Chinese fishing fleets using North Korean forced labour in potential breach of sanctions, report claims
The report, published on Monday, has identified at least 12 Chinese deep-water fishing vessels that employed North Korean crew between 2019 and 2024.
There are strict international sanctions on United Nations member countries using North Korean labour. Adopted by the UN security council, the sanctions are designed to curtail Pyongyang's program of exporting labour and goods to raise funds for its weapons programs.
Some North Korean crew were allegedly kept at sea for up to a decade, transferred from vessel to vessel and often temporarily transferred to other ships to avoid being detected at foreign ports, with their salary given to their government.
EJF identified the North Korean crew through photos, video, and interviews with 19 Indonesian and Filipino fishers who worked alongside them in the Indian Ocean.
The North Koreans described in the EJF report were likely sent to work on the boats by their government, which is known to export its citizens as labourers. It is one of several forms of forced labour which the UN office of the human rights high commission says has become 'deeply institutionalised' in the closed-off authoritarian country.
'Some of the North Korean crew told me that they work on Chinese fishing vessels to escape from military conscription,' one Indonesian fisher told the Guardian. 'There are only two choices, to support the government by working in plantations or a government enterprise, or to work abroad on Chinese fishing vessels.'
'My [North Korean] friend told me was that in seven years working on fishing vessels, they and their family were never given the money. The government takes the money and once they return the government builds them a house as compensation. They were not happy about the arrangement but they don't have any option.'
The fishers also described multiple at-sea transfers of the North Koreans and alleged attempts to hide them from detection by temporarily moving them to another vessel before going in to port.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
'This indicates that vessel captains, and likely vessel owners, were aware that the use of this labour was prohibited,' said EJF. In 2022 six North Koreans and a Chinese boat captain were arrested in Mauritius for allegedly refusing to report the North Koreans' entrance to the country.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
The sanctions against North Korean labour prohibit UN and EU member states from issuing work permits to North Korean nationals and ban UN member states from acquiring seafood originating from North Korea or its nationals, and on UN member states nationals from procuring any. A UN security council resolution also required all UN member states to expel any North Korean workers by 2019. But the use of North Korean labour continues, and China is a key destination for North Korean workers sent abroad.
Last year it was revealed tens of thousands had been sent to work in Chinese factories and seafood processing plants, with widespread allegations of abuse and exploitation.
China's deep sea fishing fleet is the largest in the world and has been accused of widespread abuse and exploitation of crew members and illegal fishing practices.
Steve Trent, chief executive of EJF, said there needed to be more collective responsibility taken for ensuring transparency in supply chains, to avoid products 'tainted by modern slavery'.
'Failure to take the necessary, low- or no-cost steps to end this outlined by the charter for fisheries transparency, from mandatory transmission of AIS signals to the elimination or close monitoring of trans-shipment, means turning a blind eye to extreme, avoidable suffering.'
Additional research by Jason Tzu Kuan Lu
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Sharp rise in Blue Badge misuse by dead people's relatives... with some claiming they were parking with the permit for 'sentimental reasons'
An unprecedented rise in people using the Blue Badges of those who have died has seen relatives claim they were parking with the permit for 'sentimental reasons' and beliefs they had 'inherited the badge'. This sharp increase has led to more than 77 cases of people being caught misusing the deceased's parking permits in Nottingham since the start of 2025. In 2024, there were 53 cases of misuse of deceased badges, which have been cancelled since the holder's death. Yet with four months to go until the end of the year, there have already been 24 more cases reported by the city council. In some of the cases, explanations from drivers were 'I thought I could use it because it was still in date' and 'I used it for sentimental reasons'. While others said, 'I need my own badge, so I thought I'd use this one until I sort out mine', as another believed that they had 'inherited the badge with the car'. One claimed that 'nobody told me I couldn't', with other excuses including 'it was only for seven minutes' and 'it was early and there were loads of spaces, so I don't think I've done anything wrong'. Since the start of 2025, more than 500 cases of Blue Badge misuse have been identified. This could be for a myriad of reasons aside from using the deceased badges, including fake badges, stolen badges, expired badges, or the use of that badge has been revoked. Marcus Hall, a parking compliance officer for Nottingham City Council, has been working in parking since 2001 and has been with the council since 2004. He said: 'You used to have to make your own badges back in the day. 'Now it's been centralised by the Department for Transport, which has made enforcement much easier. 'Deceased badges have gone up; we have 35 out of 100 open cases for them, but stolen and fake badges have also gone up. 'People buy these on social media sites like Facebook Marketplace. 'The vast majority of them are stolen from London, because they don't have different rules there. 'The fake ones, people are making them, and they are getting better, but they are still rubbish. 'It's not just the use of it that is taking space away from a space user; it's taking money away from the public purse. Our main focus is on people taking that space away. 'The vast majority of misuse cases are disabled spaces in the city.' Being caught using a cancelled badge could result in Penalty Charge Notice issues, potential vehicle removal, and legal action. In some recent prosecutions, fines of over £1500 were issued. A recent case, in March 2025, a Ford Fiesta was found displaying a badge that had been cancelled over two years ago, after the death of an 80-year-old Nottingham resident. The driver was the deceased's son, and after being caught, he described his actions as 'selfish and stupid'. Councillor Linda Woodings, executive member for regional development, growth and transport at Nottingham City Council, said: 'Our message is simple - if you misuse or abuse a Blue Badge in Nottingham, you will be caught and face legal consequences. 'The council is absolutely committed to protecting this vital scheme, which supports people with genuine mobility needs. Fraudulent use is not only illegal, but selfish and unfair. 'It directly undermines the whole purpose of the scheme, which is to support people with significant mobility impairments. 'When badges are used fraudulently or by those not entitled, it reduces the availability of accessible parking spaces for those who genuinely need them. 'This can lead to increased stress, reduced independence and missed appointments or opportunities for disabled people. 'Ensuring the integrity of the scheme is therefore not only a matter of enforcement but also of equity, accessibility and dignity for legitimate badge holders. 'We make no apology for holding those to account who misuse Blue Badges in our city.'
Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Ice cream seller, 41, who was stabbed to death is pictured for the first time: Woman and man arrested after 'murder'
A man who was stabbed to death in the middle of the street has been named by police as 41-year-old Shazad Khan. The Metropolitan Police were called to reports of a stabbing in Monks Park, Wembley, at around 6.10pm on Tuesday. Mr Khan was treated by London Ambulance Service paramedics but, despite their best efforts, he was pronounced dead at the scene. His family are being supported by specialist officers. A 26-year-old man has been arrested on suspicion of murder, while a 31-year-old woman was detained at the scene on suspicion of conspiracy to murder. They both remain in police custody. A blue forensics tent has been erected on the street following the stabbing on Tuesday Detective Chief Superintendent Luke Williams, local policing commander for north-west London, said: 'Our thoughts remain with Shazad's family and friends at this unimaginably difficult time. 'This incident will rightly cause concern across the community, but intelligence at this stage leads us to believe there is no wider threat to the public. 'Detectives are conducting a thorough and fast-paced investigation, and locals can expect to see an uptick in police presence in the area. 'Anyone with any information – particularly dashcam or doorbell footage from the time of the incident – is urged to speak to us as a matter of urgency.'
The Guardian
18 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Labour-run councils consider legal challenges to close asylum hotels
Labour-run councils are considering legal challenges to close hotels housing asylum seekers after a landmark ruling prompted officials to consider increasing the use of former military sites as emergency accommodation. Wirral and Tamworth councils said they are exploring high court injunctions to remove claimants after the Conservative-run authority in Epping Forest won a temporary high court injunction to remove people from the Bell Hotel. The developments come after the Home Office minister Dan Jarvis said the government is looking at alternative options if there is a flurry of successful challenges from councils. Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, is determinedto stick to her plan after the Epping ruling and its consequences, a source said. 'We have a plan and we're sticking to it to close asylum hotels by the end of the parliament. This is one narrow court judgment that happened yesterday. We're not being knocked off course, this is our manifesto commitment,' the source said. Ministers are reluctant to disclose the details about alternatives to asylum hotels because of concerns that it could be used as a recruitment tool for the far right, a government source said. Cllr Paula Basnett, the leader of Wirral council whose boundaries include the Wallasey constituency of the immigration minister Angela Eagle, said the council is actively considering 'all options' to close a local hotel. She added: 'Like many other local authorities, we have concerns about the Home Office's practice of placing asylum seekers in hotels without consultation or regard to local planning requirements. 'We are actively considering all options available to us to ensure that any use of hotels or other premises in Wirral is lawful and does not ride roughshod over planning regulations or the wishes of our communities. 'Wirral has always been proud of its record in supporting families and those fleeing conflict, but it is unacceptable for the government to impose unsuitable, short-term arrangements that disrupt communities and bypass local decision-making. 'If necessary, we will not hesitate to challenge such decisions in order to protect both residents and those seeking refuge.' Labour councillor Carol Dean, leader of Tamworth borough council, said they had explored similar legal avenues in 2022 when the Home Office first started using a local hotel, but did not end up pursuing them. 'The situation at Epping Forest represents a potentially important legal precedent, and we are carefully assessing what this might mean for our circumstances here in Tamworth. 'We fully recognise the UK government has a statutory duty to accommodate people seeking asylum. However, we have consistently maintained that the prolonged use of hotel accommodation may not represent the best approach,' she added. Conservative-run Broxbourne Council in Hertfordshire has said it was taking legal advice 'as a matter of urgency', while Tory-run East Lindsey district council in Lincolnshire said officers are investigating and 'will take appropriate action'. Reform UK-led councils, West Northamptonshire council and Staffordshire county council, also said the authorities would look at the options available after the high court ruling. On Tuesday, Reform UK leaders Nigel Farage and Richard Tice indicated that councils run by the party will consider their own legal challenges. However, a number of these do not have responsibility for planning permission, which may limit their ability to launch legal bids. Other authorities have ruled out legal action, with the leader of Labour-run Newcastle city council saying she was 'confident' the council could end the use of hotels without going to court. Karen Kilgour said: 'We recognise that people seeking asylum include families, women, and children, many of whom have faced unimaginable trauma. 'Newcastle has a proud history of offering sanctuary, and we stand ready to play our part – but it must be done in a way that works for our city and supports the dignity and wellbeing of those who come here.' Mr Justice Eyre granted the Epping injunction after hearing the local council's complaints that planning law had been breached in changing the site's use. Epping district council also cited disruption caused by the protests and concerns for the safety of the asylum seekers themselves. The hotel has been at the centre of violent far-right protests since an asylum seeker was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu has denied charges against him and is due to stand trial later this month. Since 2020, there has been greater reliance on hotels to house asylum seekers, with 32,345 being housed temporarily in England and Wales at the end of March this year. Labour has promised to end the use of hotels to house asylum seekers by 2029 by cutting small boat crossings and building new accommodation. Asked on Times Radio about possible housing options for anyone removed from hotels, Jarvis said on Wednesday that the government is 'looking at a range of different contingency options'. These are understood to include placing people removed from hotels in Wethersfield Air Base in Essex and Napier Barracks in Kent. Figures from the end of March show that almost a third of asylum seekers that receive government support were housed in 'contingency accommodation' which is flats and houses. The statistics, from the National Audit Office (NAO) and other official sources, says this amounts to about 32, 300 people, a reduction of 42% compared with its 2023 peak. But the current government and its predecessors have also been forced to use disused military bases to house refugees, with the two most high-profile being Wethersfield Air Base in Essex and Napier Barracks in Kent. Despite ministers coming under heavy criticism for the conditions refugees have been forced to endure, this Labour government is set to expand the use of both bases. It comes after the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, pledged to stop using taxpayer-funded hotels by 2029 in her Spending Review, in a drive to save £1bn. The Home Office aims to achieve this by moving refugees into cheaper sites. In April of last year, Cooper said Wethersfield is neither 'a sustainable solution' nor provides 'value for money for the taxpayer'. But an internal Home Office memo dated 24 July, seen by the Guardian, shows there are plans to put people in Wethersfield despite it being at maximum capacity. It states: 'While the site's regular cap is 800 an additional 445 bed spaces may be used temporarily during peak demand. There are no plans to exceed 1,245.' In March, the high court found the previous government's use of Wethersfield to be unlawful after three men likened their conditions to a prison. Napier Barracks, which was due to be handed back to the Ministry of Defence in September, will instead continue to house migrants into 2026.
