
Hasta La Vista, Long-Lived Certs: Why 2029 Is The Year Everything Changes
Jason Sabin, CTO of DigiCert Inc. Passionate about digital trust, including digital certificate management for web, device & user identity.
With quantum computing breakthroughs from Microsoft, Amazon and Google over the past six months, it's starting to feel like 2029 is shaping up to be a real turning point. And no, not just because it's the year the Terminator came back to hunt down Sarah Connor.
In the world of digital trust, 2029 has its own kind of Judgment Day.
It's the year Gartner says organizations need to be quantum-ready. And as of April 14, 2025, it's also the year the industry is expected to shift to 47-day certificate lifespans, replacing the already-short 398-day standard. And it's the year organizations that haven't embraced crypto-agility may find themselves scrambling to catch up.
This isn't science fiction—it's the very real future of cybersecurity. And the clock is ticking.
The Quantum Arms Race Is Real
Recent advances in error correction, qubit stability and hybrid quantum models have put us on an accelerated path toward a cryptographically relevant quantum computer—one that could break widely used encryption like RSA and ECC. When that day arrives, the consequences won't be limited to headlines. It will affect everything: secure internet sessions, financial transactions, software updates and more.
And while that quantum day hasn't yet arrived, attackers aren't waiting. 'Harvest now, decrypt later' tactics are already in play. Sensitive data is being intercepted today, with the intent to break it once quantum capabilities catch up. For governments, enterprises and anyone dealing in IP or personal data, this is a now problem—not a later one.
The Good Guys Have a Plan: PQC + Automation
Enter post-quantum cryptography (PQC)—a new generation of encryption designed to withstand quantum threats. We are actively working with NIST, IETF and industry partners to bring quantum-safe and hybrid certificate solutions into the mainstream. NIST's selection of its first four PQC algorithms in 2024 was a major milestone, but transitioning global systems will take time.
And here's where it gets interesting: The same tools and strategies organizations need to become quantum-ready are the same ones they'll need to survive the move to 47-day certificates.
Let that sink in.
By modernizing your public key infrastructure (PKI), automating certificate lifecycle management and preparing for crypto-agility today, you're essentially killing two security birds with one stone:
• You're ready for quantum threats
• You're ready for short-lived certificate enforcement
Why 2029 Really Matters
NIST recommends public-sector organizations be fully transitioned to quantum-safe crypto between 2030 and 2035. Gartner, however, has drawn a sharper line for enterprises: be quantum-ready by 2029. That same year, browser vendors are expected to enforce 47-day certificate validity, requiring automated, scalable certificate management to keep up.
These timelines aren't random—they're the reality check for organizations still relying on manual certificate (cert) renewals or legacy encryption protocols. The digital trust infrastructure we rely on today won't stand up to what's coming.
What To Do Now?
Organizations that wait will be forced into reactive mode—facing operational risk, regulatory penalties and potential breaches. Those who act now can make a smooth, strategic transition. That includes:
• Taking inventory of current cryptographic assets/cryptographic bill of materials (CBOM).
• Implementing certificate automation across environments to support crypto-agility.
• Preparing internal policies and compliance plans for short-lived certificates.
Over the past couple of years, a number of enterprises have mapped out their PQC roadmap and implemented the tools to thrive in a post-quantum, automation-first future. The move to PQC isn't just a swap of algorithms—it's a fundamental shift in how organizations manage trust.
So whether you're facing quantum threats or chasing short-lived cert cycles, 2029 is your deadline. And as any sci-fi fan will tell you: The future isn't set—but it is coming.
Will you be ready?
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
24 minutes ago
- CNN
‘Musk is right about this': Elizabeth Warren shocked to find agreement with Musk over megabill
CNN's Kaitlan Collins talks with Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) about finding surprising common cause with Elon Musk over their shared objections to President Trump's megabill.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mark Zuckerberg overhauled Meta's entire AI org in a risky, multi-billion dollar bet on ‘superintelligence'
Mark Zuckerberg is stacking the deck in the AI race, betting that unlimited capital, top talent, and raw computing power will ensure victory. If the winning hand Zuckerberg is chasing—AI 'superintelligence'— is still very much a vague and theoretical concept, the Meta CEO's remarkable series of moves unveiled Monday instantly changed the reality for everyone else in the game, particularly the pioneering AI startups without Meta's resources. Zuckerberg announced a major revamp of its AI operations on Monday, putting the company's collection of AI businesses and projects under the umbrella of a newly created organization called Meta Superintelligence Labs, or MSL, and appointing Alexandr Wang, the former CEO of data-labeling startup Scale AI, as Meta's first ever Chief AI Officer. 'As the pace of AI progress accelerates, developing superintelligence is coming into sight,' Zuckerberg wrote in an internal memo obtained by Fortune. 'I believe this will be the beginning of a new era for humanity, and I am fully committed to doing what it takes for Meta to lead the way.' He added that the details he would share were about building towards a company vision of 'personal superintelligence for everyone.' The new superintelligence lab, Zuckerberg wrote, 'includes all of our foundations, product, and FAIR teams, as well as a new lab focused on developing the next generation of our models.' He also confirmed that former GitHub CEO and investor Nat Friedman has also joined Meta to partner with Wang to lead MSL, heading Meta's work on AI products and applied research. 'Nat has served on our Meta Advisory Group for the last year, so he already has a good sense of our roadmap and what we need to do,' Zuckerberg wrote. Fortune reported last week that Friedman is also connected with Wang and Scale – he is a longtime and active Scale investor and co-hosted the secretive Scale AI Security Summit in Utah in November 2023. Meta has embarked on an extraordinary hiring spree in recent weeks, bringing Wang on board as part of a $14.3 billion deal with Scale, and recruiting top researchers from OpenAI with rumored $100 million compensation offers. In Zuckerberg's internal memo on Monday, he named eleven top researchers who had joined Meta from OpenAI, Anthropic and Google. For OpenAI, which kicked off the generative AI craze with the release of ChatGPT in late 2022, Meta's aggressive hiring spree represents a critical threat. OpenAI's chief research officer Mark Chen described the situation as feeling like someone 'breaking into our home,' calling the talent loss 'theft.' OpenAI said it had begun recalibrating compensation and crafting 'creative' retention packages to stay competitive. While OpenAI has a longstanding partnership with Microsoft, which has invested more than $13 billion in OpenAI, the relationship between the two companies has reportedly grown strained over the past year. As Meta increasingly seeks to move into OpenAI's territory however, the Sam Altman led startup may need to find allies with deep pockets. OpenAI recently began using AI chips made by Google, according to media reports, signaling a growing bond between the two companies, even though Google's Gemini LLMs compete directly with OpenAI. With an internet advertising business that generates more than $40 billion every quarter, Meta can afford to bankroll a no-holds-barred AI batter even it doesn't immediately deliver a profit. Still, Meta's latest moves carry plenty of risks. In making Wang chief AI officer, Meta has chosen someone who is not a computer scientist to lead all of its AI efforts—a choice that may not go over well with Meta's deep bench of AI scientists and PhDs, many of whom have already decamped. Zuckerberg noted in his memo that he and Wang had worked together for several years and said 'I consider him to be the most impressive founder of his generation.' There is also no agreed-upon formal definition of 'superintelligence,' though it is typically refers to an intelligence that vastly surpasses human capabilities in virtually all domains, including scientific creativity, general wisdom, and social skills—exceeding human cognition across the board. Superintelligence is generally perceived as going beyond artificial general intelligence, or AGI, which, though also vague, typically refers to an AI system with human-level intelligence across a wide range of work-related tasks. That is, it can reason, plan, solve problems, understand language, and learn in a generalizable way, much like a human. Zuckerberg claimed that Meta is 'uniquely positioned to deliver superintelligence to the world,' pointing to its efforts to build out data centers supporting more computing power than smaller labs – it is currently spending tens of billions on data centers and is raising more. The Financial Times reported last week that Meta is seeking $29 billion from private capital firms for its all-in push to build AI data centers. Of course, Microsoft and Google are also spending tens of billions of dollars in cap ex to build out their AI infrastructure. And OpenAI has said it intends to invest $500 billion with partners including Softbank in the coming years to build out its Stargate network of AI datacenters. If the race to Superintelligence is a test of wills and capital, Zuckerberg seems to be betting that he can outlast the competition. This story was originally featured on


New York Times
28 minutes ago
- New York Times
NBA free agency 2025 tracker, live updates: Latest deals, news, reaction and more as negotiating window opens
The Hawks' Dejounte Murray trade with New Orleans keeps on paying dividends. Not only did Atlanta obtain the pick that went to the Celtics for Kristaps Porziņģis and defensive stopper Dyson Daniels, but also the $25 million trade exception that deal generated now has been used to acquire Nickeil Alexander-Walker from the Minnesota Timberwolves. Atlanta will still have several million of that exception left over, as well as its full $14.1 million nontaxpayer midlevel exception and a $13 million exception from the Bogdan Bogdanović trade. But as a practical consequence, a hugely productive offseason in Atlanta is now down to smaller moves. Atlanta sent only a second-round pick to Minnesota in the sign-and-trade to assure it topped every other team on the market, ultimately going a shade over the nontaxpayer midlevel exception to get Alexander-Walker. The Hawks still have roughly $13 million remaining below the tax line with at least two more roster spots to fill, and seem likely to target another guard based on current needs. For its trouble, Minnesota will receive a trade exception for roughly $14.4 million. The Wolves are hugely unlikely to use it this season because they're way over the first apron, but it's a possibility for next summer.