logo
Jed the Fish, Quirky Pioneer of Los Angeles Radio, Dies at 69

Jed the Fish, Quirky Pioneer of Los Angeles Radio, Dies at 69

New York Times26-04-2025
Jed Gould, the influential Los Angeles disc jockey known as Jed the Fish, who used his off-kilter sensibility and deep musical knowledge to shine a light on artists like the Cure, Depeche Mode and the Offspring at the groundbreaking New Wave and alternative rock station KROQ-FM in the 1980s and '90s, died on April 14 at his home in Pasadena, Calif. He was 69.
The cause was an aggressive form of small-cell lung cancer, Rudy Koerner, a close friend, said. Mr. Gould was never a cigarette smoker, he added, and before he was diagnosed last month, he had thought his recent violent coughing fits were related to the Los Angeles wildfires.
For decades, Mr. Gould served as a trusted musical savant — and drive-time friend — to young Angelenos, particularly members of Generation X. He also influenced future broadcasting stars.
In a social media post after Mr. Gould's death, Jimmy Kimmel, who worked on the morning show at KROQ early in his career, described him as 'a legend.' On his podcast, Mr. Kimmel's old sidekick on 'The Man Show,' Adam Carolla, a former host of the relationship show 'Loveline' on KROQ, called Mr. Gould 'an icon.'
With his boyish energy, free-ranging musical tastes and maniacal cackle, Mr. Gould helped lead a radio revolution at the maverick KROQ, based in Pasadena, starting in the late 1970s.
At a time when FM rock stations were dominated by hyper-produced corporate juggernauts like Styx and Foreigner, KROQ became a sensation for its 'Roq of the '80s' format, which shimmered with fresh sounds from New Wave bands like Talking Heads and Devo, synth-pop groups like the Human League and Spandau Ballet, and local heroes like X and the Go-Go's.
'Jeddum Fishum,' as he sometimes referred to himself, and his fellow KROQ jocks brought a sense of anarchy to the airwaves, cracking irreverent jokes and dropping in audio snippets — like deadpan Jack Webb lines from 'Dragnet' — at well-timed moments in the middle of songs, often with hilarious results.
Mr. Gould and his colleagues were in the 'right place at the right time,' he wrote on LinkedIn. 'We were leading the way but had no idea.'
Following a broadcasting philosophy that he called 'consistent inconsistency,' Mr. Gould manned the afternoon slot at the station. His droll humor and his knack for musical surprises served as a needed tonic for a captive audience creeping along sclerotic freeways for hours that felt more like days.
'It took me years of imitation before I learned the simplicity of being myself on the air,' he wrote. 'Turns out this was a wacky position to take, but people seem to like the honesty behind it.'
That prime post-lunch slot gave Mr. Gould a powerful platform for promoting new acts and hotly anticipated releases. 'Because Jed was on from 2P to 6P, immediately following our music meeting, he would often do the honors of world-premiering new music,' Andy Schuon, a former KROQ program director, wrote in a tribute on LinkedIn.
In a social media post, Noodles, the guitarist for the Southern California punk-pop band the Offspring, wrote that Jed the Fish was the first D.J. to play the band's 1994 breakout hit, 'Come Out and Play,' 'which changed our band's trajectory in ways we never thought possible.'
With a personality that was 'insane in all the best ways,' as Noodles put it, Mr. Gould was all too willing to defy convention. During a recent video tribute by former KROQ colleagues, Mr. Schuon recalled listening to Jed the Fish for more than an hour while driving to the office and noticing that he did not once mention the station's call letters, a standard practice for D.J.s that was crucial for ratings.
When Mr. Schuon pressed him on the apparent oversight, Mr. Gould responded: 'Everyone knows if I'm on the station, it must be KROQ. Who else would hire me?'
Edwin Fish Gould III was born on July 15, 1955, in Los Angeles, to Edwin Fish Gould Jr., a salesman for a valve-and-fittings company, and Joan (Hall) Gould. He grew up in the beach communities of Orange County before his family moved to Casa Grande, Ariz.
In high school, he hosted a local radio program for teenagers until he was fired for reading George Carlin's famous 'Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television' monologue on the air.
He graduated from high school in 1973 and enrolled at the University of Southern California, where he received a bachelor's degree in broadcast journalism. After college, he held a series of jobs at Los Angeles-area radio stations before landing a position at KROQ in 1978. His application consisted of a crude punk-style pink flyer that featured a picture of himself in a white leotard scrunched up in a chair and an offer to work '30 hours per week or less 90 day max FUR FREE!'
It was not long before he was helping to orchestrate the chaos in the studio. In a 2001 oral history of the station, he said that for an outsider to ask about the early history of KROQ would be like saying, ''Tell me about Vietnam' or 'Tell me about the French Revolution.' No one will ever know all of it.'
As it turned out, there was plenty about Mr. Gould that his listeners did not know. At one point in the mid-1980s, he said in the oral history, he left KROQ after he was kicked out of the Betty Ford Center for stealing a car to buy drugs.
He returned, but he was pulled off the air again when he was arrested on suspicion of possession of heroin and drug paraphernalia in March 1989. After more than two months in a detox center, he once again assumed his spot at the microphone.
'In the old days, I'd just shoot a bunch of dope, go on the air and do anything,' he said in an interview the next year with The Los Angeles Times, while discussing his newfound commitment to sobriety. 'I'd developed my crazy style as a result of getting high. But now it comes out of being me. I'm more clearheaded and more focused.'
Mr. Gould worked at KROQ until 2012 and later moved to two other local stations, KCSN-FM and KLOS-FM. In 2019, he joined the 'Roq of the '80s' Sunday night show on KROQ's HD2 station.
He is survived by a half brother, Tony Chatterton.
Throughout his career, Mr. Gould strove to keep the spirit of the music alive in his work behind the microphone. 'When a DJ is playing music we expect you to dance to, I think it's important for the DJ to dance,' he wrote on his professional site in 2018.
'It's not that I'm a lithe and dainty dancer,' he added. 'No one who incorporates a golf swing into their dance moves should be considered dainty. I just believe anyone in charge of the music should move with it.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The ‘Battlefield 6' Beta Has Just Made Instant Changes To Rush
The ‘Battlefield 6' Beta Has Just Made Instant Changes To Rush

Forbes

time2 days ago

  • Forbes

The ‘Battlefield 6' Beta Has Just Made Instant Changes To Rush

After a whole lot of blowback about the return of Rush mode in the Battlefield 6 beta, DICE has read the room and decided to roll out a number of changes to the mode. No, it's not going to Locked Weapons, but it is fixing a few issues that players have been complaining about. Here's the list: These changes are being well-received so far, albeit there are certainly plenty more complaints here, including the fact that it's limited to 12v12, which is not some sort of switch that's simply going to be flipped, as the mode is currently balanced (well, sort of) around that playercount. If that changes, it would be a longer-term project. There are other technical issues here that have been brought up by DICE since the beta launched. Namely, an issue with DLSS and DLAA where players do not see those. They do not have an ETA for a fix on that, and the last update was 14 hours ago which simply says they're continuing to work on it. Given all the updates they keep giving, I would expect that is probably going to be fixed fairly soon. Battlefield 6 rode a wave of hugely positive sentiment from its reveal videos to the first beta. Players are enjoying the second beta and numbers are good, but it's clear that there are more issues and complaints this time around, largely centered around Rush issues and also its current use of Open Weapons. FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™ Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase Pinpoint By Linkedin Guess The Category Queens By Linkedin Crown Each Region Crossclimb By Linkedin Unlock A Trivia Ladder It remains to be seen what the takeaway will be from the second weekend, and what other changes DICE may roll out here, but there's only so much time left. There is, however, a good amount of time left until October launch, and post-launch, obviously, there are going to be loads of fixes and changes based on feedback. For now, we'll see how these changes play out, and they are live now. Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram. Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.

The Yeartide Apex God Rolls To Farm In ‘Destiny 2' Before It Leaves For A Year
The Yeartide Apex God Rolls To Farm In ‘Destiny 2' Before It Leaves For A Year

Forbes

time2 days ago

  • Forbes

The Yeartide Apex God Rolls To Farm In ‘Destiny 2' Before It Leaves For A Year

Destiny 2 continues to endure controversy, big bugs, questionable playercounts and an uncertain future in the Edge of Fate era, but there are certainly some bright spots, and one of them is the current, ending soon Solstice event. For whatever reason, Bungie decided that Solstice should be 50x as rewarding as everything else in Destiny 2 right now with guaranteed armor and weapon drops a full Tier above your current level, something that my take dozens of hours to reach otherwise. Grab a bunch of armor sets, sure, but I would advise getting a copy, or several, of the new SMG, Yeartide Apex, which with certain roles, could be the best legendary SMG in the game, thanks in no part to extreme power creep, and I've already found it to be one of my favorites ever in just over a week. Different Tiers will give you different numbers of perks, and after hitting 400, I'm getting six perk Tier 5 drops I can combine in a number of ways. But even two perks in a column or two, correctly rolled normal perks are going to make this worthwhile. Here are the roles I'd pursue. Heal Clip/Chaos Reshaped – This is healbot, the gun. Heal Clip already cures both you and allies after a kill reload, and then over time in addition to a damage increase, Chaos Reshaped will give you additional heals when it stacks. So long as you can keep killing, this will keep healing. FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™ Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase Pinpoint By Linkedin Guess The Category Queens By Linkedin Crown Each Region Crossclimb By Linkedin Unlock A Trivia Ladder Heal Clip/Incandescent – It's the classic combo. This is certainly a more solar-focused build for spreading scorch, and while there are a number of guns, including SMGs, that can roll this, Yeartide Apex is the best-feeling, I'd argue. Attrition Orbs/Burning Ambition – This is the single target solar build that can apply scorch without a kill, while at the same time generating orbs. This is better for higher end content where frequent kills are harder to find and chunky enemies have lots of health. Demolitionist/Chaos Reshaped or Incandescent – Obviously this is going to be for a grenade focused build, and then throwing one out will auto-reload you on top of that. With the grenade stat a huge draw now, it's a great pick. Lone Wolf/Target Lock – I don't think this is the best SMG in Crucible or anything, but this is a solid combo if you wanted to try it out. It's a monster of a gun. My Tier 5 is never going to leave any solar build I make, though my Heal Clip/Chaos combo doesn't even need that subclass to be good. Get one before it's gone for a year as of next Tuesday. Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram. Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.

AI Demand-Shaping And The Frictionless Rub Of Solipsistic Efficiency
AI Demand-Shaping And The Frictionless Rub Of Solipsistic Efficiency

Forbes

time3 days ago

  • Forbes

AI Demand-Shaping And The Frictionless Rub Of Solipsistic Efficiency

In 1897, painter Frederic Remington wired New York Journal publisher William Randolph Hearst from Cuba with bad news. There was nothing to see, no war to illustrate. Hearst's infamous reply: 'You furnish the pictures, and I'll furnish the war.' The apocryphal anecdote endures as a cautionary tale of media's power to shape reality to its owners' interests. Broadly speaking, historians agree that the sensationalist reporting of Spanish atrocities in Cuba and the mysterious sinking of the USS Maine, which typified the Yellow Journalism era, contributed to the U.S. decision to enter the Spanish-American War in 1898. Hearst and other publishers, like Joseph Pulitzer, saw circulation spikes from their vivid, lurid, and constant coverage, facilitated by new technologies that brought battlefield color to readers at telegraphic speed. Narrative precedes truth. Sensation succeeds substance. Today, emerging feedback loops echo Hearst's telegram, with campaigns to shape consumer demand through prescriptive analytics and generative AI. These are mostly tolerated when used for dynamic ticket pricing and for brand lore development, less so in propaganda campaigns. But what if the demand were being created before there was a product? In late May the Chicago Sun-Times and the Philadelphia Inquirer published 'Heat Index' a 'best of summer' guide insert with, among other fun tips, book recommendations. Those recommendations included reviews and plot summaries, as might be expected from such a feature. The problem, which readers discovered when they sought out their beach reading, was that some of the books did not exist! Chicago freelancer Marco Buscaglia admitting using AI to create the 'Heat Index' book reviews and to not checking against hallucinations. He was working for King Features Syndicate, a unit of Hearst—yes, that Hearst—which apparently did not fact check the recommendations. Neither did the newspapers that published them. FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™ Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase Pinpoint By Linkedin Guess The Category Queens By Linkedin Crown Each Region Crossclimb By Linkedin Unlock A Trivia Ladder Both the Sun-Times and Inquirer have since retracted and apologized for the list, but not before it had circulated widely creating interest, clicks, and even demand for books that no one wrote. Until they did. Since the 'Heat Index' publication, dozens of versions of its fake books have been published and sold through Amazon. The sloppy journalism portends a cost-effective, less-human creative process in the not too distant future; one that speaks to dystopian fears around AI. Here's a modification to the 'Heat Index' story (*only 1 and 5 were added): I call this solipsistic efficiency, a media logic where content generates its own demand, based on individualized tastes, in a closed loop, detached from real authors, real experiences, and external verification. It's not about deception in the traditional sense. It's about removing the inefficiencies of reality to create a perpetual, self-driving consumer experience in which authenticity exists only as a marketing metric. In such a media ecosystem, the uncertainty about what's real becomes a valuable hook. Remember James Frey's A Million Little Pieces? His 'memoir' sold better after being exposed as fabricated. The author admitted as much in a Vanity Fair interview discussing his new book, which (spoiler) he used AI in part to craft. The thrill of maybe-it's-real, maybe-it's-not becomes a form of marketable mystique. We see this across contemporary culture: One of this season's hottest Apple TV+ shows, The Studio, brings viewers inside an uncanny Hollywood featuring actual A-listers playing caricatures of themselves. The show captured 23 Emmy nominations (including five of the six for Guest Actor in a Comedy Series) as well as public fascination for an industry of smoke, mirrors, and greed. The fascination is driven by the tantalizing question: Is that what Hollywood is really like? How real were Martin Scorsese and Ron Howard's performances? In music, French streaming platform Deezer estimates that AI-generated music accounts for 18% of all uploads. This July, The Guardian ran the headline 'An AI-generated band got 1m plays on Spotify.' Where is the line between artistic merit and metadata optimization? It's gotten to the point where The Atlantic's Ian Bogost recently wrote a screed titled 'Nobody Cares If Music Is Real Anymore.' Everyone I've asked says they still do care, provided they know. But if you don't know it's fake, then does it actually matter? For several months the Australian Radio Network featured (without telling listeners at first) an AI DJ named 'Thy' (pronounced 'Tee') across several of its stations. NBC Sports recently unveiled an AI-voiced narrator for NBA games, modeled after Jim Fagan, the deceased, hall of fame voice nostalgically familiar to anyone who watched games in the 1990s. Audacy sports talk radio host James Seltzer (WIP 94.1 FM) characterized the trend as professionally problematic, during a recent on-air broadcast, while acknowledging such tech will be difficult to prevent. AI-driven demand and the opacification of reality are dominating media narratives and perplexing media scholars. This summer, Maggie Harrison Dupré of Futurist reported that 'USA TODAY is publishing automated sports stories that serve as SEO-targeted vehicles for sports gambling ads, toeing ethical lines and blurring the boundaries between sports journalism and the rapidly growing sports betting industry.' The demand to bet on a game may be shaped by AI-generated coverage of it, and with platforms like ESPN, earning from both its news content and its sports book (ESPN BET), such lines are at best questionable. We all know it's here and rapidly advancing, but even experts are perplexed about what to do. 'We can't fight it, and we'd be crazy to try to,' Rowan University Journalism Professor Carl Hausman told me. He stresses the importance of media literacy in education, 'so we don't end up hallucinating ourselves to death.' Last week I attended the 108th Association for Educators in Journalism & Mass Communication (AEJMC), an academic conference for national and international media scholars and practitioners. 'AI' was the talk of our four-day, San Francisco conference, appearing at least 273 times in the 246 page program. Research presentations, panels, working groups, and late night discussions unpacked a range of AI fears and fantasies with many practical and bounded conversations about the future of journalism and how to use AI and generative engine optimization (GMO) to improve curricula. Even its most ardent detractors admit artificial intelligence is increasing efficiency and saving money. From decisions about crop management to gene therapy to real-time translation for financial news wires AI is 'paradigm-shifting technology akin to the internet,' according to Ari Moskowitz, Content Marketing Director at Conviva, a leading platform for real-time performance analytics of apps, streaming platforms, and AI agents. Since the wheel, and probably before it, our human drive to get more with less effort is why we create technology. But for some, the consequences of AI signal a systemic, dehumanizing transformation, where generative systems mimic not just content, but the entire ecosystem: creator, reviewer, performer, promoter, consumer. Cultural artifacts now exist because someone made them and/or because algorithms detected a space where they should exist and then filled it. Even the once-stalwart security of a computer science degree is reportedly under assault, with AI replacing entry-level coders. Such efficiency may be a goal of Open AI and ventures like Meta's Superintelligence Labs. CEO Mark Zuckerberg is reportedly paying record salaries to poach engineers who will 'fast-track work on machines that could outthink humans on many tasks.' In a world where $100 million AI engineers are prompting the future of our social, cultural, and professional experience, the trajectory appears to be solipsistic efficiency: a frictionless, perpetual system tailored to create and satisfy our individual wants before we knew we had them. Even a $100,000-per-year engineer, who may now be out of work, would tell you that such a concept violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. After all, energy cannot be created from nothing, and systems trend toward entropy. But solipsistic efficiency simulates energy through perception. You feel like something was created. Time was spent. Meaning was produced. But in reality, the loop simply confected noise based on prescriptive analytics into a temporarily convincing form shaped to some strategic, synthetic engagement protocols. The extent and time-horizon for such an existential shift will depend not only on AI's advancement, but human choices about we value and who we are. The latter variable is confounded as AI-generated content saturates the mediascape and feeds it back into what we consume. According to science fiction author Storm Humbert 'AI was engineered to solve a problem: shifting creativity to wealth while shifting wealth away from creators.' There's a kind of cultural entropy inversion at work: the more content we generate through closed AI loops, the less value it contains. Can this process increase understanding, connection, originality or is it just more frictionless production, more viral polish? On one hand authenticity has never been more prized. Because of that though the suspicion of inauthenticity becomes part of the draw, like a world reoriented to the ontology of professional wrestling. Is that book real? Is that DJ human? Did AOC really say that? When every artifact can be faked, doubt itself becomes a form of engagement. We click to solve a mystery that grows harder to solve by every click. To be clear, this isn't a Luddite argument against technology. AI has real potential in augmenting creativity, accessibility, and speed. I've used it to help organize, shape, caption, and optimize this article (per Forbes guidelines). But the feedback loops it can create—especially when paired with platform incentives and weak editorial oversight—risk replacing meaning with momentum. We need friction and provenance, to put it bluntly. We need platforms and publishers to invest in verifiability and authorial transparency, and to reward editorial standards as well as GEO and SEO. We need algorithms that foster human connection, not just predictive profitability. And we need cultural gatekeepers—critics, educators, and institutions—to ask not just is it engaging, but is it real? And why does it matter if it's not? Friction and inefficiency are, in some ways, what make us human. Instant transportation between destinations means sacrificing the journey. What would The Canterbury Tales be if the pilgrimage from the Tabard Inn to the Shrine of Thomas Becket were instantaneous? Solipsistic efficiency doesn't directly violate physics. But it violates our ability to know what's real, what's worth preserving, and what, if anything, actually happened. Once the guardrails of reality are gone, the laws of physics no longer exist, at least not to our perception. The Hearst telegram was about manufacturing war. These new loops manufacture demand, legitimacy, and cultural weight—not because of what the content says, but because of how it was engineered a priori. You furnish the engagement; I'll furnish the reality.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store