
Geoeconomics 2.0: The Real War Is In Chips, Currencies And Control
What makes this development significant is its departure from the traditional notion of globalization. Trade is no longer just about economic efficiency; it has become an arena of ideological and strategic alignment. As reported by the Financial Times, the current U.S. trade policy under Donald Trump's renewed influence is less about balancing imports and exports, and more about leveraging tariffs as geopolitical tools. Trump has recently announced sweeping new tariffs—30% on imports from the European Union and Mexico, and up to 35% on Canadian goods—framing them not as economic adjustments, but as assertions of national strength. In response, the European Commission is preparing over €70 billion in countermeasures while also seeking to maintain diplomatic engagement. Strategic Supply Chains and the New Resource Wars
Parallel to the trade frictions is the reconfiguration of global supply chains, especially in critical sectors like semiconductors, rare earth elements, and artificial intelligence. The U.S. has accelerated its efforts to reshore chip manufacturing, investing heavily in domestic fabrication facilities under the CHIPS and Science Act. These investments are driven less by efficiency and more by the growing sense that technological dependence—particularly on China—presents a national security threat.
Meanwhile, China has responded with its own countermeasures, including tighter export controls on rare materials such as gallium and germanium, both crucial to the production of semiconductors and green technologies. According to the Financial Times, these measures are not merely retaliatory but part of a broader strategy to gain leverage in the global technology race.
Multinational firms are adapting by shifting operations toward more geopolitically stable manufacturing hubs such as India and Vietnam. As explained by the World Economic Forum, artificial intelligence tools are now central to managing these increasingly complex global supply chains—helping businesses anticipate risk and adjust logistics in real time. The Rise of Economic Blocs
The increasing use of economic tools for strategic ends is also driving the formation of geoeconomic blocs. A tighter U.S.–EU alignment is emerging, focused on joint export controls, digital infrastructure and AI regulation, largely in response to China's growing technological influence.
At the same time, the BRICS+ alliance—comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and new entrants—is working to establish alternative trade systems that reduce reliance on the U.S. dollar. Though still in early stages, this de-dollarization agenda could have significant implications for the global financial architecture.
India, in particular, has become a key swing player in this new configuration. According to the Times of India, Goldman Sachs projects that India's economy will reach $10 trillion by 2035, bolstered by its booming digital services sector and expansion of global capability centers (GCCs). With Western firms eager to diversify out of China, India is increasingly becoming a preferred partner in tech, pharma, and manufacturing. Business on the Front Lines
Corporations are no longer passive economic actors. Increasingly, they are becoming entangled in the national security concerns of their home governments. Export restrictions on chips and AI models, foreign investment screening, and cybersecurity compliance have made firms like Nvidia, TSMC, and Microsoft strategic assets—not just market players.
A recent controversy involving proposed U.S. tariffs on imported copper illustrates the complexity of this environment. As reported by MarketWatch, industry leaders are warning that such measures could jeopardize America's ambitions in both artificial intelligence and clean energy, since copper is a critical input for electric vehicles, servers, and power grids. What once would have been a narrow industrial tariff now threatens to ripple across multiple sectors of national importance.
The business environment has thus shifted from a focus on cost optimization to one of strategic positioning. Firms are being forced to consider geopolitical risk, regulatory friction, and even military escalation in their long-term planning. Markets and Consumers Caught in the Crossfire
These global realignments are not just boardroom concerns—they're already impacting markets and consumers. Investors are seeing increased volatility in sectors sensitive to trade policy, such as energy, healthcare, and tech. According to Business Insider, UBS has advised clients to hedge exposure and focus on firms with deep government ties or strategic sector alignment.
Meanwhile, consumers can expect to see higher costs in electronics, vehicles, and digital services. Cross-border regulations on data storage, content moderation, and cloud infrastructure are also reshaping how global digital services function, fragmenting the once-borderless nature of the internet. Strategy Over Efficiency
What we're witnessing is a redefinition of economic globalization, where nations act like corporations and corporations act like states. Trade corridors are being redrawn, not just based on cost, but on security, ideology, and strategic trust. The new age of geoeconomics is not about who makes a product cheapest, but who can guarantee supply, protect intellectual property, and align with allies.
In this environment, resilience and foresight are worth more than speed or scale. For companies, that means investing in intelligence—not just artificial, but geopolitical. For nations, it means viewing commerce not as an end, but as a powerful tool in a long-term game of influence.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Trump meets EU chief in push to clinch trade deal – DW – 07/27/2025
EU chief Ursula von der Leyen is hoping to strike a trade deal with the US before August 1, to avoid a transatlantic trade war. Trump describes the prospect of an agreement as "50-50." US President Donald Trump is meeting with the European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland on Sunday, as Brussels seeks to finalize a trade agreement with Washington before the August 1 deadline. Ahead of the meeting, Trump gave "a good 50-50 chance" on Friday for a deal with the European Union to be reached. Von der Leyen has been pushing hard for a trade pact that would see the bloc avoid the 30% tariffs that Trump has threatened on all goods from the EU. Most EU goods already face a 10% tariff, with levies of 25% on cars and car parts and 50% on steel and aluminum. On Sunday, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the August 1 deadline was firm. "No extensions, no more grace periods. Aug. 1, the tariffs are set, they'll go into place, Customs will start collecting the money and off we go," Lutnick told the US broadcaster Fox News. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video According to an EU diplomat briefed ahead of the meeting, set for 4:30 p.m. (1530 GMT), key issues still need to be hammered out. "A political deal is on the table — but it needs the sign-off from Trump, who wants to negotiate this down to the very last moment," the diplomat told AFP. European negotiators are aiming for a baseline levy of around 15 percent on EU exports to the US — the level secured by Japan. Any deal will need to be approved by all member states. EU ambassadors, on a visit to Greenland, were updated on the negotiations by the Commission on Sunday morning, and would meet again after any agreement.


Int'l Business Times
13 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Battling Tariffs Is No Trivial Pursuit For US Games Retailer
At a strip mall in Maryland, a miniature landscape extends across a table between Dash Krempel and his friend as a war game unfolds. But their hobby is becoming more expensive as US tariffs take a toll. Krempel, 29, told AFP the cost of models for tabletop games have surged from inflation, and continued rising since US President Donald Trump imposed sweeping tariffs on trading partners this year. UK-made figurines that cost $60 around three years ago now go for $94.50, he said. "Prices have gotten bigger," he added. "It's a very expensive hobby to begin with, so it's maybe pricing a lot of people out." Instead of buying more products, he now tries to support retailer Game Kastle College Park by renting tables to play in-store. For the shop's owner, Boyd Stephenson, stocking new board games, paints and hobby supplies has only become more challenging. To avoid the harshest of Trump's tariffs, some suppliers had to delay shipments or postpone new releases. As they raised their suggested retail prices, so has Stephenson at Game Kastle. About a fifth of his store's products have seen cost hikes, with increases ranging from 5 percent to 20 percent. "If we see higher prices or higher tariffs, I'm going to see higher wholesale prices, and then I have to raise my prices accordingly," he said. Asked what percentage of his store relies on imports, Stephenson replied: "Almost all of it." Stephenson estimates some 7,000 board games were released last year from 5,000 different companies. "You're really looking at 5,000 different approaches (to tariffs)," he said. "Some producers are saying, 'We're going to eat the cost.' Some producers are saying, 'We're passing the cost through all the way.' And other producers are doing some sort of mix of that." Like other US retailers, Stephenson could face more cost pressures come August 1, when steeper tariffs are set to hit dozens of economies like the European Union and India. The elevated rates mark an increase from the 10 percent levy Trump imposed on goods from most economies in April. While China -- a crucial manufacturing hub for games -- is temporarily spared, Trump has separately imposed fresh 30 percent tariffs on products from the world's second biggest economy this year. US tariffs on Chinese products could return to higher levels from August 12 if officials fail to extend their truce. Yet, there is no quick fix to return manufacturing to the United States. "US manufacturers just don't have the capacity to do that anymore," said Stephenson, showing an intricate board game figurine. "Really, the people that are good at that, that's China," he said. "The best modeling paints come from Spain." "So if you see tariffs get put up on the EU, then all of a sudden I'm going to have to pay higher prices on modeling paint when I bring it into the country," he added. Trump has threatened the bloc with a 30 percent tariff. Stephenson tries to absorb some cost hikes, but said: "I have to be able to pay the staff, pay the electric company, pay the landlord." Trump's on-again, off-again approach to duties has also made suppliers' price changes more unpredictable. "What is always universally bad for business is uncertainty," Stephenson said. He usually stocks up on inventory ahead of the year-end holiday season, but expects to be more strategic with purchases this year to avoid unwelcome surprises. Many companies are delaying merchandise imports as they lack certainty, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy at the National Retail Federation. "When the product is brought into the country and entered into commerce, you have 15 days to pay your tariff bill," he said. This causes problems when tariff rates change and businesses lack funds to pay for orders. Some businesses, and industry group the Game Manufacturers Association, have mounted legal challenges against Trump's blanket tariffs hitting various countries, noting nearly 80 percent of tabletop games sold in the US are made abroad. But such complaints are an uphill battle. "The damage, especially for small retailers, has been significant," Gold said. A US games retailer has been forced to hike costs as some suppliers raised their wholesale prices due to President Donald Trump's tariffs AFP Boyd Stephenson, owner of Game Kastle College Park, says uncertainty is universally bad for business AFP US tariffs on China-made products could bounce to higher levels from August 12 if officials fail to extend a current truce AFP


Int'l Business Times
15 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
US Fed Poised To Hold Off On Rate Cuts, Defying Trump Pressure
The US central bank is widely expected to hold off slashing interest rates again at its upcoming meeting, as officials gather under the cloud of an intensifying pressure campaign by President Donald Trump. Policymakers at the independent Federal Reserve have kept the benchmark lending rate steady since the start of the year as they monitor how Trump's sweeping tariffs are impacting the world's biggest economy. With Trump's on-again, off-again tariff approach -- and the levies' lagged effects on inflation -- Fed officials want to see economic data from this summer to gauge how prices are being affected. When mulling changes to interest rates, the central bank -- which meets on Tuesday and Wednesday -- seeks a balance between reining in inflation and the health of the jobs market. But the bank's data-dependent approach has enraged the Republican president, who has repeatedly criticized Fed Chair Jerome Powell for not slashing rates further, calling him a "numbskull" and "moron." Most recently, Trump signaled he could use the Fed's $2.5 billion renovation project as an avenue to oust Powell, before backing off and saying that would be unlikely. Trump visited the Fed construction site on Thursday, making a tense appearance with Powell in which the Fed chair disputed Trump's characterization of the total cost of the refurbishment in front of the cameras. But economists expect the Fed to look past the political pressure at its policy meeting. "We're just now beginning to see the evidence of tariffs' impact on inflation," said Ryan Sweet, chief US economist at Oxford Economics. "We're going to see it (too) in July and August, and we think that's going to give the Fed reason to remain on the sidelines," he told AFP. Since returning to the presidency in January, Trump has imposed a 10 percent tariff on goods from almost all countries, as well as steeper rates on steel, aluminum and autos. The effect on inflation has so far been limited, prompting the US leader to use this as grounds for calling for interest rates to be lowered by three percentage points. Currently, the benchmark lending rate stands at a range between 4.25 percent and 4.50 percent. Trump also argues that lower rates would save the government money on interest payments, and floated the idea of firing Powell. The comments roiled financial markets. "Powell can see that the administration floated this trial balloon" of ousting him before walking it back on the market's reaction, Sweet said. "It showed that markets value an independent central bank," the Oxford Economics analyst added, anticipating Powell will be instead more influenced by labor market concerns. Powell's term as Fed chair ends in May 2026. Analysts expect to see a couple of members break ranks if the Fed's rate-setting committee decides for a fifth straight meeting to keep interest rates unchanged. Sweet cautioned that some observers may spin dissents as pushback on Powell but argued this is not necessarily the case. "It's not out-of-line or unusual to see, at times when there's a high degree of uncertainty, or maybe a turning point in policy, that you get one or two people dissenting," said Nationwide chief economist Kathy Bostjancic. Fed Governor Christopher Waller and Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman have both signaled openness to rate cuts as early as July, meaning their disagreement with a decision to hold rates steady would not surprise markets. Bostjancic said that too many dissents could be "eyebrow-raising," and lead some to question if Powell is losing control of the board, but added: "I don't anticipate that to be the case." For Sweet, "the big wild card is the labor market." There has been weakness in the private sector, while the hiring rate has been below average and the number of permanent job losers is rising. "There are some fissures in the labor market, but they haven't turned into fault lines yet," Sweet said. If the labor market suddenly weakened, he said he would expect the Fed to start cutting interest rates sooner.