
Cargo vessel that collided with US military tanker was carrying sodium cyanide
LONDON — A cargo ship that smashed into a US military chartered oil tanker off the northeast coast of England on Monday was carrying sodium cyanide, according to the maritime intelligence company and shipping journal Lloyd's List.
The collision sparked a huge fire, a dramatic rescue effort and fears of environmental damage.
Just before 10 a.m. local time (6 a.m. ET), a Portuguese-flagged container ship called the Solong careered into the oil tanker, called the Stena Immaculate, which was at anchor in the North Sea about 10 miles off the English coastline, according to the ship tracking tool VesselFinder.
All but one of the 14 crew members on board the Solong were brought safely to shore, the vessel's owner Ernst Russ said in a statement Monday evening.
By Monday night local time, an 'extensive' search for the missing crew member had ended, the British coast guard said. The missing person had not been found.
Ernst Russ also said in its statement that both vessels 'sustained significant damage in the impact of the collision and the subsequent fire.'
Crowley, a US logistics firm that manages the Stena Immaculate, confirmed that all members of its crew were safe. A total of 36 patients were treated by ambulance services after reaching the shore, according to Alastair Smith, Head of Operations for Lincolnshire at East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust.
The Solong was carrying 'an unknown quantity of alcohol and 15 containers of sodium cyanide,' Lloyd's List reported. It is unclear whether the cyanide has entered the water.
Sodium cyanide, according to the US' National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, releases a highly toxic hydrogen cyanide gas that interferes with the body's ability to use oxygen.
According to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), sodium cyanide can also turn into hydrogen cyanide on contact with water.
Videos of the incident showed black plumes of smoke billowing into the sky and at least one of the vessels engulfed by flames.
The Stena Immaculate was carrying military jet fuel and marine diesel on its way to Killingholme, England, according to a spokesperson for the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), an agency of the US' Department of Defense.
The tanker was on a long-term charter with DLA Energy, which manages and distributes petroleum and fuel products. It was scheduled to re-supply fuel to Killingholme before reloading and delivering fuel to locations in the Mediterranean, the spokesperson said.
The Solong left the Scottish port of Grangemouth on Sunday evening and was headed for Rotterdam, the Netherlands, at the time of the collision, according to VesselFinder.
Martyn Boyers, chief executive of the nearby Port of Grimsby East, told CNN earlier Monday that he had seen people being brought ashore and that ambulances had been waiting to receive them.
It was not immediately clear how or why the collision occurred.
'It seems a mystery, really, because all the vessels now have very highly sophisticated technical equipment to plot courses and to look at any obstacles or anything they've got to avoid,' Boyers said.
'It's difficult to actually suggest what went on, other than the fact it should never have happened,' he added.
The port chief said the Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB) and the Marine and Coastguard Agency (MCA) would likely investigate what went wrong.
'How did that vessel continue plowing into the berth vessel? There must have been some warning signs. They must have been able to detect it on the radar,' Boyers said to CNN.
Crowley said there were 'multiple explosions on board' after the Stena Immaculate was struck by the Solong, adding that it had 'sustained a ruptured cargo tank containing Jet-A1 fuel' due to the collision.
It had anchored off the English coast after leaving the Greek port of Agioi Theodoroi last month, according to VesselFinder.
A flurry of high-speed ships and tugboats were seen moving toward the site of the collision at the time of the coastguard's rescue operation, real-time data from VesselFinder showed.
Experts say jet fuel spills tend to impact the environment less than crude oil spills. Bacteria can degrade the jet fuel molecules more quickly, leading to faster biodegradation, Mark Sephton, Professor of Organic Geochemistry at Imperial College London said.
'Whilst the images look worrying, from the perspective of the impact to the aquatic environment it's less of a concern than if this had been crude oil because most of the jet fuel will evaporate very quickly,' Dr Mark Hartl, a marine ecotoxicologist from the Centre for Marine Biodiversity & Biotechnology at Heriot-Watt University, added.
But Greenpeace UK said in a statement that it had 'serious concerns' that the cargo onboard the vessels, as well as the fuel inside them, could pose a threat to marine life.
'As more information emerges about what the ships were carrying, we are extremely concerned about the multiple toxic hazards these chemicals could pose to marine life. The jet fuel that entered the water close to a breeding ground for harbor porpoises is toxic to fish and other sea creatures,' Dr. Paul Johnston, a senior scientist at the Greenpeace Research Laboratories at Exeter University, said.
Johnston urged authorities to put measures in place to contain the release of any toxic substances from the vessels. 'We must hope an environmental disaster can be averted,' he said. — CNN
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


9 News
10 minutes ago
- 9 News
PM defends sanctions against Israeli ministers
The prime minister has defended Australia's actions against two Israeli ministers who have been slapped with sanctions.


Time of India
10 minutes ago
- Time of India
Social media fuelling 'devastating' kids' mental health crisis: NGO
The report said what it termed "problematic" social media use was on the rise, with a direct link between heavy internet use and suicide blanket bans are not the answer, the group warned. Australia passed a law to ban social media use for under-16s. "Such blanket bans may infringe on children's civil and political rights," including access to information, said the report. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The "unchecked expansion" of social media platforms is driving an unprecedented global mental health crisis in kids and teens, a children's NGO said Wednesday, calling for urgent coordinated action KidsRights report said one in seven children and adolescents aged between 10 and 19 suffered mental health issues, with the global suicide rate at six per 100,000 for those aged these high rates represent "the tip of the iceberg" as suicide is widely under-reported due to stigma, according to the Amsterdam-based group."This year's report is a wake-up call that we cannot ignore any longer" said Marc Dullaert, KidsRights chairman."The mental health... crisis among our children has reached a tipping point, exacerbated by the unchecked expansion of social media platforms that prioritise engagement over child safety," he report said what it termed "problematic" social media use was on the rise, with a direct link between heavy internet use and suicide blanket bans are not the answer, the group passed a law to ban social media use for under-16s."Such blanket bans may infringe on children's civil and political rights," including access to information, said the group urged "comprehensive child rights impact assessments" at a global level for social media platforms, better education for kids, and improved training for mental health report seized on the popularity of Netflix sensation "Adolescence", which highlighted some of the toxic content kids view mini-series "demonstrated global awareness of these issues, but awareness alone is insufficient," said Dullaert."We need concrete action to ensure that the digital revolution serves to enhance, not endanger, the wellbeing of the world's 2.2 billion children," he said. "The time for half-measures is over.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
People Are Asking ChatGPT for Relationship Advice and It's Ending in Disaster
Despite ChatGPT's well-documented issues, people are using it to advise them on relationship issues — and it's going about as well as you'd expect. In a new editorial, Vice advice columnist Sammi Caramela said she had been blissfully unaware of the ChatGPT-as-therapist trend until someone wrote into her work email about it earlier this year. Back in February, an unnamed man told the writer that his girlfriend refused to stop using the chatbot for dating advice and would even bring up things it had told her in arguments. Though Caramela was so shocked that she "nearly choked" on her coffee, the advice-seeker wasn't all that perturbed — and claimed that he found his girlfriend's ChatGPT use fascinating. "I was a bit floored by this confession. I had no idea people were actually turning to AI for advice, much less input on their relationships," the columnist wrote in her more recent piece. "However, the more I explored the topic, the more I realized how common it was to seek help from AI — especially in an era where therapy is an expensive luxury." Intrigued, Caramela found a friend who used the OpenAI chatbot for similar purposes, running relationship issues by it as a "non-biased" sounding board. Eventually, that person realized that ChatGPT wasn't unbiased at all, but rather "seemed to heavily validate her experience, perhaps dangerously so." Similar questions have been posed on the r/ChatGPT subreddit, and as Caramela explained, the consensus over there suggested not only that the chatbot is something of a "yes-man," but also that its propensity to agree with users can be dangerous for people who have mental health issues. "I often and openly write about my struggles with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)," the writer divulged. "If I went to ChatGPT for dating advice and failed to mention how my OCD tends to attack my relationships, I might receive unhelpful, even harmful, input about my relationship." Digger deeper into the world of ChatGPT therapy, Caramela found multiple threads on OCD-related subreddits about the chatbot — and on the forum dedicated to ROCD, or relationship-focused OCD, someone even admitted that the chatbot told them to break up with their partner. "Programs like ChatGPT only speed the OCD cycle up because you can ask question after question for hours trying to gain some sense of certainty," another user responded in the r/ROCD thread. "There's always another 'what if' question with OCD." Like so many poorly-trained human professionals, chatbots aren't equipped to handle the nuance and sensitivity needed in any therapeutic context. Regardless of what OpenAI claims in its marketing, ChatGPT can't be truly empathetic — and if your "therapist" will never be able to have a human-to-human connection, why would you want it to give you dating advice in the first place? More on chatbot blues: Hanky Panky With Naughty AI Still Counts as Cheating, Therapist Says