State lawmakers are working on the two-year budget. What is it, and why does it matter?
The Republican-controlled state Legislature and Democratic Gov. Tony Evers both have a role in shaping the budget. After Evers pitched his plan, the powerful Joint Finance Committee modifies the massive bill, which Evers will take action on later this summer.
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel will follow upcoming budget hearings and how lawmakers' decisions will impact government services and programs.
Here's a broad timeline of what to expect.
The budget process starts when state agencies — such as the Department of Natural Resources, University of Wisconsin System and Department of Public Instruction — make requests for funding over the next two years.
Typically, those are released toward the end of even-numbered years. State superintendent Jill Underly unveiled a $4 billion request for the DPI in November 2024. The UW System's $855 million request was announced in August.
More: Does the UW System's $855 million budget request bring Wisconsin closer to average?
These agency requests shape the governor's budget proposal, but the governor often makes changes by removing or adding specific programs or tweaking funding levels.
The governor is required to deliver a budget message to the Legislature. Evers gave that speech Feb. 18 this year. His plans included a new tax bracket for the state's wealthiest residents, expanding the Knowles-Nelson Stewardship program and addressing lead exposure among children.
The budget proposal is also a chance for Evers to lay out policies he supports, such as marijuana legalization and Medicaid expansion, though Republicans often remove them from the budget.
More: Gov. Tony Evers' budget has a $2.4 billion net tax increase, would create a shortfall
As of early May, this is the step we're at. The budget is in the hands of the Joint Finance Committee, which is comprised of 16 lawmakers from both parties and houses. Committee members hosted public listening sessions across the state in April.
Now, the Republican-controlled committee will hold several, hours-long executive sessions in the Capitol to make changes to the governor's budget, piece by piece. In 2023, those meetings took place in May and June.
Republicans historically ignore much of what's in Evers' budget. The committee started its work May 8 by eliminating hundreds of ideas in his proposal. But it's possible this budget cycle will have more compromise — Evers and legislative leaders are holding negotiations this year, which is unusual for them to do.
More: Republicans scrap over 30 programs dedicated to behavioral health care from Evers' budget
Once the Joint Finance Committee finishes its work, the budget bill goes to the full Assembly and Senate. In 2023, the Senate approved the budget June 28, and the Assembly passed it a day later. Two Republican senators joined Democrats in voting no, though the vote is typically along party lines.
During floor debate two years ago, Democrats put forward numerous last-ditch amendments, trying to add some of Evers' policy ideas back into the budget. All were rejected by Republicans.
June 30 is the deadline to pass a budget, but lawmakers have gone beyond that date in the past. Missing the deadline doesn't have immediate impacts; spending levels stay where they are until a new plan is in place.
From there, the budget bill goes to Evers' desk to become law. The governor can veto the entire state budget.
Typically, though, Evers and other governors have used their powerful partial veto authority to remove words, numbers and punctuation from the budget, which can create new meanings or change spending amounts. In 2023, Evers issued 51 partial vetoes when he signed the budget into law July 5.
On April 18, the state Supreme Court upheld Evers' partial veto that locked in funding increases for public schools for 402 years by deleting a hyphen and a "20" in reference to the 2024-25 school year.
Assembly Speaker Robin Vos said his party would discuss how to write the 2025-27 budget in ways that limit Evers' partial veto opportunities. GOP leaders have also floated passing items typically included in the budget as separate bills to reduce the chance of vetoes.
More: Republicans scour for options to sidestep Tony Evers vetoes, including not using digits in the budget
More: Why did Wisconsin's capital move from Belmont to Madison? Corruption, land and lobbying
The state budget impacts daily life across Wisconsin. Cuts at the federal level could make funding from the state even more crucial.
Funding for the UW System dictates whether tuition will increase or remain flat for in-state undergraduates. Grants in the budget could address the rising cost of child care. Infrastructure projects, such as highway construction and traffic calming measures, are also considered in the budget. State prisons in Green Bay and Waupun could be closed or renovated as part of budget negotiations.
The budget also dictates how much money the state takes in — including through income taxes. The last budget delivered an average income tax cut of $36, down from $573 in Republicans' plan, which Evers said focused relief on the wealthiest residents.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: What exactly is the Wisconsin state budget, and why does it matter?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
15 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's New Census Could Be Bad News for Texas
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's proposal for a new national census that excludes people living in the United States illegally could reduce Texas' political power by reducing both its number of Electoral College votes and seats in the House of Representatives. Why It Matters The Trump administration is pushing for a new census despite the next one not being due until 2030. Excluding those in the U.S. illegally from the figures would reduce the political representation of states with disproportionately high illegal migrant populations, such as California and Texas. Citing "two people with knowledge of the effort," The Texas Tribune reported that the administration's primary goal behind the new census was to boost Republicans politically, though some experts have expressed skepticism over whether this would happen. What To Know On August 7, Trump said he had instructed the Department of Commerce to begin work on a new national census that would exclude illegal migrants, using data from the 2024 presidential election as a baseline. Census Bureau data is used to determine how many seats each state gets in the House of Representatives and also how many Electoral College votes it gets during presidential elections. So if a state loses population disproportionately once illegal migrants are excluded, it would see its political influence decrease. In 2024, the Department of Homeland Security estimated that in January 2022 there were 10,990,000 people residing in the U.S. illegally. It found that California had the largest illegal migrant population with 2,600,000 people, followed by Texas with 2,060,000, Florida with 590,000 and New Jersey with 490,000. Speaking with Newsweek, Joshua Blank, who heads the Texas Politics Project at the University of Texas at Austin, said a new census without illegal migrants would reduce the state's population and therefore its House representation. He added that Texas "did nothing to promote census participation" in 2020. President Donald Trump's census proposal could see Texas lose Electoral College votes and seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. President Donald Trump's census proposal could see Texas lose Electoral College votes and seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Associated Press/Canva Blank said: "While, ostensibly, this move would reduce Texas' population size for the purpose of congressional districts, it's probably the case that it's less than it would if Texas were to have engaged in a serious effort to get a good count in the first place." In terms of the nationwide political effect, Blank added: "This would apply to other states, including other states with large immigrant populations, and those that actually sought to get an accurate count, like California. So the overall exchange of seats, since the number of overall congressional seats remains fixed, is pretty hard to game out." Trump's new census plan would almost certainly face legal challenges, with critics arguing that it violates the 14th Amendment, which states that seats in the House should be based on "counting the whole number of persons in each State." What People Are Saying Gil Guerra, an immigration policy analyst at the Niskanen Center, told Newsweek: "These numbers matter enormously for apportionment—states like California, Texas, and Florida have substantial undocumented populations that currently contribute to their congressional representation." Speaking with The Texas Tribune about the president's new census proposal, Robert Warren, a demographer at the Center for Migration Studies, said: "It wouldn't shift enough [House] seats to make any difference, and that's been true for five straight censuses." President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on August 7: "I have instructed our Department of Commerce to immediately begin work on a new and highly accurate CENSUS based on modern day facts and figures and, importantly, using the results and information gained from the Presidential Election of 2024. People who are in our Country illegally WILL NOT BE COUNTED IN THE CENSUS. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" A Department of Commerce spokesperson told Newsweek: "The Census Bureau will immediately adopt modern technology tools for use in the Census to better understand our robust Census data. We will accurately analyze the data to reflect the number of legal residents in the United States." What Happens Next If Trump pushes ahead with his plan, it will almost inevitably spark a major legal battle. Even if the courts approve, experts agree that the overall effect on American politics is hard to determine, though states with a high illegal migrant population—such as Texas—will likely lose some influence.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Can Cuomo's New Attack Mode Win Back Voters and Donors?
After losing the Democratic primary in June, former Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo promised to be more visible to voters and aggressive in courting their support as a third-party candidate in the New York City mayor's race. He has largely kept to his word. There have been far more sightings, in street-side meet-and-greets with voters and with potential donors in the Hamptons. He has visited places like Shirley Chisholm State Park in eastern Brooklyn to remind voters of his accomplishments as governor. He adopted an acid-tongued voice on social media that now regularly engages with haters and fans, treating the Democratic nominee, Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani, like an exemplar for his social media savvy, but also as a political pariah for his brand of democratic socialism. He even had his campaign logo redesigned. It's hard to tell if this pivot will be enough to overcome the steep odds of defeating Mr. Mamdani in a city where about two-thirds of the electorate are registered Democrats. Recent polls suggest Mr. Cuomo is still a distant second to Mr. Mamdani, but his battle is not confined to winning over voters. Mr. Cuomo's re-energized underdog spirit appears to be also geared toward rallying the city's donor class, some of whom are still skeptical of Mr. Mamdani and seem open to supporting someone else. 'Andrew has to prove that he has a new spunk, and I think he's doing better,' said Ruben Diaz Jr., the former Bronx borough president, who supported Mr. Cuomo in the primary and served on the board of the super PAC that raised close to $25 million for the former governor in the spring. The group, however, has raised only about $700,000 since the primary. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Baumgartner 'paints it red' with re-election fundraiser alongside guest speaker, Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan
Aug. 17—The din of 200 protesters outside was imperceptible in the Davenport Grand event room, where hundreds of Republican lawmakers and key supporters gathered for the biggest re-election fundraiser yet for freshman Congressman Michael Baumgartner. The party has had a remarkable year in D.C., where the president and Republican majorities successfully approved the "Big Beautiful Bill," launched a campaign of mass deportations and renewed border security, in line with their promises to their voters last year. And while those policies have proven contentious, driving near-constant protests whenever Baumgartner has made public appearances in Spokane, they also appeared to have animated confidence inside the Davenport Grand on Sunday, with Baumgartner and allies hopeful to overcome the odds and retain power in next year's midterms. Baumgartner has, as recently as last year's campaign, acknowledged the daylight between his brand of the Republican Party and that of President Donald Trump. A product of a Harvard education and student of global affairs seemingly cut from the cloth of Bush-era conservatism, Baumgartner on Sunday demonstrated a closeness with the president and the MAGA movement, symbolized by the marquee presence of guest speaker Congressman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio. Ultimately a fundraiser for Baumgartner's re-election campaign, the event was a hodgepodge of a victory lap, a presentation on the sausage-making of federal politics and politicking, a peek at the personal peculiarities of various lawmakers, and a recollection of grievances with the political left. Jordan spoke at length about the 2017 "Russiagate," for instance, arguing Democrats and former President Barack Obama had manipulated and weaponized intelligence suggesting Russia had interfered in the presidential election on Trump's behalf. "Remember the left is crazy," Jordan said. "It's crazy to defund the police, it's crazy to let a man play in women's sports, it's crazy not to have a border. It's crazy to let a Chinese spy balloon fly across the country. ... I bet Baumgartner would have shot it down." The focus of celebration Sunday night was the "Big Beautiful Bill," the landmark 2025 fiscal package approved by a narrow Republican majority in July which the congressman and guest speakers highlighted for its tax cuts. Baumgartner explained the necessity of the reconciliation process to avoid a filibuster and approve that bill, for example. Jordan, a regular on Fox News and notable message-maker for the Republican party, spoke at length about the challenges of political messaging. "Our business is a communication business," Jordan mused Sunday, explaining with some joy the maneuvering necessary in framing a message to the media or questioning a witness in front of Congress and the C-SPAN cameras. "What I try to do with the big hearings is work backwards, what do you want the press saying?" Jordan added. "My favorite is what I call the punch in the face question. You ask the question ... and you don't even care what they say. What's important is the question." Speakers argued Washington state could benefit from the politics on the rise in Washington , D.C. Alluding to the current use of National Guard troops to crack down on violent crime in D.C., former Mayor Nadine Woodward suggested Spokane would also benefit from a military crackdown to take back its streets. The fundraiser dinner, with a minimum requested donation of $75 and top donor categories in the thousands, was called "Paint it Red," an homage to the efforts to maintain and expand the Republican majority. "We're not only going to keep Eastern Washington red; we're going to spread it to the rest of the state," Baumgartner said. Woodward and fellow former Spokane Mayor David Condon helped to highlight the work of conservatives and the need to fund those efforts, but Jordan presented the most dramatic depiction of the stakes. "What's at stake going into 2026?" Jordan said. "Real simple. We don't win." Key figures in the Republican party, whether Elon Musk or the president himself, would be personally targeted if that were to happen, Jordan warned. Baumgartner won't suffer from empty campaign coffers next year. He easily outraised his many competitors in the crowded 2024 election to replace retiring Congresswoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers, totaling more than $1.3 million in campaign contributions by the end of the election season. More than a year before the 2026 midterms, his re-election campaign has already raised more than $460,000 and spent over $210,000. Eastern Washington Impact Awards Baumgartner also celebrated five regional residents with "Eastern Washington Impact Awards," implicitly, if not explicitly, a celebration of prominent conservatives or symbols of a Republican cause. These include some of the more significant Republican donors in Spokane, such as Cindy Zapotocky, the former chair of the Spokane County GOP and "mentor to conservative candidates" who Baumgartner credited in part with his successful entrance into politics. Also celebrated was Barry Baker, who Baumgartner described as a personal friend and who serves as chairman of Baker Construction and Development and is a member of several area boards, such as the Modern Electric Water Company, which declined to pass along state-funded rebates to its poorest customers in 2024 due to partisan political concerns. The other honorees include anti-progressive activist Sheldon Jackson, the CEO of Selkirk Development, who has recently become a champion for Trump's calls to institutionalize the chronically homeless; Adams County Sheriff Dale Wagner, who is currently being sued by Washington State for allegedly coordinating with federal immigration enforcers in violation of state law; and Lauren Matthew, a West Valley High School student athlete who placed second at the 2025 2A 400-meter dash, losing to a transgender East Valley student athlete, Veronica Garcia. As transgender athletes in school sports have become an increasingly prominent issue in conservative politics, Baumgartner has used Matthew's story to highlight how young women deserve "the chance to compete on a level playing field and have her hard work honored," as he stated in a June speech on the House floor. Baumgartner's recognition of Matthew as "the rightful state champion" inspired perhaps the loudest and longest applause of the awards ceremony.
