logo
I found my nan's semi-naked body after she was killed by tights fetish maniac.. and then he moved down the road from me

I found my nan's semi-naked body after she was killed by tights fetish maniac.. and then he moved down the road from me

The Sun12-07-2025
AS she walked into her grandmother's silent house, young Sharon Owens had a sense of foreboding.
It had been a sanctuary to the 12-year-old since her dad died, but was to become a place that would haunt her for ever.
6
6
It was December 1985 and Sharon had just finished her paper round when she entered the living room to find the bludgeoned body of her nana Glenys on the floor.
The 67-year-old had been raped, killed and left wearing nothing but her pants and a pair of tights by a murderer with a twisted fetish.
Almost 40 years on, Sharon was rocked to the core when she discovered not only that the killer had been released from prison, but that he was located just 30 minutes from where she now lived.
'Nana was my entire world, my everything,' says Sharon, 52.
'It's nearly 40 years since I've felt her comforting arms around me. She was like a tiny bird, so petite at 4ft 9in tall, but she had the biggest heart I've ever known.
'That terrible day on December 13, 1985, will haunt me for ever.'
Glenys had been Sharon's saviour after her father, John — who was Glenys's son — had died three years earlier of cancer, aged 41.
Her mum, Beryl, had struggled and was emotionally distant. The family home was chaotic, so Sharon moved in with Glenys in Merthyr Tydfil, South Wales.
'My nana had become my sanctuary after losing my dad,' says Sharon, who was one of six children. 'Her three-bedroom house was filled with warmth.
'She didn't have much money, but she had a little leather purse she'd fill with coins and then give to me to spend when it was full.
'Mushroom killer' Erin Patterson GUILTY of murdering three relatives with deadly beef wellington
'She'd buy me Breakaway chocolate biscuits and we'd snuggle on the sofa watching EastEnders.
'She taught me life skills, too. How to be independent, how to manage money and, crucially, how to love and care for others.'
Earlier that fateful day, Sharon had popped in after school to tell her grandmother she would be doing her paper round before heading back for dinner. 'Nana was always happy to see me and gave me a big hug,' she recalls.
But Glenys was not alone. Donald Sheridan, a friend of Sharon's older brother, was at the house.
'He didn't say anything, he just stared at me,' says Sharon. 'Nana loved everyone, but I knew she wasn't keen on Donald. She didn't like my brother being friends with him, but she'd welcomed him in with her kind nature.'
It was 9pm when Sharon returned to Glenys's house and tried to let herself in.
She says: 'Nana always left a key on a string behind the front door. You could put your hand through the letter box and retrieve it.
'But when I put my hand through as usual, there was no key. I looked through the letter box and called out, but there was no answer, despite the living room and landing light being on.'
'She'd buy me Breakaway chocolate biscuits and we'd snuggle on the sofa watching EastEnders.
'She taught me life skills, too. How to be independent, how to manage money and, crucially, how to love and care for others.'
Earlier that fateful day, Sharon had popped in after school to tell her grandmother she would be doing her paper round before heading back for dinner. 'Nana was always happy to see me and gave me a big hug,' she recalls.
But Glenys was not alone. Donald Sheridan, a friend of Sharon's older brother, was at the house.
'He didn't say anything, he just stared at me,' says Sharon. 'Nana loved everyone, but I knew she wasn't keen on Donald. She didn't like my brother being friends with him, but she'd welcomed him in with her kind nature.'
It was 9pm when Sharon returned to Glenys's house and tried to let herself in.
She says: 'Nana always left a key on a string behind the front door. You could put your hand through the letter box and retrieve it.
'But when I put my hand through as usual, there was no key. I looked through the letter box and called out, but there was no answer, despite the living room and landing light being on.'
We walked into the house together and found Nana dead, semi-naked in front of the fire in her living room. I just screamed and screamed.
'I was thrust into a world without the unconditional love and the security Nana had given me, forced to move back into an uncaring home.'
'I didn't pass any of my exams, I truanted and I left aged 15 without any qualifications. I didn't care about anything,' she says. 'I experienced flashbacks and felt guilty for not being at home to protect Nana.'
As Sharon grew into a young woman, she tried to put Sheridan to the back of her mind. She says: 'I got married and had two children. But thoughts of my nana were always with me.'
Then, in 2021, a conversation with a relative spurred Sharon to search for Sheridan online.
'I felt a cold chill as his name popped up in a news article,' she says. 'I was shocked and extremely angry to read he had been released in May 2019.'
The Ministry of Justice has told us Sharon was not notified of the release because when Sheridan was jailed, there was no victim support scheme in place.
Sharon, now living in North Yorkshire, was horrified to discover that her grandmother's killer had been housed in a hostel just 30 minutes from her own home.
Worse still, he had struck again within a month of being freed, brutally attacking a mum.
She learned that Sheridan had been drinking rum at his probation hostel in Leeds, defying an alcohol ban, before taking money to meet a female sex worker. The woman made a phone call while they were behind a skip in a commercial yard and they began to fight, before some men turned up and stole Sheridan's money.
Later, he grabbed a woman around the neck as she walked home from the gym, forcing her into a bush. He then made her put on two pairs of tights and asked her to perform a sex act. The victim only managed to escape when a dog walker passed by.
Sheridan was caught after police found the tights at the scene, with his DNA.
Under questioning, he told detectives the victim was not 'my type' and he probably would have raped and killed her if she was older.
6
6
Sheridan also admitted he'd had a fetish for women in their sixties and seventies ever since he had seen a naked nun when he was in care as a child.
He had stolen her tights and wore them to bed.
Since then, he had carried women's tights around with him and had urges to rape and kill.
On his first court appearance for the latter attack, he even tried to strangle a female dock officer when she took him back to his cell.
In 2019, at Leeds crown court, Sheridan admitted robbery, false imprisonment, committing an offence with intent to commit a sexual offence and assault occasioning actual bodily harm.
'COLD CHILL'
He was given sentences of 11 years and life with a minimum of five and a half years. The judge said he should only be considered for parole if he 'is so enfeebled by age that he is no longer able to pose a danger'.
But Sharon worries that he will be released at the end of his sentence, if not sooner, given the growing pressure to let prisoners out early due to overcrowding.
While he could, in theory, be managed in the community, the Probation Service in England and Wales is already in crisis.
An annual report released in April found that the service has too few staff with too little experience and training. Martin Jones, the chief inspector of probation, said that attempts to 'keep others safe' are 'consistently insufficient'.
Sharon says: 'It beggars belief that this monster was deemed safe to be let out. I feel very angry that I was never even informed and to discover he was living so close to me . . . there are no words.
'He could have come to find me, as I was the main witness in the trial. Learning he had been released unleashed flashbacks and all sorts of trauma that I had tried to mask for years.'
It beggars belief that this monster was deemed safe to be let out.
Sharon
In February this year, Sheridan, 61, was eligible for parole again and Sharon successfully begged the authorities not to make the same mistake as last time, submitting a powerful victim statement.
His 11-year sentence is due to end in 2030, and he has served his minimum life term, so he will be able to apply for parole once more.
A spokesperson for the Parole Board said: 'The board has a thorough review process which closely examines and scrutinises any parole release decision after a serious further offence.
'This involves outside experts, judges, psychologists, psychiatrists, as well as senior management, and is in place to identify any lessons that could help prevent further tragedies.'
Sharon admits she finds the thought of Sheridan being back on the streets 'utterly terrifying'.
She says: 'This man is a real danger to women. He is evil, dangerous and has no conscience.
'Meanwhile, I've spent almost 40 years having vivid nightmares about finding Nana's body.
'This man can never be released. He will kill again, I know it.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Schoolboy who stabbed fellow pupil to death suffered abuse at home, trial told
Schoolboy who stabbed fellow pupil to death suffered abuse at home, trial told

The Independent

time21 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Schoolboy who stabbed fellow pupil to death suffered abuse at home, trial told

A schoolboy who stabbed a fellow pupil to death during their lunch break had suffered 'physical and emotional abuse' at home, a court heard. The 15-year-old is on trial accused of murdering Harvey Willgoose, also 15, who was killed at All Saints Catholic High School in Sheffield on February 3. On Wednesday, Sheffield Crown Court heard two consultant forensic psychiatrists agreed that there was 'evidence of physical and emotional abuse and neglect in (the defendant's) home life, including lack of food and excessive physical chastisement'. In a list of agreed facts read to the jury by junior defence counsel Richard Holland, the psychiatrists said his 'oppositional behaviour and defiance' was more obvious in school. They said that if he had had 'appropriate boundaries and discipline' he would have better emotional regulation, and that incidents of aggression in the weeks and months before the alleged murder were 'examples of his difficulties in controlling his emotions, including anger'. Mr Holland said another report by two psychologists found the defendant's below average levels of verbal comprehension were because of his 'adverse early experiences rather than a neurodevelopmental disorder'. The court also heard a copy of Harvey's school timetable was found in the defendant's bedroom, and that only a member of staff or Harvey would have been able to print it off. A jury has heard that the defendant, who cannot be named, has admitted manslaughter but denies murder. He has also admitted possession of a knife on school premises. Addressing the jury at the beginning of the trial, Gul Nawaz Hussain KC, defending, said: '(The defendant) did not set out to kill or seriously hurt anyone. 'The defence say (the defendant's) actions that day were the end result of a long period of bullying, poor treatment and violence, things that built one upon another until he lost control and did tragically what we've all seen.' The trial continues.

Reform UK unveils ex-Tory MP Adam Holloway as latest defector
Reform UK unveils ex-Tory MP Adam Holloway as latest defector

The Independent

time21 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Reform UK unveils ex-Tory MP Adam Holloway as latest defector

Nigel Farage has secured his latest defection from the Conservative Party, with ex-Tory MP Adam Holloway announcing he has become a member of Reform UK. The Reform leader will welcome Mr Holloway, a 60-year-old ex-army officer who was MP for Gravesham until July last year when he lost his seat to Labour, as the latest in a line of defectors from the Tories. He follows ex-Tory colleagues in parliament Dame Andrea Jenkyns Lee Anderson, Marco Longhi and Sir Jake Berry to jump ship to Mr Farage's party. Speaking as his defection was announced, Mr Holloway said: 'There comes a moment for many soldiers — and most politicians — when you realise the battle you think you're fighting isn't the one your leaders are waging. Many in Britain feel we may already have passed the point of no return. Our cities grow less cohesive, the country effectively bankrupt. 'That moment came for me watching Kemi Badenoch tell Trevor Phillips there are real differences between Reform UK and the Conservatives. She was right. The difference is the Reform leadership and voters grasp the scale of our national peril and back a party serious about addressing it. "I joined the Army to serve the country, not the institution. The same applies now. If we want to rescue Britain, we must be honest about who's still willing to fight for her." Mr Holloway was the Conservative MP for Gravesham from 2005 until last year's general election. He was briefly an assistant government whip in 2022 and held roles on the Home Affairs Committee and European Scrutiny Committee. He was replaced by Labour's Dr Lauren Sullivan at the election, losing his seat by 2,712 votes. During his time as a Tory MP, Mr Holloway was a vocal backer of his ex-colleagues Charlie Elphicke and Imran Khan, both of whom were convicted of sexual offences. Mr Holloway was found by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards to have attempted to improperly influence judicial proceedings in attempting to have a judge block pre-sentencing character testimonies. Previously Mr Holloway was found by the sleaze watchdog to have breached MPs' rules by failing to register two rental properties and not declaring a payment and the source of a trip he took. Mr Holloway has also been asked to repay £1,000 after he tried to claim council tax on his parliamentary expenses twice. Mr Farage told The Spectator: 'Adam's parliamentary and military experience will be vital as we look forward to the next general election'. The Reform leader added that Mr Holloway's 'bold move shows that we are the only serious option in Kent and is testament to the fantastic work our councillors are delivering across the region'. The ex-MP's defection to Reform comes as Mr Farage seeks to show his insurgent right-wing party is not running out of steam after a recent surge in the polls. There have been no defections of sitting MPs to Reform since Lee Anderson joined the party in March 2024. Those who have defected have typically done so after losing their seats fighting as Conservatives in the general election. In parliament, Mr Holloway voted against conducting air strikes on ISIS in 2014 after visiting the border with the Islamic State, and abstained on a vote for air strikes in 2015. In 2008, Adam Holloway accepted a trip to Syria and Lebanon from an organisation that described its aim as to engage with terrorist groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah in order to 'facilitate dialogue between political Islam and the West'. The Conservative Party declined to comment on the defection.

Palestine Action High Court challenge can go ahead, judge rules
Palestine Action High Court challenge can go ahead, judge rules

The Independent

time21 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Palestine Action High Court challenge can go ahead, judge rules

Palestine Action's co-founder has won a bid to bring a High Court challenge over the group's ban as a terror organisation. Huda Ammori is challenging Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's decision to proscribe the group under anti-terror laws, announced after the group claimed responsibility for action in which two Voyager planes were damaged at RAF Brize Norton on June 20. The ban means that membership of, or support for, the direct action group is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Earlier this month, lawyers for Ms Ammori asked a judge to allow her to bring the High Court challenge over the ban, describing it as an 'unlawful interference' with freedom of expression. And in a decision on Wednesday, judge Mr Justice Chamberlain said that two parts of the arguments on Ms Ammori's behalf were 'reasonably arguable'. In his ruling, he said it was arguable that the proscription 'amounts to a disproportionate interference' of Ms Ammori's rights to freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. He said: 'That being so, the point will have to be determined at a substantive hearing and it would not be appropriate for me to say more now.' The judge continued that a second argument, that Ms Cooper failed to consult Palestine Action 'in breach of natural justice', could also go to a full hearing. He said: 'As a matter of principle, I consider that it is reasonably arguable that a duty to consult arose.' He continued: 'Having considered the evidence, I also consider it reasonably arguable that there was no compelling reason why consultation could not have been undertaken here.' Mr Justice Chamberlain refused to allow Ms Ammori to challenge the Government's decision on several other grounds, including a claim that the Home Secretary failed to gather sufficient information on Palestine Action's activities or the impact of the proscription on people associated with it. He also refused to allow Ms Ammori to argue that Ms Cooper breached her duty under the Equality Act, and took into account 'irrelevant considerations', such as whether Palestine Action's methods were 'morally or politically justifiable'. Following the ruling, Ms Ammori said: 'This landmark decision to grant a judicial review which could see the Home Secretary's unlawful decision to ban Palestine Action quashed, demonstrates the significance of this case for freedoms of speech, expression and assembly and rights to natural justice in our country and the rule of law itself.' She continued: 'We will not stop defending fundamental rights to free speech and expression in our country and supporting Palestinian people against a genocide being livestreamed before our eyes.' Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, previously told the court at the hearing on July 21 that the ban had made the UK 'an international outlier' and was 'repugnant'. Mr Husain added: 'The decision to proscribe Palestine Action had the hallmarks of an authoritarian and blatant abuse of power.' The Home Office is defending the legal action. Sir James Eadie KC, for the department, said in written submissions that by causing serious damage to property, Palestine Action was 'squarely' within part of the terrorism laws used in proscription. He said: 'There is no credible basis on which it can be asserted that the purpose of this activity is not designed to influence the Government, or to intimidate the public or a section of the public, and for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.' Previously, Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, said Palestine Action could challenge the Home Secretary's decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission (POAC), a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court. Sir James said that an 'exceptional case' would be needed for it to go to the High Court, rather than the POAC. Mr Justice Chamberlain said on Wednesday that a High Court challenge could take place in the autumn of this year, whereas an appeal to the specialist tribunal would take much longer. He said: 'If it were necessary to appeal for deproscription, it is very unlikely that an application before POAC would be listed before the middle of 2026.' In his judgment, he said: 'If the legality of the proscription order can properly be raised by way of defence to criminal proceedings, that would open up the spectre of different and possibly conflicting decisions on that issue in magistrates' courts across England and Wales or before different judges or juries in the Crown Court. 'That would be a recipe for chaos. 'To avoid it, there is a strong public interest in allowing the legality of the order to be determined authoritatively as soon as possible. The obvious way to do that is in judicial review proceedings.' The judge also said that people protesting in support of Palestine and Gaza, but not expressing support for Palestine Action, had 'attracted various kinds of police attention, from questioning to arrest'. He continued that it was 'important not to draw too much from the fact that police and others appear to have misunderstood the law on some occasions'. But he added: 'Nonetheless, reports of the kind of police conduct referred to… are liable to have a chilling effect on those wishing to express legitimate political views. 'This effect can properly be regarded as an indirect consequence of the proscription order.' Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, saying that the vandalism of the two planes, which police said caused an estimated £7 million of damage, was 'disgraceful'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store