Polish nationalist Karol Nawrocki wins presidency in setback for pro-EU government
Nationalist opposition candidate Karol Nawrocki narrowly won Poland's presidential election, results showed on Monday, delivering a big blow to the centrist government's efforts to cement Warsaw's pro-European orientation.
In a victory for European conservatives inspired by US President Donald Trump, Nawrocki secured 50.89% of the vote, election commission data showed. The outcome presages more political gridlock as he is likely to use his presidential veto to thwart Prime Minister Donald Tusk's liberal policy agenda.
Tusk's government has been seeking to reverse judicial reforms made by the nationalist Law and Justice (PiS) government that lost power 18 months ago but President Andrzej Duda, a PiS ally, has blocked those efforts. Nawrocki is likely to continue that pattern as president.
The judicial reforms helped sour relations with Brussels under the PiS government. The European Union's top court ruled that a new procedure for appointing judges did not guarantee their impartiality, opening the way for rulings to be questioned, and Brussels sued Poland after its Constitutional Tribunal questioned the primacy of EU law.
Nawrocki's rival, Rafal Trzaskowski, Tusk's ruling Civic Coalition (KO) candidate, had declared victory immediately after the publication of an exit poll late on Sunday that showed the result would be very close.
"I'm sorry that I didn't manage to convince the majority of citizens of my vision of Poland," Trzaskowski said on X. "I congratulate Karol Nawrocki on winning the presidential election."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
EU picks 13 new critical material projects, including in South Africa
The EU on Wednesday announced 13 new raw material projects outside the bloc to increase its supplies of metals and minerals essential for it to stay competitive in the energy transition as well as defence and aerospace. The announcement follows China's decision in April to impose export curbs on rare earth magnets until new licences are obtained, leaving diplomats, carmakers and other companies from Europe and elsewhere scrambling to secure meetings with Beijing officials and avert factory shutdowns. "We must reduce our dependencies on all countries, particularly on a number of countries like China ... The export bans increase our will to diversify," European commissioner for industry Stephane Sejourne told reporters. China controls more than 90% of global processing capacity for the magnets, used in everything from vehicles and fighter jets to home appliances. It is also the main supplier of many key inputs for renewable energy, especially rare earth minerals, batteries and solar panels, a situation Brussels is keen to change. The EU list is part of the implementation of the Critical Raw Material Act agreed in 2023 under which the bloc aims to mine 10%, process 40% and recycle 25% of its needs by 2030. Ten of the new projects will be focused on materials essential for electric vehicle batteries and battery storage, including lithium, cobalt, manganese and graphite. Two projects for rare earths are located in Malawi and South Africa. Other projects are located in Britain, Canada, Greenland, Kazakhstan, Madagascar, Norway, Serbia, Ukraine, Zambia, Brazil and the French territory of New Caledonia. The British project is to extract tungsten and the ones in Ukraine and Greenland will be for graphite, with the project in Greenland run by GreenRoc Strategic Materials. Tungsten is key for the defence industry. Greenland has been a point of tension between Brussels and Washington this year after US President Donald Trump repeatedly said he wants to acquire the Danish overseas territory. US officials have discussed a plan to pull Greenland into America's sphere of influence with a type of agreement called COFA that the US has used to maintain close ties with several Pacific Island nations. Under COFA the US government offers essential services and in exchange, the US military operates freely while trade with the US is largely duty-free. The Serbian project, run by major miner Rio Tinto, could produce 90% of Europe's lithium needs. However, the project nearly fell apart after the government revoked the miner's licence in 2022. A Serbian court restored Rio Tinto's rights last year. Many Serbs oppose the Jadar project, saying its development will damage the environment. "With an estimated production of 58,000 tons of lithium carbonate annually, Serbia has the potential to become a key player in the electric vehicle supply chain," Rio Tinto said in a statement. The EU has estimated that the projects would need an overall capital investment of €5.5bn (R111.78bn) to get off the ground. They would receive coordinated financial support and buyer interest from the European Commission, member states and lenders. The new list brings the EU's total number of strategic projects to 60. In March, the Commission announced 47 projects within the EU.
eNCA
2 hours ago
- eNCA
Trump, Xi will 'likely' talk this week: White House
WASHINGTON D,C - US President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping will likely hold a long-awaited call later this week, the White House said Monday, as trade tensions between the world's two biggest economies ratchet back up. Trump reignited strains with China last week when he accused the world's second-biggest economy of violating a deal that had led both countries to temporarily reduce huge tit-for-tat tariffs. "The two leaders will likely talk this week," Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters outside the West Wing when asked whether Trump and Xi would speak. Asked about the statement on Tuesday, a spokesman for China's foreign ministry said Beijing had "no information to provide." Trump and Xi have yet to have any confirmed contact more than five months since the Republican returned to power, despite frequent claims by the US president that a call is imminent. Trump even said in a Time Magazine interview in April that Xi had called him -- but Beijing insisted that there had been no call recently. The US leader introduced in April sweeping worldwide tariffs that targeted China most heavily of all, accusing other countries of "ripping off" the United States and running trade imbalances. Beijing and Washington last month agreed to slash staggeringly high tariffs on each other for 90 days after talks between top officials in Geneva. But Trump and other top Washington officials last week accused China of violating the deal, with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick saying Beijing was "slow-rolling" the agreement in comments to Fox News Sunday. Beijing rejected those "bogus" US claims on Monday, and accused Washington of introducing "a number of discriminatory restrictive measures." Trump has separately ramped up tensions with other trade partners, including the European Union, by vowing to double global tariffs on steel and aluminum to 50 percent from Wednesday.
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Amélie Mauresmo faces gender bias backlash amid French Open's weather woes and attendance struggles
The 2025 French Open is coming to the boil with the favourites still in contention, but issues off court continue to detract from the Roland-Garros spectacle. The season's second Grand Slam, the French Open at Roland-Garros, has endured challenging weather and some minor distractions from riots in Paris following Paris St Germain's victory in the 2025 Champions League final. These challenges are all in a day's work for the tournament director Amélie Mauresmo. But the stone in her shoe that won't go away is the perceived issue of gender bias in the scheduling of matches. That is to say, top women's players don't believe they're getting as much exposure at prime time as their male counterparts. Women's world No 1 Aryna Sabalenka did not feature in an evening session in her first five rounds, when it's expected that television viewership would be at its peak. At Roland-Garros, the late morning/afternoon sessions are also poorly attended, with many matches starting in front of empty stands. It's simply something that doesn't happen on the major showcourts at Wimbledon, for instance. The lethargic afternoon attendance has been put down to French cultural practices, such as the enjoyment of a long lunch. Sabalenka's 7-6(3) 6-3 quarterfinal win over China's Zheng Qinwen in the afternoon session on Court Phillipe Chatrier, the complex's biggest arena, started in front of swathes of empty seats. 'We deserve equal treatment,' Sabalenka said following her victory over the 2024 Olympic champion. 'There were a lot of great battles, a lot of great matches, which would be cool to see as a night session (match), just more people in the stands watching these incredible battles and to show ourselves to more people. I definitely agree that we deserve to be put on a bigger stage, like better timing and more people watching.' Supply and demand? The arguments against the timing of women's matches range from 'market forces' such as supply and demand to the fact that they are the best of three sets, and not over five sets like the men. The implication being that fans, paying a premium price for evening session tickets, deserve more for their money. It's possible both these reasons are true, so is it a case of reopening the three versus five set debate for women's tennis? At least at the Grand Slams? Interestingly, data for the 2024 women's singles final from Europe, which is played on a Saturday afternoon, showed a 21% viewership increase year-on-year from the 2023 final. In 2024, Poland's Iga Swiatek defeated Italy's Jasmine Paolini in the final. The increased European viewing could be down to the fact that both players represent large European nations. Is it a chicken and egg situation? By not scheduling women's matches in prime time, attendance and probably television viewership is inferior to the men's draw. Mauresmo defended the situation. 'If we have two (men's) matches in the night session it doesn't work in terms of how late players are going to finish,' said Mauresmo in a press conference, explaining that earlier starts would not work as well. 'The stands are going to be empty for most of the first match. That's what we think. So, we keep this one match in the evening. It's not ideal. 'We cannot check every box because we have many things to think about when we're making these choices. 'For me, the message is not changing, and it has never been that the girls are not worthy to play at night. It's never been this. I'll not accept that you carry this message. That's clear to me.' Not new Issues with scheduling in Paris are not new. The Women's Tennis Association (WTA) raised concerns last year after it emerged that only one women's match was scheduled in the evening session in 2022 and 2023. To compound matters, all 11 evening sessions in 2024 featured men's matches. 'Fans want to see the excitement and thrill of women's tennis on the biggest stages and in the premium time slots,' The WTA said in a statement last year. 'To continue building the value of our combined product, a balanced match schedule that features both the best in men's and women's tennis is critical.' That clearly hasn't happened – yet. Former French Open finalist Ons Jabeur, who is an increasingly vocal voice of social justice over the wars in Gaza and Ukraine to equality for women's tennis, spoke out on court and on the official WTA channel. 'Frankly, playing a quarter-final at 11am is really such a chore,' Jabeur said following her 4-6 6-2 6-3 defeat by Coco Gauff in 2024. 'We deserve to be here. Playing in the afternoon is better. There is going to be more people watching us and the stadiums are crowded. 'I have a lot to say on that topic (scheduling). Ten night matches without any women playing. I really hope that I can see the contract negotiated with Prime (Video). I really don't understand the ins and outs, even for men. Playing that late for men after midnight is not a good thing (either).' Jabeur went further with these words on the official WTA channel, posted on 31 May, 2025: 'A lot of amazing athletes have been told the same things over and over. That no one watches. That no one cares. That women's sport doesn't 'move people',' Jabeur wrote. 'Judgement comes quickly, often from those who've never even watched a full match. One empty stadium is held up as proof. The packed ones? Conveniently ignored. A missed shot becomes a headline. The hundreds of brilliant ones? Forgotten. 'Still, they show up. Still, they compete. Still, they carry a sport forward on their shoulders. 'When a woman wins 6-0, 6-0, it's called boring. Too easy. When a man does it? That's 'dominance.' 'Strength.' 'Unstoppable.' 'When women play with power, they're told they 'play like men'. As if strength, speed or aggression don't belong in a woman's game. 'If they celebrate, they're dramatic. If they don't, they're cold. Too emotional. Too distant. Too loud. Too quiet. Too much. Never just right.
