Why is the BBC in the dock? Why not call out Glastonbury?
On that basis the world – and by that I mean the Conservative Party and the Daily Mail – have gone into meltdown, demanding the immediate arrest of anyone remotely connected to the affair, up to and including the director-general of the BBC.
God help us. If that was to transpire, we truly would be on a runaway train towards the terminus of a police state.
Read more by Carlos Alba
Amid the froth and fury of events at Glastonbury last Sunday, it would benefit us all to draw breath and calmly consider what actually happened.
One of two punk singers, both called Bob Vylan – but whose true identities we don't know because they refuse to divulge them – took time from their set to chant 'death to the IDF' (Israeli Defence Force).
The performer of whom, before last weekend, few of us had ever heard, also used the phrase 'from the river to the sea', interpreted by some as advocating the destruction of Israel.
From the little information that is publicly available about Bob Vylan, they are clearly more Ali G than Malcolm X.
The pair hail from Ipswich, from where they have waged a near decade-long campaign of meat-headed, sixth-form sloganeering, with song lyrics like 'violence is the only language some people understand'; 'I heard you want your country back/shut the f**k up'; and 'Whitney was everything to me when I was a kid'.
Prior to Glastonbury, all the talk was about the platforming of the Belfast hip hop trio Kneecap, who have form when it comes to upsetting the British establishment, through an overtly pro-Irish republican agenda.
If Bob Vylan's intention was to boost their own profile by grabbing the spotlight of infamy from Kneecap, they clearly succeeded, though at a cost. Their antics have sparked an investigation by Avon and Somerset Police, cost them their relationship with their agent, and led to the imposition of a ban on them entering the United States.
Someone should tell them that a minimum obligation on anyone claiming the right of free speech is to divulge who is doing the speaking.
There are those however – like the Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp, and former Home Secretary Priti Patel – for whom Bob Vylan are small fry, and who have their eyes on the bigger prize.
Philp urged police to investigate and prosecute both the performers and the BBC, condemning the broadcaster for airing "vile hatred" that incites violence.
The first test for the police, in deciding whether to bring charges, will be whether the singer's words actually did incite violence and here, the evidence is scant.
Police reported a total of 145 crimes over the five days of the festival, which included 27 reports of violence against a person, 22 drug offences, 13 public order offences, and one report of 'miscellaneous crimes against society'. They didn't reveal how many arrests were made before or after Bob Vylan's comments.
Historically, the number of arrests is on the low side when compared, for example, with 1999 when 244 people were arrested at Glastonbury – 70 more than the previous year.
For those watching on TV, anyone simple-minded enough to arm themselves for a tilt at the Israeli army – one of the world's most formidable fighting forces – based on the ramblings of a provincial clodpole at a music festival is just as likely to be influenced by something they have read on a toilet wall.
There is also the nature of the comments, and whether they constitute incitement to violence. Calling for an individual to be killed clearly is a crime, but can the same be said about a military force in a war?
To express support for the victory of Ukraine, following its illegal invasion by Russia, for example, implies the inevitability that some Russian soldiers will be killed. Should that too be regarded as an incitement to violence, punishable by UK law?
Issues of free speech aside, there is the question of the BBC's culpability. It is shocking that there does not appear to have been a protocol in place for the broadcaster to mute a performance that contained potentially illegal content.
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp has urged police to investigate and prosecute both Bob Vylan and the BBC (Image: PA)
Was it beyond the wit of anyone at the corporation to use the same birdsong dubbing techniques that Channel Four used during live broadcasts of Big Brother when housemates made potentially defamatory comments?
Why is all the focus on the BBC, rather than on the festival organisers making vast amounts of money platforming such acts?
It's not as if organisers didn't know the potential dangers posed by Bob Vylan, who posted on Facebook ahead of their performance: "Turns out we're finally at a point where the BBC trust us on live TV! Watch us live either in the field or in the comfort of your own home!"
Let's be clear, the chances of Tim Davie – or anyone else at the BBC – being successfully prosecuted for anything over this affair are slimmer than Kneecap campaigning for the Tories at the next General Election.
Beyond the silly season neurosis of the Bob Vylan saga, the real villains are the Israeli politicians and soldiers responsible for the deaths of 56,531 Gazans since October 7 and the animals from Hamas who perpetrated the 2023 atrocity.
Carlos Alba is a journalist, author, and PR consultant at Carlos Alba Media. His latest novel, There's a Problem with Dad, explores the issue of undiagnosed autism among older people
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Trump asked Polish President Nawrocki to replace Tusk in Ukraine meeting
WARSAW, Aug 13 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump at the last minute requested MAGA-allied Polish President Karol Nawrocki join the Ukraine teleconference with European leaders on Wednesday, according to centrist Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, Nawrocki's bitter political rival who had been expected to attend. Nawrocki, a conservative nationalist and eurosceptic, is an ally of Trump's right-wing populist MAGA political movement and visited the White House during Poland's presidential election campaign this year. He defeated the candidate of Tusk's pro-European, centrist party in June. "Just before midnight yesterday we received information, alongside our European partners, that the American side would prefer that Poland was represented by the president in contacts with President Trump," Tusk told a news conference. The White House did not comment whether the U.S. requested Nawrocki rather than Tusk take part in the call. A Polish government spokesperson said on Tuesday that Tusk, a former head of the European Council of leaders, would attend the call with Trump. But Nawrocki foreign policy adviser Marcin Przydacz told reporters he had "no information that Prime Minister Donald Tusk had previously planned to participate." He said Tusk's team showed it did not have good contacts with the Trump administration because it was under the impression Tusk would take part. Government spokesman Adam Szlapka said Tusk was representing Poland in two calls on Wednesday with European leaders but not Trump. Przydacz said the offices of the president and prime minister would exchange information about the meetings. European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy spoke to Trump ahead of the U.S. president's summit with Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, stressing the need to protect Kyiv's interests. Krzysztof Izdebski, policy director at the Batory Foundation, said having two political opponents represent Poland created a risk of mixed messages. "This shows that, even in foreign policy, in such a key issue of security, we are simply hostage to internal politics and a certain competition between various state bodies," he said. He said this would undermine Poland's effort to present itself as a modern country working with leading nations on international political issues. Nawrocki and PiS are strong supporters of Ukraine in its war with invading Russian forces, as is Tusk and his government, but they differ on issues such as abortion, family values and the rule of law. Tusk said that he respected the U.S. request to keep contacts at the presidential level, but this should not be used to "play Poles against each other".
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
BBC apologises over Thought for the Day ‘xenophobia' claim against Jenrick
The BBC has apologised and retrospectively edited a segment of Radio 4's Thought for the Day after the head of a refugee foundation described comments by Robert Jenrick about asylum seekers as 'xenophobia'. The remarks by Krish Kandiah, a theologian who heads the Sanctuary Foundation, prompted an angry response from Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary. The BBC said it had removed 'some of the language used' by Kandiah from a version posted online, saying it was not appropriate for the faith-based radio segment. However, Alf Dubs, the Labour peer who came to the UK as a child refugee, said he believed xenophobia was an accurate description of Jenrick's comments in the Mail on Sunday last weekend in which Jenrick said the arrival of asylum seekers on small boats made him fear for his daughters' safety and that he would not want them as neighbours. Speaking on Wednesday's episode of the Today programme, Kandiah quoted from the Mail on Sunday. '[Jenrick] said: 'I certainly don't want my children to share a neighbourhood with men from backward countries who broke into Britain illegally, and about whom we know next to nothing.' These words echo a fear many have absorbed. Fear of the stranger. The technical name for this is xenophobia.' He said such fears were irrational and that most arrivals on small boats were fleeing 'war, persecution and famine'. Kandiah argued there was no evidence that migrants posed a greater danger to children than others, noting that most offences against children were committed by people they already knew. While the segment was cleared in advance, it is understood that BBC staff decided to review the programme and edit the language without being prompted by an external complaint. The corporation then apologised to Jenrick. In his Mail on Sunday article, Jenrick listed a series of crimes, including sexual offences, in which the suspects were migrants, saying: 'It's no wonder fair-minded people are furious.' He wrote: 'When I see these stories, I can't help but think that it could have been one of my three young daughters. I certainly don't want my children to share a neighbourhood with immigrant men with backward views who broke into Britain illegally, and about whom we know next to nothing. And I don't want anyone else's family to have this forced on them either.' He added: 'My eldest daughter is 14 and already I worry about her safety as she starts to do things independently. It's challenging enough without this to contend with.' Shortly after Thought for the Day was broadcast, Jenrick posted on X: 'On BBC Radio 4 this morning listeners were told that if you're concerned about the threat of illegal migrants to your kids, you're racist. Wrong. You're a good parent.' Kandiah is understood not to have been banned by the BBC from returning on the show. It is believed that his intention was to make inclusive points about community cohesion and welcoming the stranger and that he is distressed about the row. A BBC statement said of the item: 'While its reflection on fear in society from a faith perspective is broadly in line with expectations of Thought for the Day, some of the language it used went beyond that and we apologise for its inclusion.' Items for Thought For The Day are approved by two BBC staff, the producer working on the item and someone else more senior, although the latter group can be very busy, with decisions potentially delegated. Contributors accept that they should avoid party political points. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Tina Beattie, a Catholic theologian and fellow Thought for the Day contributor, said she agreed with Kandiah's comments 'but perhaps it would have been wise to avoid referring to a particular politician. Sometimes, one can trust people to make the connections without naming names.' She added: 'Thought for the Day presenters have to tread a narrow tightrope. As the only slot on the Today programme with no right of reply, it's vital to maintain balance and to avoid partisan politics, while trying not to be banal or platitudinous. 'It takes many hours to produce the short script, working with producers who in my experience are highly professional and understand the boundaries and restrictions around what can and can't be said.' Lord Dubs, who came to the UK from Prague, said: 'I think anything that encourages hostility and is undermining mutual respect, undermining compassion, is xenophobic in its intent and xenophobic in its consequences. And that's not the sort of thing we would expect a senior politician in the Tory party to be talking about. 'I think it's a shabby comment and it's very dangerous, because what it does do is to lessen the likelihood of local communities being supportive of refugees.' The row comes amid rising tensions over asylum accommodation, with protests held outside hotels housing migrants and refugees. There were demonstrations in Epping, Essex, after an Ethiopian asylum seeker was charged with a sexual offence against a schoolgirl. Additional reporting by Harriet Sherwood
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Bangladeshi anti-corruption officials give evidence against UK MP Tulip Siddiq
Ms Siddiq, who is Ms Hasina's niece, resigned from her post in Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's Government in January following reports that she lived in London properties linked to her aunt and was named in an anti-corruption investigation in Bangladesh. The Labour MP represents the north London district of Hampstead and Highgate and served as economic secretary to the Treasury – the minister responsible for tackling financial corruption. The trial at the Dhaka Special Judge Court-4 formally began on Wednesday (Mahmud Hossain Opu/AP) She is being tried together with her mother, Sheikh Rehana, brother Radwan Mujib and sister Azmina. Ms Siddiq has been charged with facilitating their receipt of state land in a township project near the capital Dhaka. They are out of the country and being tried in absentia. Ms Siddiq's lawyers have called the charges baseless and politically motivated. Muhammad Tariqul Islam, a public prosecutor, disputed a claim by Ms Siddiq that she is not Bangladeshi, saying the anti-corruption watchdog through investigations found that she is a citizen. The prosecutor said if Ms Siddiq is convicted she could be sentenced to three to 10 years in prison. Public prosecutor Muhammad Tariqul Islam, wearing a tie, spoke to reporters after the hearing (Mahmud Hossain Opu/AP) Ms Siddiq in an interview with the British newspaper The Guardian recently referred to Bangladesh as 'a foreign country' and called the charges against her 'completely absurd'. She asserted to The Guardian she was 'collateral damage' in the longstanding feud between her aunt and Bangladesh's interim leader Muhammad Yunus. Ms Hasina had a frosty relation with Mr Yunus, and during her rule Mr Yunus faced a number of cases including for graft allegations. Courts overturned those charges before he took over as interim leader days after Ms Hasina's ousting last year in a student-led uprising. Separately, the anti-corruption investigation has alleged that Ms Siddiq's family was involved in brokering a 2013 deal with Russia for a nuclear power plant in Bangladesh in which large sums of money were said to have been embezzled.
