'Mired In Soviet Decision-Making': Report Pins Immense Losses On Zelensky's Firing Of Gen. Zaluzhny
But now, a fresh Wall Street Journal report published Tuesday calls out Ukraine's military for having increasingly adopted a rigid, Soviet-style command structure that stifles battlefield initiative.
Soldiers interviewed by the outlet described large-scale meatgrinder type tactics of blindly being sent on suicidal frontal assaults while being denied permission to withdraw from dangerous positions.
The consistent commentary on the war has long been that while Russia might have the manpower to do these old 'war of attrition' tactics, Ukraine certainly does not.
Ukrainian forces in the initial stages of the war were praised for their effective use of maneuver warfare and were more nimble and able to more quickly seize the initiative, or strategically retreat as necessary.
'Ukrainian officers and infantrymen complain of a centralized command culture that often punishes initiative and wastes men's lives. Generals order repetitive frontal assaults that have little hope of success, and deny requests from beleaguered units to carry out tactical retreats and save their men. Casualties accumulate on operations with little strategic value,' the WSJ report says.
Front line commanders have increasingly gone public to voice their frustrations after witnessing needless tragic losses:
Privately, many Ukrainian soldiers repeat a bitter refrain: 'Big Soviet army beats little Soviet army.'
Capt. Oleksandr Shyrshyn, a battalion commander in Ukraine's 47th Mechanized Brigade, took his frustrations public. In May he denounced the army's top brass on Facebook. Railing against 'stupid' orders and losses, he spoke of pervasive fear in the army of generals who are 'only capable of reprimands, investigations, imposing penalties.' Addressing the General Staff of Ukraine's armed forces, he said: 'I hope your children will also be in the infantry and will carry out your tasks.'
He told the Journal he was driven to speak out after his battalion was repeatedly ordered by senior commanders to launch assaults that were unrealistic for the unit's limited means.
We also should note something the WSJ and other establishment media won't admit: the Western allies' constant arms and monetary support – as well as the naive urging on of Ukraine forces to 'win' – has likely only encouraged such 'repetative' and 'unrealistic' frontal assaults.
Click here to read more…
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Insider
a day ago
- Gulf Insider
'Mired In Soviet Decision-Making': Report Pins Immense Losses On Zelensky's Firing Of Gen. Zaluzhny
The Western mainstream media continues the trend of turning on Ukraine, now that it's clear that it cannot win the war against Russia. Recall that during the opening couple years of war, the MSM treated any criticisms of Zelensky or the Ukrainian Army as totally off-limits. But now, a fresh Wall Street Journal report published Tuesday calls out Ukraine's military for having increasingly adopted a rigid, Soviet-style command structure that stifles battlefield initiative. Soldiers interviewed by the outlet described large-scale meatgrinder type tactics of blindly being sent on suicidal frontal assaults while being denied permission to withdraw from dangerous positions. The consistent commentary on the war has long been that while Russia might have the manpower to do these old 'war of attrition' tactics, Ukraine certainly does not. Ukrainian forces in the initial stages of the war were praised for their effective use of maneuver warfare and were more nimble and able to more quickly seize the initiative, or strategically retreat as necessary. 'Ukrainian officers and infantrymen complain of a centralized command culture that often punishes initiative and wastes men's lives. Generals order repetitive frontal assaults that have little hope of success, and deny requests from beleaguered units to carry out tactical retreats and save their men. Casualties accumulate on operations with little strategic value,' the WSJ report says. Front line commanders have increasingly gone public to voice their frustrations after witnessing needless tragic losses: Privately, many Ukrainian soldiers repeat a bitter refrain: 'Big Soviet army beats little Soviet army.' Capt. Oleksandr Shyrshyn, a battalion commander in Ukraine's 47th Mechanized Brigade, took his frustrations public. In May he denounced the army's top brass on Facebook. Railing against 'stupid' orders and losses, he spoke of pervasive fear in the army of generals who are 'only capable of reprimands, investigations, imposing penalties.' Addressing the General Staff of Ukraine's armed forces, he said: 'I hope your children will also be in the infantry and will carry out your tasks.' He told the Journal he was driven to speak out after his battalion was repeatedly ordered by senior commanders to launch assaults that were unrealistic for the unit's limited means. We also should note something the WSJ and other establishment media won't admit: the Western allies' constant arms and monetary support – as well as the naive urging on of Ukraine forces to 'win' – has likely only encouraged such 'repetative' and 'unrealistic' frontal assaults. Click here to read more…
Gulf Insider
a day ago
- Gulf Insider
India Defied US Pressure To Dump Russia For Five Reasons
The common denominator is India's rivalry with China… Trump recently made a show of doubling his 25% tariffs on India as punishment for its continued purchase of Russian energy and military-technical by Lindsey Graham, he expected that India would dump Russia after the costs of doing business with it spiked, the Kremlin would thus lose this important foreign revenue flow, and then Putin would make concessions to Ukraine in exchange for lifting these secondary sanctions in to avoid bankruptcy. Here's why India defied the US: 1. The 'Voice Of The Global South' Can't Bow To US Demands India has presented itself as the 'Voice of the Global South' since it hosted the first of these namesake summits in January 2023. It's sought to play this role by virtue of being the most populous among them, commanding the largest economy of them all, and having the fast-growing one too. India is also one of the founders of the Non-Aligned Movement. If it bows to US demands, then it'll cede leadership of the Global South to China, which India doesn't consider to be part of this category of countries anymore. 2. Discounted Russian Energy Accelerates India's Economic Rise India is the world's fastest-growing major economy and on pace to become the third-largest by 2028 due in no small part to its massive import of discounted Russian energy. Not only would India scramble to replace Russia's one-third share of its oil supplies, which would lead to a surge in global prices that would decelerate its growth, but Russia would probably sell more oil to China at an even steeper discount to replace some of its lost revenue. That would be doubly bad for India's objective interests. 3. India Can't Defend Itself From China & Pakistan Without Russia Most of India's military equipment is still Soviet/Russian despite the decade-long trend of diversifying its defense suppliers and promoting indigenous production. India is therefore still reliant on Russian ammo and spare parts. Accordingly, it wouldn't be able to defend itself from China and Pakistan without Russia, which is an unacceptable position to be in. In fact, some in India might suspect that the US wants to leave them at their mercy, perhaps as part of a Machiavellian deal to contain or even dismember India. 4. Trump Is Hellbent On Derailing India's Rise As A Great Power Building upon the above, this eponymous analysis here explains Trump's geostrategic machinations vis-à-vis India as of late, which are predicated on subordinating it as vassal state. Frankly speaking, India is rising too fast and becoming too independent of a force to be reckoned with in global affairs for the US' comfort, which fears that this will hasten the decline of its unipolar hegemony. Attempting to place India in a permanent position of dependence and vulnerability is one way to possibly avert this scenario. 5. India Can't Allow Russia To Become China's 'Junior Partner' The earlier points contextualize this one by highlighting the importance that Russia plays in India's grand strategy. Even if India maintained military-technical ties with Russia, if it curtailed or cut off oil imports, then Russia would still likely become China's 'junior partner' due to the even greater economic-financial role that China would play for it. That could lead to the dangerous scenario of China pressuring Russia to curtail or cut off arms, ammo, and spares to India, thus placing it at China's and Pakistan's mercy. As can be seen, the common denominator between these five reasons why India defied US pressure to dump Russia is its rivalry with China, which India calculated would inevitably benefit if it complied. The grand strategic costs of allowing that to happen are considered to be much greater than the financial ones imposed by the US. In fact, the US might even lift some of the latter as part of a compromise with Russia during the upcoming Putin-Trump Summit, which would be an indisputable victory for read: 'We'll Take Half World Down With Us': India Outraged By Pakistan Army Chief's Nuke Threats
Daily Tribune
2 days ago
- Daily Tribune
27 Western Nations Urge Israel to Act Immediately to End 'Unimaginable Famine' in Gaza
A total of 27 Western countries, including most EU member states, have called on Israel to take immediate action to halt what they described as an 'unimaginable famine' unfolding in the Gaza Strip. In a joint statement issued at the United Nations headquarters in New York, the countries held Israeli authorities legally and morally responsible for the severe deterioration of the humanitarian situation. The strongly worded declaration signed by the foreign ministers of the participating nations, along with the EU's foreign policy chief and two other European Commission members urged Israel to take urgent steps to end 'the famine unfolding before our eyes' in Gaza, calling for the opening of all crossings and routes to ensure the unimpeded flow of humanitarian aid. 'The famine is unfolding before our eyes. Urgent action is needed to end the hunger,' the statement read, adding: 'We call on the Government of Israel to allow all international aid shipments for NGOs to enter and to refrain from obstructing the work of key humanitarian actors.' The signatories stressed the need to use all crossings and routes to deliver food, nutritional supplies, shelter, fuel, clean water, medicines, and medical equipment to the besieged enclave. They warned that ongoing restrictions were worsening the crisis and emphasized the urgent need to dramatically increase the scale and scope of humanitarian aid. The statement was signed by the foreign ministers of Australia, Belgium, Canada, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Japan, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom, in addition to EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas and two other European Commission members. Separately, The Elder a group of global leaders issued their first-ever warning of a looming genocide in Gaza, citing Israel's obstruction of humanitarian aid as a driver of famine. Founded in 2007 by former South African President Nelson Mandela, the independent organization released a statement following a visit by its delegation to border crossings with Egypt: 'We express our shock and outrage at Israel's deliberate obstruction of life-saving humanitarian aid into Gaza,' it said. 'What we saw and heard confirms our personal conviction that Gaza is facing not only an imminent man-made famine but also an imminent genocide.' Former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark called on Israel to open the Rafah crossing between Egypt and Gaza for aid deliveries following her visit to the site. She was joined by former Irish President and former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Mary Robinson, who said global leaders 'have the power and the legal duty to impose measures to pressure this Israeli government to stop its heinous crimes.'
