Trump says he gave new orders to US nuclear submarines in response to an ex-Russian president's 'foolish' talk
"Based on the highly provocative statements" from Medvedev, who serves as deputy chairman of Russia's security council, "I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that," Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social platform.
It was not immediately clear what type of submarine Trump was talking about. All Navy submarines are nuclear-powered vessels, but only the ballistic missile subs, or SSBNs, can launch Trident II missiles, which have nuclear warheads.
US Ohio-class ballistic missile submarines are regularly on patrol, with a focus on adversarial nuclear powers like Russia or China.
The US typically does not disclose the location of its secretive missile submarines, except in cases when it's trying to send a message to adversaries. Trump didn't give away the location, but the order serves the same purpose.
"Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances," Trump said in his social media post.
Neither the White House nor the Office of the Secretary of Defense immediately responded to Business Insider's requests for additional information, and the Navy deferred to OSD.
Trump and Medvedev have been exchanging threats and warnings in the wake of the US president saying earlier in the week that Russia had just a matter of days to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine or face new tariffs. The White House continues to be frustrated with Moscow's unwavering position on the grinding war.
Medvedev, nowadays a warmonger who regularly rattles the Russian nuclear saber, responded by referring to what is perceived as an ultimatum as a "threat" that brings the two countries "a step towards war."
Trump later singled out Medvedev in a Truth Social post, calling him "the failed former President of Russia" and cautioning that he should "watch his words."
"He's entering very dangerous territory!" Trump wrote.
But Medvedev hit back on the Telegram messaging platform and said that Trump should remember "his favorite movies about 'The Walking Dead,' as well as how dangerous the nonexistent 'dead hand' can be."
The "dead hand" is a reference to a Soviet-era nuclear weapons control system designed to ensure that Russia can launch a retaliatory strike, even if leadership is physically unable to do so.
Medvedev, who served as Russia's president between 2008 and 2012, has been one of the most prominent anti-Western voices in the Kremlin since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine began in 2022. His comments this week mark the latest nuclear saber-rattling by Russia. President Vladimir Putin has also leaned on the country's nuclear arsenal, the largest in the world, in his warnings to the West amid the ongoing support for Ukraine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
14 minutes ago
- Politico
Black leaders feel under siege after Trump's DC takeover
None of that appears to have deterred Trump from launching his federal takeover. 'I think this is a moment for the mayor to question whether her strategy, which has been appeasement, has been a success,' said Paul Butler, a Georgetown law professor and former federal prosecutor. He described Trump's actions as a 'bogus declaration' but suggested there is likely little reprieve D.C. officials will gain trying to challenge the president's declaration in court. 'While the court reviews whether he appropriately has this power, the Supreme Court and other lower courts [have] generally allowed him to … proceed with what he wants to do, until they get around to deciding the case,' Butler added. 'It opens the doors to further militarization of the police, not just in the District, but in the other cities that he named.' New York City mayor Eric Adams on addressed the possibility of Trump deploying federal assets to his own city following a string of shootings over the weekend that left at least two dead and eight injured. 'When you have those high profile shootings it sends a signal sometimes across the country that we're dealing with a crime issue in New York, and we're not,' Adams said Tuesday. 'I'm not part of the group that says we don't want to work with the federal government, but we don't need anyone to come in and take over our law enforcement apparatus. We've got this under control.' National Guard troops arrive at the District of Columbia National Guard Headquarters, Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2025, in Washington. | Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP Trump has ignored the wishes of local officials and deployed federal troops in recent weeks. During the height of federal immigration raids in Los Angeles, which sparked protests that turned violent, Trump federalized some 2,000 California Guard troops against the objections of Mayor Karen Bass, who is Black, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom. Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott told The Recast that Trump's actions in D.C. and his singling out of other Black-led jurisdictions, including his own, is nothing more than a 'diversion and distraction tactic' to shift the focus from a volatile economic climate and the release of materials associated with Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender.
Politico
14 minutes ago
- Politico
White House announces Smithsonian review amid Trump's cultural reckoning
The review aims to adjust not only the museums' public exhibitions, planning and curation, but also narrative standards and collection use. The move is the latest in a sweeping effort by the Trump administration to overhaul how American history and culture is taught and presented in institutions across the country — from universities to museums to Washington's Kennedy Center for the performing arts. The letter outlines that within 30 days, eight Smithsonian museums should select a representative to liaise with the administration and provide a list of selected materials for review. Within 120 days, the museums will have a set window to institute any changes sought by the administration, 'replacing divisive or ideologically driven language with unifying, historically accurate, and constructive descriptions.' Still, the administration officials maintained that their goal 'is not to interfere with the day-to-day operations of curators or staff, but rather to support a broader vision of excellence that highlights historically accurate, uplifting, and inclusive portrayals of America's heritage.' The initial phase of the project will target the National Museum of American History, National Museum of Natural History, National Museum of African American History and Culture, National Museum of the American Indian, National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian American Art Museum, National Portrait Gallery and Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden. The administration officials said the museum network should promote the idea of 'Americanism — the people, principles, and progress that define our nation,' in order to 'renew the Smithsonian's role as the world's leading museum institution.' 'Phase II' of the review will involve an additional list of museums, the letter previewed. A spokesperson for the Smithsonian did not respond to a request for comment. Trump has specifically targeted the Smithsonian Institution, singling it out in a March executive order on 'restoring truth and sanity to American history.' The president railed against the network of museums, saying it had 'come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology' and its various branches 'portray American and Western values as inherently harmful and oppressive.'
Boston Globe
15 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
What to know about Trump's potential change in federal marijuana policy
What's the federal policy on marijuana? Possessing marijuana remains a federal crime punishable by fines and prison time. Selling or cultivating marijuana is a more serious offense, punishable by prison sentences of five years to life, depending on the quantity of the drug. Advertisement The Justice Department last year proposed to reclassify marijuana from a Schedule I drug, alongside heroin and LSD, to a less dangerous Schedule III substance, which includes such things as ketamine and some anabolic steroids. But that switch involved a lengthy bureaucratic process. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Nearly 43,000 public comments were submitted to the federal government about the proposed change. The Drug Enforcement Administration was still in the review process when Trump succeeded Biden in January, triggering a re-examination of policies across the federal government. What would reclassifying marijuana mean? Reclassifying marijuana would not make it legal for recreational use by adults nationwide. Rather, it would change the way it's regulated and taxed. Federal income tax deductions for business expenses aren't available to enterprises involved in 'trafficking' any Schedule I or II drug. Changing marijuana to a Schedule III drug could mean significant tax savings for businesses licensed to sell marijuana in states where it is legal. Advertisement It also could make it easier to research marijuana, since it's very difficult to conduct authorized clinical studies on Schedule I substances. Due to the potential for federal penalties, many banks and financial institutions don't provide debit or credit services, loans or other common banking products to marijuana businesses authorized under state laws. That's unlikely to change merely by rescheduling marijuana under the federal Controlled Substances Act, according to a Congressional Research Service report. What is there for Trump to consider? Trump is weighing the pros and cons of a marijuana policy change, noting it's a 'very complicated subject.' 'I've heard great things having to do with medical' use of marijuana and 'bad things having to do with just about everything else,' Trump said Monday. Marijuana advocacy groups have long pushed for the federal government to soften its stance. As a candidate, Trump appeared open to relaxed regulation, posting on his social media platform last year that he would 'focus on research to unlock the medical uses of marijuana to a Schedule 3 drug.' But reclassification faces resistance from some conservatives and law enforcement groups. The National Sheriffs' Association was among those submitting written opposition, highlighting prior determinations that marijuana has a 'high abuse potential' and pointing to cases of 'extreme intoxication' and fatal vehicle crashes. What's happening in the states? The medical use of marijuana is already allowed in 40 states and the District of Columbia. Over the past dozen years, the number of jurisdictions legalizing recreational marijuana for adults rose rapidly to 24 states and the District of Columbia. Advertisement But the movement suffered some recent setbacks. Ballot measures to legalize recreational marijuana failed last fall in Florida, North Dakota and South Dakota. Florida's measure received a majority vote, which would have been sufficient in most states, but fell short of the 60% threshold needed to approve amendments to the state constitution. Idaho lawmakers this year referred a proposed constitutional amendment to the ballot that would forbid citizen initiatives to legalize marijuana and instead leave such decisions only to the Legislature. Initiatives continue elsewhere to try to place recreational marijuana on the ballot, including in Oklahoma, where voters defeated a measure in 2023. What does the data say about marijuana use? About 6 in 10 voters across the country said they favor legalizing recreational use nationwide, according to AP VoteCast, a survey of more than 120,000 U.S. voters conducted during last year's election. Polling from Gallup shows support for marijuana legalization has grown significantly, from just 36% support in 2005 to 68% last year. Marijuana use has also increased. More than 64 million Americans age 12 and older — or 22.3% of people — used marijuana during the past year, according to a 2024 national survey released recently by the federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. That was up from 19% of people in 2021. The growth in marijuana use was driven by adults aged 26 and older, according to the survey. However, people ages 18-25 remained the most likely to partake in marijuana, with 35% reporting use during the past year.
