logo
Relaxing lottery rules in NI ‘would hand charities multimillion funding boost'

Relaxing lottery rules in NI ‘would hand charities multimillion funding boost'

Alliance MLA Sian Mulholland has launched a public consultation on her private member's bill that seeks to expand charity lottery fundraising in Northern Ireland.
Current legislation prevents organisations like the People's Postcode Lottery, which runs a subscription-based lottery model, from operating in Northern Ireland.
That contrasts with the National Lottery, which is governed by a different legislative framework and can operate in Northern Ireland.
The People's Postcode Lottery, which is backing Ms Mulholland's Bill, raises more than £19 million a month for charities in Great Britain.
It estimates it could raise more than £25 million for charities in Northern Ireland in five years if it was able to expand to the region.
The figure would increase to £7 million a year after year five, the organisation said.
North Antrim MLA Ms Mulholland launched the public consultation on a visit to a facility in Belfast run by the charity Young Lives vs Cancer.
Amy's House offers free accommodation to families to stay close to their children when they are having cancer treatment at the nearby Belfast City Hospital.
The UK-wide charity benefits from People's Postcode Lottery funds in Great Britain but is unable to avail of support in Northern Ireland.
On the visit to Amy's House, Ms Mulholland said: 'The charity sector in Northern Ireland is facing a difficult fundraising environment coupled with significant demand for its work and the services they provide.
'Opportunities to bring new funding into the sector are few and far between. However, it is clear that through charity lotteries we have a huge opportunity to establish an ongoing sustainable funding stream for charities large and small across Northern Ireland.
'In Britain and other European countries, there is a thriving charity lottery sector benefiting a huge number of charitable causes and I would like to see charities here benefit as well.
'Young Lives vs Cancer is just one of a great many charities doing vital work to support families and communities here. However, that costs money, and it is clear that more funding is needed. I urge politicians across all of the political parties to get behind this proposal and help us access this great funding boost.'
The Bill is backed by a range of charity representatives in Northern Ireland.
Rachel Kirby-Rider, the chief executive of Young Lives vs Cancer, voiced her support as the consultation was formally launched.
'We have some great facilities here at Amy's House which helps us make a difference to young people from Northern Ireland facing cancer,' she said.
'But we still need to reach many more young people and their families who need support at the most difficult of times, and to fund this vital work, we rely on generous donations.
'Young Lives vs Cancer has benefited hugely thanks to the support of the People's Postcode Lottery. The funding we have received has made a real difference to what we can achieve, however it is not currently available in Northern Ireland and our families are missing out.'
Clara Govier, managing director of People's Postcode Lottery, said there is 'great untapped potential' for charity lottery fundraising in Northern Ireland.
'For years we have been contacted by people wanting to play our lottery and by charities wanting to unlock that funding potential. Sian Mulholland's proposed Bill will make a great difference to a great many charities and the people and communities those charities support. We urge MLAs from all parties to give it their support,' she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ryanair baggage rule change could see passengers hit with extra £70 charge
Ryanair baggage rule change could see passengers hit with extra £70 charge

Wales Online

time11 minutes ago

  • Wales Online

Ryanair baggage rule change could see passengers hit with extra £70 charge

Ryanair baggage rule change could see passengers hit with extra £70 charge Ryanair has updated its cabin baggage rules for summer 2025 and there's one rule that could catch you out if you're unprepared The summer holidays are now upon us and many Britons are desperate to escape the UK for some well-deserved sunshine and coastal tranquillity. Unfortunately there are countless airport rules that could dampen the enthusiasm before it even starts. ‌ One rule, concerning Ryanair luggage, risks creating problems for passengers at the airport if they turn up ill-prepared. It's frequently seen as travellers' biggest nightmare – being singled out by airport personnel to check their hand luggage dimensions with sizing frames just before take-off. ‌ With budget airline Ryanair passengers are permitted to take a "personal bag" free of charge though it must comply with their strict size requirements. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here . ‌ After a recent change in line with EU rules these dimensions have been increased to 40 x 30 x 20cm. If their bag surpasses these boundaries passengers face a fee as high as £70. Ryanair operates a card-only payment system at its boarding gates, which could create problems for some holidaymakers. This means that if a passenger is prepared to pay the fee, without a payment card to hand, they could be prevented from boarding with their baggage, reports Lincolnshire Live. A Ryanair spokesman told the Daily Mail: "Our bag policy is simple; if it fits in our bag sizer (which is bigger than our agreed dimensions) it gets on free of charge. Article continues below "If it doesn't fit in our bag sizer you pay a gate bag fee. As our boarding gates are cashless gate bag fees cannot be paid in cash. "These fees are paid by less than 0.1% of passengers who don't comply with our agreed bags rules. For the 99.9% of our passengers who comply with our rules we say thank you and keep flying as you have nothing to worry about." Therefore if you're travelling with Ryanair this summer it would be wise to bring a card to guarantee your holiday begins without a hitch. ‌ This warning emerges following reports that a new four-hour regulation has been implemented before the summer holidays, affecting travellers with Ryanair, easyJet, TUI, and Jet2. Following a European Union ruling, the timeframe for claiming compensation for delayed flights has been lengthened. After more than a decade of discussions it has been determined that compensation claims for short-haul flights will only be acceptable following a delay of no less than four hours, which has increased from the earlier three-hour limit. For long-distance trips travellers must endure a delay of six hours or longer before pursuing compensation. The type of delay also influences the amount of compensation granted. Article continues below A4E, which represents leading European carriers, voiced frustration. A spokesman said: "Europe has been waiting for transparent and workable passenger rights for 12 years and member states have fallen at the final hurdle to deliver [...] member states have diluted the European Commission's original proposal and introduced even more complexity."

Yvette Cooper solves one headache for justice system but may have caused another
Yvette Cooper solves one headache for justice system but may have caused another

The Guardian

time11 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Yvette Cooper solves one headache for justice system but may have caused another

By getting her way and allowing police to consider disclosing the ethnicity and nationality of suspects charged in high-profile cases, Yvette Cooper has solved one enormous headache for the criminal justice system. But she may have caused another, which could have consequences for race relations. The home secretary has encouraged senior police officers to free themselves of longstanding protocols so they can combat the prolific use of social media by far-right bloggers and organisations that have escalated disinformation around high-profile incidents. Last summer's national riots were fomented from an early stage by misinformation about the Southport killer – he was claimed, in posts recycled tens of thousands of times, to be a Muslim, foreign-born and an asylum seeker. All three statements turned out to be wrong. Until today, there was nothing in the College of Policing's guidance that actually prevented police giving information about the nationality, asylum status or even ethnicity of someone who has been charged. The police are restricted as to what they can say about suspects. But the guidance on media relations – and what would be released to the public – said that if someone was arrested, police should only give the suspect's gender and age. Once a suspect was charged, the guidance said police could give out the suspect's name, date of birth and address. Before 2012, police forces made decisions on what information to give to the media on a purely case-by-case basis, decisions often made depending on the force's relationship with individual journalists and media outlets. But it was Lord Leveson's damning 2012 report into press ethics that prompted police forces to become more cautious because of concerns that releasing the ethnicity of suspects could be used to feed false narratives. Leveson examined testimony from the National Union of Journalists claiming that some national newsrooms openly encouraged racist reporting. One reporter was told by the news editor to 'write a story about Britain being flooded by asylum-seeking bummers', another was told to 'make stories as rightwing as you can' and another was told to go out and find Muslim women to photograph, with the instruction: 'Just fucking do it. Wrap yourself around a group of women in burkas for a photo,' the testimony said. He examined numerous reports including a Daily Star article under the headline 'Asylum seekers eat our donkeys,' which claimed that donkey meat was a speciality in Somalia and eastern Europe and blamed asylum seekers, without any evidence. Leveson concluded that 'when assessed as a whole, the evidence of discriminatory, sensational or unbalanced reporting in relation to ethnic minorities, immigrants and/or asylum seekers, is concerning.' Fast-forward 12 years to Southport, and Merseyside police were left making decisions on whether to release information on the ethnicity and nationality of the killer of three young girls in order to dispel public anger that had spilled on to the streets. Senior officers had to deal with major criminal incidents and took days to dispel social media untruths. Such disinformation was at least partly responsible for last summer's riots. At the time, Merseyside police said they were not giving out more information because of the contempt of court rules. It is hoped that the new guidance will mean police will no longer be left flat-footed when responding to viral social media posts by extremists. Decisions on releasing such information will remain with police forces, with wider legal and ethical considerations also taken into account, the National Police Chiefs' Council said, but verifying a suspect's immigration status is up to the Home Office. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion There is concern among some former police and race campaigners that Cooper's change will undo the restrictions imposed after Leveson and fuel racist sentiments. The former Met chief superintendent Dal Babu has warned of the 'unintended consequences' of the new guidance, which he said could lead to more online speculation in cases where these details are not released. 'The danger is there will be an expectation for police to release information on every single occasion,' he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. The Home Office insists that it will not be encouraging the release of ethnicity and immigration status in all cases, and there are notable occasions when it has not. But a former race adviser to No 10 told the Guardian: 'Yvette has unwittingly opened a Pandora's box. After every charge, everyone with a union jack on their X bio will demand from the police the ethnicity of the suspect. 'The Home Office is going to to get even more demands for the asylum status of every black or brown suspect. It is going to be chaos, and has handed Nigel Farage another stick to beat Labour with.' There could well be a knock-on effect on mainstream reporting and community relations, campaigners believe. Enny Choudhury, from the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants, said: 'Releasing the ethnicity of everyone suspected of serious crimes will do nothing to help victims or secure justice – it will simply fuel mistrust, deepen divisions, and make Black and brown communities more vulnerable to prejudice and harm.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store