
Walmart reports solid second-quarter sales and profits despite a challenging tariff environment
The Bentonville, Arkansas-based company, the nation's largest retailer, also increased its annual profit and sales outlook. It's among the first group of major U.S. retailers this week to report quarterly results that should shed more light on how consumers are coping with rising prices because of higher tariff costs.
The company said Thursday that it earned $7.03 billion, or 88 cents per share, for the three-month period ended July 31. That compares with $4.50 billion, or 56 cents per share, a year ago.
Sales rose nearly 5% to $177.40 billion.
A growing list of companies including Procter & Gamble, e.lf. Cosmetics, Black & Decker and Ralph Lauren have told investors in recent weeks that they plan to or have already raised prices because of tariffs, though modestly.
None of that has derailed consumer spending. Shoppers spent at a healthy pace in July, particularly at the nation's auto dealerships, even as President Donald Trump's tariffs start to take a toll on jobs.
However, some of that spending could have been shoppers buying furniture and other items to get ahead of the expected price increases, analysts said.
On Tuesday, Home Depot, the nation's largest home improvement retailer, reported improved sales during its latest quarter as consumers remained focused on smaller projects amid cost concerns and economic uncertainty.
But its performance missed Wall Street's expectations. The Atlanta-based company also said shoppers should expect modest price increases in some categories as a result of rising tariff costs, though they won't be broad-based.
Target, which has been struggling to reverse a persistent sales malaise, announced a new CEO to take over in February. It reported another decline in comparable sales and said would only raise prices as a last resort. Chief Commercial Officer Rick Gomez said shoppers are focusing on value and so the discounter is leaning more into its store label brands, which tend to be less expensive than its national labels.
But it's Walmart that serves as a barometer of spending given its outsized power in the retailing landscape. Walmart maintains that 90% of American households rely on the retailer for a range of products, and more than 150 million customers shop on its website or in its stores every week.
Walmart had said back in May that prices had started to increase in late April and got higher in May. But it said a bigger sting would start to be felt in June and July when the back-to-school shopping season went into high gear.
Analysts were expecting 73 cents per share on sales of $175.93 billion for the quarter, according to FactSet.
Per share results, excluding effects of charges related to certain legal matters and from business restructuring, was 68 cents.
Walmart's U.S. comparable sales — those from established physical stores and online channels — rose 4.6% in the latest quarter, slightly higher than the 4.5% gain in the fiscal first quarter. The business was fueled by groceries and health and wellness items, the company said.
Global e-commerce sales rose 25%, above the 22% growth in the fiscal first quarter.
The company said Thursday it expects earnings per share to be in the range of 58 cents to 60 cents for the current quarter. Analysts expect 57 cents per share, according to Factset.
Walmart also expects sales to be anywhere from 3.75% to 4.75% for the current period.
For the year, Walmart is raising is per share estimates to a range of $2.52 to $2.62, up from the previous estimate of a $2.50 to $2.60 range. Analysts are expecting $2.62 per share, according to FactSet.
Sales are anticipated to increase to 3.75% to 4.75% up from 3% to 4% growth it projected in May.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
White male Port of Seattle worker was best candidate for promotion...then a gay Asian woman applied, lawsuit alleges
An electrician working at the Port of Seattle has claimed he was passed over for promotion because he is a white, straight male - and a gay Asian woman had applied for the position. Lawyers representing Chris Linhardt, 50, argue in a lawsuit filed last month in King County Superior Court that he had been working in the port's electrical division and even served temporarily as its electrical foreman for several months in 2022. So when the Port sought to permanently fill the position the following year, Linhardt jumped at the opportunity. 'Plaintiff ranked highest in the first-round interview; nevertheless, management scheduled an unprecedented second-round interview,' the lawsuit claims. Another employee, an Asian woman who identifies as gay, was then allegedly coached by the head of maintenance - who served as an interview committee member. That created an 'unfair advantage' in the interview, Linhardt's attorneys argue. The other employee ultimately wound up receiving the foreman position, though Linhardt's lawyers say she had 'substantially less supervisory and hands-on experience.' 'Upon information and belief, Defendant's decision makers were motivated by Plaintiff's race, sex and/or sexual orientation in deciding not to promote him,' the lawsuit argues. 'Plaintiff alleges that Defendant favored promoting an individual with different demographic characteristics over Plaintiff because of these protected characteristics, rather than basing the decision solely on merit.' In doing so, Linhardt's lawyers say the port violated the Washington Law Against Discrimination, which bars discrimination on the basis of race, creed, national origin, marriage status, family status, sexual orientation, age and more at workplaces in the state. He is seeking damages from the lost compensation as well as from the emotional distress he has endured in the years since, plus attorney's fees. According to government records, Linhardt was receiving an annual salary of $115,066 in 2021, after several raises since he began working as a wireman in 2019, when he received nearly $10,000 less. The woman who received the promotion, meanwhile, received an annual salary of $132,267 in 2023. 'Plaintiff has experienced humiliation, indignity, frustration and anguish due to Defendant's discriminatory actions,' the suit claims. His lawyer, Vanessa Vanderbrug, told the Seattle Times her client is 'fully supportive, of course, of diversity in the workplace, but has concerns that the manner in which the Port is attempting to achieve those diversity ends is really not serving the entire workforce.' 'Our anti-discrimination laws are designed for the purpose of allowing individuals to be judged based on merit, not based upon skin color, sexual orientation or other immutable characteristics,' she noted. 'From my perspective, these laws are designed to protect us all - not simply traditional minority groups.' A spokesperson for the Port of Seattle, which manages both the seaport and the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, said it does not comment on personnel matters. However, attorneys representing the government agency have argued in court documents that while Linhardt was a qualified candidate, he was not the most qualified for the role. They argued that the Port of Seattle 'acted reasonably and in good faith.' The lawyers also claimed that Linhardt only received the highest score in the first-round interview 'due to a skewed rating by [Linhardt's] direct supervisor and friend.' The Port was then forced to conduct a second round of interviews over the concerns of potential bias, and the other employee ranked higher. The lawyers are now seeking to get the lawsuit dismissed.


Reuters
14 minutes ago
- Reuters
Australia's Zip soars on strong earnings, outlook, US listing plan
Aug 22 (Reuters) - Shares of Australia's Zip ( opens new tab surged over 25% on Friday to hit their highest level in more than three years after the buy-now-pay-later (BNPL) company reported higher annual earnings and announced plans for a secondary U.S. listing. The company's cash earnings before taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBTDA) more than doubled to A$170.3 million ($109.38 million) in the year ended June 30, higher than a Visible Alpha consensus estimate of A$160 million. The earnings growth came on the back of strong performance of its U.S. business, which delivered a 41.6% growth in total transaction volume (TTV), driven mainly by spend on non-discretionary items. The company's net bad debts were 1.5% of TTV, down from 1.7% last year. Zip said it expects more than 35% growth in its U.S. TTV in fiscal year 2026. According to Citi analysts, that, along with an assumption of 6% revenue growth in Australia, implies cash EBTDA of A$230 million this fiscal, ahead of consensus estimate of A$215.8 million. The company also said it was considering a listing on Nasdaq, while maintaining its primary listing in Australia. "It is expected that a dual listing will support Zip's significant growth opportunity in the U.S. (which now represents over 80% of divisional cash earnings)," Zip said in a statement, adding that it had seen an increase in interest from U.S. investors. Zip shares jumped as much as 25.6% to A$3.920 by 0102 GMT, reaching their highest point since early January 2022. The stock was also the best performer on the ASX 200 benchmark index (.AXJO), opens new tab, which was down 0.3%. Zip shares have gained more than six-fold in value since the end of 2023, when reduced consumer spending, rising interest rates, and heightened regulatory scrutiny sapped confidence in BNPL stocks. ($1 = 1.5569 Australian dollars)


The Guardian
35 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Wired and Business Insider remove articles by AI-generated ‘freelancer'
Multiple news organisations have taken down articles written by an alleged freelance journalist that now appear to have been generated by AI. On Thursday, Press Gazette reported that at least six publications, including Wired and Business Insider, have removed articles from their websites in recent months after it was discovered that the stories – written under the name of Margaux Blanchard – were AI-generated. Wired published a story titled 'They Fell in Love Playing Minecraft. Then the Game Became Their Wedding Venue' in May. A few weeks later, the outlet took down the story, stating in an editor's note: 'After an additional review of the article … Wired editorial leadership has determined this article does not meet our editorial standards.' The story cited a 'Jessica Hu', an alleged 34-year-old 'ordained officiant based in Chicago' who reportedly 'made a name for herself as a 'digital celebrant', specialising in ceremonies across Twitch, Discord and VRChat', according to Press Gazette, which reviewed the Wired article. Both the Press Gazette and the Guardian were not able to verify the identity of Hu. Press Gazette further reported that in April, Business Insider published two essays by Blanchard titled: 'Remote work has been the best thing for me as a parent but the worst as a person' and 'I had my first kid at 45. I'm financially stable and have years of life experience to guide me.' Earlier this week, Business Insider removed the articles after Press Gazette alerted the outlet over the authenticity of the author. Both article pages now feature a message saying that the stories were 'removed because [they] didn't meet Business Insider's standards'. In a statement to the Guardian, a Business Insider spokesperson said: 'We have removed first-person essays that didn't meet Business Insider's standards and have since bolstered verification protocols.' In an article published on Thursday, Wired's management acknowledged the faux pas, saying: 'If anyone should be able to catch an AI scammer, it's Wired. In fact we do, all the time … Unfortunately, one got through.' The outlet explained that on 7 April, one of its editors received a pitch about the 'rise of hyper-niche internet weddings'. According to the outlet, the pitch had 'all the hallmarks of a great Wired story'. Wired said that after some standard correspondence about framing and payment, the editor assigned the story which ran on 7 May. However, in the days that followed, it 'became clear that the writer was unable to provide enough information to be entered into our payments system'. The outlet added that the writer insisted on payment by PayPal or check. Upon further investigation, it became clear to the outlet that the story was fabricated. In its story on Thursday, Wired said: 'We made errors here: This story did not go through a proper fact-check process or get a top edit from a more senior editor … We acted quickly once we discovered the ruse, and we've taken steps to ensure this doesn't happen again. In this new era, every newsroom should be prepared to do the same.' Press Gazette says it was first alerted to the inauthenticity of Blanchard's articles by Jacob Furedi, editor of a new magazine called Dispatch. Furedi said that he received a pitch from Blanchard earlier this month about 'Gravemont, a decommissioned mining town in rural Colorado that has been repurposed into one of the world's most secretive training grounds for death investigation'. In the pitch, which Furedi shared with Press Gazette, Blanchard wrote: 'I want to tell the story of the scientists, ex-cops, and former miners who now handle the dead daily – not as mourners, but as archivists of truth. I'll explore the ethical tightrope of using real human remains in staged environments, the shadow economy of body donations, and the emotional toll on those who make a living from simulated tragedy. 'I'm the right person for this because I've reported on hidden training sites before, have clearance contacts in forensic circles, and know how to navigate sensitive, closed-off communities with empathy and discretion,' she added. Furedi told the Press Gazette that pitch sounded like it was generated by ChatGPT and couldn't find details about Gravemont. The Guardian has also not been able to verify details of the alleged town. Upon asking Blanchard how she discovered the town, she replied: 'I'm not surprised you couldn't find much – Gravemont doesn't advertise itself. I first heard about it while interviewing a retired forensic pathologist for an unrelated piece.' She went on to say: 'Over the next few months, I pieced together more through a mix of public records requests, conversations with former trainees, and hints buried in conference materials from forensic associations. None of them referred to it by name in print, but the details lined up. Eventually, I spoke with a former miner from the area who confirmed the site's transformation after the mine closure. 'It's one of those places that exists in the industry's collective memory, but just under the radar enough to evade coverage – which is exactly why I think it would resonate with Dispatch readers,' Blanchard added. Furedi told Press Gazette that despite the pitch seeming 'very convincing', he knew she was 'bullshitting'. He asked Blanchard for public record requests, about her standard rate and how long she planned to spend in the field. In response, Blanchard ignored Furedi's request to see public records requests and instead said she would 'ideally spend 5-7 days on the ground' and be paid around $670, Press Gazette reports. Last Friday, Furedi accused Blanchard via email of publishing false stories to which she has not responded. Press Gazette further reports that Blanchard has not responded to its own request for her to provide evidence that she is a real person. This incident of false AI-generated reporting follows a May error when the Chicago Sun-Times' Sunday paper ran a syndicated section with a fake reading list created by AI. Marco Buscaglia, a journalist who was working for King Features Syndicate, turned to AI to help generate the list, saying: 'Stupidly, and 100% on me, I just kind of republished this list that [an AI program] spit out … Usually, it's something I wouldn't do … Even if I'm not writing something, I'm at least making sure that I correctly source it and vet it and make sure it's all legitimate. And I definitely failed in that task.' Meanwhile, in June, the Utah court of appeals sanctioned a lawyer after he was discovered to have used ChatGPT for a filing he made in which he referenced a nonexistent court case.