State public incentive and streetcar project fire up Omaha mayoral race
OMAHA — Omaha's use, or potential overuse, of a longstanding, Legislature-approved incentive to help revive blighted areas again fired up the mayor's race in Nebraska's largest city.
Underlying the latest clash between Mayor Jean Stothert and a challenger, former State Sen. Mike McDonnell, was a critical report from State Auditor Mike Foley in September regarding tax-increment financing and what he said was the rising and sometimes loose use of the economic development tool.
Fueling the flames this week was another McDonnell attack on Omaha's Stothert-backed streetcar, a project with $389 million in city costs to be covered by TIF proceeds.
On Wednesday, Stothert defended Omaha's use of TIF and the streetcar with a pair of studies responding to the State Auditor's report, one the city financed and another from the Greater Omaha Chamber of Commerce.
Omaha officials said its review, done for $20,000 by Forvis Mazars accounting firm, concluded that the city's TIF process complies with state law. The firm delved into a handful of randomly selected active projects and other paid-off projects and did not specifically examine the streetcar.
Chamber president Heath Mello, partnering with researchers at the University of Nebraska at Omaha, said their analysis took a statewide view and affirmed that TIF 'remains a pivotal tool' for Nebraska's continued community revitalization.
During the joint news conference, remarks veered swiftly into the flap with McDonnell, who held his own gathering for reporters Tuesday along the streetcar route, calling for a stop to the project he asserted would leave Omahans in debt.
Said Stothert: 'The streetcar is progressing — and it can't be stopped.'
Stothert, seeking a fourth term as mayor, says necessary public hearings and votes have been held. Contracts for street cars, bridges, maintenance facilities are awarded, and stopping would risk lawsuits and legal costs.
She cited several urban core construction projects whose private developers have said would not rise without the streetcar energy or TIF assistance approved for the respective projects. The streetcar, Stothert said, will lead to more jobs and development, not taxpayer debt.
'Why would we pause?' she asked. 'Why would we stall our momentum?'
TIF is a public financing mechanism that requires approval from a city to leverage future property tax revenue (for up to 20 years) to help pay eligible redevelopment expenses on a project site. State law says the venture must be in a blighted area and deemed not possible to be developed 'but for' the subsidy.
Typically under tax-increment financing, developers of city-approved projects take out a loan. Over the loan span of 15 or 20 years, the property taxes generated by new improvements on the project site go toward paying eligible costs of transforming the area. That means the difference during that time does not go to the usual recipients of property tax, such as schools and local municipalities.
Meanwhile, the value of a site that existed prior to TIF approval is essentially 'frozen' during the TIF loan period, and the fixed property tax revenue generated from it continues to be collected from the owner and distributed to the usual recipients. After the developer's loan is paid off, all property taxes flow to traditional tax recipients. The idea is that the project site would then be worth more.
Since 2015, Stothert said, the city has approved 196 TIF applications totaling $584 million in financing and a projected $4.6 billion in new investment.
While the national tool — used in Nebraska since around 1980 — has been both endeared and criticized, the spotlight brightened locally after Foley's warning to state lawmakers.
He did not advocate for specific legislation, but cautioned that the statutes governing TIF in Nebraska allowed 'inordinate' flexibility that could be seen by some 'as an open invitation to push the boundaries of TIF beyond what is either ethical or beneficial to the citizens.'
On Wednesday, Foley declined to comment on recent developments except to say: 'This is a public conversation between two candidates for mayor. I have nothing to add today on any of this.'
His skeptical look at TIF in September extended to projects statewide and said that when overused or misused, the popular financing tool risks placing further upward pressure on local property taxes. The report highlighted details of Omaha's streetcar, poised to be up and running in 2027.
For example, Foley wrote in a news release related to his letter that some areas within Omaha's TIF financing area are as far as six city blocks away from the proposed streetcar route and do not appear deteriorated enough to fit a 'blighted' designation.
'Nevertheless, those properties are also having a portion of their tax obligations diverted to provide TIF funding for the project,' he wrote.
At the City Hall news conference, Stothert said the Forvis Mazars public accounting and advisory firm was hired following Foley's analysis and McDonnell's subsequent call to 'pause' future use of TIF.
The firm's review focused in part on five randomly selected redevelopment projects approved in 2022 or 2023: Mutual of Omaha's new downtown headquarters; Aksarben Keys at 6952 Grover St.; Blackstone East at 37th and Farnam Streets; and the Digs Apartments and Square Apartments, both just west of downtown.
It also looked at eight TIF-assisted projects that have been paid off, including Midtown Crossing and parts of Aksarben Village, and reported full compliance.
In examining elements including the process for blighted designations, publication requirements, cost-benefit analysis and internal procedures, the firm found two concerns Stothert characterized as minor clerical issues the city already has corrected.
One showed that a cost-benefit analysis for the Mutual headquarters was not posted properly on the city's website. The other said the city lacked a few written internal procedures for staff.
Independent and separate from the Forvis Mazars analysis, the Omaha Chamber launched its own study to counter the Foley TIF review.
Mello offered a summary of that work, which took a broader statewide view, during the Tuesday news conference: During a three-year period through 2023, property valuations of all TIF-assisted projects in Nebraska collectively rose 324%, suggesting that TIF is a benefit to communities.
On Tuesday, McDonnell repeated Foley's earlier remark that the streetcar was 'the largest diversion of property tax dollars for an economic development project in Nebraska history.'
According to the state auditor report, the number of TIF projects in Nebraska nearly doubled during the past decade to more than 1,350 separate ventures totaling more than $6 billion in increased property valuations.
In 2023 alone, it said, nearly $122 million in property tax collections went to pay for TIF projects approved by cities — more than double the annual amount a decade earlier.
'Arguably, much of those resources could have gone to fund public education and local government obligations,' Foley said in his advisory letter to lawmakers.
McDonnell criticized Stothert for not following through on a campaign comment from 2017 that she would allow Omahans to vote on the streetcar. He said the already-underway project would lead to debt and that, if elected mayor, he would allow a public vote.
The mayor has insisted that anticipated development and higher property values sparked by the streetcar should produce enough TIF revenue to pay off bonds without requiring a tax increase
The total cost to prepare the downtown-to-midtown corridor and build the streetcar is expected to be $459 million. City officials say TIF financing will pay off the $389 million in bonds issued by the city. The remainder is to be covered by sources including public utilities.
Of the property tax diversion comment repeated by McDonnell, Stothert said, 'That is assuming that all of this development along the corridor would have happened without the streetcar and without TIF… and it wouldn't be.'
Jasmine Harris and John Ewing also are candidates for mayor. The primary election is April 1 and the top two candidates advance to the May general election.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Los Angeles Times
6 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump isn't the main villain in Texas' gerrymander scheme
If you want someone to blame for the recent crisis caused by President Trump's rush to force a gerrymander of Texas' congressional districts, and the harried responses from governors in California, Illinois and New York, you can start with the Supreme Court. In 2019, in Rucho vs. Common Cause, the group held, 5 to 4, that challenges to partisan gerrymandering present 'a nonjusticiable 'political question'' and thus cannot be heard in federal court. This was widely considered a terrible ruling at the time, and we're just now starting to see the consequences. Gerrymandering occurs when the party that controls a state legislature redraws its districts to maximize smooth elections and safe seats for its party members. The notorious practice isn't new — it's nearly as old as the U.S., having taken its name from Founding Father Elbridge Gerry, an early governor of Massachusetts. Despite finding the practice 'highly disagreeable,' Gerry signed off on the drawing of his state's districts in 1812 to help his party gain competitive seats in the Legislature. During this process, someone apparently remarked that one bizarrely drawn district looked like the salamander — and the name 'gerrymandering' took hold. In the March 26, 1812, edition of the Boston Gazette, the paper ran a cartoon of the district, caricatured by artist Elkanah Tisdale to introduce 'The Gerry-Mander: A new species of Monster.' For most of American history, those engaging in gerrymandering would choose between a handful of maps based on their predictions of which could yield them the greatest advantage. Today, computers can generate thousands of these clever geographical divisions, with leaders ultimately choosing the map that provides them the best chance of partisan success. Intricate algorithms and detailed data about voters allow these map drawers to engage in gerrymandering with surgical precision. Rucho vs. Common Cause arose in North Carolina, which is basically a purple state these days; presidential elections are always close, and statewide votes for congressional seats are evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans. However, when Republicans gained control of the North Carolina Legislature in 2010, they crafted a plan to redraw the boundaries for the state's then 13 congressional districts in their favor. State Republicans hired longtime political consultant Thomas Hofeller to generate and evaluate roughly 3,000 distinctive maps, and then selected the one they believed gave Republicans the best chance of earning significant control over North Carolina's House. In the 2018 midterm elections, Republican and Democratic candidates statewide each received roughly half of the votes, but Republicans won 10 of the 13 congressional races. This, of course, isn't unique to North Carolina. In Pennsylvania, across several elections, congressional races in districts drawn by a Republican legislature resulted in Democrats receiving between 45% and 51% of the statewide vote, yet winning just five of its 18 House seats. In Rucho vs. Common Cause, a lower federal court found that partisan gerrymandering violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment (as well as the 1st Amendment and Article 1 of the Constitution). But the Supreme Court, in a 2019 opinion by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., reversed this decision. The 5-4 majority held that federal courts 'cannot entertain a claim' and suggested that the plaintiffs 'must find their resolution elsewhere.' But this was just wrong. Gerrymandering is nothing more than a method for rigging elections. The central precept of a republican government, as the Supreme Court itself once observed, is 'that the voters should choose their representatives, not the other way around.' However, partisan gerrymandering infamously creates a system for representatives to effectively choose their voters. As a result, each voter does not have the same opportunity to influence the outcome of an election, which is antithetical to equal protection. When the court first ruled on partisan gerrymandering, holding that federal courts could hear challenges to it, Justice Lewis Powell observed that 'the boundaries of the voting districts have been distorted deliberately' to deprive voters of 'an equal opportunity to participate in the State's legislative processes.' Some voters will benefit and will have more influence in choosing representatives. For others this will be more difficult as their votes are diluted. That is inconsistent with democracy. Even though districting is usually done at the beginning of each decade, right after the U.S. census, and even though Texas' congressional districts were drawn just a few years ago, Trump and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott are trying to engage in redistricting for the sole goal of manipulating the composition of Congress. Trump, knowing the Supreme Court's decision means that federal courts can't stop it, has strongly urged the state to redraw its districts now to effectively create five more safe seats for Republican representatives. Not surprisingly, states with Democratic governors and legislatures are now looking for ways to respond, including redrawing districts that create Democratic seats in Congress. But some of these states, notably California and New York, already adopted the desirable and seemingly bipartisan approach of having independent commissions draw their districts to eliminate the plague of gerrymandering. The question is whether they can and should also change this practice now to combat what Texas is trying to do. There are many ways to end partisan gerrymandering. Congress could pass a law requiring that all states use independent commissions to draw the congressional districts. The Supreme Court could reconsider and overrule Rucho vs. Common Cause and go back to holding, as the law used to be, that federal courts can invalidate partisan gerrymandering. State courts can find partisan gerrymandering violates state constitutions. But none of this is going to happen now, and there is nothing to stop Texas from its efforts to carve out five more Republican districts. States controlled by Democrats need to respond; unilateral disarmament never makes sense. The loser is American democracy. And the Supreme Court is to blame. Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Berkeley Law School, is an Opinion Voices contributing writer.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
WW Q2 Deep Dive: Strategic Restructuring and GLP-1 Headwinds Shape Outlook
Personal wellness company WeightWatchers (NASDAQ:WW) reported Q2 CY2025 results beating Wall Street's revenue expectations , but sales fell by 6.4% year on year to $189.2 million. On the other hand, the company's full-year revenue guidance of $692.5 million at the midpoint came in 1.1% below analysts' estimates. Its GAAP profit of $14.68 per share increased from $0.29 in the same quarter last year. Is now the time to buy WW? Find out in our full research report (it's free). WeightWatchers (WW) Q2 CY2025 Highlights: Revenue: $189.2 million vs analyst estimates of $178 million (6.4% year-on-year decline, 6.2% beat) Adjusted EBITDA: $60.4 million vs analyst estimates of $29.81 million (31.9% margin, significant beat) EBITDA guidance for the full year is $145 million at the midpoint, above analyst estimates of $132 million Operating Margin: 23.3%, up from 18.8% in the same quarter last year Members: 3.2 million, down 600,000 year on year Market Capitalization: $382.3 million StockStory's Take WeightWatchers' second quarter results were met with a negative market reaction, as the company faced a year-over-year revenue decline and ongoing member attrition. Management attributed these trends to challenges in acquiring new behavioral members and a significant shift in the clinical business after regulatory changes around compounded weight loss medications. CEO Tara Comonte described the quarter as a 'pivotal moment,' emphasizing the impact of transitioning members away from compounded semaglutide and lingering effects from bankruptcy proceedings. Chief Financial Officer Felicia DellaFortuna noted that, despite growth in clinical subscriber revenue, overall member acquisition remained pressured throughout the quarter. Looking forward, management's guidance is shaped by efforts to stabilize the core business and reposition WeightWatchers for long-term growth. The company is investing in technology upgrades, expanding clinical offerings, and targeting adjacent wellness segments such as women's health. Comonte said, 'We are focused on disciplined execution and meaningful innovation,' while highlighting ongoing headwinds from competitive pressures and regulatory uncertainty in the GLP-1 medication landscape. The leadership team cautioned that the effects of recent subscriber losses will continue to influence results into next year. Key Insights from Management's Remarks Management pointed to the interplay between regulatory changes, strategic reorganization, and innovation in care delivery as the primary influences on quarterly performance and guidance. GLP-1 medication transition: The discontinuation of compounded semaglutide, following new FDA guidance, required the company to move clinical members to FDA-approved alternatives. This disrupted subscriber growth but was necessary for regulatory compliance and long-term positioning. Debt reduction and reorganization: WeightWatchers completed a strategic financial restructuring, reducing debt by over 70% and freeing up cash flow. Management sees this as essential for renewed investment and operational flexibility. Member experience overhaul: The company is focusing on a seamless, personalized member experience across digital and in-person channels. The appointment of Julie Rice as Chief Experience Officer, and integration of her prior company's wellness curriculum, are central to this effort. Expansion of clinical and adjacent offerings: Management highlighted growth in the clinical business, especially through insurance-enabled access to GLP-1 medications and the forthcoming launch of new programs targeting menopause and women's health. Operational discipline and cost savings: Adjusted EBITDA margin gains stemmed from strict cost management, reduced marketing expenses during reorganization, and ongoing integration of technology and automation to drive efficiency. Drivers of Future Performance WeightWatchers' near-term outlook is shaped by ongoing clinical market changes, technology investments, and a renewed focus on expanding into adjacent health categories. Competitive GLP-1 landscape: The company expects continuing headwinds as some telehealth competitors persist in offering compounded GLP-1 medications, impacting both member retention and acquisition until regulatory enforcement is more consistent. Broader wellness and women's health: Management is prioritizing new product launches, particularly in women's health and menopause support, to diversify revenue streams and reduce reliance on the core weight loss segment. Technology and operational upgrades: Investments in data infrastructure, AI-powered personalization, and automation are expected to drive engagement and efficiency, though these efforts will take time to fully materialize in financial results. Catalysts in Upcoming Quarters In the coming quarters, the StockStory team will monitor (1) member retention and subscriber trends as the transition from compounded to FDA-approved GLP-1 medications continues, (2) execution of technology and personalization upgrades to the member experience, and (3) early traction of new women's health and menopause programs. The pace of B2B channel recovery and regulatory developments in obesity care will also be key signposts. WeightWatchers currently trades at $36.77, down from $38.11 just before the earnings. In the wake of this quarter, is it a buy or sell? Find out in our full research report (it's free). Now Could Be The Perfect Time To Invest In These Stocks When Trump unveiled his aggressive tariff plan in April 2025, markets tanked as investors feared a full-blown trade war. But those who panicked and sold missed the subsequent rebound that's already erased most losses. Don't let fear keep you from great opportunities and take a look at Top 6 Stocks for this week. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-micro-cap company Kadant (+351% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today. StockStory is growing and hiring equity analyst and marketing roles. Are you a 0 to 1 builder passionate about the markets and AI? See the open roles here. Inicia sesión para acceder a tu cartera de valores
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Republican Matt Hall leads Michigan House in tumultuous period of divided government
When Michigan House GOP Leader Matt Hall took the stage in May 2024 at a campaign rally for President Donald Trump, Republicans in the state found themselves in the political wilderness, navigating a historic period of full Democratic control of state government for the first time in decades. As his voice blared through the crowd at a Saginaw County airport, Hall urged those gathered to not just send Trump back to the White House. "This election in November, we need to elect Republicans to the Michigan House, so we can take the House back and put a check and balance on Gov. Whitmer," he said, adding that Republican victories would help support Trump's policy agenda in Michigan. Less than a year later, Hall had ascended to House speaker with the support of Republicans who flipped enough blue seats red to deliver a GOP majority in the chamber, and, in his new post, he joined Gov. Gretchen Whitmer in the Oval Office to meet with Trump to advocate for Michigan's federal priorities. The two have claimed some wins, including a new fighter jet mission for Selfridge Air National Guard Base, a push by Trump to protect the Great Lakes from invasive Asian carp and a disaster declaration from the president to support ice storm recovery efforts in northern Michigan. But back in Lansing, Hall's tenure as speaker has coincided with a tumultuous new era of divided state government, with a GOP-controlled Michigan House and Democratic-controlled Michigan Senate. Gridlock has come to define Lansing, with a Legislature that hasn't sent many bipartisan policies Whitmer's way. The logjam has Hall pointing his finger at Democratic lawmakers who, in turn, have routinely blasted Hall as uncooperative. In his job as House speaker, Hall pulls strings or pushes buttons, depending on which side of the aisle someone sits. Since taking the speaker's gavel, Hall has helped broker major bipartisan compromises on Michigan's minimum wage and sick leave policies, held back bills that the Legislature before him approved but failed to forward to Whitmer for signature and has yet to emerge from state budget negotiations with a deal after blowing past the July 1 deadline for approving a plan. Hall, 42, of Richland Township outside Kalamazoo, has publicly embraced political partnerships with some Democrats, including Whitmer, whose willingness to collaborate with Trump has received Hall's praise. Whitmer, in turn, has commended Hall for putting forward a road funding plan after years of legislative inaction. But Hall has also angered Democrats who castigate his Trump-like penchant for lobbing insults across the aisle. "It's an unserious approach that's going to lead to dangerous consequences," said House Minority Leader Ranjeev Puri, D-Canton, in a May interview about Hall's leadership style. Hall, who doesn't typically shy away from the news media when his legislative priorities are the topic, declined to be interviewed for this profile. A spokesperson for Hall initially agreed to an in-person interview with the Detroit Free Press for this profile but the offer was later rescinded. Asked why he wouldn't go through with an interview, Hall told the Free Press during an April 2025 event that he disagreed with a fact-check the newspaper published in 2021 that found he made a misleading claim, as a state representative, about Michigan's voter rolls. Lansing insiders frequently describe Hall as a creature of politics. "This is what he lives and breathes," said former state Rep. Andrew Beeler, R-Port Huron, in a November 2024 interview after Republicans flipped the state House and the GOP caucus tapped Hall as the next House speaker. Beeler — who chaired the House Republicans' campaign committee during the last election cycle — described Hall then as the hardest working person in Lansing and said he received frequent late-night calls from the GOP leader to strategize. Democratic legislative leaders, however, have complained about Hall's communication with them, saying he had ignored their attempts to negotiate ahead of the July 1 budget deadline. Bipartisan discussions eventually took place as the clock ticked, but when it struck midnight, a deal was nowhere to be found and budget negotiations appear to have reached a standstill. Michigan's next fiscal year begins Oct. 1. During a news conference Aug. 6, Hall again blasted Senate Democrats and their spending plan, saying it doesn't reflect current fiscal realities. He said he does routinely talk to Senate Majority Leader Winnie Brinks, D-Grand Rapids, and outlined plans to produce a House budget soon but didn't specify a deadline. Brinks declined a request to comment on Hall for this profile but speaking generally about the legislative session in a May interview, she bemoaned the lack of bipartisan action in Lansing and cast blame on Hall. "So I would say it's easy to be the party of opposition if you have to be, but you know he's got a chamber, he's in the majority and he has an opportunity to actually be productive, so it's unfortunate that he's not taking us up on working together on anything," she said. Hall, on his end, has repeatedly during news conferences blamed Democrats for inaction and touted his ability to bring House lawmakers together across party lines to pass policies to fund police and roads. Still, bipartisan cooperation hasn't always appeared to be Hall's goal. In March, Hall made a last-minute addition to the House's daily agenda that put his Democratic predecessor on the hot seat. He put a bill up for vote, introduced by state Rep. Joe Tate, D-Detroit, who served as House speaker during the previous legislative session. Tate's bill proposed providing driver's licenses for immigrants in the United States illegally. Hall and every House Republican opposed the bill, yet Hall put it up for a vote anyway, likely knowing it would fail. If Hall's goal was to underscore Democratic divisions on immigration — a key issue in the 2024 election — he succeeded. Six Democrats broke from their party to join every Republican lawmaker to vote against the bill. Before the vote, Tate in a speech on the House floor, called Hall's move "nothing but a political ploy." Hall has continued to rile Democrats but his ability to unite Republicans has also faced a test. During a July 24 House session, Hall couldn't cobble together enough Republican members to advance legislation to restrict students' phone use at school and extend the timeline to prosecutors to pursue resentencing hearings to seek life sentences for convicted murderers who committed their crimes when they were 19 or 20 years old. Hall said Democrats reneged on commitments they made to support the bills. Among them was state Rep. Alabas Farhat, D-Dearborn, according to Hall who said the Democratic lawmaker promised to vote for the resentencing legislation. Farhat has denied that he made a deal to vote for the bill. During the House session, Hall ousted Farhat as the Minority Vice Chair on the powerful House Appropriations Committee and during a news conference immediately after the votes, Hall said that he needs a partner to achieve a bipartisan budget deal and said Farhat wasn't up to the job. Hall has rejected Puri's recommendation to reinstate Farhat as the Democratic appropriations chair, made in a letter that blasted the speaker's approach to budget negotiations. On Hall's side of the aisle, state Rep. Matt Maddock, R-Milford, who serves as majority vice chair on the House Appropriations Committee, has praised Hall's speakership. "I'm glad he is where he is, he's been nothing but impressive to me," he said during a July appearance on WKAR's "Off the Record." "He knows what he's doing, he's a fighter and I got his back." Hall makes his way to Lansing Hall grew up in Rochester Hills but he didn't stay in metro Detroit. He attended Western Michigan University in Kalamazoo, worked as former Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette's west Michigan liaison from 2011 to 2015 and received his law degree from WMU Cooley Law School in 2017. Hall fought some of his early political battles with members of his own party, according to Republicans who encountered him as an emerging political force. In 2016, when the Michigan GOP met to choose delegates for the Republican National Convention, it wasn't clear Trump would secure enough delegates to win on the first ballot, which could have seriously threatened his nomination, according to former Michigan GOP Executive Director Jeff Timmer. Trump had won most of the Michigan delegates but U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and then-Ohio Gov. John Kasich each won delegates, too, so their Michigan supporters had some level of bargaining power at the gathering. Former Michigan GOP Chair Saul Anuzis served as the lieutenant for Cruz's presidential campaign, Hall represented the Trump campaign and Timmer helmed the faction for Kasich, and they all cut deals with one another related to which delegates would serve on key committees at the convention, according to Timmer. Ultimately, Timmer said he and Hall sidelined Anuzis, reneging on the deals they made with him. Timmer, who has become a vocal critic of the Republican Party under Trump, said the episode left a lasting negative impression of Hall on him. Anuzis did not respond to a request for comment. In 2018, Hall launched his first bid for the state House with a campaign to take on GOP incumbent state Rep. David Maturen, R-Vicksburg, who represented the 63rd District at the time. On the day of the deadline for candidates to file to run, Maturen said Hall asked to meet him outside the Michigan House chamber, where Hall told the GOP lawmaker that he had launched a campaign to challenge him. The last-minute primary fight in 2018 wasn't pretty, according to Maturen, who said his opponent's campaign operatives portrayed him as evil. Maturen described himself as a moderate Republican running against a "Trumper" and said that he struggled to mitigate the president's influence in the race. "It was a national election based on him," Maturen said of Trump. He recounted questions on the campaign trail seeking his thoughts on the president to which Maturen said he responded by saying he sought a seat in the state House, not Congress. Maturen lost to Hall by 20 percentage points. Hall then won the general election. Republicans tap Hall to lead Hall honed his combative style in his first term when he led hearings as chair of the Joint Select Committee on the COVID-19 Pandemic, challenging Whitmer's handling of the public health crisis. In 2022, Whitmer won reelection and Democrats flipped control of both chambers of the Michigan Legislature, delivering a Democratic governing trifecta for the first time in 40 years. Hall worked tirelessly to seize opportunities to assert Republicans' power as the minority party. When Democrats temporarily lost their majority to a tied House after a pair of special elections in 2023, Hall insisted that the two parties come together to broker an agreement to share power, essentially asking Tate to relinquish some of his authority as House speaker. Tate didn't budge and Hall proceeded to put on stunning displays of GOP unity. For instance, Beeler — the former GOP state representative — said Hall encouraged every House Republican to stick together to vote against the budget Democrats crafted in 2024, despite funding included for GOP districts. "It was a master class in leadership," Beeler said in November. After Republicans selected Hall to serve as the next House speaker, he led every GOP lawmaker in the state House in a walkout of the 2024 lame duck session, the period of lawmaking after the election when defeated and outgoing Democratic lawmakers still held power. Hall helmed the GOP boycott with the stated goal of forcing a vote on legislation to stop pending changes to Michigan's minimum wage and paid sick leave laws, opposed by business groups. The move infuriated Democrats, who characterized the Republican protest led by Hall as a dereliction of duty by elected representatives. "Republicans aren't here. So how can we have a conversation if they're not here and decided to, you know, go make snow angels in front of the Capitol, I guess?" Tate told reporters in December 2024 on the day Republicans stormed off the House floor. The fallout from the last legislative session has continued to linger over the current one, with an ongoing lawsuit from the Michigan Senate against Hall for refusing to send bills passed in the previous legislative session to the governor's desk. When he took the gavel as House speaker at the start of 2025, Hall expressed hope that Michigan would not transform into a mirror image of politics at the national level. "You know, we've been able to keep all that Washington, D.C. stuff out of here," he said. Yet Hall quickly proceeded to use his speakership to bring Trump's policy fights to the Michigan House. Republicans have passed resolutions, which were nonbinding, supporting the president's efforts to eliminate the U.S. Department of Education, encourage county sheriffs and local law enforcement to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement and ban transgender girls from competing on girls' sports teams in Michigan. Hall has modeled his quest to slash state government spending after former Trump aide Elon Musk's cost-cutting "Department of Government Efficiency." Michigan's U.S. Senate race: Who's winning — and losing — the fundraising sweepstakes While Hall has reshaped policymaking in Lansing, he has also brought a cutting communication style to the Capitol. He has said one Democratic lawmaker — state Rep. Mai Xiong, of Warren — has a low IQ for calling out Hall for being away from Lansing when he was in Macomb County with Trump for his announcement of a new fighter jet mission at Selfridge Air National Guard Base. Xiong condemned Hall's comment as evidence that he seems more intent on bullying than working together to solve Michigan's challenges. Hall's regular and lengthy news conferences as House speaker, in which he blasts Democrats one minute and then outlines why they should support his policy demands in the next, have become a fixture in the Michigan Capitol. During them, he has advocated for new mandates for state employees to work in-person and a permanent cut to Michigan's income tax. He has also used the forum to take a victory lap, once displaying a photo of him and Whitmer at the Oval Office with Trump in April. In a July statement, Whitmer said she has been consistent in her willingness to work in a bipartisan manner to deliver results for Michigan. "That's no different this term. We have a productive relationship and I appreciate Speaker Hall's willingness to work together," she said. Michigan's economy: Gretchen Whitmer? Donald Trump? We all lose in semiconductor plant blame bingo. | Opinion John Sellek, chief strategist and CEO of Lansing-based public relations and affairs firm Harbor Strategic, said Hall has set the terms of debate in the Capitol and shown he won't shy away from sharing his conversations with other legislative leaders, publicly to praise or pressure them. Sellek and Hall both worked for Schuette when he was attorney general. Sellek tied Hall's approach back to his path to the state House. "He is not somebody who very carefully ran for school board and then ran for city council and then ran for House. He actually moved and challenged a sitting representative and beat him," Sellek said. "And he carries that same swagger and fearlessness into what he's doing now." Contact Clara Hendrickson: chendrickson@ or 313-296-5743. This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Republican Matt Hall's path to Michigan House Speaker