
Trump's 25% tariff threat puts $87 billion in Indian exports at risk
While details of the proposed tariffs are yet to emerge, Trump's statement, issued Wednesday, has unsettled markets and cast a shadow over India's near-term export outlook. A US delegation is scheduled to visit India on 25 August for bilateral trade talks, but the final contours of the measures remain unclear.
'While India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the world, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers of any country," Trump said on his social media platform Truth Social.
The Indian government is analysing the potential impact of the 25% tariff on exporter losses in terms of value and outbound shipments, the ministry of commerce said in a statement issued Wednesday.
Madhavi Arora, chief economist at Emkay Global Financial Services, said the proposed tariffs would significantly raise the effective US duty on Indian goods from an average of 10.7% to about 22%, after factoring in higher duties on exempted sectors such as copper, steel and aluminium. This rate, she added, is already higher than what most Asian economies face, barring China.
'We do not believe the talks are over," Arora said, noting that while negotiations appear stalled, geopolitical factors may drive a fresh round of engagement. 'Even countries like the UK, EU, Japan, and Indonesia, Vietnam that signed trade pacts with the US continue to face elevated tariffs despite major concessions. These deals are, in many ways, no better than a trade war," she said.
India exported goods worth $87 billion to the US in FY25, accounting for 2.3% of GDP, Arora said.
Of this, five sectors—engineering goods ($19.16 billion), electronics ($14.64 billion), drugs and pharmaceuticals ($10.52 billion), gems and jewellery ($9.94 billion), and textiles ($10.91 billion)—together made up $65.17 billion.
According to government estimates, about 75.3% of India's merchandise exports to the US could be impacted by the proposed tariffs.
'We've already seen front-loading of shipments in the last three months, so exports may remain tepid in the coming months unless clarity emerges," she added. Her current account model factors in a 3.5% contraction in exports, though the overall current account deficit-to-GDP ratio remains below 1%.
Exporters flag rising costs
'The 25% tariff on Indian manufactured goods by the US introduces new variables for exporters, particularly in sectors such as electronics where supply chains are globally integrated," said Abhishek Malik, executive director of Calcom Vision Ltd, which exports LED lighting systems and BLDC fans. 'These measures could lead to higher cost structures and may influence future investment decisions and planning."
Vipul Shah, former chairman of the Gems and Jewellery Export Promotion Council (GJEPC) and an exporter himself, said the move could materially damage shipments: 'It's a big setback for the gems and jewellery sector. The US is one of our largest markets, and if the revised tariff remains in place, exports could decline by about 30%."
Rajiv Nath, forum coordinator at the Association of Indian Medical Device Industry (AiMeD), said the relative competitiveness of Indian firms may depend on how Chinese duties evolve.
'Clarity will come after 12 August, when the duties on Chinese products are expected to be finalised. They were earlier raised to over 50%, but were temporarily reduced to 30%," he said. 'If, after August, the duties on Chinese medical devices revert to over 50% while Indian goods face a 25% tariff, our export prospects versus China will improve. However, both the government and manufacturers will need to work on enhancing our competitiveness to offset the 6% disadvantage we face compared to Indonesian and Vietnamese competitors."
Textile firms brace for hit amid uncertainty
In the textile sector, the proposed 25% tariff, and the added risk of an unknown penalty, has weighed on sentiment, especially since industry expectations had been for a softer rate following the 90-day pause.
'This is slightly worse than expected," said Harsh Mittal, research analyst at Emkay Global Financial Services, adding that companies such as Gokaldas Exports, which derives nearly 48% of its revenue from the US, are likely to feel the most heat. SP Apparels and Pearl Global, with 25-30% exposure, may also take a hit, while KPR Mills, with under 9% dependence, could see limited impact.
While textile stocks may react negatively in the near term, the sector is banking on relief from other trade agreements. The India-UK FTA, expected to be operational in a few months, and ongoing talks with the EU may help offset some market share loss in the US, Mittal said.
Pharma counts on exemption, but awaits clarity
Pharmaceutical players are cautiously optimistic that Indian generics may be exempted from the proposed tariffs, similar to the zero-tariff carve-out offered in the US-EU deal.
Shashank Krishnakumar, pharma expert at Emkay, said Indian companies supply nearly 47% of the US generics market by volume, and any tariff shock would hurt both sides.
While US-based Teva Pharmaceuticals has flagged uncertainty, most Indian players, including Aurobindo, Dr. Reddy's and Biocon, expect to continue exports regardless of tariff movements.
'Onshoring is not a viable option given the regulatory timelines and cost inefficiencies," he said. Sun Pharma's specialty drugs, largely made in Korea, may see some relief due to that country's preferential terms with the US.
Auto parts makers already under pressure
Auto component firms, already subject to a 25% US import duty since April, do not expect a major incremental hit unless a separate penalty tariff is imposed. Analysts flagged concerns about volume and margin pressures arising from slowing US demand and price absorption along the value chain.
'Bharat Forge has 25% exposure to the US market, and while it has local operations there, demand will still be affected," said Chirag Jain, an auto and electronics sector expert. Tata Motors' US exposure via Jaguar Land Rover is expected to remain insulated due to UK-US trade arrangements.
As per Jefferies, the impact of the proposed US reciprocal tariffs will vary across sectors.
In auto components, Bharat Forge (40-45% US revenue) may be more affected due to new duties on truck parts, while Sona Comstar (30-35%) sees limited impact as PV parts already face 25%. OEMs like Eicher Motors (3-4%) and Tata Motors' JLR (30-35%) face minimal risk due to low exposure or UK-EU trade cover.
In capital goods, Cummins, Thermax, and KEI have 5-15% US exposure, with China as an alternate source. Chemical exporters like Navin Fluorine (24%), PI Industries (20%), and SRF (6%) could be hit due to refrigerant gas tariffs. Pharma companies, especially Biocon, Sun Pharma, and Dr Reddy's, risk a 2-8% EPS hit in FY26 unless generics are exempted, Jefferies said.
Dixon, which gets around 10% revenue from the US, may see some pressure, but Syrma, Kaynes, and Polycab have low exposure. Refiners like Reliance Industries Ltd, Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd, and Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd may be indirectly affected due to sourcing shifts.
Waaree Energies, with a 59% US order book, could be impacted. In textiles, firms like Welspun, Gokaldas, and Indo Count (40-70% US revenue) face competitiveness challenges versus China, Vietnam, and Bangladesh, it said.
Macroeconomic impact could be modest but real
According to Goldman Sachs, the proposed 25% reciprocal tariff by the US could cause an incremental drag of about 0.3 percentage points on India's real GDP growth in 2025, on top of a previously estimated 0.2 percentage point hit if tariffs above 10% are enforced.
The impact stems from India's goods exports exposure of around 4% of GDP to US final demand.
Goldman also flagged indirect risks from elevated trade policy uncertainty, which could delay investment decisions by Indian firms. On earnings, the brokerage estimates a potential 2% hit to MSCI India EPS if the new tariffs are enforced, considering both direct and second-order effects.
Despite this, it has not revised its 12% and 14% EPS growth forecasts for 2025 and 2026 but warns of downside risks.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
12 minutes ago
- Time of India
IDMIF appoints JioStar's Kevin Vaz as president
The Indian Digital Media Industry Foundation (IDMIF), a subsidiary of the Indian Broadcasting & Digital Foundation (IBDF) has announced the appointment of Kevin Vaz as its new President. The decision was taken at the IDMIF board of directors meeting held on July 30, 2025. According to the press release, Vaz brings to bear nearly three decades of experience that have shaped the industry. Currently serving as chief executive officer of the entertainment business at JioStar , he succeeds K. Madhavan , under whose leadership IDMIF has grown into a key advocate for India's digital media sector. Speaking on his appointment, Kevin Vaz said, "I am honoured to take on this responsibility and build upon the strong foundation laid by Mr. Madhavan. As we move into 2025–26, my focus will be on fostering fair competition, innovation and sustainable growth across India's digital media landscape. Digital is a critical pillar of the media and entertainment industry and with the right policy push and collaborative efforts, we have an incredible opportunity to further innovate, empower creators and enhance audience experiences. By working closely with the government, industry stakeholders and the creative community, we can shape an inclusive, future-ready ecosystem that delivers lasting value for all.' IDMIF's Digital Media Content Regulatory Council (DMCRC), established on 31 May 2021 under the IT Rules, 2021, functions as an independent self-regulatory body for non-news content of IDMIF member Online Curated Content Providers (OCCPs). Registered with the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting (MIB), the DMCRC ensures balanced content governance, protecting consumer interests while upholding creative freedom. The DMCRC is chaired by Justice Mukul Mudgal (Retd.) and comprises eminent industry experts, including, Ashwiny Iyer Tiwari (Writer & Filmmaker), Nikkhil Advani (Producer & Director), Deepak Dhar (CEO, Banijay Asia) and Tigmanshu Dhulia (Director, Actor & Screenwriter) The Council also includes representatives from leading Online Curated Content Providers (OCCPs) such as Anil Lale (JioHotstar) and Ritesh Khosla (SonyLIV). Modelled on the highly acclaimed Broadcasting Content Complaints Council (BCCC) – IBDF's self-regulatory body for non-news television channels, the DMCRC plays a vital role in addressing viewer concerns and promoting responsible content practices. Notably, Justice Mudgal also previously chaired the BCCC, which has been commended by Indian courts for its effective self-regulation framework.

Time of India
12 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘End War Or Else…': Trump Sends Special Envoy To Russia, Threatens Putin With Nuclear Subs, Tariff
/ Aug 04, 2025, 11:32AM IST US President Donald Trump has confirmed that his special envoy, Steve Witkoff, will visit Russia this week to push for a ceasefire in the Ukraine war. Trump warned of 'very severe tariffs' against Russia if it refuses to strike a deal. He also revealed that two US nuclear submarines have been deployed to the region, though details remain classified. The announcement follows a deadly Russian drone strike in Kyiv that killed 31 civilians, part of a record wave of 6,297 drone attacks in July. Ukraine, in turn, has launched its own deadly strikes inside Russia. Witkoff, a close ally of Trump and real estate tycoon, has already met with Putin and also serves as Trump's envoy in Israel-Hamas peace efforts.#PresidentTrump #TrumpRussiaTalks #UkraineCrisis #WitkoffMission #KyivStrike #NuclearThreat#CeasefireNow #TrumpVsPutin #USSubmarines #UkraineWar #BreakingNews #TrumpAdministration

The Hindu
12 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Takeaways for India from Trump moment: strategic autonomy is alive, neoliberalism is dead
Donald J. Trump can be brutally forthright and publicly so. It is partly innate and partly a strategy to throw his interlocutors off balance. In a 1989 interview on CNN's Larry King Live, Mr. Trump was asked by the host about his strategies for gaining an edge in negotiations. Mr. Trump responded not with a direct answer, but with a startling personal comment: 'Can I move my chair? Because your breath is very bad. It really is... Has this ever been told to you before?' Years later, Mr. Trump explained that it was a demonstration of his negotiation tactics. Mr. Trump's outspokenness can be unsettling, but it can also be helpful. There are a few valuable lessons that Indian strategy could learn, thanks to the manner in which Mr. Trump conducts U.S. diplomacy. Donald Trump's worldview Key elements of his worldview have largely remained consistent for decades. Even before he made an entry into politics, Mr. Trump was anti-trade, anti-war, cognizant of the economic and social challenges within the American society, and believed that all other countries were taking advantage of the U.S. He is trying to turn all those beliefs into policies with varying levels of success. However, what is remarkable is his ongoing exposition of American policy, which is too candid to be comforting for partners abroad. For his critics at home, it is what he says rather than what he does that is infuriating. All countries are scurrying to reposition themselves. It is a moment of reckoning for India. Editorial | Soured relations: On Trump's 25% tariff, 'penalty' The idea that India's hesitation to go into a complete strategic lock-in with the U.S. and to completely open its market is hindering progress in bilateral ties is commonplace because its proponents are influential. India, whether under Jawaharlal Nehru or Narendra Modi, has been reluctant to do either of these, and strategic autonomy has held the country in good stead. For one, alliances are not insulated from shifts in U.S. priorities over time, Trump or not. To cite one example, when Joe Biden was President, Australia scrapped a $90 billion deal with France to build conventional diesel-electric submarines. Instead, it entered the AUKUS pact with the U.S. and the U.K. to acquire nuclear-powered submarines using the U.S. technology. All within the family, but hanging France out to dry. Mr. Trump, who is often portrayed as hostile to U.S. allies, is saying it all too loud. India's choice Amid Mr. Trump's rhetoric, India could be further incentivised to reinforce the idea of strategic autonomy, which remains the most viable framework for sustaining a robust relationship with the U.S. The Modi government has, in practice, followed the path of strategic autonomy. Both strategic autonomy and strategic subservience carry costs. India appears increasingly prepared to bear the cost of autonomy — rather than of subservience. Turning into a frontline of any U.S. strategy for containment of another country or expansion of its own interest can be fatal — ask Ukraine. Mr. Trump has done India a favour by silencing the call for abandoning strategic autonomy. If there was any doubt about strategic autonomy, the Trump moment has clarified it. Mr. Trump wants to restore manufacturing and jobs in the U.S. and has, in the process, unsettled global trade. Access to its market has been a lever of American power for long, and Mr. Trump is just blunt about it. A trade deal may resolve some immediate issues, but India cannot ignore the reality that in a world where every country has turned protectionist, export-driven growth is a narrow and difficult path. Mr. Trump has made it amply clear that he does not want China being replaced by any country in U.S. supply chains. It will be foolhardy to assume that any future U.S. President will be fine with that either. It is as if no country wants to import anything other than plastic toys and T-shirts. India could pay more attention to leveraging its domestic market to build its economy and manufacturing. Considering the rapid automation and the consequent limits of job growth in manufacturing, 'making for the world' is not sustainable for India, economist Raghuram Rajan has pointed out. Mr. Modi on Sunday exhorted Indians to augment domestic consumption. A domestic market-driven development model needs to be articulated strongly. The priority and the emphasis need to shift. Ties with the U.S. The Trump moment tells India two things — strategic autonomy is alive; and neoliberalism is dead. India has to navigate the path ahead, and the U.S. remains a key partner in that. It is reasonable to assume that the U.S. will remain the most powerful state on the planet for several decades to come. Relations with the U.S. will continue to be a major determinant of India's capacity to realise its ambitions and make progress. Getting this one relationship right will be critical for India. Neither obsequiousness nor confrontation can advance India's relations with the U.S. India should also learn that soft power is supposed to be soft, not loud and screeching. As the yoga teacher would say, pranayama practice should not make any sound.