‘On your bike': Aer Lingus treatment of reader with young family ‘does the airline's own staff a huge disservice too'
travel
is on the minds of many, although we are not convinced that plans to jet away to sunnier spots or memories of holidays just finished are behind the recent spike in complaints about
Aer Lingus
.
A couple of weeks back
we highlighted
the story of a reader called Cathy
who was left hungry on a transatlantic flight
, having had the temerity to fall asleep ahead of the in-flight meal service.
Aer Lingus did resolve the issue to her satisfaction but her story prompted quite a few other readers to get in touch to share stories of how they had been let down by what was once our national airline. Here are just some of them.
First up is Joanne who admitted her story was going to 'seem like very much a first world problem' but she was prompted to share it because of 'the recent proliferation of Aer Lingus AerClub advertisements enticing new customers to join' and said it was 'driving me a little round the bend when I've been completely shafted by AerClub despite having spent thousands with Aer Lingus through business and personal travel in the last few years'.
READ MORE
Joanne has been a member of the Aer Lingus AerClub loyalty scheme for more than three years and usually chooses Aer Lingus for all her air travel. She has had Silver tier AerClub status since 2023.
[
Would you want to be woken for an in-flight meal of rubbery pasta?
Opens in new window
]
'Before the new Tier Credit period began on April 1st I was tracking my tier credits and planning travel to ensure (as I was so close) that I would fly enough sectors to ensure elevation to Platinum tier, which would unlock more benefits,' she says. 'I flew all the flights needed but noticed that one flight on March 13th was missing and never awarded the credits. Within a week I submitted my first missing credits form.'
She says she is 'not joking' about having called the Aer Lingus AerClub line approximately 20 times since, 'and, as nice as some of the agents are, I can get absolutely no answer or update on when my case will be reviewed.
'It seems forever destined to stay 'in the queue'. After three months with no movement whatsoever I can only assume I've been totally shafted and Aer Lingus have no intention to update my status and award me the credits I'm owed.'
We contacted the airline and in a statement it said Joanne's AerClub tier credits 'were not automatically assigned at the time of booking due to a technical error. However, our customer's AerClub account has now been fully credited, and as a gesture of goodwill, we have extended their Platinum membership status until 2027.'
[
'I am really disappointed in how Aer Lingus treats customers when things go wrong'
Opens in new window
]
The next story is far more serious and comes from a reader who contacted us on behalf of her recently widowed mother who is in her 80s.
A couple of years ago her parents were in Malaga when her mother's sister had a fall and needed surgery. She was told things were not looking good.
Our reader called Aer Lingus and 'spoke to a great chap and he assured me that, although we had to pay for new returns, we could claim this back, if my aunt died, and if we could provide a death certificate'.
The woman did pass away but there was a delay in issuing the death certificate and in the interim our reader's father also died suddenly.
Our reader was left to chase the refund.
In March of this year she mailed Aer Lingus and was told that because her parents had flown home with Aer Lingus from Malaga in September 2023 there was no refund due.
It turns out that while the return flight, which was changed for September 22nd from the original date of September 26th, was paid for in full, the Aer Lingus agent used the same booking reference.
[
An Aer Lingus passenger's 26-hour trek home, and eventual refund
Opens in new window
]
'I've tried to use the refund online service, but as the booking reference shows they did take flights, and no nuance about the flights being paid for separately, their computer says 'no' each time. I've sent an email asking to speak with a person as it needs a light touch and a bit of investigation, but I got the standard reply back: sorry, cannot help you, you flew.'
'Aer Lingus extends its deepest sympathies to the family for their loss and apologise for the delay in resolving their query,' the company said in a statement. 'While Aer Lingus policy requires a government-issued death certificate for bereavement related refunds, given the extenuating circumstances of this case, we are liaising with the family and will accept alternative available documentation to process the refund.'
And finally, there is Marc, who has also been given the runaround by Aer Lingus.
'Last August my wife, our three kids aged four, three and eight months and I flew to France with Aer Lingus for a comping holiday. On arrival at Brest airport we realised Aer Lingus hadn't loaded our bags on to the flight in Dublin,' he begins. 'This happens, but it was particularly challenging for us as travelling with three young kids.'
He repeats that such things happens but says the 'subsequent experience with Aer Lingus, however, was beyond disgraceful'.
He says that after multiple calls to find out where their luggage was and when it might get to them, he was able to establish that they were scheduled to arrive five days later 'on the next direct flight into Brest airport. This is despite multiple flights to nearby airports and even connections via Paris in the intervening days.
'My family's situation didn't matter to them and it was impossible to speak to a direct Aer Lingus employee on this.'
Marc says that in the meantime the had buy food and also clothes for their children in the nearest town 'to get us through the first few days of the trip'.
'I kept receipts for most items but not all, which was my mistake, in hindsight. Once the bags arrived I was advised to raise a 'delayed baggage claim' to get refunded for my costs. I did this immediately. You won't be surprised to hear I only heard back from them last week on this – while on this year's holiday. We flew Ryanair – apart from some delays due to French ACT, so far so good.
'I did send a mail [to Aer Lingus] once a month, asking as to the status of my claim – no response, of course. I doubt a human read it.'
Marc had submitted claims totalling €160 'to cover food, clothing, toiletries and a bike rental to cycle into the town to purchase these items'.
He says he accepts that the last one could be seen as stretching things but, given the circumstances, he figured it was reasonable.
'When I heard back from them last week I was told only €13 was refundable because the other receipts didn't explicitly state they were in euro, even though it was clear they were from a French supermarket, and, in the case of bike rental, were not itemised,' he says.
Marc managed to find a clause in EU legislation that states 'inclusion of currency is not mandatory in French receipts' and he sent the full receipt for the bike rental.
'I received a mail the next morning to state that a 'full and final payment' of €13 had been made. When I responded again I got an automated mail saying the case is now closed and this email won't be read.
'What shocked us is that Aer Lingus positions itself as a family-friendly, national carrier who cares about its customers. The staff at the check-in area in T2 are some of the most courteous and professional people I have met and always go out of their way to help when they see us coming with lots of bags and kids hanging out of us. It has always been a trigger to fly Aer Lingus up to now.
'This experience was the polar opposite of it, and as well as being the worst customer service experience of my life, it does a huge disservice to these people too.'
In response, Aer Lingus said it 'reimburses reasonable expenses such as the purchase of essential items such as clothes or toiletries in the case of delayed baggage, but does not refund cost of meals. We fully understand the inconvenience of delayed baggage, particularly for a family travelling with young children, and have offered [our reader] a gesture of goodwill on this occasion as a valued customer.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Economist calls for budget ‘prudence', as Central Bank governor suggests rethink is needed
'A lot of prudence' is needed in Budget 2026 , while there is a case for postponing recurrent spending and tax cuts until there is 'greater clarity' on the negative implications of the EU-US trade deal , a prominent economist has said. Dan O'Brien, the chief economist of the Institute of International and European Affairs , made the remarks while responding to comments from the Central Bank governor Gabriel Makhlouf suggesting the Government should rethink its approach to the October budget. In its summer economic statement last month the Government said a €9.4 billion tax and spending package will form the foundation of the upcoming budget. However, the Coalition warned at the time it may have to 'recalibrate' its strategy and reduce the size of the overall package if there is a 'deterioration in the tariff landscape' over the coming months. READ MORE The European Union has since struck a trade deal with the United States which sees EU goods, including those from Ireland, hit with 15 per cent tariffs by the US. The Business Post reported on Sunday that Mr Makhlouf said Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe now has 'more certainly' for planning the budget with the level of tariffs on EU goods known. 'Hopefully the summer economic statement is not the budget, and hopefully, by the time he (Mr Donohoe) gets there, he will have reflected again on what the trade situation is telling us,' Mr Makhlouf said. He added: 'For an economy operating at full employment, we're adding more stimulus to the economy than it needs – and I would look again at what we're planning to do.' Mr Makhlouf also told the paper: 'I think at the moment there's a risk that we're in the wrong place.' [ What did the summer economic statement really tell us about Budget 2026? Opens in new window ] A spokeswoman for Mr Donohoe declined to comment on Mr Makhlouf's remarks. During an interview on Newstalk radio on Sunday, Mr O'Brien was asked if he agrees Mr Donohoe needs to rethink the budget. He said this suggestion is 'largely' correct, as 'we're facing a lot of uncertainty'. Mr O'Brien added: 'I think the Government needs to manage expectations around this. There's been a lot of giveaways [in recent budgets]. Clearly we had a general election last year.' He said there has been a 'big uptick in inflation' but this has 'come right back down again' and 'there isn't the justification for Government to be intervening to deal with every problem'. Mr O'Brien said the implications of the trade situation for the pharmaceutical sector are uncertain, relying on the 'whims of the US president who may just decide he doesn't like the pharmaceutical sector in Europe selling stuff to the US and he may do something more radical'. He added: 'So there's a lot of uncertainty here, and I think we need a lot of prudence in this budget.' Asked about potential tax choices in the budget, Mr O'Brien argued there is 'no economic justification' for the Government's intention to reduce the VAT rate for the hospitality sector. 'One might strongly make the case that both recurrent spending and tax cuts maybe need to be postponed until we get greater clarity as to the negative implications of the trade deal and the extent to which it effects particularly the pharmaceutical sector and how that feeds into corporation tax revenues,' Mr O'Brien added. 'We just don't know how big a hit that could impose on the public finances if we get a change in pharmaceuticals sales to the US and that results in a reduction in corporation tax profits.' Did the EU have its hands tied before striking a trade deal with the US? Listen | 23:32
The 42
4 hours ago
- The 42
Farrell's Ireland set to visit Australia and New Zealand next year
ANDY FARRELL'S IRELAND are set to visit Australia and New Zealand in the summer of 2026 for the opening window of the new Nations Cup. It's understood that Ireland are in line to face the Wallabies and the All Blacks in July 2026, as well as playing Japan. The game against Eddie Jones' Japan is expected to take place in either Australia or New Zealand, with Australia more likely given the huge Irish diaspora Down Under. Final details are still to be confirmed, with the IRFU and other unions having further discussed plans at World Rugby meetings in Sydney this week. This also means that Ireland are set to welcome South Africa, Fiji, and Argentina to Dublin in autumn 2026 for their other Nations Cup fixtures next year. Advertisement From 2026, the new biennial Nations Cup will take place across the July and November Test windows. At the end of the November window, there will be a Grand Final, along with other placing games. The 2026 play-offs will be hosted at Twickenham and Tottenham Hotspur Stadium in London, with Qatar to host the 2028 deciders, and the 2030 finals set to take place in the US. It had been hoped that the likes of Japan and Fiji would host all their 'home' games in the Nations Cup on actual Japanese and Fijian soil next year, but the strong prospect of Ireland facing Japan in Australia shows that might not be the case. The travel schedules for nations like Ireland have been a concern since the competition was agreed upon, with worries for player welfare amid three July Tests in three different countries – several of which are long flights from each other – across three consecutive weekends, as opposed to the current status quo of three-Test series in one country. That seemingly means that the Nations Cup will involve clusters of games in one nation, as in the possible example of Ireland playing the Wallabies and Japan in Australia on consecutive weekends next summer. Ireland's 2026 visit to Australia means that Farrell and the large contingent of Irish players and staff who have been Down Under on the Lions tour will be returning swiftly next summer. There will be another big trip to Australia in 2027 for the World Cup. The rivalry with both the Wallabies and the All Blacks is set to grow this coming autumn as Farrell's men face both sides. Ireland open their 2025 November Tests campaign against New Zealand in Chicago on 2 November, while they host Joe Schmidt's men in Dublin on 16 November, with a game against Japan at the Aviva Stadium in between. They complete their campaign against the Springboks on 23 November. Former Ireland boss Schmidt will be in his final campaign with the Wallabies when Farrell and co. visit Australia in July 2026, before handing the reins over to ex-Ireland defence coach Les Kiss.
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
Inheritance, relatives and blended families: what does it mean for tax-free thresholds?
Could you clarify a passing comment that you made in your article last week. You used the phrase 'by blood'. Are you drawing a distinction with uncle or aunt by marriage versus an uncle or aunt 'by blood'? In other words, are you saying that a child can inherit under Class B from their parent's sibling, but not the spouse of that sibling? Are you sure that is correct as I do not see any such distinction in Revenue guidance ? It also raises the question of who is 'the parent' in the case of a divorce and remarriage. Does the birth parent for Class A purposes cease to be a parent on remarriage or can the step-parent become one? Mr DL READ MORE I always wonder when I write 'by blood' whether it is clearly understood. As with many recurring items, I have set out clearly what that means at one point or another but often revert to the shorthand. And yes, it can be counterintuitive if, like me, you grew up in a family where aunts were regarded as aunts regardless of whether they were my parents' siblings or had married into the family – and similarly for uncles. But Revenue does make a distinction when it comes to inheritance. The three inheritance tax thresholds are very specifically delineated according to blood relationship between the person making the gift or leaving the inheritance in their will and the person receiving it. Category A, which offers the highest tax-free threshold – currently €400,000 – is generally referred to as covering gifts and inheritances from a parent to a child, but it is slightly wider than that. [ Inheritance tax: How to avoid leaving your loved ones with a hefty bill Opens in new window ] For instance, if it is the child that dies – as an adult or otherwise – and the parent who inherits from them, the parent will also benefit from the Category A threshold as long as they are inheriting outright – rather than, say, getting a life interest in a property. The threshold will also apply to a child – anyone under the age of 18 – where they are inheriting from their grandparent when their parent is dead. We'll come back to that Category A in a minute in relation to the second part of your query. Category B covers close blood relatives other than parents – or other scenarios covered by Category A. It is sometimes described as lineal relations – i.e. those in a direct line of descent or ancestry. Most commonly, that is seen as covering gifts and inheritance from a brother or sister, a grandparent and an uncle or aunt. And yes, it is only aunts or uncles related by blood – i.e. siblings of one or other parent. You're certainly right to query it. I used to think it covered everyone with that title but I did check with the Revenue commissioners and they did confirm that there had to be a blood relationship with the aunt or uncle for them to be covered under Category B. Category B will also cover life interest inheritance from a child to a parent or any inheritance from a child to an aunt, uncle or grandparent in the unfortunate circumstance of the child predeceasing the older relative. [ Will inheritance tax be cut again in the budget? Opens in new window ] Many people worry about what other people will pay in tax on an unexpected windfall (inheritance) after they are gone. Photograph: Getty Images There is a growing clamour – particularly from people who do not have children – for reform of this Category B. As it stands, the tax-free threshold under Category B is €40,000, just 10 per cent of the Category A threshold. An awful lot of people worry about what other people will pay in tax on an unexpected windfall (inheritance) after they are gone. Personally, I always find that odd but that's not to say it is not a thing. There is pressure either to raise this significantly or to find some other device to allow people without children nominate one or two beneficiaries who can avail of a higher threshold. It is something that has been examined in the Tax Strategy Papers published recently by the Department of Finance . These papers examine issues that might be addressed in the budget later this year or a budget further down the line. As is their wont, this review merely sets out options and, to the degree possible, their likely cost or benefit to the exchequer. Whether one approach should be favoured over another or whether any policy change should be pursued remains a political matter for decision by the Government . Finally, we have Category C which covers all other people benefiting from a gift or inheritance – sometimes called 'strangers in blood' where the current tax-free threshold is €20,000. [ I am due to inherit €30,000, is it worth my while to gift my husband half to avoid tax? Opens in new window ] The three inheritance tax thresholds are delineated according to blood relationship between the person leaving the inheritance in their will and the person receiving it. Photograph: Getty Images And you can see here why Revenue specifies that aunts and uncles in Category B must be blood relations, not relations by marriage. Apart from friends, neighbours, carers, gardeners etc, Category C also includes cousins who are, by definition, blood relatives of some sort and also in-laws, whom in many cases can be closer to the disponer (the person making the gift or inheritance) than even a niece or nephew by blood. But so it is. As regular readers will know, the other key thing to note is that these are lifetime limits on all gifts and inheritances dating back under each category to December 5th, 1991. So, under Category B, you need to tot up all large gifts and inheritances you have received from any grandparent, sibling, aunt or uncle to see if your latest windfall is tax-free or otherwise. And when we say gifts, we mean gifts valued at more than €3,000, as anything below that in any year is covered by the small gift exemption and is also tax free. Finally, once to hit 80 per cent of the relevant threshold – benefits of €320,000, €32,000 and €16,000 for each category respectively, you need to file an inheritance tax return to Revenue even though no tax is owing until you exceed the full threshold. Getting back to your second query – the position with blended families after divorce, remarriage and separation – you're quite correct to say that this is increasingly relevant in our modern society. We need to return to the question of the Category A threshold. When it states that a child can receive up to €400,000 tax-free from parents, the definition of child also refers to stepchildren and to adopted children. In fact, it even applies to foster children as long as those foster children spent at least five years with the family before the age of 18 at the family's expense. So does that mean that a child who is adopted or whose parents have divorced and remarried can receive category A benefits from more than two parents? Yes, it does. A stepchild qualifies for Category A on inheritance or gift from their birth parents and from any step-parent. The same is true for a child formally adopted. But birth parents are not removed from the Category A equation. A child can still avail of Category A in relation to a birth parent, even after divorce and remarriage, or where the child has been adopted elsewhere, as can a child who has been fostered under the criteria mentioned above. The one difference between the three categories of child is that if an adopted child's birth parent dies without making a will, they are not entitled to anything under intestacy where a stepchild and a fostered child would be. Please send your queries to Dominic Coyle, Q&A, The Irish Times, 24-28 Tara Street, Dublin 2, or by email to , with a contact phone number. This column is a reader service and is not intended to replace professional advice
