SSA To Seek 100% Recovery On Social Security Overpayments - Here's What This Means For Your Benefits
The new policy is set to take effect on March 27—and it could have serious financial implications for some Social Security recipients.
Don't Miss:
Many are using retirement income calculators to check if they're on pace —
Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die."
The SSA announced on March 7 that it will increase the default overpayment withholding rate to 100% to improve the recovery of improperly distributed funds. According to the SSA's Office of the Chief Actuary, the change is expected to result in program savings of about $7 billion over the next decade.
Lee Dudek, the acting SSA commissioner, said that the agency has 'a significant responsibility to be good stewards of the trust funds for the American people.' Dudek noted that the move is intended to return the overpayment recovery policy to the standard used during the Obama and early Trump administrations.
Trending: BlackRock is calling 2025 the year of alternative assets.
Overpayments from Social Security are relatively rare but still represent billions of dollars each year. A 2024 report from the SSA's inspector general found that fewer than 1% of Social Security payments were improper, but over time, these small errors add up. From 2015 to 2022, the SSA paid out about $72 billion in improper payments, most of which were overpayments.
Beneficiaries not updating the SSA with changes in their earnings, marital status, or living situation.
SSA employees failing to update beneficiary records in a timely manner.
Complex benefit calculations that lead to miscalculations.
According to Ed Weir, a former Social Security manager, some seniors intentionally accept overpayments by continuing to receive benefits while working, even if they expect to exceed the annual earnings limit. Under current rules, Social Security withholds $1 in benefits for every $2 earned above $23,400 annually.
Trending: Can you guess how many Americans successfully retire with $1,000,000 saved?.
Under the new policy, beneficiaries who are overpaid after March 27 will automatically face 100% withholding of their monthly Social Security payments until the debt is repaid. Those with overpayment cases established before March 27 will continue to have a 10% withholding rate. The 10% rate will also remain in place for overpayments related to Supplemental Security Income.
For many seniors, the shift to a full withholding rate could create financial strain. Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works, told CBS News that overpayments are often unexpected. 'People generally do not know they are overpaid,' Altman said. 'People are really desperate when they get a letter from the government saying, 'You owe $10,000' that they don't have.'
A key concern is how the clawback could affect Medicare coverage. Most seniors have their Medicare Part B premiums deducted from their Social Security checks. If the full check is withheld to cover an overpayment, it's unclear how Medicare payments will be handled.
'If you are on Medicare, it means you might not pay your Medicare possibly, so you might lose your Medicare,' Weir said in his webcast. The SSA has not yet clarified how Medicare deductions will be handled under the new policy.If you receive an overpayment notice, you have several options:
Request a waiver – If the overpayment wasn't your fault and you can't afford to repay it, you can file SSA Form 632 to request a waiver.
Appeal the overpayment – If you believe the overpayment is incorrect, you can file SSA Form 561 to appeal the decision.
Request a lower repayment rate – If the full withholding causes financial hardship, you can ask the SSA to adjust the repayment rate to a lower percentage.
Beneficiaries have 30 days from the date of the overpayment notice to respond before the SSA begins collection. During this period, the agency will not take action if you file an appeal or waiver request.
The new policy marks a significant shift in how the SSA handles overpayments — and could lead to financial difficulties for some beneficiaries. If you receive an overpayment notice, acting quickly and understanding your options can help protect your benefits.
Read Next:
The average American couple has saved this much money for retirement —?
It's no wonder Jeff Bezos holds over $250 million in art —
Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market.
Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?
APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report
TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report
This article SSA To Seek 100% Recovery On Social Security Overpayments - Here's What This Means For Your Benefits originally appeared on Benzinga.com
© 2025 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
15 minutes ago
- USA Today
Bath & Body Works opens kiosks in 600 college bookstores. See list.
It's back to school for Bath & Body Works as the company announced plans to sell its products in over 600 college campus stores for the 2025-2026 academic year. The brand's reach aims to strengthen its connection with Generation Z consumers after being named the No. 1 fragrance brand for American teens and the third overall most-shopped at beauty stores by teens in the Piper Sandler Taking Stock with Teens Spring 2025 Survey. Bath & Body Works has partnered with ICM Distributing Company to launch kiosks, working with national chains such as Barnes & Noble College and Follett-operated bookstores, as well as independent campus retailers, according to Chief Merchandising Officer Betsy Schumacher. What products will be available at college campuses? A variety of Bath & Body Works products will be available on college campuses, including body creams and lotions, fragrance mists, Wallflower diffusers, PocketBac hand sanitizers, lip products such as glosses and scrubs, hand soap and 3-wick candles, Schumacher said. Scents like Champagne Toast, Mahogany Teakwood and Clean House Vibes are standout scents and will be available in these bookstores, added Schumacher. What campuses will Bath & Body Works be available at? Bath & Body Works kiosks will be located on approximately 600 college campuses nationwide. The following 400-plus locations are at Barnes & Noble College- and Follett-owned campus bookstores, provided to USA TODAY by Bath & Body Works. The remaining locations, not included in the chart below, are independently owned bookstores. Can't see the chart in your browser? Visit Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@
San Francisco Chronicle
15 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Stanford preserves legacy admissions by pulling out of Cal Grant aid program
With three weeks to go before California's ban on legacy admissions takes effect at private universities that receive state funding, Stanford has made a stunning decision: To preserve that perk, it's pulling out of the Cal Grant program that benefits hundreds of low-income students at the pricey campus. By declining Cal Grants, Stanford can continue giving admissions preference to hundreds of students who are related to alumni or whose relatives have given money to the university. The statewide ban on such legacy and donor-driven admissions takes effect Sept. 1 under Assembly Bill 1780, which was signed into law last year. Stanford officials say they will cover the canceled aid with university money, and that it will cost just $4 million a year. 'The university will continue to study the consideration of legacy status in admissions and opt out of state financial aid funding in order to comply with recent California legislation,' university officials said in a statement posted on their website over the summer. The statement noted that such admits need to be academically qualified to be considered. 'I was genuinely shocked to see Stanford make this decision. I was surprised that Stanford decided that they would rather put the thumb on the scale for the richest students than take Cal Grant money,' said James Murphy, director of postsecondary policy at Education Reform Now, a think tank that opposes legacy admissions. Stanford is one of six California private schools that last year reported giving preferential admissions to the children of alumni or wealthy donors. Stanford said it admitted 295 students this way in fall 2023, or 13.6% of all undergraduates admitted that year. The other private schools that relied on the practice were Santa Clara University, the University of Southern California, Northeastern University Oakland (formerly Mills College), Claremont McKenna College and Harvey Mudd College. None has said it was pulling out of the Cal Grant program. A wave of opposition to legacy and donor admissions emerged after the 2019 nationwide admissions bribery scandal known as Varsity Blues, in which it was revealed that wealthy parents, including celebrities, had cheated to get their children into Stanford, the University of Southern California, UCLA, UC Berkeley and other prestigious schools across the country. Opposition to legacy admissions strengthened in 2023, after the U.S. Supreme Court outlawed affirmative action in higher education. That ruling made it illegal for universities across the country to consider the race of applicants in admissions decisions. Then-Assemblymember Phil Ting, D-S.F., who last year authored California's ban on legacy admissions, called the practice 'affirmative action for the wealthiest Americans.' Another critic, Stanford alumnus Ryan Cieslikowski, who has pushed for similar bans across the country, said Tuesday that 'by clinging to legacy preferences,' the university is sending the message that 'the children of wealthy alumni and donors come first.' Stanford says that no one who would have received state aid will be able to tell the difference, and they need to take no action. 'Stanford will substitute university scholarship funding for California student financial assistance programs, including the Cal Grant program,' the university told the Chronicle in an email Tuesday. Stanford already pays $486 million a year to fully cover the $67,731 tuition plus room and board for students from families with annual income of less than $100,000. Pulling out of the state aid program will cost the university about $4 million a year to make up the difference, campus officials said Tuesday, noting that about 440 Stanford undergraduates and 60 graduate students received Cal Grants or Golden State Teacher Grants last year. This year's maximum Cal Grant for private school attendance is $9,708. Yet the decision to spend more to preserve legacy and donor admissions comes as Stanford is preparing to permanently lay off or eliminate 363 staff jobs in October to reduce its budget by an unspecified amount in the face or rising costs driven in part by federal policy changes. This includes a new 8% tax on its endowment — up from 1.4% — that is expected to cost Stanford $200 million this year.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang calls Trump 'America's unique advantage' because he's ramping up US energy
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Whether you see it as an advantage or a disadvantage, today of all days, one can't help but deny there's something… unique about the US thanks to President Trump. During this very AI-centric 24 hours for Trump—with his unveiling of the administration's AI action plan and his talk at the All-In Podcast's 'Winning the AI Race' summit—Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang also took to the summit stage and had some positive words to share about the US president (via RapidResponse47 on X). "America's unique advantage that no country could possibly have", Huang says, "is President Trump." Said without an air of hesitation, mind. The Nvidia CEO explains that this is primarily because the president has understood the importance of energy for AI: "On the first day of his administration, he realised the importance of AI, and he realised the importance of energy. For the last I don't know how many years, energy production was vilified, if you guys remember. We can't create new industries without energy. You can't reshore manufacturing without energy. You can't sustain a brand-new industry like artificial intelligence without energy. If we decide, as a country, the only thing we want is IP—to be an IP-only, a services-only country—then we don't need much energy. But if we want to produce things, something as vital as artificial intelligence, then we need energy." Huang is certainly right that Trump has pushed for more energy production. In April, for instance, he signed an Executive Order "requiring the automatic rescission of outdated regulations to unleash American innovation and energy production." And the president does, of course, seem to be set on pushing AI and ensuring America remains the king of that particular castle. That's surely at least part of what was discussed behind closed doors between Huang and Trump. And it is, of course, what the president is aiming for with his action plan, which looks to chart "a decisive course to cement US dominance in artificial intelligence", through, for instance, deregulation and AI exportation. This latter point is one that Huang was keen on emphasising after the Trump administration restricted the export of Nvidia's chips to China. Those restrictions have since been lifted somewhat, as Nvidia can now continue H20 exports to the eastern superpower. Given all this, it's not exactly surprising that Huang would be acting as hype man for the president, here. As it stands, Nvidia holds the (hardware) keys to the AI kingdom, and it's a kingdom that the president wants the US to lead the charge of. None of this is to call the headstrong push into all things AI-wise, mind you. That particular question is one we might not know the answer to until we're already there, in a completely AI-clad world. One would hope that fact might inspire a little caution, but alas. There are also many, I'm sure, who will be keen to point out that energy deregulation and ramped energy production for AI might not be the wisest decision, either. Though the retort would be that the AI arms race is one the US cannot afford to lose. Whichever side of that particular argument you come down on, it's a big bet to take. AI companies are borrowing and spending billions of dollars and have yet to see anywhere near break-even returns. Some might call that a bubble, others a necessary investment into the fourth industrial revolution. Whatever the case, it looks like the US president and Nvidia CEO are walking the same road, for now. Even if Trump does seem to want this hefty amount of power consumption explained to him. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
