
Disposable vape ban starts today - here's what it means
The sale and supply of single-use vapes has been banned today.
People will still be allowed to smoke the controversial disposable vapes, but shops can no longer sell them legally.
Ministers said the move is designed to protect children's health and prevent environmental damage, with devolved governments in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland also introducing the ban from today.
Businesses were told to 'sell any remaining stock they hold and prepare for the ban coming into force' ahead of June.
The illegal supply of single-use vapes carries a £200 fine at first instance from council Trading Standards, who enforce the ban.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
If the supply continues, punishment could be an unlimited fine, a prison sentence of up to two years, or both.
Many users have said that they are willing to resort to the black market when the ban starts, and they typically have about nine week's worth of disposable vapes.
A ban was previously announced by the Conservative government in January, but was not enacted until after the general election.
Disposable vapes are considered extremely harmful for the environment, being difficult to recycle and full of harmful waste such as lithium, battery acid and mercury.
Holly Bowman, a 17-year-old schoolgirl from Ireland, began vaping when she was just 12 and 'really regrets' that decision.
When I started vaping it was no big deal,' she said.
'It was just something that everyone else did and it made me feel grown up. At no point did I think it was going to be a long-term thing.
'Little did I know I would become addicted so quickly. When you're 12 you don't even know what addiction is really.
'Five years later I still can't kick the habit. Both the cost and health implications aren't sustainable for me. It's a decision I really regret.'
Holly's Mum, Nicky Bowman, sits on the board of management at an Irish school and says vaping is a challenge she has deal with every day.
'It's a huge problem,' she said.
'We've had to increase CCTV at the school because there were hidden corners where kids would vape in between lessons. We had to introduce new toilet rules because kids as young as eleven are vaping.
To make matters worse, batteries thrown into bins cause hundreds of fires at waste processing centres and the back of refuse trucks every year.
It is estimated that around 40 tonnes of lithium has been discarded in the past 12 months- enough to power 5,000 electric vehicles.
The Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs (Defra) estimates that almost five million single-use vapes were either littered or thrown away every week in 2023.
And vape use in the UK has boomed. Around 9.1% of the population is believed to have bought and used them – a 400% increase between 2012 and 2023.
However, latest figures from Action on Smoking and Health show that use of single-use vapes fell from 30% in 2024 to 24% so far in 2025.
Despite the rapid popularity many products can only dream of, 40% of users said they are in favour of the ban, according to a poll of 1,000 adults by übbs Pouches, an online nicotine brand.
Defra's circular economy minister, Mary Creagh, said that 'for too long, single-use vapes have blighted our streets as litter and hooked our children on nicotine.
'That ends today.
'The Government calls time on these nasty devices.'
Caroline Cerny, the deputy chief executive at Action on Smoking and Health, said: 'It's promising to see that many people switched away from disposable vapes to re-usable products well ahead of the ban.
'This is particularly marked among young people, who were more likely to use disposable products due to their attractiveness, affordability, and heavy marketing.
'This new law is a step towards reducing vaping among children, while ensuring products are available to support people to quit smoking. It will be up to manufacturers and retailers to ensure customers are informed and able to reuse and recycle their products securing a real change in consumer behaviour and a reduction in environmental waste. If behaviour does not change then further regulations will be possible following the passage of the Tobacco and Vapes Bill.'
Around 48% of children caught vaping are less than eleven years old, research has found.
It is already illegal to sell disposable vapes to anyone under 18, but the smaller, more colourful packaging on many of them is seen as a 'key driver behind the alarming rise in youth vaping', the previous government said.
Although vaping is considerably less harmful than smoking cigarettes, it has not been around long enough for its long-term effects to be studied, according to the NHS.
Nor should its addictive qualities be downplayed. Speaking about the ban on Good Morning Britain, ITV presenter Kate Garraway admitted becoming 'instantly addicted' to vaping again after giving it during pregnancy.
She told hosts Susanna Reid and Richard Madeley: 'The last thing I want to do is anyway in sanction [vaping], because I don't know.
'But my experience was, after Billy was born, I did smoke before and I was craving going back to smoking [but] didn't want to.'
But after stumbling upon some vapes which were being used on set as 'props', she said her addiction was instantly reignited.
'I think we had some props in here or something ridiculous, and I picked it up and I was instantly addicted, like beyond anything!
'I couldn't believe it and it made me realise how, particularly those disposable ones, are so addictive.'
She added: 'They're so easy to do, and they deliver such a hit, so I don't know that it's a solution to ban the disposable ones, but they're everywhere.'
Mum Crystal Baynam spoke to Metro about her dismay upon discovering her 15-year-old daughter had started vaping at school.
She said: 'Katie, just 15, had been caught using a vape, and I was completely stunned.
'This was despite the fact that a few weeks earlier I had found a disposable vape – pink lemonade flavour – in her room, which Katie had explained away, claiming it belonged to one of her friends.
'When I received the message about Katie's detention, I was also told that they could throw the vape or give it back to her.
'It shocked me that handing kids back a vape was even an option, and without a moment's hesitation, I told them to throw it away.'
She added: 'Katie has confessed that she loves some of the bright colours on the packaging, which is why I agree with the government's conclusion these products are aimed at children. More Trending
'The fact that these vapes are cheaper and disposable too, makes them easier for teens to afford and hide from their parents. I certainly didn't suspect anything until that call from the school.
'Now, I can't get my daughter to quit.'
Libby Peake, head of resources at Green Alliance, said: 'Single use vapes should never have been allowed on the market. They've been a blight on our countryside, wasted resources needed for important uses like EV batteries and caused scores of fires at waste sites. And they've done all this while having a lasting impact on the health of young people, creating a new generation of nicotine addicts.
'The government should rightly be proud of taking this vital step to get rid of these polluting products and encourage people who want to quit smoking to opt for reusable and refillable options instead.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Disposable vapes officially banned in the UK from today
MORE: Champions League final odds: Paris Saint-Germain's youngsters can lift trophy for the first time but may need to go the distance against Inter Milan
MORE: Customers sing the praises of Uniqlo's £34.90 'crease-free' barrel leg trousers that fit like a glove
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
US suggests Palestinian state should be in the French Riviera
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The US ambassador to Israel ripped France's efforts to advocate for and recognize a Palestinian state. Ambassador Mike Huckabee ripped France's initiative 'revolting' in light of Israel continuing to fight Hamas in the Gaza Strip. 'When I heard that the French were trying to spearhead this effort to get a meeting together at the United Nations, the purpose of which supposedly is to recognize a Palestinian state,' Huckabee told Fox News on Sunday. 'First of all, it's incredibly inappropriate in the midst of a war that Israel is dealing with, to go out and present something that I think increasingly Israelis are steadfast against.' The ambassador added that October 7, 2023 – when Hamas launched a coordinated attack on Israel that triggered a new phase of the Israel-Palestinian conflict – 'changed a lot of things'. 'If France is really so determined to see a Palestinian state, I've got a suggestion for them: carve out a piece of the French Riviera and create a Palestinian state,' Huckabee proposed. More Trending 'They're welcome to do that. But they're not welcome to impose that kind of pressure on a sovereign nation.' Huckabee added that he found it 'revolting that they think they have the right to do such a thing'. 'I hope they will reconsider but the US will not participate,' he said. 'It simply will not be a part of such a ruse.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Map shows where northern lights will be visible tonight in the US MORE: Gaza doctor who lost nine children in Israeli attack dies from injuries MORE: Colorado man who 'threw Molotov cocktails hurting 12 pro-Israel marchers tried to buy gun'


North Wales Chronicle
2 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Inquiry launched into appointment of football regulator chairman
David Kogan, a media rights expert, was named as the Government's preferred candidate to chair the Independent Football Regulator in April, and his appointment was endorsed by a cross-party committee of MPs last month. But the revelation that he had donated money to both Sir Keir Starmer and Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy – as well as other Labour figures – drew complaints from the Conservatives and calls for the commissioner for public appointments to investigate. In a letter to the permanent secretary at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, commissioner Sir William Shawcross said he had carried out a series of 'spot checks' and now believed a full inquiry into Mr Kogan's appointment was 'necessary'. Sir William's inquiry will look into whether the rules on public appointments were followed, and is likely to involve interviews with both Mr Kogan and Ms Nandy. Mr Kogan was originally approached about the football regulator job by the Conservatives while they were still in office, and has advised the Premier League, EFL and other leagues on broadcast rights. He has also donated thousands of pounds to Labour MPs and candidates in recent years, and sat on the board of Labour news website LabourList. During his pre-appointment hearing with the Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee – which later backed his appointment – he revealed he had also donated 'very small sums' to Sir Keir and Ms Nandy's leadership campaigns in 2020. Those donations had not previously been revealed as they were below the threshold for public declaration. A week later, Ms Nandy wrote to the committee to inform MPs that she had stepped back from making the final decision on whether to appoint Mr Kogan, delegating the choice to sport minister Stephanie Peacock. Stuart Andrew, the Conservative shadow culture secretary, said Mr Kogan's appointment 'bears all the hallmarks of yet more Labour cronyism', adding Ms Nandy's decision to step back 'highlights just how compromised this selection has become'. He said: 'Number 10 must now come clean about the involvement of the Downing Street appointments unit and special advisers in promoting David Kogan as the preferred candidate. 'The public has a right to know whether this was a fair and impartial process, or yet another case of political patronage disguised as due diligence.' Mr Kogan did not comment on the launch of the inquiry.


North Wales Chronicle
2 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
New defence plans could lead to ‘significant cuts' in other areas, MPs warn
John Healey said the Government has 'already committed the funds' for the 62 recommendations outlined in the review, as MPs scrutinised the proposals on Monday. Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge branded the review an 'empty wish list', telling MPs: 'They haven't got a plan to fund it.' Meanwhile, Conservative MP Sir Bernard Jenkin said he was concerned 'significant cuts' would have to be made to increase defence spending to 3% of gross domestic product, in line with the Government's plans. Speaking in the Commons, Mr Cartlidge said: 'For the Treasury to approve a plan, it will have to feature billions of pounds of cuts to existing MoD (Ministry of Defence) programmes and so this SDR has dodged the big decisions on existing capabilities. 'Can the Secretary of State confirm that the so-called defence investment plan, to be published in the autumn, will set out the cuts needed for the Treasury to agree a plan to get to 3%? Details we should have had today in the SDR.' In his reply, Mr Healey said: 'I have no doubt that we will meet our ambition to hit 3% of spending on defence in the next Parliament.' 'We're committed to spending what we need to deliver this review,' he added. Sir Bernard, MP for Harwich and North Essex, said: 'The document says this will allow us to grow our nuclear-powered attack submarine fleet to up to 12. Isn't the truth, and let's speak the truth, that this is the ask to the Treasury? 'The spending review is yet to decide what the defence programme will actually be. 'I hear what he says when he says with his full force and sincerity that, quote 'we will fund this defence review', but how is he going to achieve that without very much more significant cuts in other budgets? Because this Government, and no government, can afford to spend much more and borrow much more if anything at all.' Mr Healey replied: 'This is an investment that we're making now in the production capacity, so that we can build at a faster rate, we can have a double production line in Barrow, that will allow us to build new subs to meet the number of subs we'll need in the future to deter the threats that we'll face, meet our Nato commitments and I'm glad that he welcomes it.' Conservative former chancellor Sir Jeremy Hunt asked: 'What is the difference between the Chancellor's black hole and the Defence Secretary accepting 62 recommendations from the SDR without committing the funds to pay for them?' Mr Healey replied: 'Because the Prime Minister and the Government have committed the funds, we've committed the funds, we've built them into the terms of reference that allow this SDR over the next 10 years and beyond to be delivered.' Conservative former minister Danny Kruger said: 'The Defence Secretary has just thrown into doubt the future of the new medium helicopter. I'm very concerned to hear that that programme, clearly, may not go ahead. 'Could he just tell the House whether he plans to reduce the number of RAF Chinooks? Which, as he knows, are very important, both to our special forces and to our army.' Mr Healey urged the MP for East Wiltshire 'not to read what he has into my remarks', adding: 'I was simply stating the facts as they are, that there is a process underway that has got to conclude.' He continued: 'This review is not about cuts. It's the first review since the end of the Cold War, which has not been taken in the context of cuts, but in the context of a decade of rising defence expenditure. 'It's about enhancing what we have for the future. It's about building out, not hollowing out. And I hope he'll take that as the signature for the Strategic Defence Review that we've published this afternoon.' Conservative MP for North Cotswolds and chairman of the public accounts committee, Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, pressed Mr Healey to publish the investment plan so the committee can 'examine whether the funds match the equipment that he's talked about today, so that this ambitious plan can be delivered and is affordable'. Mr Healey confirmed it would be published 'in the autumn'. Conservative former minister Dame Caroline Dinenage raised concerns about the future of the training estate. The MP for Gosport said: 'Could he confirm that the outstanding training establishments at HMS Sultan and HMS Collingwood, which employ so many, will not be under threat?' Mr Healey replied: 'We are doing further work on the nature and the needs for our defence estate, it's right that we do that, because we have a long-term view now we'll be able to take better, long-term decisions on that.' Elsewhere in the session, Labour MP Richard Burgon argued proposals in the SDR could make the UK 'less safe'. The Leeds East MP said: 'These 12 new nuclear-powered AUKUS submarines almost double the UK's fleet of such submarines. Given these submarines are to be shared with non-nuclear Australia, doesn't this go against the UK's obligations under the non-proliferation treaty? 'And as they are part of the AUKUS treaty, a treaty with the USA as well as Australia, and focused in the Asia-Pacific, doesn't this risk adding to the growing tensions developing between the USA and China and make us all less safe?' Mr Healey replied: 'No and no. The AUKUS partnership is entirely consistent with the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and our obligations. And no, because it reinforces the regional stability and security, it reinforces regional deterrence, makes conflict less likely, not more likely.'