logo
Geoeconomics 2.0: The Real War Is In Chips, Currencies And Control

Geoeconomics 2.0: The Real War Is In Chips, Currencies And Control

The world is no longer negotiating peace through treaties or posturing with missiles. Instead, it's wielding tariffs, technology bans, and resource chokeholds as weapons. From Washington to Beijing, New Delhi to Brussels, economic leverage has become the new language of global power. In this new era of geoeconomics, trade routes, tech supply chains, and financial systems are being redrawn—not by markets, but by strategy. And as nations scramble to protect sovereignty and secure advantage, companies and consumers are being pulled into the frontline of an invisible war.
What makes this development significant is its departure from the traditional notion of globalization. Trade is no longer just about economic efficiency; it has become an arena of ideological and strategic alignment. As reported by the Financial Times, the current U.S. trade policy under Donald Trump's renewed influence is less about balancing imports and exports, and more about leveraging tariffs as geopolitical tools. Trump has recently announced sweeping new tariffs—30% on imports from the European Union and Mexico, and up to 35% on Canadian goods—framing them not as economic adjustments, but as assertions of national strength. In response, the European Commission is preparing over €70 billion in countermeasures while also seeking to maintain diplomatic engagement. Strategic Supply Chains and the New Resource Wars
Parallel to the trade frictions is the reconfiguration of global supply chains, especially in critical sectors like semiconductors, rare earth elements, and artificial intelligence. The U.S. has accelerated its efforts to reshore chip manufacturing, investing heavily in domestic fabrication facilities under the CHIPS and Science Act. These investments are driven less by efficiency and more by the growing sense that technological dependence—particularly on China—presents a national security threat.
Meanwhile, China has responded with its own countermeasures, including tighter export controls on rare materials such as gallium and germanium, both crucial to the production of semiconductors and green technologies. According to the Financial Times, these measures are not merely retaliatory but part of a broader strategy to gain leverage in the global technology race.
Multinational firms are adapting by shifting operations toward more geopolitically stable manufacturing hubs such as India and Vietnam. As explained by the World Economic Forum, artificial intelligence tools are now central to managing these increasingly complex global supply chains—helping businesses anticipate risk and adjust logistics in real time. The Rise of Economic Blocs
The increasing use of economic tools for strategic ends is also driving the formation of geoeconomic blocs. A tighter U.S.–EU alignment is emerging, focused on joint export controls, digital infrastructure and AI regulation, largely in response to China's growing technological influence.
At the same time, the BRICS+ alliance—comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and new entrants—is working to establish alternative trade systems that reduce reliance on the U.S. dollar. Though still in early stages, this de-dollarization agenda could have significant implications for the global financial architecture.
India, in particular, has become a key swing player in this new configuration. According to the Times of India, Goldman Sachs projects that India's economy will reach $10 trillion by 2035, bolstered by its booming digital services sector and expansion of global capability centers (GCCs). With Western firms eager to diversify out of China, India is increasingly becoming a preferred partner in tech, pharma, and manufacturing. Business on the Front Lines
Corporations are no longer passive economic actors. Increasingly, they are becoming entangled in the national security concerns of their home governments. Export restrictions on chips and AI models, foreign investment screening, and cybersecurity compliance have made firms like Nvidia, TSMC, and Microsoft strategic assets—not just market players.
A recent controversy involving proposed U.S. tariffs on imported copper illustrates the complexity of this environment. As reported by MarketWatch, industry leaders are warning that such measures could jeopardize America's ambitions in both artificial intelligence and clean energy, since copper is a critical input for electric vehicles, servers, and power grids. What once would have been a narrow industrial tariff now threatens to ripple across multiple sectors of national importance.
The business environment has thus shifted from a focus on cost optimization to one of strategic positioning. Firms are being forced to consider geopolitical risk, regulatory friction, and even military escalation in their long-term planning. Markets and Consumers Caught in the Crossfire
These global realignments are not just boardroom concerns—they're already impacting markets and consumers. Investors are seeing increased volatility in sectors sensitive to trade policy, such as energy, healthcare, and tech. According to Business Insider, UBS has advised clients to hedge exposure and focus on firms with deep government ties or strategic sector alignment.
Meanwhile, consumers can expect to see higher costs in electronics, vehicles, and digital services. Cross-border regulations on data storage, content moderation, and cloud infrastructure are also reshaping how global digital services function, fragmenting the once-borderless nature of the internet. Strategy Over Efficiency
What we're witnessing is a redefinition of economic globalization, where nations act like corporations and corporations act like states. Trade corridors are being redrawn, not just based on cost, but on security, ideology, and strategic trust. The new age of geoeconomics is not about who makes a product cheapest, but who can guarantee supply, protect intellectual property, and align with allies.
In this environment, resilience and foresight are worth more than speed or scale. For companies, that means investing in intelligence—not just artificial, but geopolitical. For nations, it means viewing commerce not as an end, but as a powerful tool in a long-term game of influence.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia Kills 25 In Ukraine, As Kremlin Says 'Committed' To Peace
Russia Kills 25 In Ukraine, As Kremlin Says 'Committed' To Peace

Int'l Business Times

time7 minutes ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Russia Kills 25 In Ukraine, As Kremlin Says 'Committed' To Peace

The Kremlin said on Tuesday that it wanted to pursue peace in Ukraine hours after mounting attacks that killed at least 25 people, including a 23-year-old pregnant woman and more than a dozen prison inmates. The strikes on several regions came hours after US President Donald Trump issued Moscow with a new deadline to end its grinding invasion of Ukraine -- now in its fourth year -- or face tough new sanctions. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky accused Russia of purposefully targeting a prison in the Zaporizhzhia region -- that Russia claims as its own -- killing 16 people and wounding more than 40 others. "It was a deliberate strike, intentional, not accidental. The Russians could not have been unaware that they were targeting civilians in that facility," Zelensky said on social media in response. The Kremlin denied that claim. "The Russian army does not strike civilian targets," spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters, including from AFP. Peskov added that Moscow had "taken note" of Trump's new deadline and told journalists that it remained "committed to the peace process to resolve the conflict around Ukraine and secure our interests." Ukraine's justice ministry said Moscow's forces hit the prison with four glide bombs, while police said 16 inmates were killed and 43 were wounded. Bricks and debris were strewn on the ground around buildings with blown-out windows, according to images released by the ministry. The facility's perimeter was intact and there was no threat that inmates would escape, it added. Rescue workers were seen searching for survivors in pictures released by the region's emergency services. The source added there were no Russian war prisoners being held at the centre. Ukraine's human rights ombudsman Dmytro Lubinets said the Zaporizhzhia attack was further evidence of Russian "war crimes". "People held in places of detention do not lose their right to life and protection," he wrote on social media. In addition to the glide bomb attack, the Ukrainian air force said that Russia had launched 37 drones and two missiles overnight, adding that its air defence systems had downed 32 of the drones. Zelensky said that among the separate attacks, Russian forces had targeted a hospital in the town of the Kamyanske in the Dnipropetrovsk region. "Three people were killed in the attack, including a pregnant woman. Her name was Diana. She was only 23-years-old," Zelensky said. Separate strikes in the eastern Kharkiv region that borders Russia killed six people, regional authorities said. In the southern Russian region of Rostov, a Ukrainian drone attack killed one person, the region's acting governor said. Kyiv has been trying to repel Russia's summer offensive, which has made fresh advances into areas largely spared since the start of the invasion in 2022. The Russian defence ministry claimed fresh advances across the sprawling front line on Tuesday, saying its forces had taken control of two more villages -- one in the Donetsk region, and another in the Zaporizhzhia region. The prison strike on Tuesday came on the three-year anniversary of a attack on another detention facility in occupied Ukrainian territory that Kyiv blamed on Moscow and that was reported to have killed dozens of captured Ukrainian soldiers. Ukraine and Russia blamed each other for the strike over the night of July 29 three years ago on the detention centre in the Russian-occupied Donetsk region, which the Kremlin says is part of Russia. Ukraine says that dozens of its soldiers who laid down their arms after a long Russian siege of the port city of Mariupol were killed in that attack on the Olenivka detention facility. Russia has been ramping up its air attacks against Ukraine AFP Ukrainians gathered this week to mark the third anniversary of the Olenivka prison attack AFP

North Korea says US should abandon denuclearization push – DW – 07/29/2025
North Korea says US should abandon denuclearization push – DW – 07/29/2025

DW

time2 hours ago

  • DW

North Korea says US should abandon denuclearization push – DW – 07/29/2025

US President Donald Trump is seeking fresh talks with North Korea on its nuclear program, returning to the direct engagement seen during his first term. Kim's powerful sister has said denuclearization is off the table. North Korea on Tuesday urged the US to abandon any attempts to persuade it to abandon its nuclear weapons program. US President Donald Trump, who began his second term in January, is interested in resuming talks with North Korea on denuclearization. During his first term in the years of 2018 and 2019, Trump met with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un three times in Singapore, Vietnam and at the demilitarized zone (DMZ) that separates the two Koreas. Although the Trump administration wanted North Korea to give up its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief, no deal was struck between the two sides and Pyongyang continues to advance its nuclear aspirations. Kim's powerful sister, Kim Yo Jong, said Trump's personal relationship with the North Korean leader is "not bad." However, she said if the US administration were to use the Trump-Kim relationship to push for North Korean denuclearization, Pyongyang would consider it "nothing but a mockery." "If the US fails to accept the changed reality and persists in the failed past, the DPRK-US meeting will remains as a 'hope' of the US side," Kim Yo Jong said, using the acronym for North Korea's formal name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. Kim Yo Jong's remarks suggest that North Korea is ruling out complete denuclearization as an option if talks are relaunched with the US. A White House official told Reuters news agency that Trump is still seeking the same objectives in regards to North Korea as he did in the first term. "The president retains those objectives and remains open to engaging with Leader Kim to achieve a fully denuclearized North Korea," the unnamed US official told Reuters. During Trump's first term, the president had sometimes a unusually friendly relationship with Kim after a tense start, with Trump saying the two leaders "fell in love." After nuclear negotiations broke down in October 2019, the two leaders began exchanging insults, with North Korea in December of that year threatening to call him a "dotard." Since Trump's first term from 2017 to 2021, US and North Korea ties have grown more fraught. Trump's successor, Joe Biden, did not continue the flashy diplomatic engagements with Kim that were a feature of Trump's first administration. Instead, the Biden administration chose to deepen ties with South Korea and Japan in a bid to further isolate Pyongyang. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video North Korea, meanwhile, has been growing closer with Russia since it launched its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. North Korea has sent weapons and troops to assist Russia's assault, with Moscow in turn backing North Korea's nuclear program. The US firmly opposed the invasion of Ukraine during Biden's term, with Trump in his second term also pushing Russia to commit to a ceasefire and end the conflict.

Chinese, US Officials Meet For 2nd Day Of Trade Talks In Stockholm
Chinese, US Officials Meet For 2nd Day Of Trade Talks In Stockholm

Int'l Business Times

time2 hours ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Chinese, US Officials Meet For 2nd Day Of Trade Talks In Stockholm

Chinese and US delegations met for their second day of trade negotiations in Stockholm, with both sides said to be aiming to extend a truce due to end in two weeks' time. AFP journalists saw officials from both sides, led respectively by Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, enter the Swedish government building serving as the talks venue. Neither side has so far made public any information about what has gone on in the talks, which started on Monday. The negotiations are happening in the wake of a US-EU trade deal struck over the weekend that set US tariffs on most EU imports at 15 percent, but none on US goods going to the EU. The truce between China and the United States, the countries with the worlds two top economies, has temporarily set US duties on Chinese goods at 30 percent, and Chinese levies on US ones at 10 percent. That accord, reached in Geneva in May, brought down triple-digit tariffs each side had levelled at the other after a trade war sparked by US President Donald Trump spiralled into a tit-for-tat bilateral escalation. The 90-day truce is meant to end on August 12. But there are indications both delegations want to use the Stockholm talks to push the date back further. The South China Morning Post, citing sources on both sides, reported on Sunday that Washington and Beijing are expected to extend their tariff pause by a further 90 days. Trump has threatened to hit dozens of other countries with stiffer tariffs from Friday this week unless they agree to trade deals with Washington. Among them are Brazil and India, which he has warned could be targeted for 50-percent tariffs. The US leader has already announced deal outlines with five countries -- Britain, Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines -- as well as the one with the 27-nation EU. Beijing says it wants to see "reciprocity" in its trade with the United States. Foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said dialogue was need "to reduce misunderstandings". The previous round of of China-US talks was held in London. Analysts said many of the trade deals Trump has been publicising were leaning more on optics than on details. Stephen Innes, managing partner at SPI Asset Management, a firm that advises on currency exchange and commodities, said an extension of the 90-day truce between China and the United States could reinforce that view. "That truce could set the stage for a Trump - (President) Xi (Jinping) handshake later this year -- another risk-on carrot for markets to chew," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store