logo
A climate-friendly home starts with an energy assessment. Here's how my 100-year-old house did

A climate-friendly home starts with an energy assessment. Here's how my 100-year-old house did

Independent7 days ago
A significant share of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions comes from heating, cooling and powering homes — about 15%, according to one estimate by the Environmental Protection Agency. So if you want to reduce your carbon footprint, the home is an effective place to start.
There are so many factors involved in a household's energy consumption, including whether you have gas or electric heat and how you use your kitchen appliances, washer and dryer. It's often overwhelming to figure out where to begin.
That's why experts recommend a home energy assessment conducted by a professional. The room-by-room examinations help homeowners determine energy use, discover inefficiencies and create a plan to reduce both. In addition to helping the environment, improving efficiency saves money over the long term.
The assessments typically last several hours and cost anywhere from $100 to more than $1,000. Until the end of the year, the Inflation Reduction Act, a major U.S. climate law passed in 2022, helps cover the cost. Congress recently rescinded many of those benefits, which will be phased out.
I'm a climate reporter, so I've written about responsible energy use more than a few times. But in May, after years of apartment-dwelling, I moved into the first home I've ever owned.
So, I signed up for a home energy assessment.
My home, outside of Cleveland, is more than 100 years old. When I blast the air conditioning, it's still hot and humid upstairs. I can hear birds chirping outside no matter how hard I shut the windows. And there's a giant pipe in my basement held together by duct tape and prayers.
My assessment delivered pretty bad news. But with it came with lots of room for improvement. Here's how the day unfolded:
The HVAC tests
Tim Portman, owner of the HVAC company Portman Mechanical in northeast Ohio, started with an hourlong interview about my goals of having a more comfortable and climate-friendly house. Then he headed into the basement to test my furnace, air conditioner and water heater.
The water heater pressure was normal, so Portman said there was no major risk of a water burst. However, the pressure in both the furnace and air conditioner was too high.
Which reveals my first problem: They are too big for the duct work. That's inefficient, and it wears on the equipment. Making matters worse, Portman noticed a bunch of unnecessary turns in the ducts.
He equated it to having great water pressure in a kinked garden hose.
'If you don't get the kink out of that garden hose, you're never going to have a good experience,' he said.
The highlight of my basement woes was a giant pipe that feeds heating and cooling to the rest of the house. It just ... wasn't connected. It was jammed together like two straws without a junction. It bugged him enough that he paused to fix it.
And who am I to stop him?
The blower door
After the basement, Portman assembled a contraption called a blower door. He jammed a bunch of airtight plastic in my front doorway, shoved a big fan through the middle and turned it on so that it was blowing air out of my house.
'It literally sets up a vacuum in the house. So anywhere where there are leaks, you can see where those leaks are,' he said.
Seconds later, my home got hot and musty as the fan pulled outdoor air through all the leaky seams. Portman guessed the primary culprit immediately. I followed him upstairs into what felt like a sauna near the opening to the attic.
'You literally have hot, humid air — and your attic's warmer than outside — just pouring into the second floor,' Portman said.
The blower door measures how many cubic feet of air flow through per minute. In a well-sealed house, the number should be less than or equal to the square footage. In my 1,500 square-foot (139-square-meter) house, the blower door number was 4,500. Three times as leaky as it should be.
Portman called it a worst-case scenario.
'It's like driving your car around with the AC on and the windows rolled down," he said.
The thermal camera
Next, Portman grabbed a thermal camera. The goal, since it was 80 degrees Fahrenheit (27 degrees Celsius) outside, was to see if leaks would show up as hot spots on the camera.
There were a lot. On the screen, yellow revealed a hot spot. The coolest spaces were dark blue. The leaky door frame around the attic lit up bright yellow.
"Do you think that's a problem?' Portman joked.
'Oops,' I said.
'Yeah,' he said. 'Oops is the right answer.'
There were a few unsurprising finds, including a leaky bathroom fan and gaps around the hundred-year-old windows. Downstairs we also found major gaps in the living room's exposed beams.
Thermal images proved Portman's theory that my walls were not insulated. That's because my house still has some knob and tube wiring, a system of ceramic supports and porcelain-wrapped wires that's a relic of the early 20th century. Because of how it heats up, only certain insulation can be used with it. It can also be very expensive to remove.
In the basement, the camera revealed major gaps next to pipes and some other just ... random holes. They were maybe where wiring used to be, or just hollow spots in the old wooden framing. But the air seepage was strong enough to make the cobwebs flutter frantically, as if reflecting my dread discovering them.
The verdict
After his review, Portman's first recommendation was to call an electrician about the old wiring.
'Getting knob and tube out of your house opens the door to have insulation in your walls,' he said.
Once that's addressed, Portman said I need to upgrade my electrical panel to support an eventual switch to a heat pump and an electric water heater, though those appliances don't fit my budget this year.
One electrician I spoke to by phone guessed it would cost $30,000 to remove the old wiring. But another said as long as he inspects the wiring and doesn't find any dangerous modifications, I could leave it and replace the panel for roughly $3,000.
I went with the second guy.
Through the end of 2025, federal tax credits will help subsidize weatherization upgrades, including insulation, windows, doors and electrical panels.
In the meantime, my husband and I have a different homework assignment: use a caulk gun and spray foam to plug the holes that we found on the thermal camera.
Between July heat waves and January cold snaps, sealing a house in the Cleveland area isn't just good for the planet. It's a good investment.
'You could potentially cut your bills in half. Potentially even more,' he said.
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Popular beach resort set to ban shops from displaying clothing emblazoned with vulgar slogans to clean up their reputation
Popular beach resort set to ban shops from displaying clothing emblazoned with vulgar slogans to clean up their reputation

Daily Mail​

time22 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Popular beach resort set to ban shops from displaying clothing emblazoned with vulgar slogans to clean up their reputation

The Virginia Beach City Council is trying to ban shops along the famous boardwalk from displaying clothing with raunchy slogans to 'clean up' the family-friendly resort. The southeastern Virginia coastal city has long attracted families for its abundance of activities for all ages and stunning shores. But its three-mile oceanfront boardwalk has always been the star of the show for its games, restaurants and stores. And many of those stores have caught the eye of visitors for their attention-grabbing merchandise, which local officials say is wildly inappropriate. Some clothing and gift shops sell shorts with innuendos on the back, with some pairs reading 'all you can eat,' 'it ain't gonna spank itself' and 'roll your weed on it' with marijuana leaves. Other items include profanity, such as shirts reading 'I'm not always a d*ck' and 'f*ck around and find out.' Another top reads, 'I [heart] boobs.' 'The new generation, they like this so much,' Adam Desouki, the manager of Ocean 11 Clothing and Gift Shop, told The Virginian-Pilot. Desouki said vulgar apparel flies off the shelves and guests, especially young adults, cannot get enough of the merchandise. The southeastern Virginia coastal city has long attracted families for its abundance of activities for all ages and stunning shores But local officials believe these novelty clothing items have no place lining the boardwalk. 'Enough is enough,' Councilman Worth Remick, who represents a portion of the Oceanfront Boardwalk community, told The Virginian-Pilot. He said many constituents are less than thrilled with the non-PG sentiments printed on the clothes. 'This is a calm, gentle, nice way to say this is not good for our brand, for our city.' On Tuesday night, the City Council unanimously voted to approve a resolution to request Oceanfront stores remove 'indecent' items from their displays. But the resolution is voluntary, as criminal enforcement for obscenity is a difficult threshold to meet. So, the members of the council are asking for retailers to abide by the resolution for the community's greater good. The resolution also asked for the Atlantic Avenue Association and the Resort Advisory Commission to back their stance and try to 'inspire Oceanfront retailers to act in accordance with such environment.' 'We're not telling store owners not to carry the shirts,' president of the Atlantic Avenue Association Deepak Nachnani told WHRO. 'We're just telling them to not put them in the store windows or on the mannequins at the front of the store.' Regardless, this 'peer pressure' approach being taken by the City Council is not sitting well with many of the boardwalk businesses. 'The owners need to make money in a certain period of time, and in the winter nobody's here,' Desouki said about Ocean 11. He believes that taking the controversial clothing off display would cause sales to plummet, as those shirts and shorts are a main attraction to the shop. But other businesses are willing to comply, as their management understands where the city is coming from on the matter. Avinash Basnet, owner of The T-Shirt Factory at the resort, told WHRO he would be willing to participate in this boardwalk clean-up, but it must be a unified effort. 'I'm willing to commit to that, but it has to be for everybody,' he told the outlet. Virginia Beach visitors have seemingly sided with the council, as the swear words and provocative language are far from family-friendly. 'They're just shoving this in kids' faces,' Kecia Magnus, of New Jersey, told WHRO. Angie Whitlock, 68, of Georgia, was also not fond of the clothing. 'I think it's awful. This is a family-friendly place, and as a community we need to protect our children. Maybe move that stuff to the back for the bachelors,' she told The Virginian-Pilot.

The degrees that may not be worth the paper they're written on
The degrees that may not be worth the paper they're written on

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

The degrees that may not be worth the paper they're written on

There are many reasons to go to university, whether that be a yearning for independence, a desire for further study or, for many, the chance to have an iron-clad excuse to have a good time. These are all worthy motivations but it's worth remembering the fundamental driver for getting a degree in the first place: the hope that in the future, you will earn more money because of that shiny certificate. While university might once have been the golden ticket to a good career, a soaring number of graduates, an increase in what critics describe as 'Mickey Mouse' degrees and the rising threat of artificial intelligence (AI) have all made the decision more complex. • The degrees that earn the best salaries — and protect you from AI According to the Department for Education, those who specifically study teaching as a first degree are unlikely to earn large salaries, even after a decade of working. The average salary of someone who had a degree in education and teaching was just £27,700 after 10 years — the lowest of all the subjects. The majority of teachers earn more than this, but will have studied different degrees. Other low-return degrees included performing arts, creative arts and design, and agricultural studies. Graduates of these subjects typically failed to breach the £30,000 salary mark after 10 years. For context, £34,300 is the median graduate earnings 10 years after graduation, according to the latest longitudinal education outcomes data from the ministry. Victoria McLean from the career consultants City CV and Hanover said: 'It's a shame, but some of the most intellectually rich and socially vital degrees often don't convert to high salaries, at least not in the early years. 'It's not a judgment on their value, but a reflection of how these sectors are structured and funded. It's entirely possible to build a brilliant, lucrative career from these degrees, but it takes longer and demands more pivots along the way.' • How do student loans work and when do you start repaying? Generic or wide-reaching degrees were also unlikely to lead to six-figure careers. A degree in 'combined and general studies' typically had a starting salary of £24,100 and after a decade, this moved up to £30,700. Oliver Sidwell from Higherin, an early careers jobs platform, said that such degrees were typically less likely to get you a degree-level job after university in the first place, so ended up leading to lower-paid jobs. He added that while degrees were still sought-after in general, this was increasingly becoming 'a more outdated view'. The money available in any given sector won't matter, however, if the jobs are likely to be done by AI in the future. Graduate jobs are already among the most affected by the advent of artificial intelligence software. The recruitment firm Adzuna found that the number of entry-level roles had fallen 32 per cent since the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022. David Morel from the London firm Tiger Recruitment said: 'We are already beginning to see a decline in entry-level job opportunities. Many sectors are cutting costs, and businesses are increasingly turning to software like AI to perform tasks that were once handled by less qualified employees.' • Read more money advice and tips on investing from our experts Data entry and content writing roles have been the first to go, while fields such as proofreading and customer service are now beginning to be automated. According to Lacey Kaelani, who has been tracking AI threats through her jobs platform Metaintro, there has been a drop in roles that require business graduates because AI can handle basic business analysis and generate reports. Kaelani said: 'There is also a 31 per cent decline in entry-level roles in communications roles, and we are seeing 25 per cent fewer 'economic analyst' graduate positions. In all industries, those who can interpret AI and combine AI with expertise and strategic thinking are managing to buck the trend.' Another way of judging AI risks is to look at AI occupational exposure (AIOE) scores — the higher the score, the more replaceable occupations are by AI. According to the Department for Education, industries such as sport, leisure and recreation, engineering and sociology are among the least exposed. Economics, maths and accounting are among the most. Vicky Harvey from the University of Salford said that the pace of change was rapid and so the true impact on jobs was unknown. But she added that many universities were integrating AI into their teaching and research to help students understand and adapt to the evolving landscape. If you want to look at the potential return on investment of different degrees, you need to first understand the initial cost. The average student debt built up by those studying in England is now £53,000, and this is likely to increase as the cap on fees for full-time students will rise to £9,535 a year from September, up from £9,250. However, most students never pay back their loans in full. Instead, those thinking about university should look at the repayment system and how it will affect their take-home pay in the future. Those starting university this year will be on the Plan 5 repayment system. This means that 9 per cent of earnings above £25,000 will go towards paying back their loan. If they have not repaid it within 40 years, the debt is cancelled. It gives a basic-rate taxpayer with a salary above that threshold a marginal tax rate of 37 per cent. A higher-rate taxpayer pays a marginal rate of 51 per cent. While the system can mean that high earners will begin to feel their student loan repayments in their pay cheque — someone earning £100,000 would pay £6,750 a year or £563 a month, for instance — those with smaller salaries are somewhat protected. Those on the average graduate salary of £34,300 a decade after graduation would pay just £837 a year, or £70 a month. McLean added: 'Before choosing a course, I would urge students to ask: what roles do I want to target? What do they pay? What's the outlook for three or five years? And is there a high enough salary to justify the debt? 'You don't need to have it all figured out by 18, but that doesn't mean you can't think strategically. This is one of the biggest investments you will make.'

Trump's stooge has a crazy plan to weaken the dollar
Trump's stooge has a crazy plan to weaken the dollar

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Trump's stooge has a crazy plan to weaken the dollar

Maintaining a strong dollar has been an article of faith in US economic policy for as long as I can remember. But all that may be about to change. Already, Donald Trump has shattered post-war convention by imposing some of the highest tariffs since the notorious Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930. It goes without saying that a weaker dollar furthers Trump's protectionist goals by making imports more expensive and exports cheaper. And now he's alighted on just the man who might help bring that devaluation about – Stephen Miran, the chairman of the council of economic advisers. Miran has been nominated by Trump for a soon-to-be-vacated seat on the Federal Reserve's board of governors, and is therefore considered to be a prime candidate to replace Jerome Powell as chairman when the incumbent's term ends in May next year – or possibly sooner, if Trump gets his way in forcing the incumbent's early resignation. There are lots of other names in the frame, so Miran cannot yet regard himself as a shoo-in for the job. But in some respects at least, he sings from the same hymn sheet as Trump, so he's in with a decent chance. Miran is a committed 'devaluationist', and once appointed head of the world's most powerful monetary authority, could steer policy decisively in the direction of a weaker dollar. Does it make any kind of sense? As on most other aspects of Trump's economic agenda, the President's 'vision' for the dollar is a mass of contradictions and apparently incompatible goals. He wants both a weaker dollar so as to make American goods more competitive and thereby reduce the trade deficit. But at the same time, he wants to preserve and enhance the dollar's global reserve currency status, and its parallel position as the predominant international means of exchange. To list but the most important of them, the benefits of dollar hegemony include enabling the US to borrow more cheaply in world markets, the exercise of geo-political influence through the imposition of sanctions, and encouraging foreign investment in the US. It is not at all clear that Trump can maintain what France's one-time president, Valéry Giscard d'Estaing, called America's 'exorbitant privilege' while at the same time pursuing strategies, such as inflationary monetary policy, that might weaken its currency. We know what Miran's thoughts on the matter are, since he wrote about them in a paper published shortly before Trump's re-election as president. His musings might be seen as an extended job application. The dollar has long been persistently overvalued from a trade perspective, he argued, and that's in large part because dollar assets 'function as the world's reserve currency'. Can you have one without the other, both reserve currency supremacy and a much weaker dollar? Not according to Miran, who suggests that foreigners could be taxed on their holdings of US Treasuries to lessen their attractions to overseas investors, never mind that this would be both a technical and legal default. If that happened, then the dollar would indeed lose the commanding position it now holds; it's hard to imagine a policy less likely to make America great again, and essentially amounts to quack economics. As it happens, Trump already seems to be getting his way on a weaker dollar, and that's without even trying. Conventional economics would suggest that if you raise tariffs significantly, the dollar would appreciate to compensate, negating at least part of the impact of tariffs on prices. In the event, it's actually gone the other way, depreciating by nearly 10pc on a trade-weighted basis since it first became apparent that Trump was deadly serious about tariffs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store