligible, and answerable, without compromising its independence.' Though he did not mention any names, CJI Gavai's remarks come in the backdrop of the recent controversy surrounding high court judge Yashwant Varma, who has been indicted by a Supreme Court in-house inquiry panel over unaccounted cash found at his Delhi residence in March. In early May, the then CJI, Sanjiv Khanna initiated the process for the removal of justice Varma by writing to President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, stating that the allegations of recovery of cash at the judge's residence was serious and warranted initiation of proceedings for his removal. The development has once again placed judicial accountability under the spotlight, fueling calls for clearer standards and greater transparency. 'Legitimacy rooted in integrity': CJI Gavai's wide-ranging speech examined the core values underpinning judicial legitimacy, contrasting the judiciary's authority, which derives not from the ballot, but from public confidence, with the powers of the executive and legislature. 'In every democracy, the judiciary must not only dispense justice, but also be seen as an institution that deserves to hold truth to power,' said the judge, highlighting that the terms 'judicial legitimacy' and 'public confidence' are interconnected. He drew on the vision of Dr BR Ambedkar, who had warned during the Constituent Assembly Debates that the judiciary must remain 'independent of the executive' and 'competent in itself.' Article 50 of the Constitution, Gavai noted, mandates the separation of the judiciary from the executive in public services, and mechanisms like fixed retirement ages, financial independence, and the collegium system were designed to uphold this principle. The CJI also reaffirmed the importance of judicial review and the judiciary's counter-majoritarian role. 'Courts must have the power of independent judicial review,' said justice Gavai, citing some Supreme Court of India's landmark decisions that reinforced the supremacy of constitutional values over political expediency. The Chief Justice further highlighted recent transparency initiatives by the Supreme Court, such as the live-streaming of Constitution Bench hearings and the public disclosure of judges' assets. 'These are significant steps,' he said, 'to bolster public confidence through transparency. Judges, as public functionaries, are accountable to the people.' While acknowledging that 'no system is immune to flaws,' he emphasised that 'solutions must never come at the cost of judicial independence.' 'Judges must be free from external control,' maintained the CJI, calling for renewed commitment to reasoned judgments, recusal practices in case of conflicts of interest and ethical leadership from the top.
