Meta and Oakley's smart glasses are coming this week
Oakley teased the launch on Monday, with a video that displays the two companies' logos, and a caption that reads: "The next evolution is coming on June 20."
Oakley also shared the same video on Instagram, with a notable nod by Ray-Ban Meta's official account.
SEE ALSO: Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses are more of an AI device than ever with new updates
This isn't about Meta jumping ship and working with an entirely different company. Both the Oakley and Ray-Ban brands are owned by Italian eyewear mega-company Luxottica.
Given that Oakley is better known for sports glasses, while Ray-Ban mostly sells fashion eyewear, we're probably getting a sportier version of Ray-Ban Meta on Friday, this time with the Oakley brand attached.
New Meta/Oakley smart glasses might look a little bit like the Oakley Sphaera (pictured). Credit: Oakley
In January this year, Bloomberg reported that Meta and Oakley were collaborating on smart glasses, which would be based on Oakley's Sphaera glasses, and aimed at cyclists and other athletes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
35 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why Big Tech's AI Billions Are Being Rewarded Unevenly
On July 30, Microsoft's market cap briefly soared past $4 trillion after the company reported another earnings beat. CEO Satya Nadella credited Azure's AI-driven growth and surging demand for copilot, telling investors the company was 'well-positioned to lead in the new era of AI-infused productivity,' according to its Q4 earnings call transcript. A day later, Meta's stock surged more than 8% after it reported ad revenue growth of 17% year-over-year and outlined new AI-powered tools for advertisers, details also captured in the Q2 earnings call transcript. On the other side of the divide, the mood was far less exuberant for Amazon and Apple. Both beat Wall Street's earnings expectations, but their stock moves were muted — and in Amazon's case, 'shares slipped despite reporting $147 billion in revenue. Apple unveiled 'Apple Intelligence' for iPhones, iPads and Macs, but offered few specifics on rollout or monetization. The contrast wasn't about who spent the most on AI. It was about which companies could convincingly connect that spending to measurable business results. That shift — from hype to proof — is redefining how the market judges AI investments. And that split is getting much harder to ignore across the industry. The AI Accountability Era When I asked what the recent earnings call by these four tech behemoths meant for the AI industry, Shekhar Natarajan, CEO of Orchestro, described it in blunt terms, calling it the new reality. 'Microsoft and Meta won because they mastered the art of AI storytelling with receipts,' he told me. 'Microsoft essentially turned OpenAI into the world's most expensive enterprise sales tool — every Azure deal now comes with an AI fairy tale that CFOs actually believe. Meta took the opposite approach: they made AI so invisible that advertisers don't even realize they're paying premium rates for algorithmic wizardry.' In contrast, he said, Amazon and Apple are 'AI rich, narrative poor.' Amazon 'built the most sophisticated AI infrastructure on the planet and somehow made it sound boring,' while Apple 'spent billions making Siri slightly less embarrassing and called it revolutionary.' That, Natarajan argued, is no longer enough. 'We've entered what I call the 'AI accountability era' — where investors have figured out that 'synergies' and 'transformation' don't pay dividends, but revenue does. The market essentially said: 'Cool demo, where's the recurring subscription model?'' This shift is merciless for companies still leaning on AI as a catch-all talking point. 'The next 12–18 months will be a bloodbath for AI tourism — expect pivots from 'AI-powered everything' to 'AI-profitable something specific,'' Natarajan noted. What Investors Reward Now Guy Dassa, AI expert and investment partner at OurCrowd, agrees the earnings gap isn't about AI spend levels, but about visibility and execution. 'The market is no longer rewarding AI spending in a vacuum, it's rewarding clarity, execution, and monetization,' he explained. Microsoft tied its AI investments directly to Azure's revenue growth and to customer adoption of copilot across office and enterprise workflows. Meta demonstrated that AI-driven ad targeting and content recommendations are keeping users engaged and advertisers spending more. Amazon and Apple, Dassa said, were 'more opaque' — investors heard about model development and branding, but saw little in the way of measurable revenue attribution. 'Yes, we're entering a post-hype phase,' he added. 'The narrative is shifting from potential to performance. Investors are asking: Where is the revenue? Where is the efficiency gain? Where is the user growth? Companies can no longer get by with vague promises or flashy demos — they need to show productized AI, enterprise adoption, or embedded monetization.' According to IDC, companies are now generating an average of $3.50 in value for every $1 spent on AI, with more than 90% of initiatives delivering measurable returns within 18 months. In practical terms, Dassa explained, that means investor decks will focus less on model size and more on use case adoption, margin expansion and defensible infrastructure. 'AI is no longer a strategy; it's an execution layer,' he added. The New AI Differentiator If 2023 was about who had the biggest model, 2025 is about who can deploy one seamlessly at scale. 'Here's the dirty secret nobody talks about: Building great AI models is now table stakes,' said Natarajan. 'Every teenager with a GitHub account can fine-tune GPT. The real money is in the unglamorous stuff — who can serve a model in 50 milliseconds instead of 500, who can handle inference spikes without melting their data centers.' That's where infrastructure maturity becomes visible in market performance. Dassa noted that Microsoft's lead in enterprise AI is underpinned by Azure's GPU access, inference optimization and integration pipelines — capabilities it has been quietly scaling for years. Meta's advantage comes from running AI models across one of the most extensive proprietary stacks in tech, tuned for ad delivery at global scale. 'Meanwhile,' Dassa noted, 'companies without robust infrastructure or with unclear integration plans are struggling to convince investors they can translate models into money.' The analogy Natarajan draws is to the internet boom of the late 1990s. 'Everyone focused on websites while the real winners were building CDNs and payment processors,' he said. 'Today's AI infrastructure leaders are tomorrow's Cloudflares and Stripes.' AI Execution Needs People Capital spending alone won't win the next phase of AI adoption. Kieran Corbett, venture partner at Geek Ventures, put it plainly: 'CAPEX for CAPEX sake will no longer be tolerated by shareholders, tangible growth and execution is what will be rewarded by further capital. Where so much of this AI spend is now being spent on is the talent race to enable effective execution and this doesn't look like it'll slow down.' In other words, execution isn't just about GPUs and data centers. It's about whether a company can attract and retain the talent to turn its AI investments into differentiated products, integrated workflows and sticky revenue streams. That talent race is intensifying, particularly for engineers who can bridge the gap between research and deployment. And for public companies, the stakes are higher than just quarterly earnings calls. Miss the execution mark now, and it's not only market cap that suffers, but also the competitive positioning for the rest of the decade. Time To Build Real Stuff Microsoft and Meta didn't simply benefit from favorable market winds this quarter. They earned investor confidence by pairing clear AI narratives with visible revenue impact, backed by infrastructure and teams that can deliver at scale. Amazon and Apple may close that gap in future quarters, but Q2 sent a message the market won't soon forget: the AI free ride is over. As Natarajan put it, 'We funded your AI fantasy camp. Time to build an AI business.'
New York Times
3 hours ago
- New York Times
What to Know About Instagram Map, a New Feature Drawing Backlash
A new Instagram feature rolled out in the United States this week stirred strong feelings: Users can now share and view locations of others on a map. Meta, which owns Instagram, said in a blog post on Wednesday that the feature was an opt-in service to help people 'stay up to date with friends.' Some users, however, reacted with confusion and panic, voicing concerns about privacy and safety. Here's what to know about the feature. What is Instagram Map? The new map, which can be found on top of Instagram's message inbox, allows users to share their live location while they are using the app. It also allows people to see the locations of users who share that information in recent posts on their feeds. Who can see you on it? By default, nobody. Meta said in its blog post that the location sharing option was inactive by default, and users would have to opt in. The company said people could limit who could see that information, or turn it off entirely. Meta called it a 'new, lightweight way to connect with each other.' Similar features exist in other apps: Snapchat has a personalized map feature, and Apple devices allow users to share their locations with one another. Meta's other platforms like Facebook and WhatsApp also offer live location sharing. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Gizmodo
4 hours ago
- Gizmodo
After a Summer of Chaos, OpenAI Strikes Back
OpenAI just had its best week in months. And it desperately needed it. The San Francisco-based company, best known for ChatGPT, has spent much of June and July in the headlines for all the wrong reasons. First came the talent raid: Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg opened the checkbook, reportedly offering hundreds of millions of dollars in compensation to lure away OpenAI's top researchers. Several jumped ship. CEO Sam Altman publicly lashed out, calling Meta's approach mercenary and accusing it of having no culture. Then came the failed acquisition of Windsurf, a hot AI startup specializing in AI-native data infrastructure, that OpenAI had been in talks to buy. Google swooped in at the last minute and closed the deal instead, a humiliating loss in the high-stakes AI arms race. And to top it off, OpenAI had to delay the release of its long-promised open-source models after intense pressure from developers, fueling criticism that the company was falling behind rivals like Meta, which has aggressively released its own models for free. Internally, things looked chaotic. Leadership handed all employees a week off, and leaked memos described a company under siege, a fortress attacked on all sides, or worse, a house on fire. The once-untouchable AI darling was starting to look rattled, and the perception that Meta had stolen its momentum was growing. This week, OpenAI finally started playing offense again. First, it released the long-awaited open-source models, a move aimed at appeasing developers and reasserting its relevance in the open AI ecosystem. Just three days later came the bigger swing: the launch of GPT-5, billed as the most powerful AI chatbot on the market. OpenAI claims GPT-5 tackles two of the biggest complaints about AI assistants: 'hallucinations' — when chatbots confidently spit out false information — and the overly polite, bland tone that makes them sound like corporate PR interns. The company says the new model is faster, more accurate, and capable of providing more nuanced answers without the sugarcoating. By learning to say 'I don't know,' GPT-5 aims to be the first AI chatbot you can actually trust. While independent tests will be needed to confirm those claims, the rollout gave OpenAI something it hasn't had in weeks: control of the narrative. For now, the AI spotlight is back in San Francisco, not in Menlo Park, where Meta's so-called 'dream team' of ex-OpenAI researchers is building its own models. At the same time, the company is in discussion with investors about a massive employee share sale that would value it at $500 billion, a move widely seen as a defensive strategy to create 'golden handcuffs' and stop the talent exodus. The big question: was this just a good week, or the start of a real comeback? In the high-speed world of AI, stability rarely lasts long. While OpenAI's ambitious claims about GPT-5 still need to be verified, the message this week was unmistakable: while its rivals were writing checks and poaching talent, OpenAI was building. With these two major launches, the company has effectively taken back control of the conversation. The AI beacon still shines brightest in San Francisco, not in Menlo Park, where Meta's 'dream team' of AI mercenaries is based. The question now is whether this powerful show of force is enough to end the distractions and permanently regain the momentum.
