Judge pauses IU protest policy, says it likely violates First Amendment
IU revised its "expressive activity" policy in mid-2024 to ban overnight camping and use of structures, such as tents, without approval — hallmarks of the pro-Palestine protest movement.
In response, the Indiana Chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit challenging the policy last August. In its complaint, the ACLU alleged the university policy violates the First Amendment and is overly broad.
Judge Richard Young of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana agreed and granted a preliminary injunction May 29.
"The Policy likely burdens substantially more speech than necessary to further the University's interest in public safety and thus lacks narrow tailoring," the preliminary injunction reads. "The Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that the Policy violates the First Amendment."
During the 2024 spring semester, protesters established an encampment in Dunn Meadow for several months. The protests drew national attention, resulted in dozens of arrests and required 'extensive repairs' of the area.
Under the now-halted section of the policy, students, faculty and staff could not engage in protests and other expressive activities from 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. without permission. If violated, one could face a range of disciplinary actions, including suspension, expulsion, loss of university employment and a responsibility to pay for damages.
"While IU supports everyone's right to protest, camping or using any item to create a shelter is not a permitted form of expressive activity," the university said in paid content published in the Herald-Times last fall. "This ensures campus safety and accessibility for all community members."
IU did not provide a reaction to the injunction since the university does not comment on pending litigation, spokesperson Mark Bode said.
The USA TODAY Network - Indiana's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners.
Have a story to tell? Reach Cate Charron by email at ccharron@indystar.com or message her on Signal at @cate.charron.28.
This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Judge pauses IU protest policy, says it likely violates 1st Amendment
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
7 minutes ago
- CBS News
Federal judge blocks Texas law requiring Ten Commandments displayed in public school classrooms
A federal district court in Texas temporarily blocked a new state law on Wednesday that would have required public schools to display the Ten Commandments in every classroom. U.S. District Court Judge Fred Biery issued a preliminary injunction in Rabbi Nathan v. Alamo Heights Independent School District, ruling that Texas Senate Bill 10, set to take effect Sept. 1, likely violates both the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment. The lawsuit was originally filed in late June by several families after Gov. Greg Abbott signed Senate Bill 10 into law. Parents argued the measure intruded on their rights to guide their children's religious education and forced religious mandates in public classrooms. The ruling halts school districts from implementing the measure, which mandated a 16-by-20-inch poster or framed copy of a specific English version of the Ten Commandments in every classroom. In his decision, Biery wrote that requiring the displays could amount to unconstitutional religious coercion, pressuring students into religious observance and suppressing their own beliefs. "[T]he displays are likely to pressure the child-Plaintiffs into religious observance, meditation on, veneration, and adoption of the State's favored religious scripture, and into suppressing expression of their own religious or nonreligious background and beliefs while at school," Biery stated. The plaintiffs included Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Unitarian Universalist and nonreligious families with children in Texas public schools. They were represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the Freedom from Religion Foundation, and pro bono counsel from Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP. Plaintiff Rabbi Mara Nathan called the decision a win for parents' rights: "Children's religious beliefs should be instilled by parents and faith communities, not politicians and public schools." Heather L. Weaver, senior counsel for the ACLU's Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief, said the ruling protects inclusivity in schools. "Public schools are not Sunday schools," Weaver said.
New York Times
7 minutes ago
- New York Times
MLS to allow Palestinian flag for Columbus Crew signing, league-wide ban remains
MLS will allow the display of a Palestinian flag at Columbus Crew home games in support of new signing Wessam Abou Ali but a league-wide ban will remain, according to multiple people briefed on the situation. Abou Ali is of Palestinian descent and represented Denmark, the country of his birth, up to under-20 level before switching allegiance to play for Palestine, for whom he has scored four goals in 10 international appearances, in March 2024. Advertisement The 26-year-old striker was the Crew's marquee signing of the summer, and his arrival preceded the Nordecke, the club's leading supporter group, submitting a request to bring the relevant national flags in support of their players during matches. While the league previously allowed supporters to display any national flag, in October 2023 — following the Hamas attack on Israel — it crafted a new policy that barred the display of national flags that were not previously present at a given stadium on a regular basis. Fans can request exemptions to the policy, and the requests can be forwarded by clubs to the league. Other national flags, such as Mexican or Colombian flags, have often been present at stadiums. But no such exemptions have been granted for Israeli or Palestinian flags except for one, in Philadelphia, where Union supporters are allowed to display the Israeli flag in support of striker Tai Baribo. More broadly, MLS has sought to limit what it considers political displays at games. The league's Fan Code of Conduct forbids 'displaying signs, symbols or images for commercial purposes or for electioneering, campaigning or advocating for or against any candidate, political party, legislative issue, or government action.' Following a request from the Crew on behalf of its Nordecke fan group for supporters to bring national flags representative of all their side's players, MLS has sanctioned the display of one flag from each nationality present — including Palestine — in the Crew's squad in a designated area of their Field stadium. Alongside the Palestinian flag, the flags of Algeria, Argentina, Canada, Cape Verde, Denmark, Finland, France, Ghana, Guatemala, Hungary, Liberia, Nigeria, Ukraine, United States and Uruguay would be present. The league, however, will not sanction fans to bring Palestinian flags to the stadium, with the flag to be provided and installed by the club. Advertisement The proposal from MLS is due to be discussed between the club and the Nordecke on Thursday at a regularly scheduled meeting. 'The Columbus Crew embrace soccer's power to bring together people from all walks of life in our locker rooms, stadium and community,' a Crew spokesperson told The Athletic. Abou Ali played for AaB, Silkeborg and Vendsyssel in Denmark and IK Sirius of Sweden, before a January 2024 move to Egyptian club Al Ahly, for whom he scored 38 goals across 59 first-team appearances, including a hat-trick in the 4-4 draw against FC Porto at this summer's Club World Cup. (Top image of Wessam Abou Ali:) Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas can't require the Ten Commandments in every public school classroom, judge says
Texas cannot require public schools to display the Ten Commandments in every classroom, a judge said Wednesday in a temporary ruling against the state's new requirement, making it the third such state law to be blocked by a court. A group of Dallas-area families and faith leaders sought a preliminary injunction against the law, which goes into effect on Sept. 1. They say the requirement violates the First Amendment's protections for the separation of church and state and the right to free religious exercise. Texas is the largest state to attempt such a requirement, and U.S. District Judge Fred Biery's ruling from San Antonio is the latest in a widening legal fight that's expected to eventually go before the U.S. Supreme Court. 'Even though the Ten Commandments would not be affirmatively taught, the captive audience of students likely would have questions, which teachers would feel compelled to answer. That is what they do," Biery wrote in the 55-page ruling that began with quoting the First Amendment and ended with "Amen." The lawsuit names the Texas Education Agency, state education Commissioner Mike Morath and three Dallas-area school districts as defendants. A federal appeals court has blocked a similar law in Louisiana, and a judge in Arkansas told four districts they cannot put up the posters, although other districts in the state said they're not putting them up either. Although Friday's ruling marked a major win for civil liberties groups who say the law violates the separation of church and state, the legal battle is likely far from over. Religious groups and conservatives say the Ten Commandments are part of the foundation of the United States' judicial and educational systems and should be displayed. Texas has a Ten Commandments monument on the Capitol grounds and won a 2005 Supreme Court case that upheld the monument. In Louisiana — the first state that mandated the Ten Commandments be displayed in classrooms — a panel of three appellate judges in June ruled that the law was unconstitutional. Solve the daily Crossword
