Hong Kong intervenes to defend FX peg as local currency drops
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) purchased HK$9.42 billion (S$1.5 billion) of local currency against the US dollar, after the exchange rate touched the weak end of the permitted 7.75 to 7.85 per greenback trading band.
In addition to pushing the currency back into its permitted trading range, the move will also make bearish bets more costly. It does this by draining liquidity from the financial system and driving up borrowing costs.
The last time HKMA intervened in this direction was in May 2023.
In May, the HKMA injected a large amount of liquidity into the financial system to rein in what had become a rapid appreciation of the currency amid broad US dollar weakness. But that helped push borrowing costs lower and drove the spread between local interest rates and those in the US to a record.
When Hong Kong dollar's funding costs are significantly lower than those in the greenback, traders tend to borrow the city's currency and sell it against its higher-yielding US counterpart to earn the interest-rate difference. That's made it the world's most rewarding carry trade over the past month by one measure.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Earlier this year, the Hong Kong dollar had touched 7.75, the strong end of the trading band. Hong Kong's domestic borrowing costs are now not far from zero.
The currency edged higher to 7.8495 per US dollar in early Thursday trading in Asia.
The Hong Kong dollar's slide in May was its biggest monthly slump since 1983 when it was pegged to the US peer. Its volatility triggered fresh debate on if the decades-long peg to the greenback is sustainable, even though there are few signs of an imminent threat to its existence.
Hong Kong will maintain its currency's peg to the US dollar as it is a key success factor, Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu told local media in early June, after market speculation about alternatives to a US dollar peg. BLOOMBERG
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
8 hours ago
- Business Times
Trump hits Indian imports with 25% tariff starting Aug 1
[WASHINGTON] US President Donald Trump said he would impose a tariff rate of 25 per cent on India starting on Aug 1 and suggested he would add an additional penalty over the country's energy purchases from Russia. Trump in a post to Truth Social on Wednesday (Jul 30) said India had tariffs that were 'among the highest in the world, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers of any country.' 'Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of energy, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to stop the killing in Ukraine, ' he added. 'India will therefore be paying a tariff of 25%, plus a penalty for the above, starting on August first.' Trump's announcement comes ahead of the Aug 1 deadline he set for imposing new import taxes on dozens of trading partners. The levies dash New Delhi's hopes of preferential treatment over its regional peers. India had been among the first to engage Washington in talks, following Prime Minister Narendra Modi's high-profile White House visit in February. For much of this year, the Modi government had adopted a conciliatory approach towards Trump, revamping India's tariff structure and offering several trade and immigration concessions to the US administration. But in recent weeks, New Delhi had shifted to a tougher stance, as negotiations hit a roadblock over contentious issues like agriculture. Trump had previously said that a 'very big' agreement was imminent – one that would open the Indian market to US businesses. But he has since changed his stance, saying on Tuesday that he could hit the South Asian nation with a tariff rate of 20 to 25 per cent. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Even after these latest tariffs, Indian officials are planning to continue negotiating with the US for a bilateral trade deal by fall of this year, Bloomberg News reported earlier. The two sides had already finalised terms of reference for a bilateral pact in April, following US Vice-President JD Vance's meeting with Modi in New Delhi. That initial agreement outlined the framework for trade negotiations. The US is India's largest trading partner and top export market. New Delhi had attempted – but failed – to secure a limited trade deal with Washington during Trump's first term. The two-way trade between India and the US stood at US$127.9 billion in 2024. Trump's threat of additional penalties on India comes a day after he formally announced that he was giving Russia a new 10-day deadline to reach a truce with Ukraine in his bid to end the war. The US president has threatened tariffs on Russia which could take the form of secondary levies that would hit countries that buy Russian exports such as oil. Washington and other capitals allied with Kyiv view such oil purchases as a form of tacit support for Russia, helping to bolster its economy and undercut sanctions. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
9 hours ago
- Business Times
Stablecoins thrive on regulation, but is that enough?
STABLECOINS have brought national-currency denominated monies onto blockchain. Not only is this highly commendable, it also crucially exposes the slowness of traditional money issuers in adopting new technologies. Recent regulatory advances, however, now seem to bestow stablecoins with specific advantages that may drive money fragmentation and arbitrage, create new compliance risks and distort fair competition. Economically, stablecoins are equivalent to e-money and bank deposits, as they promise the bearer a redemption at par (1:1) in a national currency. Like e-money institutions and banks, stablecoins need to observe certain rules to ensure par redemption is being observed, mostly by maintaining a dedicated pool of high-quality assets. Similar to all par commitments, there is a risk that par redemption cannot be sustained. The distinctive innovation with stablecoins lies in the use of blockchain as a payment processing platform. It affords tamper-evident records and advanced functionalities through programmability to support advanced payment automation promising important efficiency gains. The composability of blockchains makes it easy to combine different instruments in the same environment. Additionally, the use of permissionless blockchains as a readily available public financial market infrastructure offers important economies of scale. Speed is not the problem... The innovation with stablecoins lies not in moving money quickly. Speed is not the problem as most banks can already process payments instantly. They have also not solved for what the main obstacles for moving money are – namely compliance and intermediation. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Unlike other forms of money, stablecoins are increasingly being transferred in a manner akin to bearer instruments. This practice appears to be accommodated by emerging regulation in the European Union (EU), through Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation and European Banking Authority (Mica) guidance, and in the US, via the Genius Act for person-to-person transfers. ... Compliance is While neither Mica nor the Genius Act explicitly classify them as bearer instruments or provide a lenient compliance regime, their treatment of transferability – especially in non-intermediated contexts – may de facto enable transactions that occur outside of traditional compliance channels. Easy transferability is desirable and may be critical to facilitate new use cases. But it creates new challenges for compliance. Like cash – of which there are far more US banknotes circulating abroad than stablecoins – this ease of transferability can be a key success factor. However, compliance frameworks exist to ensure money is transferred only upon certain checks to avert money laundering and terrorism financing and observe sanctions. Money can normally not be sent to anyone, nor can money be used to settle any debt. Intermediation makes compliance checks more cumbersome. Banks do typically only maintain a direct relationship with a reduced set of banks. This means the payer bank needs to find a bank that maintains a relationship – typically through a correspondent bank – with the payee bank. This is a challenge, especially in cross-border payments. Even for EU banks, nearly half of all cross-border payments require four or more banks for a transfer from payer to payee. Every participant in a payment chain will need to adhere to compliance checks as a monetary claim is being passed forward. The longer the chain, the more burdensome the checks. This is the reason for big frictions in payments. There are two ways to address this friction: reduce the number of compliance checks or ensure more direct monetary relations to keep compliance checks few. Regulation needs to be harmonised Stablecoins can be transferred to third parties, not clients of the stablecoin issuer. Only this enables the borderless and frictionless transfer the stablecoin industry rightly aspires to. In many cases, unless there is a direct transfer to an individual, transfers will probably occur on exchanges that will be required to perform certain checks. But delegating compliance is delicate and near impossible if the issuer were to assume liability for failed compliance. The alternative is a clearing arrangement like the one maintained by banks. Banks accept each other's liabilities through so-called nostro accounts upon meeting their respective prudential standards. If banks or other stablecoin issuers were to readily accept certain stablecoins, then transferring them would be relatively easy and solve for 'last mile' issues. Cheques work similarly. If an entity wants to issue money, the choice would be in most jurisdictions to adopt any of the following models: a bank, an e-money institution or an asset manager. To maintain a level playing field, the rules for issuing and transferring money should be similar also to ensure the incentives for sound money issuance are aligned. There is generally no regulatory gap when it comes to issuing money. With stablecoins, regulators now risk creating one failing their own principles of same risk, same activity, same regulation. For countries still considering stablecoin regulation, a better approach would be to simply map them into existing regulation or even better, ask stablecoin issuers to elect any of the existing regulatory models. OMFIF The writer is senior adviser at Accenture and visiting fellow at the London School of Economics and Political Science
Business Times
10 hours ago
- Business Times
Jardine C&C reports 23% fall in H1 earnings to US$371 million on unrealised fair value losses
[SINGAPORE] Jardine Cycle & Carriage (JC&C) on Wednesday (Jul 30) reported a 23 per cent decline in earnings to S$371.1 million for the first half of 2025, from S$483.3 million for the same period a year earlier. This was mainly driven by unrealised fair value losses related to noncurrent investments, the group said in a bourse filing. Revenue for H1 2025 inched up 1 per cent to US$10.8 billion, from US$10.7 billion a year earlier. The board has declared an interim dividend of US$0.28 per share, unchanged from H1 2024. The dividend will be paid on Oct 3, 2025. Underlying profit for H1 2025 grew 6 per cent to US$529.1 million, from US$500.1 million a year earlier. This was driven by a US$33 million translation gain on foreign currency corporate loans and higher contributions from the Vietnam business. Contribution to underlying profits from Vietnam came in at US$36 million, up 17 per cent year on year from US$30 million in H1 2024. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up This was driven by higher sales in Truong Hai Group (Thaco), as well as JC&C's increased stake in Ree Corporation – to 41.6 per cent from 34.9 per cent previously – and the Vietnamese company's higher earnings from its power-generation business. JC&C's Indonesia business, meanwhile, posted a 9 per cent fall in underlying profit to US$466 million for H1 2025, from US$513 million a year earlier. Lower contributions from Astra due to weaker performances from its new car, mining and coal mining operations were partially offset by improved earnings from financial services, agribusiness and infrastructure. Ben Birks, managing director of JC&C, noted that while the macroeconomic environment 'remains challenging', the group expects its 'businesses in Indonesia and Singapore is expected to remain stable, (and its) Vietnamese businesses are expected to build on the country's economic momentum for the rest of the year'. 'Looking further ahead, we remain focused on our longer-term objective of building a portfolio with strong growth and total shareholder returns,' Birks added. Shares of JC&C fell 0.6 per cent or S$0.17 on Wednesday to close at S$27.35, before the results were announced.
